We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 06 February 15
SHIP DAMAGED BY FIRE CAUSED BY PIRATES FOUND TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS - TAYLOR WESSING
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The High Court was asked to determine a number of preliminary issues, including whether a vessel was a constructive total loss (“CTL”), whether the claimants had lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, and whether the claimants were entitled to an indemnity for salvage, tug hire and port expenses under a war risks policy.
Background
The first claimant was the owner of the tanker Brillante Virtuoso (the “vessel”). The vessel was insured against war risks under a policy underwritten by the defendants. The second claimant was the mortgagee of the vessel and the co-assured under the policy. The value of the vessel under the hull and machinery section of the policy was US$55 million, and a further US$22 million under the increased value section of the policy.
In July 2011, whilst en route from the Ukraine to China, the vessel (carrying a cargo of fuel oil) stopped off in Aden in order for an unarmed security team to embark ahead of their journey through the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean where there is a risk of pirate attacks. However, whilst the vessel was waiting, it was in fact boarded by armed pirates who detonated an explosive device causing a fire on board and destroying a substantial proportion of machinery and equipment. The vessel subsequently became a dead ship with no power.
The crew were rescued by the US navy and the owners engaged a salvage company the same day to extinguish the fire. The owners’ consultant surveyor inspected the ship and sought quotations from shipyards in the Middle East and China for the cleaning and repairs of the vessel. He formed the opinion that the cost of repair would exceed the insured value of US$55 million. Accordingly, the owners tendered a notice of abandonment (“NOA”) to the insurers declaring the vessel a CTL. The insurers rejected the NOA.
The owners instructed shipbrokers to sell the vessel to a suitable buyer for scrap, however, the shipbrokers struggled to find a purchaser, and only managed to secure an offer of US$700,000 for the vessel. The insurers did not object to the sale at the time (in spite of being given an opportunity to do so) and the vessel was subsequently sold.
The claimants’ case was that the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of an insured peril or perils (i.e. the acts of pirates and/or persons acting maliciously, alternatively terrorists and/or persons acting from a political motive and/or the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of piracy, vandalism, sabotage, violent theft and/or malicious mischief).
The claimants claimed an indemnity for:
(i) a CTL;
(ii) if the vessel was not a CTL for partial loss and loss of hire and
(iii) sue and labour expenses incurred.
The insurers’ defence was that the claimants were not entitled to cover under the policy because, by delaying transit through the Gulf of Aden and/or calling at a port or place within the Gulf, the owners were in breach of the Talbot Gulf of Aden warranty which prevented vessels calling at any port or place or delaying their passage when transiting and/or the owners were in breach of the warranty by failing to apply Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy. The claimants denied this allegation.
Issues examined by the Court
Was the vessel a Constructive Total Loss?
The Court analysed the law on CTL and, in particular, examined section 60(2)(ii) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 which states that a vessel is a CTL “where she is so damaged by a peril insured against that the cost of repairing the damage would exceed the value of the ship when repaired.” Clause 19 of the Institute Time Clauses-Hulls also qualifies this further by stating:
“The measure of indemnity in respect of claims for unrepaired damage shall be the reasonable depreciation in the market value of the Vessel at the time this insurance terminates arising from such unrepaired damage, but not exceeding the reasonable cost of repairs…”
The Court held that in order to succeed in establishing that the vessel was a CTL, the claimants had to prove that the cost of repairing the vessel would have exceeded the insured value of US$55 million.
The Court held that in assessing the costs of repair to the vessel, the question to be asked is what a prudent uninsured shipowner in the position of the claimants would have done in deciding whether or not to repair the vessel, and where and how the repair should be carried out.
The Court acknowledged that in this case, it was not possible to determine with complete accuracy the actual extent of damage to the vessel. In cases such as this, where matters cannot be determined with precision, the Court has to apply a “large margin” to any repair estimate. The Court recognised that a margin of error has to be applied in relation to the extent of the damage where it was not possible to investigate fully and the assessment of the cost of repair has to take account of the fact that the items which were not opened up and tested might well have required replacement, so that a prudent uninsured owner would have replaced them.
Where should the repairs have been carried out?
The Court also held that whilst cost is an important factor in determining where the prudent uninsured owner would have carried out the repairs, it is not determinative. Accordingly, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would consider all the other factors which might well make the closer (whilst more expensive) yard the proper and appropriate place for repair. Hence, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would have favoured repair in these circumstances in Dubai rather than China, even though the quotations for repairs in China were much lower than in the Middle East. Accordingly, the Court found that the vessel was a CTL.
Had the owners lost the right to claim for CTL by selling the vessel?
The Court held that the owners had not lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, as the insurers were well aware throughout that the owners were proposing to sell the vessel and did not object to it. By selling the vessel, the owners were acting in the interests of both themselves and the insurers.
Sue and labour costs
In considering whether an indemnity was payable to the claimants for expenditure in relation to the costs of salvage, tugs and agency fees, the Court disagreed with the insurers’ case that once the vessel had been redelivered by the salvors, any insured peril which had been operating (e.g. violent theft, piracy, vandalism, sabotage and malicious mischief) ceased to operate. The Court found that until the vessel was in a place of safety, the insured peril continued to operate, even after redelivery by the salvors. The Court also held that the cost of the standby tugs and the associated agency expenses were incurred not only for the benefit of the owners, but for the benefit of the insurers, so that they were recoverable as sue and labour expenses.
However, the Court agreed with the insurers that the entitlement to recover sue and labour expenses ceased once the claim form was issued. The Court applied the decision in Kuwait Airways v Kuwait Insurance2 that the issue of the claim form (or writ) crystallises the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract of insurance, so that the relations between the parties are thereafter governed by the Civil Procedure Rules, rather than the contract of insurance. Hence the duty of utmost good faith ceases once proceedings are issued and sue and labour expenses incurred in that period are not recoverable as they were incurred solely for the owner’s benefit.
Source: Taylor Wessing Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 03 March 15
INDIAN THERMAL COAL IMPORTS: STEAMING FORWARD - CLARKSONS
Coal-fired power stations comprise around 60% of India’s power output, and with domestic supply issues and favourable international coal pric ...
Tuesday, 03 March 15
Q4' FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP CLOSED 2% LOWER COMPARED TO Q2 CLOSING PRICE OF $ 47.47
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for delivery Q2' 2015 rose month on month and declined week over week.
The Q2 swap increased US$ 2.24 ...
Tuesday, 03 March 15
FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAPS: Q2 UP 9.60%; Q3 UP 9.75% W-O-W
COALspot.com: API 4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q2' 2015 surge month over month and week on week.
The Q2 swap has soared US$ 5 ...
Monday, 02 March 15
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP FOR Q2 DELIVERY REACHED $ 57.50 PMT W/E 27 FEB 2015
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q2’ 2015 delivery rose US$ 1.37 (+2.44%) per MT month over month and declined US$ 0.42 ...
Monday, 02 March 15
BORYEONG POWER PLANT OF KOMIPO TO IMPORT 140K OF SUB-BITUMINOUS COAL FOR Q2
COALspot.com - Korea Midland Power Co. Ltd. (KOMIPO) is inviting bids from coal producers, marketing companies, or traders to supply of 140,000 (70 ...
|
|
|
Showing 3166 to 3170 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- The University of Queensland
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
|
| |
| |
|
