We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 06 February 15
SHIP DAMAGED BY FIRE CAUSED BY PIRATES FOUND TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS - TAYLOR WESSING
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The High Court was asked to determine a number of preliminary issues, including whether a vessel was a constructive total loss (“CTL”), whether the claimants had lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, and whether the claimants were entitled to an indemnity for salvage, tug hire and port expenses under a war risks policy.
Background
The first claimant was the owner of the tanker Brillante Virtuoso (the “vessel”). The vessel was insured against war risks under a policy underwritten by the defendants. The second claimant was the mortgagee of the vessel and the co-assured under the policy. The value of the vessel under the hull and machinery section of the policy was US$55 million, and a further US$22 million under the increased value section of the policy.
In July 2011, whilst en route from the Ukraine to China, the vessel (carrying a cargo of fuel oil) stopped off in Aden in order for an unarmed security team to embark ahead of their journey through the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean where there is a risk of pirate attacks. However, whilst the vessel was waiting, it was in fact boarded by armed pirates who detonated an explosive device causing a fire on board and destroying a substantial proportion of machinery and equipment. The vessel subsequently became a dead ship with no power.
The crew were rescued by the US navy and the owners engaged a salvage company the same day to extinguish the fire. The owners’ consultant surveyor inspected the ship and sought quotations from shipyards in the Middle East and China for the cleaning and repairs of the vessel. He formed the opinion that the cost of repair would exceed the insured value of US$55 million. Accordingly, the owners tendered a notice of abandonment (“NOA”) to the insurers declaring the vessel a CTL. The insurers rejected the NOA.
The owners instructed shipbrokers to sell the vessel to a suitable buyer for scrap, however, the shipbrokers struggled to find a purchaser, and only managed to secure an offer of US$700,000 for the vessel. The insurers did not object to the sale at the time (in spite of being given an opportunity to do so) and the vessel was subsequently sold.
The claimants’ case was that the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of an insured peril or perils (i.e. the acts of pirates and/or persons acting maliciously, alternatively terrorists and/or persons acting from a political motive and/or the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of piracy, vandalism, sabotage, violent theft and/or malicious mischief).
The claimants claimed an indemnity for:
(i) a CTL;
(ii) if the vessel was not a CTL for partial loss and loss of hire and
(iii) sue and labour expenses incurred.
The insurers’ defence was that the claimants were not entitled to cover under the policy because, by delaying transit through the Gulf of Aden and/or calling at a port or place within the Gulf, the owners were in breach of the Talbot Gulf of Aden warranty which prevented vessels calling at any port or place or delaying their passage when transiting and/or the owners were in breach of the warranty by failing to apply Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy. The claimants denied this allegation.
Issues examined by the Court
Was the vessel a Constructive Total Loss?
The Court analysed the law on CTL and, in particular, examined section 60(2)(ii) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 which states that a vessel is a CTL “where she is so damaged by a peril insured against that the cost of repairing the damage would exceed the value of the ship when repaired.” Clause 19 of the Institute Time Clauses-Hulls also qualifies this further by stating:
“The measure of indemnity in respect of claims for unrepaired damage shall be the reasonable depreciation in the market value of the Vessel at the time this insurance terminates arising from such unrepaired damage, but not exceeding the reasonable cost of repairs…”
The Court held that in order to succeed in establishing that the vessel was a CTL, the claimants had to prove that the cost of repairing the vessel would have exceeded the insured value of US$55 million.
The Court held that in assessing the costs of repair to the vessel, the question to be asked is what a prudent uninsured shipowner in the position of the claimants would have done in deciding whether or not to repair the vessel, and where and how the repair should be carried out.
The Court acknowledged that in this case, it was not possible to determine with complete accuracy the actual extent of damage to the vessel. In cases such as this, where matters cannot be determined with precision, the Court has to apply a “large margin” to any repair estimate. The Court recognised that a margin of error has to be applied in relation to the extent of the damage where it was not possible to investigate fully and the assessment of the cost of repair has to take account of the fact that the items which were not opened up and tested might well have required replacement, so that a prudent uninsured owner would have replaced them.
Where should the repairs have been carried out?
The Court also held that whilst cost is an important factor in determining where the prudent uninsured owner would have carried out the repairs, it is not determinative. Accordingly, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would consider all the other factors which might well make the closer (whilst more expensive) yard the proper and appropriate place for repair. Hence, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would have favoured repair in these circumstances in Dubai rather than China, even though the quotations for repairs in China were much lower than in the Middle East. Accordingly, the Court found that the vessel was a CTL.
Had the owners lost the right to claim for CTL by selling the vessel?
The Court held that the owners had not lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, as the insurers were well aware throughout that the owners were proposing to sell the vessel and did not object to it. By selling the vessel, the owners were acting in the interests of both themselves and the insurers.
Sue and labour costs
In considering whether an indemnity was payable to the claimants for expenditure in relation to the costs of salvage, tugs and agency fees, the Court disagreed with the insurers’ case that once the vessel had been redelivered by the salvors, any insured peril which had been operating (e.g. violent theft, piracy, vandalism, sabotage and malicious mischief) ceased to operate. The Court found that until the vessel was in a place of safety, the insured peril continued to operate, even after redelivery by the salvors. The Court also held that the cost of the standby tugs and the associated agency expenses were incurred not only for the benefit of the owners, but for the benefit of the insurers, so that they were recoverable as sue and labour expenses.
However, the Court agreed with the insurers that the entitlement to recover sue and labour expenses ceased once the claim form was issued. The Court applied the decision in Kuwait Airways v Kuwait Insurance2 that the issue of the claim form (or writ) crystallises the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract of insurance, so that the relations between the parties are thereafter governed by the Civil Procedure Rules, rather than the contract of insurance. Hence the duty of utmost good faith ceases once proceedings are issued and sue and labour expenses incurred in that period are not recoverable as they were incurred solely for the owner’s benefit.
Source: Taylor Wessing Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 09 March 15
CHINA'S IMPORTS - NEVER MORE IMPORTANT TO SHIPPING? - CLARKSONS
Over the last 15 years China has led maritime forecasters a right old dance. In 2002, rumours that Chinese iron ore imports were about to take off ...
Sunday, 08 March 15
FREIGHT RATES FROM INDONESIA TO INDIA IS TRENDING UP
COALspot.com: The freight market continued to see gains this week and all the indices were rose except for Cape index. The BDI was increased 4.62 p ...
Friday, 06 March 15
BALTIC DRY INDEX: IS THIS POWERFUL INDICATOR SIGNALING A GLOBAL RECESSION? - STREET AUTHORITY
Although memories of the Great Recession linger, a case can be made that better days lie ahead.
That’s because central banks around the ...
Friday, 06 March 15
U.S. WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION ROSE 3.5% WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of the largest coal producers, produced approximately 17.1 million short tons (mmst) of coal ...
Thursday, 05 March 15
PANAMAX : THE ATLANTIC ROUND IS NOW PAYING AROUND US$ 5K PER DAY
COALspot.com: Handy - The activity in the handy/supra segment is back. “ We see more fresh cargo in the market for 2nd half March dates ...
|
|
|
Showing 3156 to 3160 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Planning Commission, India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- The University of Queensland
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- PTC India Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Australian Coal Association
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
