We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 06 February 15
SHIP DAMAGED BY FIRE CAUSED BY PIRATES FOUND TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS - TAYLOR WESSING
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The High Court was asked to determine a number of preliminary issues, including whether a vessel was a constructive total loss (“CTL”), whether the claimants had lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, and whether the claimants were entitled to an indemnity for salvage, tug hire and port expenses under a war risks policy.
Background
The first claimant was the owner of the tanker Brillante Virtuoso (the “vessel”). The vessel was insured against war risks under a policy underwritten by the defendants. The second claimant was the mortgagee of the vessel and the co-assured under the policy. The value of the vessel under the hull and machinery section of the policy was US$55 million, and a further US$22 million under the increased value section of the policy.
In July 2011, whilst en route from the Ukraine to China, the vessel (carrying a cargo of fuel oil) stopped off in Aden in order for an unarmed security team to embark ahead of their journey through the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean where there is a risk of pirate attacks. However, whilst the vessel was waiting, it was in fact boarded by armed pirates who detonated an explosive device causing a fire on board and destroying a substantial proportion of machinery and equipment. The vessel subsequently became a dead ship with no power.
The crew were rescued by the US navy and the owners engaged a salvage company the same day to extinguish the fire. The owners’ consultant surveyor inspected the ship and sought quotations from shipyards in the Middle East and China for the cleaning and repairs of the vessel. He formed the opinion that the cost of repair would exceed the insured value of US$55 million. Accordingly, the owners tendered a notice of abandonment (“NOA”) to the insurers declaring the vessel a CTL. The insurers rejected the NOA.
The owners instructed shipbrokers to sell the vessel to a suitable buyer for scrap, however, the shipbrokers struggled to find a purchaser, and only managed to secure an offer of US$700,000 for the vessel. The insurers did not object to the sale at the time (in spite of being given an opportunity to do so) and the vessel was subsequently sold.
The claimants’ case was that the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of an insured peril or perils (i.e. the acts of pirates and/or persons acting maliciously, alternatively terrorists and/or persons acting from a political motive and/or the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of piracy, vandalism, sabotage, violent theft and/or malicious mischief).
The claimants claimed an indemnity for:
(i) a CTL;
(ii) if the vessel was not a CTL for partial loss and loss of hire and
(iii) sue and labour expenses incurred.
The insurers’ defence was that the claimants were not entitled to cover under the policy because, by delaying transit through the Gulf of Aden and/or calling at a port or place within the Gulf, the owners were in breach of the Talbot Gulf of Aden warranty which prevented vessels calling at any port or place or delaying their passage when transiting and/or the owners were in breach of the warranty by failing to apply Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy. The claimants denied this allegation.
Issues examined by the Court
Was the vessel a Constructive Total Loss?
The Court analysed the law on CTL and, in particular, examined section 60(2)(ii) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 which states that a vessel is a CTL “where she is so damaged by a peril insured against that the cost of repairing the damage would exceed the value of the ship when repaired.” Clause 19 of the Institute Time Clauses-Hulls also qualifies this further by stating:
“The measure of indemnity in respect of claims for unrepaired damage shall be the reasonable depreciation in the market value of the Vessel at the time this insurance terminates arising from such unrepaired damage, but not exceeding the reasonable cost of repairs…”
The Court held that in order to succeed in establishing that the vessel was a CTL, the claimants had to prove that the cost of repairing the vessel would have exceeded the insured value of US$55 million.
The Court held that in assessing the costs of repair to the vessel, the question to be asked is what a prudent uninsured shipowner in the position of the claimants would have done in deciding whether or not to repair the vessel, and where and how the repair should be carried out.
The Court acknowledged that in this case, it was not possible to determine with complete accuracy the actual extent of damage to the vessel. In cases such as this, where matters cannot be determined with precision, the Court has to apply a “large margin” to any repair estimate. The Court recognised that a margin of error has to be applied in relation to the extent of the damage where it was not possible to investigate fully and the assessment of the cost of repair has to take account of the fact that the items which were not opened up and tested might well have required replacement, so that a prudent uninsured owner would have replaced them.
Where should the repairs have been carried out?
The Court also held that whilst cost is an important factor in determining where the prudent uninsured owner would have carried out the repairs, it is not determinative. Accordingly, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would consider all the other factors which might well make the closer (whilst more expensive) yard the proper and appropriate place for repair. Hence, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would have favoured repair in these circumstances in Dubai rather than China, even though the quotations for repairs in China were much lower than in the Middle East. Accordingly, the Court found that the vessel was a CTL.
Had the owners lost the right to claim for CTL by selling the vessel?
The Court held that the owners had not lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, as the insurers were well aware throughout that the owners were proposing to sell the vessel and did not object to it. By selling the vessel, the owners were acting in the interests of both themselves and the insurers.
Sue and labour costs
In considering whether an indemnity was payable to the claimants for expenditure in relation to the costs of salvage, tugs and agency fees, the Court disagreed with the insurers’ case that once the vessel had been redelivered by the salvors, any insured peril which had been operating (e.g. violent theft, piracy, vandalism, sabotage and malicious mischief) ceased to operate. The Court found that until the vessel was in a place of safety, the insured peril continued to operate, even after redelivery by the salvors. The Court also held that the cost of the standby tugs and the associated agency expenses were incurred not only for the benefit of the owners, but for the benefit of the insurers, so that they were recoverable as sue and labour expenses.
However, the Court agreed with the insurers that the entitlement to recover sue and labour expenses ceased once the claim form was issued. The Court applied the decision in Kuwait Airways v Kuwait Insurance2 that the issue of the claim form (or writ) crystallises the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract of insurance, so that the relations between the parties are thereafter governed by the Civil Procedure Rules, rather than the contract of insurance. Hence the duty of utmost good faith ceases once proceedings are issued and sue and labour expenses incurred in that period are not recoverable as they were incurred solely for the owner’s benefit.
Source: Taylor Wessing Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 10 March 15
OIL PRICE FORECASTING - IGNORE THE EXPERTS: COLIN MARSHALL
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Experts put themselves on a pedestal, making claims to have special forecasting abilities for oil price trends. They, too ...
Tuesday, 10 March 15
FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAPS HEADING SOUTH
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q2’ 2015 delivery declined US$ 0.24 per MT (-0.47%) month over month and US$ 1.52 (-2.93%) we ...
Tuesday, 10 March 15
CFR SOUTH CHINA POWER-STATION COAL SWAPS DECLINE
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q2’ 2015 delivery fell US$ 0.42 (-0.74%) per MT month over month and declined US$ 1.00 &nbs ...
Monday, 09 March 15
INDONESIA GREETS INDIA RATE CUT AS GOOD FOR EXPORTS - GLOBEASIA
Indonesian commodity producers and economists have hailed the Indian central bank’s rate cut as good for boosting exports from Southeast Asia ...
Monday, 09 March 15
CHINA'S SUPREME COURT ISSUES NEW JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION ON SHIP ARREST AND JUDICIAL SALE OF SHIPS - GARD
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
China is not traditionally a popular jurisdiction for ship arrest. However, Members and clients with ships calling at por ...
|
|
|
Showing 3151 to 3155 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Planning Commission, India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Australian Coal Association
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- White Energy Company Limited
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
|
| |
| |
|
