We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 06 February 15
SHIP DAMAGED BY FIRE CAUSED BY PIRATES FOUND TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS - TAYLOR WESSING
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The High Court was asked to determine a number of preliminary issues, including whether a vessel was a constructive total loss (“CTL”), whether the claimants had lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, and whether the claimants were entitled to an indemnity for salvage, tug hire and port expenses under a war risks policy.
Background
The first claimant was the owner of the tanker Brillante Virtuoso (the “vessel”). The vessel was insured against war risks under a policy underwritten by the defendants. The second claimant was the mortgagee of the vessel and the co-assured under the policy. The value of the vessel under the hull and machinery section of the policy was US$55 million, and a further US$22 million under the increased value section of the policy.
In July 2011, whilst en route from the Ukraine to China, the vessel (carrying a cargo of fuel oil) stopped off in Aden in order for an unarmed security team to embark ahead of their journey through the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean where there is a risk of pirate attacks. However, whilst the vessel was waiting, it was in fact boarded by armed pirates who detonated an explosive device causing a fire on board and destroying a substantial proportion of machinery and equipment. The vessel subsequently became a dead ship with no power.
The crew were rescued by the US navy and the owners engaged a salvage company the same day to extinguish the fire. The owners’ consultant surveyor inspected the ship and sought quotations from shipyards in the Middle East and China for the cleaning and repairs of the vessel. He formed the opinion that the cost of repair would exceed the insured value of US$55 million. Accordingly, the owners tendered a notice of abandonment (“NOA”) to the insurers declaring the vessel a CTL. The insurers rejected the NOA.
The owners instructed shipbrokers to sell the vessel to a suitable buyer for scrap, however, the shipbrokers struggled to find a purchaser, and only managed to secure an offer of US$700,000 for the vessel. The insurers did not object to the sale at the time (in spite of being given an opportunity to do so) and the vessel was subsequently sold.
The claimants’ case was that the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of an insured peril or perils (i.e. the acts of pirates and/or persons acting maliciously, alternatively terrorists and/or persons acting from a political motive and/or the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of piracy, vandalism, sabotage, violent theft and/or malicious mischief).
The claimants claimed an indemnity for:
(i) a CTL;
(ii) if the vessel was not a CTL for partial loss and loss of hire and
(iii) sue and labour expenses incurred.
The insurers’ defence was that the claimants were not entitled to cover under the policy because, by delaying transit through the Gulf of Aden and/or calling at a port or place within the Gulf, the owners were in breach of the Talbot Gulf of Aden warranty which prevented vessels calling at any port or place or delaying their passage when transiting and/or the owners were in breach of the warranty by failing to apply Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy. The claimants denied this allegation.
Issues examined by the Court
Was the vessel a Constructive Total Loss?
The Court analysed the law on CTL and, in particular, examined section 60(2)(ii) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 which states that a vessel is a CTL “where she is so damaged by a peril insured against that the cost of repairing the damage would exceed the value of the ship when repaired.” Clause 19 of the Institute Time Clauses-Hulls also qualifies this further by stating:
“The measure of indemnity in respect of claims for unrepaired damage shall be the reasonable depreciation in the market value of the Vessel at the time this insurance terminates arising from such unrepaired damage, but not exceeding the reasonable cost of repairs…”
The Court held that in order to succeed in establishing that the vessel was a CTL, the claimants had to prove that the cost of repairing the vessel would have exceeded the insured value of US$55 million.
The Court held that in assessing the costs of repair to the vessel, the question to be asked is what a prudent uninsured shipowner in the position of the claimants would have done in deciding whether or not to repair the vessel, and where and how the repair should be carried out.
The Court acknowledged that in this case, it was not possible to determine with complete accuracy the actual extent of damage to the vessel. In cases such as this, where matters cannot be determined with precision, the Court has to apply a “large margin” to any repair estimate. The Court recognised that a margin of error has to be applied in relation to the extent of the damage where it was not possible to investigate fully and the assessment of the cost of repair has to take account of the fact that the items which were not opened up and tested might well have required replacement, so that a prudent uninsured owner would have replaced them.
Where should the repairs have been carried out?
The Court also held that whilst cost is an important factor in determining where the prudent uninsured owner would have carried out the repairs, it is not determinative. Accordingly, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would consider all the other factors which might well make the closer (whilst more expensive) yard the proper and appropriate place for repair. Hence, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would have favoured repair in these circumstances in Dubai rather than China, even though the quotations for repairs in China were much lower than in the Middle East. Accordingly, the Court found that the vessel was a CTL.
Had the owners lost the right to claim for CTL by selling the vessel?
The Court held that the owners had not lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, as the insurers were well aware throughout that the owners were proposing to sell the vessel and did not object to it. By selling the vessel, the owners were acting in the interests of both themselves and the insurers.
Sue and labour costs
In considering whether an indemnity was payable to the claimants for expenditure in relation to the costs of salvage, tugs and agency fees, the Court disagreed with the insurers’ case that once the vessel had been redelivered by the salvors, any insured peril which had been operating (e.g. violent theft, piracy, vandalism, sabotage and malicious mischief) ceased to operate. The Court found that until the vessel was in a place of safety, the insured peril continued to operate, even after redelivery by the salvors. The Court also held that the cost of the standby tugs and the associated agency expenses were incurred not only for the benefit of the owners, but for the benefit of the insurers, so that they were recoverable as sue and labour expenses.
However, the Court agreed with the insurers that the entitlement to recover sue and labour expenses ceased once the claim form was issued. The Court applied the decision in Kuwait Airways v Kuwait Insurance2 that the issue of the claim form (or writ) crystallises the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract of insurance, so that the relations between the parties are thereafter governed by the Civil Procedure Rules, rather than the contract of insurance. Hence the duty of utmost good faith ceases once proceedings are issued and sue and labour expenses incurred in that period are not recoverable as they were incurred solely for the owner’s benefit.
Source: Taylor Wessing Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 24 February 15
IHS ENERGY COAL CONFERENCE OF THE AMERICAS
Attend the IHS Energy Coal Conference of the Americas 17-19 March in Cartagena, Colombia and learn about timely concerns in today's coal indust ...
Monday, 23 February 15
Q2' CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP FOR Q2 ROSE 3.39% M-O-M
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q2’ 2015 delivery rose US$ 1.90 (+3.39%) per MT month over month and declined US$ 0.08 ...
Monday, 23 February 15
Q2' API 5 FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP CLOSED $1 HIGHER THAN Q3
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q2’ 2015 delivery rose US$ 3.12 per MT (+6.44%) month over month and fall US$ 0.43 (-0.83%) w ...
Sunday, 22 February 15
THE BALTIC DRY INDEX LOST ALMOST 3.2% OR 17 POINTS WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com: The Baltic Dry Index, one of the economic indicators that monitors the health of the world's economy by tracking the price of shi ...
Friday, 20 February 15
GOVT SET TO INCREASE COAL OUTPUT TARGET THIS YEAR - JAKARTA POST
The Energy and Mineral Resources Ministry is planning to increase its coal output target this year as the government seeks to offset the ongoing de ...
|
|
|
Showing 3181 to 3185 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- PTC India Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Planning Commission, India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Australian Coal Association
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
