We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 04 November 22
CHINA EXPANDS COAL TERM CONTRACTS TO ALL MINES TO STABILIZE MARKET - REUTERS
China has expanded long-term thermal coal supply contracts for 2023 to all coal mines and asked power utilities to source more of their demand thro ...
Thursday, 03 November 22
HANDYSIZE VALUES MOVING UP IN OCTOBER, WHILE LNG VALUES SKYROCKET - VESSELSVALUE
Handysize values have increased this month across most ages, following a period of decline. Values for generic 10 year old Handysizes have moved up ...
Thursday, 03 November 22
EUROPEAN GAS SUPPLY SURPLUS, NOVEMBER HBA DOWN TO US$ 308.2 PER TON - ESDM
European gas supply conditions have a major influence in determining fluctuations in the Reference Coal Price (HBA). The November 2022 HBA recorded ...
Wednesday, 02 November 22
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Only five weeks before western sanctions’ full effect, uncertainty over energy has markets and governments on the edge. What was initially th ...
Tuesday, 01 November 22
CHINA COAL TRADE DISRUPTED BY COVID OUTBREAKS AS WINTER LOOMS - REUTERS
China’s strict COVID-19 policy is constraining coal supplies and pushing up prices, industry officials and traders say, just weeks before the ...
|
|
|
Showing 196 to 200 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Planning Commission, India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- White Energy Company Limited
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- PTC India Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- The University of Queensland
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
