We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 29 November 22
SEABORNE COAL FLOWS IN 2022 - SIGNAL
This year is crucial for the energy mix in European countries, as the EU has imposed new sanctions on Russia. It is important to emphasize that the ...
Friday, 25 November 22
APAC THERMAL COAL PRICES CORRECT FROM RECORD HIGH - FITCH RATINGS
Prices of Newcastle 6,000kcal/kg coal have corrected following falling European gas and coal prices, and more supply from Australia could help miti ...
Thursday, 24 November 22
VIETNAM BOOSTS COAL USE PLAN FOR 2030 AS G7 CLIMATE OFFER STALLS - REUTERS
Vietnam has increased its coal power target for 2030 under a revised draft energy plan, government documents seen by Reuters show, while renewables ...
Tuesday, 22 November 22
THE GENCON 2022 CHARTERPARTY - GARD
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
BIMCO has published a revamped version of the popular GENCON charterparty. Our author, Helena Biggs, was a member of the ...
Tuesday, 22 November 22
INDIA POWER BINGES ON COAL, OUTPACES ASIA - REUTERS
India’s coal-fired power output has increased much faster than any other country in the Asia Pacific since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine ...
|
|
|
Showing 186 to 190 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Central Electricity Authority - India
|
| |
| |
|
