We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 18 November 22
REALITIES OF LOI LIABILITIES - BALTIC EXCHANGE
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The cargo misdelivery claim in Trafigura Maritime Logistics Pte Ltd v. Clearlake Shipping Pte Ltd (Miracle Hope) [2022] E ...
Tuesday, 15 November 22
CHINA SEES RISING COAL STORAGE AMID SUPPLY PUSH - XINHUA
Coal stockpiles at China’s power plants have seen considerable increases, ensuring energy supply for the winter, the country’s energy r ...
Tuesday, 15 November 22
SEABORNE THERMAL COAL PRICES START TO EASE, BUT PROCESS IS UNEVEN - REUTERS
Prices for seaborne thermal coal have started to drop as fears of a winter energy crunch ease, but the rate of decline has varied across the differ ...
Thursday, 10 November 22
INDIA: THERMAL PLANTS HAVE ADEQUATE COAL STOCKS AT 25.6 MILLION TONNES, SAYS GOVT - IANS
The coal stock with domestic dry fuel-based power plants, as on October 31, was 25.6 million tonnes, the government said, adding that the availabil ...
Tuesday, 08 November 22
OUTLOOK ON CHINA’S WEAKENED BASIC MATERIALS SECTOR CLOUDED BY POLICY SWINGS - FITCH RATINGS
Fitch Ratings expects basic materials demand in China to improve qoq in 4Q22, driven by seasonally higher construction activity, solid infrastructu ...
|
|
|
Showing 191 to 195 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- The University of Queensland
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- White Energy Company Limited
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- VISA Power Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
