We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 31 August 20
DEFECTIVE PASSAGE PLANNING: UNSEAWORTHINESS OR A NAVIGATIONAL DECISION? THE CMA CGM LIBRA QUESTION SAILS ON TO THE UK SUPREME COURT - GARD
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The UK Supreme Court has granted leave to appeal the recent decision in Alize 1954 v Allianz Elementar Versicherungs AG (The “CMA CGM LIBRA”). While the decision involved General Average, we discuss the ramifications of the finding of unseaworthiness as it applies to the allocation of risk and liabilities in the wider context of the marine transport of goods.
International law aims to apportion risk in the transport of goods between the ship interests and cargo interests. Simply put, shipowners are responsible for cargo claims caused by unseaworthiness of the ship but are exempt from liability for cargo claims caused by certain risks, including navigational errors. The decision in Alize 1954 v Allianz Elementar Versicherungs AG (The “CMA CGM LIBRA”) [2020] EWCA Civ 293 shifts the established boundary between what is considered “seaworthiness” and “navigation” resulting in shipowners bearing a greater portion of the risk of the adventure. While the CMA CGM LIBRA case involved General Average, it comes as no surprise that decision led to an increase in claims by cargo interests alleging unseaworthiness on the basis of navigational decisions. The vessel owners recently obtained permission to appeal the decision to the UK Supreme Court and the International Group of P&I Clubs supports the vessel owners’ position.
Background to the case
On 17 May 2011, M/V “CMA CGM LIBRA”, a 6,000 TEU container ship, grounded while leaving the port of Xiamen, China. The ship’s charts had failed to record a warning derived from a Notice to Mariners that depths shown on the chart outside the fairway were unreliable and waters were shallower than recorded on the chart. The grounding occurred when the master sailed the vessel outside of the fairway, expecting the waters to be deeper than they actually were. The owners claimed general average contributions from the cargo interests.
The first instance judgment
In Teare J’s first instance decision dated 8 March 2019, he held that the passage plan and working charts were defective due to the failure to record the warning required by the Notice to Mariners, and these defects rendered the vessel unseaworthy at the commencement of the voyage. The owners’ claims were therefore dismissed.
The first instance decision gave rise to significant controversy in maritime law circles. Some commentators held the view that the decision confused issues of unseaworthiness with issues of navigation. They argued that the preparation of passage plans is a matter of navigation, the neglect of which would entitle a carrier to defences under Article IV Rule 2(a) of the Hague or Hague-Visby Rules. By considering passage planning as falling within the orbit of seaworthiness rather than navigation, the court is disrupting the well-established division of risk between the ship and cargo. It has also been commented that applying a strictly temporal approach, i.e. that all acts or omissions prior to the commencement of the voyage relate to seaworthiness may have wider implication to re-distributing risk between the ship and cargo than the question of passage planning.
Other commentators saw the decision as a correct application of principles concerning a carrier’s duties in respect of seaworthiness, based on the traditional definition of seaworthiness laid down in McFadden v Blue Star Line (1905): “Would a prudent owner have required that [the relevant defect] should be made good before sending his ship to sea, had he known of it? If he would, the ship was not seaworthy.” On this view, given that no prudent shipowner would knowingly send his vessel to sea with a defective passage plan and defective charts that had not been properly updated, these commentators argued that it therefore follows that the vessel was not seaworthy at the commencement of the voyage.
The Court of Appeal decision
The first instance judgment was appealed, and for a time, it seemed that the controversy had been resolved following the handing down of the Court of Appeal’s judgment on 4 March 2020. In a unanimous decision by a 3-member panel of experienced shipping judges, the Court of Appeal upheld the first instance judgment. The Court confirmed that errors in navigation or management can render a vessel unseaworthy if they occur prior to the commencement of the voyage. The Court rejected the vessel owners’ argument that the passage plan and working chart were not “attributes of the ship”, but records of navigational decisions taken by the crew.
The Court also found that once the owners assumed responsibility for the cargo as the carrier, all acts of the master and crew in preparing the vessel for the voyage (even if they are acts of navigation performed before or at the commencement of the voyage) are performed qua carrier and not qua navigator. Thus, the owners are responsible for all such acts, and the crew’s failure to exercise due diligence to make the vessel seaworthy would be imputed to the owners.
Leave to appeal to the Supreme Court
In late July 2020, the owners obtained permission to appeal the Court of Appeal’s decision to the UK Supreme Court. The owners’ position remains that the crew’s decision as to what to mark on the chart was a navigational decision rather than an “attribute of the ship” and was therefore not an issue of seaworthiness. It is anticipated that the appeal will take place in late 2021.
Concluding comments
Given the importance of this case regarding the allocation of risk between ship and cargo in a maritime adventure, the International Group of P&I Clubs welcome the UK Supreme Court’s decision to hear the case, and has backed the application made seeking leave to appeal to the Supreme court. Gard will continue to provide updates on developments in this case as they unfold.
Source: Gard
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 17 July 23
APPROVED AMMONIA-FUELED CONTAINERSHIP - BENEFITS AND RISKS: REED SMITH
Following the news in Offshore Energy that Korea Maritime Consultants has secured approval in principle from the American Bureau of Shipping for it ...
Friday, 14 July 23
CLEAN COAL USE KEY TO DEEP CUTS IN EMISSIONS, STABLE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY - CHINA DAILY
China must push for the clean use of coal and step up integration of the dirty fuel with carbon capture, utilization and storage to achieve sustain ...
Thursday, 13 July 23
VIETNAM'S COAL EMISSIONS PRIMED FOR SURGE AFTER IMPORTS JUMP - REUTERS
Vietnam’s thermal power emissions are primed for a steep climb this summer after the country’s imports of thermal coal soared to their ...
Monday, 26 June 23
COAL PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION UP IN 2022 - EUROSTAT
In 2022, EU coal production and consumption continued to increase, reaching 349 million tonnes (+5% compared with the previous year) and 454 millio ...
Wednesday, 21 June 23
QATAR STRIKES SECOND BIG LNG SUPPLY DEAL WITH CHINA - REUTERS
Qatar on Tuesday secured its second large gas supply deal with a Chinese state-controlled company in less than a year, putting Asia clearly ahead i ...
|
|
|
Showing 91 to 95 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- The University of Queensland
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- MS Steel International - UAE
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
