We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This is in part because English courts or arbitration tribunals will interpret these clauses strictly and narrowly against the party seeking to rely on them.
Recent decisions, including Triple Point Technology v PTT (2017) and Seadrill Ghana v Tullow Ghana (2018), are evidence of this approach. However, Sucden Middle-East, represented by Nick Fisher of HFW, has recently relied successfully on such a clause in the Commercial Court, on appeal from arbitration.
The case, Sucden Middle-East v Yagci Denizcilik Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, “The Mv Muammer Yagci”, involved a shipment of sugar to Algeria on the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form. The facts found by the arbitral tribunal were that when the cargo arrived in Algeria, the cargo-receivers submitted false import documents to local customs authorities. The local customs responded by seizing the cargo, using powers under customs laws and regulations.
A delay to discharging the cargo of four and a half months ensued. Sucden, as charterers, claimed this delay fell within the exceptions to laytime running under clause 28. Owners disagreed. At first instance, the arbitral tribunal agreed with owners.
Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court. Permission to bring the appeal was given on the basis that the question of law was one of general public importance, as it related to a standard form contract in wide commercial usage.
The judgement
The question before the Commercial Court was: “Where a cargo is seized by the local customs authorities at the discharge port causing a delay to discharge, is the time so lost caused by ‘government interferences’ within the meaning of clause 28 of the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form?” Clause 28 reads:
“Strikes and Force Majeure
In the event that whilst at or off the loading place or discharging place the loading and/or discharging of the vessel is prevented or delayed by any of the following occurrences: strikes, riots, civil commotions, lockouts of men, accidents and/or breakdowns on railways, stoppages on railway and/or river and/or canal by ice or frost, mechanical breakdowns at mechanical loading plants, government interferences, vessel being inoperative or rendered inoperative due to terms and conditions of employment of the Officers and Crew, time so lost shall not count as laytime on demurrage or detention…”
In deciding whether a force majeure event had occurred, the Court focused on the construction of “government interferences”. It was fairly straightforward to establish that a government entity acting in a sovereign capacity was involved, but owners argued that the government being involved was not enough and that there had to be “interferences”. In reaching its decision that there had been no interference, the tribunal had considered it a key point that seizure was an “ordinary” action. The Court rejected this conclusion. It held that the seizure of the cargo was not routine and did fall within the meaning of “interferences”. Seizure is a significant exercise of executive power and therefore could not be regarded as “ordinary”. Suspected or predictable consequences are not the same as ordinary actions (such as the inspection of the cargo by a government surveyor): “In the usual course of things, cargo is not seized and property rights are not invaded in that way.” The very fact that false documents were involved showed that the circumstances were not routine.
The Court emphasised that it was of “real importance” that its conclusion on the language was not difficult to apply, nor did it in any way offend commercial common sense.
The owners’ causation argument was also dismissed, as it was held that the seizure caused the delay, even if the submission of false documents caused the seizure.
Further detail
In allowing the appeal, the Court still maintained the strict and narrow approach to force majeure, stressing that “the answer given to the question is only a narrow ‘yes’. It is ‘yes’ where the circumstances are as in the present case. The answer does not address all of the circumstances that may come within or fall outside clause 28. The answer is concerned only with the seizure of a cargo and with that seizure by a customs authority that is a State revenue authority acting in a sovereign capacity”.
This judgment gives some welcome publicly-available guidance on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a standard form widely used in sugar trading. While the charterers were successfully able to rely on the force majeure clause in this case, it does not signal a change in the strict and narrow approach typically adopted by the English courts.
Source: Baltic Exchange
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 06 September 24
REBOUND IN OIL DEMAND COULD LIFT MARKET IN LATTER HALF OF 2024 - BIMCO
Supply/demand
Based on a strong second half demand, the supply/balance is forecast to strengthen in 2024 but weaken slightly in 2025 as n ...
Friday, 06 September 24
GLOBAL SEABORNE LNG TRADE HAS CONTINUED TO INCREASE LAST YEAR - BANCHERO COSTA
Global seaborne LNG trade has continued to increase last year, helped also by the events in Ukraine which forced Europe to diversify away from Russ ...
Wednesday, 28 August 24
SEABORNE COAL IMPORTS INTO INDIA INCREASED BY +9.9% Y-O-Y TO 146.6 MLN T - BANCHERO COSTA
Global coal trade has really picked up pace over the past year, and is now fully back to pre-Covid levels said Banchero Costa Research in its lates ...
Tuesday, 06 August 24
EXERCISE CAUTION WITH AMMONIA SWITCH - BALTIC EXCHANGE
A new study from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has thrown a spanner into the plan to transition ships from diesel fuel to ammonia ...
Friday, 02 August 24
ENERGY MARKET DEVELOPMENTS: COAL AND NATURAL GAS PRICES REACH RECORD HIGHS - WORLD BANK
The recent surge in natural gas and coal prices has been so swift that the main benchmarks were roughly three times higher in 2022Q2 compared to a ...
|
|
|
Showing 1 to 5 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
1 