We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This is in part because English courts or arbitration tribunals will interpret these clauses strictly and narrowly against the party seeking to rely on them.
Recent decisions, including Triple Point Technology v PTT (2017) and Seadrill Ghana v Tullow Ghana (2018), are evidence of this approach. However, Sucden Middle-East, represented by Nick Fisher of HFW, has recently relied successfully on such a clause in the Commercial Court, on appeal from arbitration.
The case, Sucden Middle-East v Yagci Denizcilik Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, “The Mv Muammer Yagci”, involved a shipment of sugar to Algeria on the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form. The facts found by the arbitral tribunal were that when the cargo arrived in Algeria, the cargo-receivers submitted false import documents to local customs authorities. The local customs responded by seizing the cargo, using powers under customs laws and regulations.
A delay to discharging the cargo of four and a half months ensued. Sucden, as charterers, claimed this delay fell within the exceptions to laytime running under clause 28. Owners disagreed. At first instance, the arbitral tribunal agreed with owners.
Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court. Permission to bring the appeal was given on the basis that the question of law was one of general public importance, as it related to a standard form contract in wide commercial usage.
The judgement
The question before the Commercial Court was: “Where a cargo is seized by the local customs authorities at the discharge port causing a delay to discharge, is the time so lost caused by ‘government interferences’ within the meaning of clause 28 of the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form?” Clause 28 reads:
“Strikes and Force Majeure
In the event that whilst at or off the loading place or discharging place the loading and/or discharging of the vessel is prevented or delayed by any of the following occurrences: strikes, riots, civil commotions, lockouts of men, accidents and/or breakdowns on railways, stoppages on railway and/or river and/or canal by ice or frost, mechanical breakdowns at mechanical loading plants, government interferences, vessel being inoperative or rendered inoperative due to terms and conditions of employment of the Officers and Crew, time so lost shall not count as laytime on demurrage or detention…”
In deciding whether a force majeure event had occurred, the Court focused on the construction of “government interferences”. It was fairly straightforward to establish that a government entity acting in a sovereign capacity was involved, but owners argued that the government being involved was not enough and that there had to be “interferences”. In reaching its decision that there had been no interference, the tribunal had considered it a key point that seizure was an “ordinary” action. The Court rejected this conclusion. It held that the seizure of the cargo was not routine and did fall within the meaning of “interferences”. Seizure is a significant exercise of executive power and therefore could not be regarded as “ordinary”. Suspected or predictable consequences are not the same as ordinary actions (such as the inspection of the cargo by a government surveyor): “In the usual course of things, cargo is not seized and property rights are not invaded in that way.” The very fact that false documents were involved showed that the circumstances were not routine.
The Court emphasised that it was of “real importance” that its conclusion on the language was not difficult to apply, nor did it in any way offend commercial common sense.
The owners’ causation argument was also dismissed, as it was held that the seizure caused the delay, even if the submission of false documents caused the seizure.
Further detail
In allowing the appeal, the Court still maintained the strict and narrow approach to force majeure, stressing that “the answer given to the question is only a narrow ‘yes’. It is ‘yes’ where the circumstances are as in the present case. The answer does not address all of the circumstances that may come within or fall outside clause 28. The answer is concerned only with the seizure of a cargo and with that seizure by a customs authority that is a State revenue authority acting in a sovereign capacity”.
This judgment gives some welcome publicly-available guidance on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a standard form widely used in sugar trading. While the charterers were successfully able to rely on the force majeure clause in this case, it does not signal a change in the strict and narrow approach typically adopted by the English courts.
Source: Baltic Exchange
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 24 June 24
PHILIPPINES COAL SUPPLY ENOUGH UNTIL 2030 - PHILSTAR GLOBAL
The country’s existing coal-fired power plants are sufficient to ensure enough base load capacity in the next six years, Energy Secretary Rap ...
Friday, 14 June 24
NEXTDECADE, SAUDI ARAMCO SIGN 20-YEAR LNG SUPPLY DEAL - REUTERS
U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) provider NextDecade has signed a non-binding agreement with Saudi Aramco 2222.SE to supply 1.2 million tonnes per ...
Friday, 14 June 24
NEWBUILDING PRICES CLIMB 3% TO HIGHEST LEVEL IN 16 YEARS - NIELS RASMUSSEN
“Since the start of the year, newbuilding prices have risen 3% to their highest level since 2008. Compared to their most recent low in late 2 ...
Friday, 14 June 24
INDIA TARGETS HIGHER DOMESTIC COAL PRODUCTION, REDUCED IMPORTS: GOVT - REUTERS
India wants to reduce coal imports and increase domestic production, federal coal minister G. Kishan Reddy said on Thursday.
The cou ...
Thursday, 13 June 24
US LNG TO ASIA FOR POWER GENERATION EXPECTED TO CUT EMISSIONS VERSUS COAL - RYSTAD ENERGY
The value-chain emissions of liquified natural gas (LNG) are lower on average than for coal-fired power generation, even when the fuel is shipp ...
|
|
|
Showing 16 to 20 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Australian Coal Association
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Parliament of New Zealand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- The University of Queensland
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
|
| |
| |
|
