We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 30 March 18
EXPLAINING POLAND'S COAL PARADOX - FORBES
 In the U.S. coal is succumbing to market forces despite the Trump Administration’s push to support the industry. Abundant, cheap and cleaner natural gas together with ever more efficient and increasingly affordable wind and solar continue displacing coal in electricity generation. But to assume this is the general worldwide trend would be a serious mistake. In fact, even in the heart of “renewable-friendly” Europe, coal is and most likely will continue to be a fuel of choice. Despite coal’s obvious shortcomings that include high CO2 content and local air pollutants, Poland projects that in 2050 coal will still constitute 50% of its energy mix. The strong commitment to coal expressed most recently in the government’s program for the hard coal sector, is driven by host of factors that include social, electoral and policy considerations. As a general statement, it is important to understand the powerful role these factors play in the fuel mix across different countries.
Currently, Poland tops the EU list of biggest coal energy producers, and coal continues to dominate the energy mix in Poland (50%), accounting for a whopping 80% of electricity generation. Going forward, the country is looking into expanding coal production through investment in multiple new mines, including those producing lignite. These plans correspond with power-generation and district heating investments in new plants or expansion of existing facilities.
At the same time, Poland has been behind the EU schedule in implementing the mandated share of renewables energy sources (RES) in the Polish energy mix. The government has also been visibly slow with implementing the 2015 law on renewable energy sources, which in contrast to many EU countries, includes coal as part of the renewable energy mix via coal-biomass based cogeneration.
On the surface, the Polish government’s strong commitment to coal is removed from the realities of the current EU policy direction and market conditions. It goes against the trends in most OECD countries where a less-CO2 intensive energy mix includes increases in RES and natural gas while phasing out coal. Additionally, by pursuing coal Poland opens itself to disputes with the EU that can include substantial monetary fines. Moreover, Polish policy seems to contradict the government’s recent commitment to fight high levels of smog in many cities.
However, a deeper dive reveals that the pervasive use of coal in Poland cannot be explained in strictly environmental or market terms, or even in reference to the EU policy direction.
Coal takes a special place not only in Poland’s energy mix but also in the nation’s collective heart. The coal industry has been traditionally revered, if not romanticized, and much of this continues today. As reported by Poland’s Public Opinion Research Center (CBOS) in 2016, miners in Poland are respected at levels (82%) comparable to university professors (80%) and more than medical doctors (74%) or teachers (71%).
Miners have also enjoyed high salaries and pensions, often several times higher than the national average. In addition, they are highly organized within politically influential trade unions. The government is well aware that any decision that endangers the future of mining will meet with substantial protest, as exemplified by the events of 2015 when miners threatened to end the government of Ewa Kopacz, then Polish Prime Minister. A new law to restructure Poland’s largest mining company was met with widespread protests by miners and their unions, who saw the law as a prelude to the closing of four mines in the Upper Silesia region. Negotiations that ensued resulted in the government’s strong commitment to keeping all mines open, effectively assuring the mining jobs that could have otherwise been eliminated.
Thus, any policy that could potentially limit coal and negatively affect mining jobs can have immediate negative consequences for the incumbent government as well as serious electoral implications. There are 55 seats (out of 460 seats) in the Sejm (the lower chamber of the parliament) and 13 (out of 100) in Senate (the upper chamber of the parliament elected in Upper Silesia – the region historically known as “the kingdom of black coal.” Additional “coal” seats are dispersed around the country where lignite is mined. When compared to prospective EU disputes and/or fines, electoral and public support considerations are more immediate and can directly affect chances of survival for any incumbent government.
Intertwined with socio-political consideration is the second major issue that explains coal’s strong position and commitment to coal going forward – energy security. In Poland, the concept of energy security is viewed predominantly as low dependence on Russia, and it is at the top of government and general public priorities. Domestically available coal offers predictability and peace of mind at a time when renewable energy is still at the very beginning of its development, a potential nuclear power plant is still in discussion stages, and the majority of natural gas consumed in Poland needs to be imported from abroad, primarily from Russia.
Recognizing the geopolitical consequences of dependence on Russian gas, Poland has diversified its pool of natural gas providers, thanks to the newly built LNG terminal in Swinoujscie. But, LNG imports are intended to back out Russian gas rather then provide substitute for coal; so they are unlikely to push out coal in the same manner domestically available natural gas has in the US. In fact, part of the planned expansion of LNG imports into Poland is designed to capitalize on Poland becoming a hub for LNG distribution to other European countries.
Coal policy is a difficult balancing act for Poland. It needs to take into account immediate electoral, social and energy security considerations as well as the country’s commitments as a member of the EU. Poland receives substantial EU subsidies, including €27.4 billion for the Program on Infrastructure and Environment that stresses low-emission economy and environmental protection in addition to infrastructure development and energy security. Those funds could potentially be at risk going forward if Poland does not live up to its stated RES and emissions obligations.
The situation is also difficult for the EU more generally, as it highlights the tensions and different priorities between “high income Western Europe” and “middle income Central and Eastern Europe”. To be truly successful the EU has to understand the heterogeneous needs and priorities of its members. Strict RES development goals not adjusted to local needs, combined with potential fines and reprimands for noncompliance are unlikely to achieve the climate and decarbonization goals the EU has established. Instead rigid rules could push countries like Poland where government’s skepticism towards the EU is already high, toward a non-EU future. The issue seems to have been considered by the EU, which has recently committed €1.25 billion ($1.55 billion) to assist the Polish government with mine closures that could address some of the hardships such closures could have for the affected population. One might suspect substantive help provided to coal-dependent regions – including re-training and unemployment compensation – could alleviate some of the social and electoral considerations. Also, support toward less carbon-intensive energy sources that could be developed domestically – such as biogas – could facilitate a less coal-intensive future. Lastly, research toward and potential development of capture and storage solutions and/or coal gasification could accommodate some of Poland’s reliance on coal while minimizing its negative externalities, such as CO2 emissions and smog.
Source: Forbes
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 29 November 17
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - VASILIS MOIRIS
In line with most expectations for the end of this month, during the past days the Dry Bulk market realized a significant rebound that sent the BDI ...
Tuesday, 28 November 17
THE DRY BULK MARKET HAS SHOWN A REMARKABLE RECOVERY THIS YEAR - GEORGE LAZARIDIS
The Dry Bulk market has shown a remarkable recovery this year with the average earnings having increased by around 63% this year so far compared to ...
Friday, 24 November 17
U.S. PRODUCED 14.9 MMST FOR THE WEEK ENDING NOV 18; UP 0.9% W/W - EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 14.9 million short ton ...
Thursday, 23 November 17
PANAMAX: ANOTHER SLOW AND UNEVENTFUL WEEK; DECREASING FREIGHT RATES IN BOTH HEMISPHERES - FEARNLEYS
Supramax
A quiet start to the week. USG closed last week a bit tighter, and continued into the new week on a positive tone with little concluded, ...
Wednesday, 22 November 17
THERMAL COAL WAS FLAT AMID CONCERNS OF FURTHER GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION IN CHINA, SAYS DANIEL HYNES
Coal prices were mixed. Thermal coal was flat amid concerns of further government intervention in China, said Daniel Hynes Senior Commodity Strateg ...
|
|
|
Showing 1866 to 1870 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- The University of Queensland
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- White Energy Company Limited
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
