We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 30 March 18
EXPLAINING POLAND'S COAL PARADOX - FORBES
 In the U.S. coal is succumbing to market forces despite the Trump Administration’s push to support the industry. Abundant, cheap and cleaner natural gas together with ever more efficient and increasingly affordable wind and solar continue displacing coal in electricity generation. But to assume this is the general worldwide trend would be a serious mistake. In fact, even in the heart of “renewable-friendly” Europe, coal is and most likely will continue to be a fuel of choice. Despite coal’s obvious shortcomings that include high CO2 content and local air pollutants, Poland projects that in 2050 coal will still constitute 50% of its energy mix. The strong commitment to coal expressed most recently in the government’s program for the hard coal sector, is driven by host of factors that include social, electoral and policy considerations. As a general statement, it is important to understand the powerful role these factors play in the fuel mix across different countries.
Currently, Poland tops the EU list of biggest coal energy producers, and coal continues to dominate the energy mix in Poland (50%), accounting for a whopping 80% of electricity generation. Going forward, the country is looking into expanding coal production through investment in multiple new mines, including those producing lignite. These plans correspond with power-generation and district heating investments in new plants or expansion of existing facilities.
At the same time, Poland has been behind the EU schedule in implementing the mandated share of renewables energy sources (RES) in the Polish energy mix. The government has also been visibly slow with implementing the 2015 law on renewable energy sources, which in contrast to many EU countries, includes coal as part of the renewable energy mix via coal-biomass based cogeneration.
On the surface, the Polish government’s strong commitment to coal is removed from the realities of the current EU policy direction and market conditions. It goes against the trends in most OECD countries where a less-CO2 intensive energy mix includes increases in RES and natural gas while phasing out coal. Additionally, by pursuing coal Poland opens itself to disputes with the EU that can include substantial monetary fines. Moreover, Polish policy seems to contradict the government’s recent commitment to fight high levels of smog in many cities.
However, a deeper dive reveals that the pervasive use of coal in Poland cannot be explained in strictly environmental or market terms, or even in reference to the EU policy direction.
Coal takes a special place not only in Poland’s energy mix but also in the nation’s collective heart. The coal industry has been traditionally revered, if not romanticized, and much of this continues today. As reported by Poland’s Public Opinion Research Center (CBOS) in 2016, miners in Poland are respected at levels (82%) comparable to university professors (80%) and more than medical doctors (74%) or teachers (71%).
Miners have also enjoyed high salaries and pensions, often several times higher than the national average. In addition, they are highly organized within politically influential trade unions. The government is well aware that any decision that endangers the future of mining will meet with substantial protest, as exemplified by the events of 2015 when miners threatened to end the government of Ewa Kopacz, then Polish Prime Minister. A new law to restructure Poland’s largest mining company was met with widespread protests by miners and their unions, who saw the law as a prelude to the closing of four mines in the Upper Silesia region. Negotiations that ensued resulted in the government’s strong commitment to keeping all mines open, effectively assuring the mining jobs that could have otherwise been eliminated.
Thus, any policy that could potentially limit coal and negatively affect mining jobs can have immediate negative consequences for the incumbent government as well as serious electoral implications. There are 55 seats (out of 460 seats) in the Sejm (the lower chamber of the parliament) and 13 (out of 100) in Senate (the upper chamber of the parliament elected in Upper Silesia – the region historically known as “the kingdom of black coal.” Additional “coal” seats are dispersed around the country where lignite is mined. When compared to prospective EU disputes and/or fines, electoral and public support considerations are more immediate and can directly affect chances of survival for any incumbent government.
Intertwined with socio-political consideration is the second major issue that explains coal’s strong position and commitment to coal going forward – energy security. In Poland, the concept of energy security is viewed predominantly as low dependence on Russia, and it is at the top of government and general public priorities. Domestically available coal offers predictability and peace of mind at a time when renewable energy is still at the very beginning of its development, a potential nuclear power plant is still in discussion stages, and the majority of natural gas consumed in Poland needs to be imported from abroad, primarily from Russia.
Recognizing the geopolitical consequences of dependence on Russian gas, Poland has diversified its pool of natural gas providers, thanks to the newly built LNG terminal in Swinoujscie. But, LNG imports are intended to back out Russian gas rather then provide substitute for coal; so they are unlikely to push out coal in the same manner domestically available natural gas has in the US. In fact, part of the planned expansion of LNG imports into Poland is designed to capitalize on Poland becoming a hub for LNG distribution to other European countries.
Coal policy is a difficult balancing act for Poland. It needs to take into account immediate electoral, social and energy security considerations as well as the country’s commitments as a member of the EU. Poland receives substantial EU subsidies, including €27.4 billion for the Program on Infrastructure and Environment that stresses low-emission economy and environmental protection in addition to infrastructure development and energy security. Those funds could potentially be at risk going forward if Poland does not live up to its stated RES and emissions obligations.
The situation is also difficult for the EU more generally, as it highlights the tensions and different priorities between “high income Western Europe” and “middle income Central and Eastern Europe”. To be truly successful the EU has to understand the heterogeneous needs and priorities of its members. Strict RES development goals not adjusted to local needs, combined with potential fines and reprimands for noncompliance are unlikely to achieve the climate and decarbonization goals the EU has established. Instead rigid rules could push countries like Poland where government’s skepticism towards the EU is already high, toward a non-EU future. The issue seems to have been considered by the EU, which has recently committed €1.25 billion ($1.55 billion) to assist the Polish government with mine closures that could address some of the hardships such closures could have for the affected population. One might suspect substantive help provided to coal-dependent regions – including re-training and unemployment compensation – could alleviate some of the social and electoral considerations. Also, support toward less carbon-intensive energy sources that could be developed domestically – such as biogas – could facilitate a less coal-intensive future. Lastly, research toward and potential development of capture and storage solutions and/or coal gasification could accommodate some of Poland’s reliance on coal while minimizing its negative externalities, such as CO2 emissions and smog.
Source: Forbes
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 05 December 17
THE COKING AND THERMAL COAL RECORDING SMALL GAINS - DANIEL HYNES
Coal markets were higher, with both coking and thermal coal recording small gains, said Daniel Hynes Senior Commodity Strategist at ANZ in his late ...
Tuesday, 05 December 17
WEEKLY US COAL PRODUCTION ESTIMATES DIP WEEK OVER WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 14.1 million short ton ...
Thursday, 30 November 17
CONTEMPLATING COAL'S CONTROVERSY AT COP23 - BENJAMIN SPORTON
Representing the coal industry at climate talks is never going to be an easy proposition. For many people, coal and climate action are incompatible ...
Wednesday, 29 November 17
THE LAST DAYS OF COAL? - ALIBRA SHIPPING
At least 15 countries have joined an international alliance to phase out coal use for power generation before 2030.
Britain, Canada, Denmark, ...
Wednesday, 29 November 17
THERMAL COAL MARKETS WERE A LITTLE BIT MORE SUBDUED - DANIEL HYNES, ANZ
Coal prices were stronger, led by gains in coking coal. Premium hard coking coal jumped above USD200/t for the first time in two months, said Danie ...
|
|
|
Showing 1861 to 1865 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Parliament of New Zealand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- The University of Queensland
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
