We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 22 March 24
INDONESIA APPROVES 922.14 MLN T COAL PRODUCTION QUOTA FOR 2024, ABOVE TARGET - REUTERS
Indonesia has approved coal production quotas totalling 922.14 million metric tons for 2024, Bambang Suswantono, a senior official at the mining mi ...
Friday, 22 March 24
CHINA COAL INDUSTRY GROUP EXPECTS OUTPUT GROWTH TO SLOW IN 2024 - REUTERS
China’s coal output is expected to increase 36 million metric tons, or 0.8%, to about 4.7 billion tonnes in 2024, a Chinese coal industry gro ...
Monday, 18 March 24
THREE KEY TAKEAWAYS FROM OUR EUROPE GAS MARKETS SHORT-TERM OUTLOOK Q1 2024 - WOOD MACKENZIE
European gas prices are currently back to pre-crisis levels, but with a complex series of factors affecting future supply and demand, are they set ...
Wednesday, 06 March 24
INDONESIA AIMS TO FINISH MINING OUTPUT QUOTAS APPROVAL BY END-MARCH, OFFICIAL SAYS - REUTERS
Indonesia’s has approved the mining production quotarequests from more than 120mineral companies and aims to complete the approval process th ...
Monday, 04 March 24
IS YOUR GUARANTEE A GUARANTEE? NOTE TO SHIPOWNERS - GARD
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The law of guarantees is not always obvious or easy to understand without proper guidance. This article clarifies the dif ...
|
|
|
Showing 26 to 30 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Planning Commission, India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- The University of Queensland
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- White Energy Company Limited
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|