We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 24 June 24
PHILIPPINES COAL SUPPLY ENOUGH UNTIL 2030 - PHILSTAR GLOBAL
The country’s existing coal-fired power plants are sufficient to ensure enough base load capacity in the next six years, Energy Secretary Rap ...
Friday, 14 June 24
NEXTDECADE, SAUDI ARAMCO SIGN 20-YEAR LNG SUPPLY DEAL - REUTERS
U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) provider NextDecade has signed a non-binding agreement with Saudi Aramco 2222.SE to supply 1.2 million tonnes per ...
Friday, 14 June 24
NEWBUILDING PRICES CLIMB 3% TO HIGHEST LEVEL IN 16 YEARS - NIELS RASMUSSEN
“Since the start of the year, newbuilding prices have risen 3% to their highest level since 2008. Compared to their most recent low in late 2 ...
Friday, 14 June 24
INDIA TARGETS HIGHER DOMESTIC COAL PRODUCTION, REDUCED IMPORTS: GOVT - REUTERS
India wants to reduce coal imports and increase domestic production, federal coal minister G. Kishan Reddy said on Thursday.
The cou ...
Thursday, 13 June 24
US LNG TO ASIA FOR POWER GENERATION EXPECTED TO CUT EMISSIONS VERSUS COAL - RYSTAD ENERGY
The value-chain emissions of liquified natural gas (LNG) are lower on average than for coal-fired power generation, even when the fuel is shipp ...
|
|
|
Showing 16 to 20 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Australian Coal Association
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
