We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 15 June 15
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP: ROSE M-O-M; DECLINED W-O-W
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q3’ 2015 delivery rose US$ 1.43 (2.82%) per MT month over month.
A commodity swap is a ...
Sunday, 14 June 15
THE FREIGHT MARKET FINISHED THE WEEK UP COMPARED TO LAST WEEK
COALspot.com: The freight market finished the week up compared to last week. All the segments except for Cape index were up. Cape segment was ...
Friday, 12 June 15
EXPECTATIONS IN REGARDS TO THE SUMMER SEASON VARY ACROSS THE MARKET - INTERMODAL
The Dry Bulk market closed off last slightly up last week, with the BDI re-gaining the 600 points level, while the driving force behind the increas ...
Friday, 12 June 15
U.S. PRODUCED 15.1 MMST OF COAL THIS PAST WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the second largest coal producer in the world has produced approximately totaled an estimated 15.1 million short ...
Thursday, 11 June 15
IS COAL INDUSTRY GOING TO HIT A BRICK WALL?
COALspot.com - The Director General of Mineral and Coal of Indonesia revised down Indonesian coal benchmark price once again to US$ 59.59 per MT fo ...
|
|
|
Showing 2976 to 2980 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- The University of Queensland
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Planning Commission, India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Australian Coal Association
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- PTC India Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
|
| |
| |
|