We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 19 June 15
U.S. WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION UP SLIGHTLY COMPARED TO LAST WEEK; CONTINUES TO BE DOWN FROM LAST YEAR
COALspot.com – United States the second largest coal producer in the world has produced approximately totaled an estimated 15.4 million short ...
Friday, 19 June 15
INDONESIA'S COAL-TRAFFICKING PROBLEM REQUIRES IMPARTIAL INQUIRY - JAKARTA GLOBE
Indonesia, the leading supplier to the seaborne thermal coal market, produces 420 million tons of coal per year, according to its official tally.
...
Thursday, 18 June 15
DRY BULK SHIPPING: LOWEST FLEET GROWTH IN 10 YEARS MAY NOT PROVE ENOUGH AS DEMAND IS NOT KEEPING PACE - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The demand side of things in the dry bulk market seems unable to keep pace with even the slightest fleet growth, a sign of the demise that the indu ...
Thursday, 18 June 15
THE FAR EAST HANDYSIZE, HANDYMAX, SUPRAMAX MARKET REMAINED STEADY LAST WEEK - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The Dry Bulk market closed off on Friday (last week) noting small gains on the back of stronger performance in the Panamax segment, w ...
Thursday, 18 June 15
MERCATOR'S KAMSARMAX FIXED WITH CLEARLAKE
COALspot.com: Mercator Lines (Singapore) Limited, a leading Indian-owned international dry bulk shipping company focused on markets such as India, ...
|
|
|
Showing 2966 to 2970 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Australian Coal Association
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Planning Commission, India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- The University of Queensland
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
