We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 26 July 15
INDO-INDIA OCEAN COAL FREIGHT RATES REMAIN STEADY
COALspot.com: The freight market continued lost steam towards end of the week and all indices were showing downward trend.
The BDI was up by 3 ...
Friday, 24 July 15
U.S PRODUCED 17.2 MMST OF COAL FOR THE WEEK ENDED JULY 18; FELL 11.5% YEAR ON YEAR
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 17.2 million shor ...
Friday, 24 July 15
THE IMPACT OF COLLAPSING CHINESE COAL IMPORTS - CLARKSONS
Global seaborne coal trade is currently projected to drop 1% y-o-y in 2015, which would be the first annual decline in almost three decades. The dr ...
Thursday, 23 July 15
ELEVEN NEW NICKEL SMELTERS ARE TO BE BUILT IN INDONESIA OVER THE NEXT TWO YEARS AT A COST OF $1.4 BILLION
Indonesia’s Most Reputable Nickel Event
Eleven new nickel smelters are to be built in Indonesia over the next two years at a cost of $1. ...
Thursday, 23 July 15
THE CAPESIZE SEGMENT KEPT FOUNDING SUPPORT ON INCREASED DEMAND FROM CHINESE STEEL MILLS - INTERMODAL
The Dry Bulk market closed off on Friday (17July 2015) noting substantial gains and the BDI surpassing the 1,000 points level for the first time af ...
|
|
|
Showing 2906 to 2910 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- The University of Queensland
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Australian Coal Association
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|