We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 26 July 15
INDO-INDIA OCEAN COAL FREIGHT RATES REMAIN STEADY
COALspot.com: The freight market continued lost steam towards end of the week and all indices were showing downward trend.
The BDI was up by 3 ...
Friday, 24 July 15
U.S PRODUCED 17.2 MMST OF COAL FOR THE WEEK ENDED JULY 18; FELL 11.5% YEAR ON YEAR
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 17.2 million shor ...
Friday, 24 July 15
THE IMPACT OF COLLAPSING CHINESE COAL IMPORTS - CLARKSONS
Global seaborne coal trade is currently projected to drop 1% y-o-y in 2015, which would be the first annual decline in almost three decades. The dr ...
Thursday, 23 July 15
ELEVEN NEW NICKEL SMELTERS ARE TO BE BUILT IN INDONESIA OVER THE NEXT TWO YEARS AT A COST OF $1.4 BILLION
Indonesia’s Most Reputable Nickel Event
Eleven new nickel smelters are to be built in Indonesia over the next two years at a cost of $1. ...
Thursday, 23 July 15
THE CAPESIZE SEGMENT KEPT FOUNDING SUPPORT ON INCREASED DEMAND FROM CHINESE STEEL MILLS - INTERMODAL
The Dry Bulk market closed off on Friday (17July 2015) noting substantial gains and the BDI surpassing the 1,000 points level for the first time af ...
|
|
|
Showing 2906 to 2910 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- The University of Queensland
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Planning Commission, India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
|
| |
| |
|
