We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 31 July 15
CAPE'S PAPER MARKET REMAINS FIRM - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The positive sentiment that the Dry Bulk market has been enjoying as of the previous month, was carried through last week as well, bu ...
Friday, 31 July 15
COAL PRODUCTION IN THE U.S. UP 3.6% FOR THE WEEK ENDING JULY 25
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 17.8 million shor ...
Friday, 31 July 15
CHINA'S NEW OIL IMPORT RULES HAVE MINIMAL IMPACT ON STATUS QUO - FITCH
Fitch Ratings says that China's looser criteria for crude oil import rights are a positive but modest step towards encouraging private-sector p ...
Thursday, 30 July 15
EFFECTS OF THE CHINESE STOCK MARKET CRISIS - INTERMODAL
All evidence is currently signaling that the Chinese stock market will be the newest hurdle for the global economy. With the world's second lar ...
Wednesday, 29 July 15
Q1'16 FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP CLOSED HIGHER THAN Q3'15
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery Q3 2015 declined month on month and gains week over week, this past week.
The Q3 swap was decl ...
|
|
|
Showing 2896 to 2900 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Australian Coal Association
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Parliament of New Zealand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- The University of Queensland
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
|
| |
| |
|
