We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 13 January 15
MORE PITFALLS FOR OWNERS LOOKING TO TERMINATE FOR UNPAID HIRE - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is a debatable point whether or not the obligation to pay hire under a time charter is a condition of the contract or not, notwithstanding the obiter comments of Mr Justice Flaux in the Astra [2013] EWHC 865 (see the Shipping E-Brief July 2013). Making payment under a commercial contract is said to be “not of the essence of the contract” and therefore not a condition. The significance is that a breach of condition allows the innocent party to terminate the contract in addition to claiming damages. Otherwise, he may be limited to his damages claim but unable to terminate the contract unless the failure to make payment, or indeed making repeated late payment under an instalment contract, amounts to a repudiatory breach of the contract.
The traditional view is that, in order to terminate a time charter and claim damages for losses suffered following a failure to pay hire, the charterer’s conduct must be shown to be
(i) repudiatory in the sense that the breach deprives the owner of substantially the whole benefit of the charter; and/or
(ii) renunciatory in the sense that it evinces an intention on the charterer’s part no longer to perform the charter at all or to perform the charter in a manner substantially inconsistent with his contractual obligations.
It will very much depend on the facts and circumstances in any given case whether the non-payment or late payment of hire instalments under a time charter amounts to a repudiatory breach. This often requires the owner to make a difficult decision as to whether the charterer’s failure to pay a number of hire instalments, or paying them late, entitles him, the owner, to terminate the charter. If the owner “calls it wrong”, he can find himself in repudiatory breach for wrongful termination and facing a claim for damages from the charterer.
Januzaj v. Valilas is not a shipping case but deals with general principles concerning the law on repudiation. It arguably introduces a further potential pitfall for owners seeking to rely on multiple failures to pay hire, or repeated late payments of hire, in order to demonstrate repudiatory conduct on the part of a charterer.
The background facts
The Claimant was a dentist operating his practice from the Defendant’s premises. The Claimant had agreed to pay the Defendant half his earnings from his practice in return for use of the premises. The Claimant’s earnings came from the UK’s National Health Service (the “NHS”) under an arrangement whereby the Claimant was paid in advance in equal monthly instalments for his work. If, at the end of the year, the Claimant had not done sufficient work, then any over-payment of his advance earnings had to be refunded to the NHS.
A dispute arose between the Claimant and Defendant, as a result of which the Claimant stopped any further payments to the Defendant. The Claimant was particularly concerned that the Defendant would not return his half of any advance payments if a refund became due to the NHS. The Claimant failed to make three monthly payments to the Defendant between August and October. In November, the Defendant terminated the agreement on the basis of the Claimant’s repudiatory breach of contract.
The Court decisions
At first instance, the Court found that the agreement had been terminated wrongfully and awarded the Claimant damages. The majority of the Court of Appeal upheld this decision on the basis that, on the facts, the Defendant should have been aware that the Claimant was only intending to pay late as opposed to evincing an intention not to pay at all. By contrast, the dissenting judgment concluded that the failure to make three payments in a row was a repudiatory breach.
In the context of time charter hire disputes
The onus will be on an owner to demonstrate that he has been deprived of substantially the whole benefit of his time charter and/or that the charterer does not intend to make any further hire payments in the future. Furthermore, The Brimnes [1972] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 465 made it clear that even persistent late payment of hire instalments will not necessarily amount to a repudiation of the charter.
One of the majority appeal judges in Januzaj v. Valilas suggested that, in determining whether the number of missed or late payments was repudiatory, regard had to be given to the length of the contract as a whole. There is, however, previous case law to the effect that, in deciding whether repeated late payments are repudiatory, it will not simply be a question of looking at the number of payment instalments required over the whole of the contractual period and comparing that number with the number of occasions on which payment has not been made or has been made late. It is also necessary to look at the type of contract in question.
Januzaj v. Valilas was very much decided on its own facts. In that case, the dentist who missed three monthly payments had, in previous years, always managed to complete the requisite amount of work he had to perform for the NHS over the course of the year and so no refund to the NHS had ever been necessary. The majority of the Court of Appeal concluded that the Defendant should, therefore, have known that the Claimant would complete all his NHS work in the relevant year also, so that no refund would have been required and the Claimant would eventually have paid the Defendant all that was owing to him, albeit somewhat late. That was not sufficient to amount to repudiatory conduct.
In a time charter context, however, and in a challenging economic climate, it will often not be at all clear to an owner that he will eventually get his money, albeit late. Charterers may be on the brink of insolvency and may be looking to negotiate a reduced hire rate rather than comply with their original contractual obligations. There may also be a history of repeated defaults on the part of the charterer that can render his behaviour repudiatory as a whole. Nonetheless, Januzaj v. Valilas gives an owner faced with a defaulting charterer some cause for concern that he will be jumping the gun if he chooses to terminate where a charterer has missed a few hire payments. Is it relevant to consider the length of the charter when deciding whether several unpaid instalments is repudiatory? Are those payments just late or is the charterer not going to pay at all?
Comment
Given the Court of Appeal decision in Januzaj v. Valilas, an owner will need to be cautious about terminating for late payments of hire and there remains uncertainty over exactly how many non-payments will be sufficient to justify a decision by the owner to terminate the charter. Defaulting charterers often suggest to owners that they intend to pay outstanding hire in the future. Such a defaulting charterer, faced with an owner who chooses to terminate the charter as a result, may now argue that the outstanding payments were merely late or that only a few non-payments of hire in the context of a long-term charter is not repudiatory.
Source: INCE&Co | Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 14 January 15
DRY BULK MARKET NOTED ANOTHER WEEKLY DECLINE - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The Dry bulk market noted another weekly decline on Friday, with the performance of the Capesize market still weighing down on the re ...
Wednesday, 14 January 15
MARKET INSIGHT - TIMOS PAPADIMITRIOU
In Oil we trust! The Barrel price has declined by almost a third in comparison to the 2014 January and has being on the downhill since early last s ...
Wednesday, 14 January 15
COMMODITIES AREN'T PRIMED FOR A REBOUND DURING 2015: SHIPPING COULD BENEFIT FROM LOWER PRICES - ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
In the recent past, higher commodity prices were driven by an increase in demand from developing countries, which spelled good news for ship owners ...
Wednesday, 14 January 15
SUB-BIT FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP FOR Q1 DELIVERY CLOSED AT US$ 46.97 PMT
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for delivery Q1' 2015 declined month on month and week over week.
The Q1 swap has fell US$ 1.53 (-3.15 ...
Wednesday, 14 January 15
Q4' 15 FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP CLOSED 4.51% LOWER COMPARED TO Q1' 15 PRICE
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery lost US$ 1.56 per MT (-3.0%) month over month and US$ 1.03 (-2.0%) week ove ...
|
|
|
Showing 3256 to 3260 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- PTC India Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Planning Commission, India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Australian Coal Association
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
|
| |
| |
|
