We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 13 January 15
MORE PITFALLS FOR OWNERS LOOKING TO TERMINATE FOR UNPAID HIRE - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is a debatable point whether or not the obligation to pay hire under a time charter is a condition of the contract or not, notwithstanding the obiter comments of Mr Justice Flaux in the Astra [2013] EWHC 865 (see the Shipping E-Brief July 2013). Making payment under a commercial contract is said to be “not of the essence of the contract” and therefore not a condition. The significance is that a breach of condition allows the innocent party to terminate the contract in addition to claiming damages. Otherwise, he may be limited to his damages claim but unable to terminate the contract unless the failure to make payment, or indeed making repeated late payment under an instalment contract, amounts to a repudiatory breach of the contract.
The traditional view is that, in order to terminate a time charter and claim damages for losses suffered following a failure to pay hire, the charterer’s conduct must be shown to be
(i) repudiatory in the sense that the breach deprives the owner of substantially the whole benefit of the charter; and/or
(ii) renunciatory in the sense that it evinces an intention on the charterer’s part no longer to perform the charter at all or to perform the charter in a manner substantially inconsistent with his contractual obligations.
It will very much depend on the facts and circumstances in any given case whether the non-payment or late payment of hire instalments under a time charter amounts to a repudiatory breach. This often requires the owner to make a difficult decision as to whether the charterer’s failure to pay a number of hire instalments, or paying them late, entitles him, the owner, to terminate the charter. If the owner “calls it wrong”, he can find himself in repudiatory breach for wrongful termination and facing a claim for damages from the charterer.
Januzaj v. Valilas is not a shipping case but deals with general principles concerning the law on repudiation. It arguably introduces a further potential pitfall for owners seeking to rely on multiple failures to pay hire, or repeated late payments of hire, in order to demonstrate repudiatory conduct on the part of a charterer.
The background facts
The Claimant was a dentist operating his practice from the Defendant’s premises. The Claimant had agreed to pay the Defendant half his earnings from his practice in return for use of the premises. The Claimant’s earnings came from the UK’s National Health Service (the “NHS”) under an arrangement whereby the Claimant was paid in advance in equal monthly instalments for his work. If, at the end of the year, the Claimant had not done sufficient work, then any over-payment of his advance earnings had to be refunded to the NHS.
A dispute arose between the Claimant and Defendant, as a result of which the Claimant stopped any further payments to the Defendant. The Claimant was particularly concerned that the Defendant would not return his half of any advance payments if a refund became due to the NHS. The Claimant failed to make three monthly payments to the Defendant between August and October. In November, the Defendant terminated the agreement on the basis of the Claimant’s repudiatory breach of contract.
The Court decisions
At first instance, the Court found that the agreement had been terminated wrongfully and awarded the Claimant damages. The majority of the Court of Appeal upheld this decision on the basis that, on the facts, the Defendant should have been aware that the Claimant was only intending to pay late as opposed to evincing an intention not to pay at all. By contrast, the dissenting judgment concluded that the failure to make three payments in a row was a repudiatory breach.
In the context of time charter hire disputes
The onus will be on an owner to demonstrate that he has been deprived of substantially the whole benefit of his time charter and/or that the charterer does not intend to make any further hire payments in the future. Furthermore, The Brimnes [1972] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 465 made it clear that even persistent late payment of hire instalments will not necessarily amount to a repudiation of the charter.
One of the majority appeal judges in Januzaj v. Valilas suggested that, in determining whether the number of missed or late payments was repudiatory, regard had to be given to the length of the contract as a whole. There is, however, previous case law to the effect that, in deciding whether repeated late payments are repudiatory, it will not simply be a question of looking at the number of payment instalments required over the whole of the contractual period and comparing that number with the number of occasions on which payment has not been made or has been made late. It is also necessary to look at the type of contract in question.
Januzaj v. Valilas was very much decided on its own facts. In that case, the dentist who missed three monthly payments had, in previous years, always managed to complete the requisite amount of work he had to perform for the NHS over the course of the year and so no refund to the NHS had ever been necessary. The majority of the Court of Appeal concluded that the Defendant should, therefore, have known that the Claimant would complete all his NHS work in the relevant year also, so that no refund would have been required and the Claimant would eventually have paid the Defendant all that was owing to him, albeit somewhat late. That was not sufficient to amount to repudiatory conduct.
In a time charter context, however, and in a challenging economic climate, it will often not be at all clear to an owner that he will eventually get his money, albeit late. Charterers may be on the brink of insolvency and may be looking to negotiate a reduced hire rate rather than comply with their original contractual obligations. There may also be a history of repeated defaults on the part of the charterer that can render his behaviour repudiatory as a whole. Nonetheless, Januzaj v. Valilas gives an owner faced with a defaulting charterer some cause for concern that he will be jumping the gun if he chooses to terminate where a charterer has missed a few hire payments. Is it relevant to consider the length of the charter when deciding whether several unpaid instalments is repudiatory? Are those payments just late or is the charterer not going to pay at all?
Comment
Given the Court of Appeal decision in Januzaj v. Valilas, an owner will need to be cautious about terminating for late payments of hire and there remains uncertainty over exactly how many non-payments will be sufficient to justify a decision by the owner to terminate the charter. Defaulting charterers often suggest to owners that they intend to pay outstanding hire in the future. Such a defaulting charterer, faced with an owner who chooses to terminate the charter as a result, may now argue that the outstanding payments were merely late or that only a few non-payments of hire in the context of a long-term charter is not repudiatory.
Source: INCE&Co | Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 19 January 15
FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAP FOR Q4 DELIVERY CLOSED 4% LOWER THAN Q1 DELIVERY PRICE
COALspot.com: API 4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q1' 2015 declined month over month and week over week.
The Q1 swap has f ...
Sunday, 18 January 15
INDONESIA TO INDIA SUPRAMAX FREIGHT RATES ARE EXPECTED TO REMAIN WEAK NEXT WEEK
COALspot.com: The BDI was up 4.51 pct week on week on Friday 16, January 2015. The BDI closed at 741 points on this Friday after gaining arou ...
Friday, 16 January 15
U.S. WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION UP 7.3% W-O-W
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of the largest coal producers, produced approximately 18.9 million short tons (mmst) of coal ...
Thursday, 15 January 15
PANAMAX : MARKET CONTINUE ON LOW PACE - FEARNLEYS
Handy
On a general basis we can say that rates are softening in both hemispheres. Although for some specific trades we can see premiums being ach ...
Thursday, 15 January 15
LOW CASH COSTS, GOOD LIQUIDITY HELP ASIAN OIL COMPANIES IN PRICE ROUT - FITCH
Fitch Ratings says that rated oil and gas production companies in Asia can comfortably operate under low oil prices for some time given their gener ...
|
|
|
Showing 3251 to 3255 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Australian Coal Association
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
|
| |
| |
|
