We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 02 February 24
DRY BULK MARKET: THE DOWNWARD REVISION IN THE GROWTH OF CAPESIZE TONNE DAYS IN JANUARY WITH THE BCI DROPPING - MARIA BERTZELETOU
In the last week of January, the dry freight market sustained weakness in the Capesize segment, while the number of ballasters in the Southeast (SE ...
Friday, 02 February 24
COAL INDIA ACHIEVES NEARLY 80% OF ITS FY24 PRODUCTION TARGET IN TEN MONTHS - CNBCTV18
For the month of January, the company’s production grew by 9.1% from the same period last year to 78.4 Million Tonnes (MT), from 71.9 MT last ...
Thursday, 01 February 24
CHINA'S WIND, SOLAR CAPACITY TO OVERTAKE COAL IN 2024 - INDUSTRY BODY, REUTERS REPORTED
China’s installed wind and solar capacity is expected to overtake coal for the first time this year, according to industry forecasts.
&nb ...
Thursday, 01 February 24
ANTI-DEDUCTION CLAUSES: CAN A CHARTERER WITHHOLD HIRE WITHOUT AN OWNER'S CONSENT? - SKULD
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Summary
In The Anna Dorothea, the Court found that where a charterparty provides that no deduction from hire may be m ...
Thursday, 01 February 24
INDIA REBUILDS COAL STOCKS TO ENSURE ELECTRIC RELIABILITY - REUTERS
India’s electricity supply is much more comfortable at the start of 2024 than in either 2023 or 2022 as coal production has ramped up and the ...
|
|
|
Showing 41 to 45 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- The University of Queensland
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
