We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 23 February 24
STRONG OUTLOOK FOR THE TANKER MARKET IN 2024 AND BEYOND - DNV
Several factors have aligned over the past two years to create a robust and profitable market for tanker owners, which is expected to drive newbuil ...
Friday, 23 February 24
AUSTRALIAN COAL FLOWS TO ASIA HOVER ABOVE LAST YEAR’S VOLUME TONNES - SIGNAL GROUP
In the final days of February, the dry bulk freight market appeared to maintain a relatively stable momentum, particularly evident in the large ves ...
Friday, 23 February 24
RUSSIAN COAL SHIPMENTS FALL 14% AS SANCTIONS BITE - BIMCO
During the first seven weeks of 2024, Russian coal shipments have fallen 14% y/y. Volumes have gradually declined since October 2023 when logistica ...
Thursday, 22 February 24
BIMCO PUBLISHES SHIP FINANCING FORMS TO ENSURE UNINTERRUPTED USE OF SHIPS
BIMCO has published two standard Quiet Enjoyment Letters (QELs), the first standard form QELs available to the industry, to offer a tool that can e ...
Monday, 19 February 24
METALS INVESTMENT: THE DARKEST HOUR IS JUST BEFORE THE DAWN - WOOD MACKENZIE
Things often seem at their worst just before they get better. In terms of meeting our net zero 2050 scenario, we’ve reached a watershed momen ...
|
|
|
Showing 31 to 35 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
|
| |
| |
|
