We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 24 June 24
PHILIPPINES COAL SUPPLY ENOUGH UNTIL 2030 - PHILSTAR GLOBAL
The country’s existing coal-fired power plants are sufficient to ensure enough base load capacity in the next six years, Energy Secretary Rap ...
Friday, 14 June 24
NEXTDECADE, SAUDI ARAMCO SIGN 20-YEAR LNG SUPPLY DEAL - REUTERS
U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) provider NextDecade has signed a non-binding agreement with Saudi Aramco 2222.SE to supply 1.2 million tonnes per ...
Friday, 14 June 24
NEWBUILDING PRICES CLIMB 3% TO HIGHEST LEVEL IN 16 YEARS - NIELS RASMUSSEN
“Since the start of the year, newbuilding prices have risen 3% to their highest level since 2008. Compared to their most recent low in late 2 ...
Friday, 14 June 24
INDIA TARGETS HIGHER DOMESTIC COAL PRODUCTION, REDUCED IMPORTS: GOVT - REUTERS
India wants to reduce coal imports and increase domestic production, federal coal minister G. Kishan Reddy said on Thursday.
The cou ...
Thursday, 13 June 24
US LNG TO ASIA FOR POWER GENERATION EXPECTED TO CUT EMISSIONS VERSUS COAL - RYSTAD ENERGY
The value-chain emissions of liquified natural gas (LNG) are lower on average than for coal-fired power generation, even when the fuel is shipp ...
|
|
|
Showing 16 to 20 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- PTC India Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- The University of Queensland
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Australian Coal Association
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
