We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether an arbitration provision in a Club Letter of Undertaking (LOU) had entirely replaced the arbitration agreement in the bills of lading. If it had not, the Cargo Interests may have been faced with a time bar argument in respect of some of their claims. Luckily for them, the Court found in their favour.
The background facts
The dispute arose out of a shipment of a cargo of bagged rice from Thailand to Nigeria pursuant to four Congenbill 1994 bills of lading.
There was a head time charterparty, a sub-trip time charterparty and a sub-sub voyage charterparty. The first two charterparties provided for LMAA arbitration in London, with the LMAA Small Claims Procedure (SCP) to apply to claims of less than US$100,000. The sub-sub voyage charterparty provided for Singapore arbitration. All three charterparties were governed by English law. Each bill of lading incorporated the “Law and Arbitration Clause” of the “Charterparty, dated as overleaf”, but no charterparty was actually identified (by date).
Cargo damage was alleged upon discharge, and the Cargo Interests sought security from the Owners for their claims under the bills of lading. The Owners’ P&I Club issued a LOU which, among other things, confirmed the Owners’ agreement that the Cargo Interests’ claims (to which the LOU would respond if they succeeded) would be referred to LMAA arbitration in London before three arbitrators and that English Law would apply (including the Hague-Visby Rules and the English Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992). The Cargo Interests commenced arbitration under the standard LMAA Terms, but no references were made under the SCP.
The Owners argued that the commencement of arbitration was invalid because the Cargo Interests should have commenced four separate arbitrations (not one) of which some should have been under the SCP (before a sole arbitrator) because the claim values under some of the bills of lading were apparently less than US$100,000; and so the arbitrators had no jurisdiction to decide the claims in this arbitration (and the Cargo Interests were time-barred from commencing new arbitration proceedings to correct this). The Owners argued this on the basis that (1) the head time charterparty’s law and jurisdiction provisions had been incorporated into the bills of lading; and (2) its SCP provision for claims for less than US$100,000 survived the LOU – which amended the bills of lading’s arbitration provision in some limited respects but left the SCP provision intact.
The Cargo Interests argued that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of ladings’ arbitration provision entirely.
The Tribunal’s decision
The majority arbitrators held that they had jurisdiction to hear a bill of lading claim for more than US$100,000, but (as the Owners were arguing) no jurisdiction to hear a claim for less than this sum. That said, they could not say which claims they could hear because the Cargo Interests had not set out the claim amount under each bill of lading.
The minority arbitrator held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide all of the bill of lading claims (as the Cargo Interests were arguing).
The Commercial Court decision
The Court agreed with the Cargo Interests that the LOU’s arbitration provision had replaced the bills of lading’s arbitration provision entirely such that the arbitration had been validly commenced. The Court’s reasoning was as follows:
There was no reason in principle why this should not be the case, and the authorities relied upon by the Owners to the contrary did not directly apply here. The LOU’s arbitration provision operated comfortably as a new and free-standing agreement which was comprehensive – dealing with the (London) seat of the arbitration; the (LMAA Terms) arbitration procedure; the number of arbitrators (three, appointed in the usual way); the time for appointing the second arbitrator (14 days); and the law governing the dispute (English law, including the Hague-Visby Rules and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992).
This was also the natural meaning of the LOU’s arbitration provision.
With this in mind, there was no apparent reason why the parties should not have intended this. On the contrary, there were good reasons why they should:
the arbitration agreement would in this way be found in one document (the LOU) rather than two (the LOU and the bill of lading/head charterparty clause);
the parties knew that some of the modest claims would be less than US$100,000 and would therefore have mentioned the SCP in the LOU if they intended it to apply;
it made no sense for them to have been agreeing to four arbitrations under different LMAA procedures; and
it was in fact arguable that the voyage charterparty’s Singapore arbitration provision actually applied instead of the head charterparty’s London/SCP arbitration provision – as to which any dispute was removed if the LOU’s arbitration provision replaced it entirely.
Comment
The Court would seem to have made a common-sense decision giving effect to the words used in the LOU and, apparently, to what the parties would have intended.
Whilst not relevant to the decision reached, the Court’s comment in passing that the Owners “may well be right”, subject to some scope for disagreement, that the head time charterparty’s arbitration provision would initially have been incorporated into the bills of lading (rather than the voyage charterparty’s arbitration provision) might be questioned in future cases; there is both textbook authority and case law to the effect that if there is a sub-voyage charterparty, the arbitration provision in that sub-charterparty (not that of the head time charterparty) is incorporated into the bill of lading, consistent with the bill of lading’s phrase “freight payable as per cp dated ”.
Source: INCE &Co / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 28 June 24
INDIAN POWER STATIONS STOCKED WITH BUMPER COAL SUPPLY AS TRANSPORT WOES EASE - BUSINESS STANDARD
Even as power demand has touched a historic high of 250 gigawatts (Gw) amid sweltering heat this June, India’s power stations are stocked wit ...
Friday, 28 June 24
INDIA'S CY23 COAL USE LARGER THAN NORTH AMERICA, EUROPE COMBINED - THE HINDU
For the first time, India’s coal consumption surpassed that of North America and Europe combined in the calendar year 2023, said Energy Insti ...
Monday, 24 June 24
PLN'S FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY RESTS ON ACCELERATED COAL RETIREMENT AND RENEWABLES DEPLOYMENT - MUTYA YUSTIKA
On 28 May 2024, Indonesia’s national electricity utility, PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN), released its financial report for 2023. Althoug ...
Monday, 24 June 24
INDIA'S COAL-BASED POWER DEMAND AT ALL-TIME HIGH, GOVERNMENT SAYS - REUTERS
India’s demand for coal-based power has risen by 7.3% this fiscal year to an all-time high, the government said in a statement on Wednesday.
...
Monday, 24 June 24
CHINA'S COAL INDUSTRY TURNS GREENER THROUGH INNOVATIVE APPROACHES - PEOPLE'S DAILY
At an opencast mine operated by Inner Mongolia Pingzhuang Coal Group Co. Ltd., a subsidiary of CHN Energy Investment Group (CHN Energy), a 14-meter ...
|
|
|
Showing 11 to 15 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Planning Commission, India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Australian Coal Association
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- The University of Queensland
- PTC India Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
|
| |
| |
|
