We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 18 April 13
FEATURE: PREDICTING THE FUTURE - AND THE PAST - BIMCO
It’s not predicting the future that is problematical, it’s the realisation that you have to relive the past again and again when you fail to learn from your mistakes. So much so in fact that, like a scientist studying the formation of the universe, it should become possible to predict the past too.
Shipping knows exactly how this feels, having ignored the simplest of supply/demand equations and instead put its faith in fanciful predictions that the world – and therefore business – had changed forever.
The trouble is that the more things change, the more they also stay the same. The belief that an industry could break completely free of the cycles which had marked its history for hundreds of years was in fact a departure from reality, the consequences of which we continue to live with.
At least we know now, in case we did not before, that the world will continue to be a difficult place in which to trade, and one need only attend one of the regular shipping industry trade shows to experience that feeling first hand.
Even in Asia, grounded more in trade and consumption rather than the optimism of capital markets, there is an expectation that the world which emerges from the industry’s longest downturn in a generation will be different to the one that went into it.
Classification Society Lloyd’s Register used the recent Singapore Maritime Week to launch its own piece of long range research, laying down competing scenarios of what the industry might have to be grappling with by 2030.
A thorough piece of work put together by LR, QinetiQ and Strathclyde University, it nonetheless can only really succeed in telling the reader what they might already suspect, particularly with regard to the economic/political backdrop.
It seems highly unlikely, for example, that the world will adopt anything but an aggressive posture to protection and preference, not simply for the length of the recession but subsequently, as the emerging nations that (again, we know) will come to dominate the industry flex their muscles.
The shipping industry gives thanks en masse for China’s rise but it must surely recognise that the trading partner with which it will have to deal is no US, no Europe, not even a Russia.
Shipping has traditionally enjoyed freedom of capital, movement of people, goods and services, all commodities it cannot be certain will be so readily available in future. The evidence of the tension emerging in Singapore last week over the need to balance immigration against the requirement to import skills to cement the city-state’s future growth is one clear example and far from being the only one.
Shipping also likes to be left alone and to do its own thing, rather in the same way as entrepreneurs enjoy conditions of privacy to found and grow businesses – unfettered by regulation and competitive constraints, served by relatively free-flowing debt financing.
Again, little to no hope there. Shipping’s dalliance with unreality has left it, if not high and dry, then in a new room with different lenders with very different ideas compared to its former ship finance partners.
Shipping is also highly regulated, but in some areas, less highly regulated than other comparable industries. The trouble is that the industry has done a bad job too often of arguing its case that the positives outweigh the negatives.
There are a number of reasons for that, not least that its main regulator has to juggle the demands of being a technical body on the one hand with being a political one on the other. The tidal wave of opprobrium heaped upon regulators during CMA was a little less obvious during Maritime Week but it is clear the costs of compliance, the need to demonstrate transparency and the requirement to operate under greater scrutiny will all be firm future requirements.
But can shipping change by enough to meet these needs? Of course it should – by practising restraint, by being more commercially adept, by making friends with regulators earlier in the rulemaking process, by recognising that market share without profit margin is a pointless metric and that it something looks too good to be true, it probably is.
To carve out a survival strategy that goes beyond merely putting off the inevitable for another seven years, shipping certainly has to get smarter, and not just in terms of the above commercial issues, however pressing they appear.
Shipping needs to cure itself of the affliction that it has suffered under for at least the last 20 years – you take care of providing sufficient growth, we’ll take care of the rest. The industry is being asked tough questions about its place in the world, just at the time when it has demonstrated the definition of commercial irresponsibility and lack of regulatory engagement. So, back to the future. There is a fine living to be made predicting even short term scenarios, but better cuttings and weblinks to be garnered by mopping up in the aftermath. Most of those doing the latter focus on how we failed to spot the emergence of various technologies and services in time to either make our fortunes or to adopt them to our competitive advantage, preferring to dismiss them as the short term fads driven by people who just want to sell us things before our current things have worn out.
But watch this space – there are two factors that will be decisive in marking out corporates for survival and perhaps the wider industry for adaptive evolution: attitudes to people and the use of technology. The entry into force of the MLC might not by itself guarantee better working conditions for all seafarers but it demonstrates a much clearer focus by regulators that owners will be unable to ignore and should turn to their advantage.
And as for technology? Well, without new approaches to designing, building and operating ships, incorporating not just some tried and trusted techniques but new – and as yet unproven – technologies, there is little hope of meeting future regulatory hurdles and energy efficiency requirements.
I said that predicting the past was possible and here is the history lesson. Owners will adapt and survive. Some will leave the stage and some big names disappear but long before 2030, we will see a new industry emerge. In fact this is not a prediction. It will have to happen.
Source: BIMCO / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 29 March 13
SUB-BIT INDONESIA COAL SWAPS: UP 0.55 % WOW; CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL CONTRACT: UP 0.23 % WOW
COALspot.com - Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swaps (FOB ) for average Q2’ 2013 delivery has gained 0.55 percent and CFR South China coal shipment&nbs ...
Thursday, 28 March 13
SHIP OWNERS KEEN ON ACQUIRING SECOND HAND TONNAGE, AS WELL AS NEW BUILDINGS IN CONVENTIONAL SEGMENTS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The recent rally of the Baltic Dry Index (BDI), coupled with renewed optimism, at least in some parts of the wet market, have prompted many ship own ...
Wednesday, 27 March 13
PTBA HAS CONCLUDED US$ 16.14 BILLION WORTH OF COAL SALES AND PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH PLN
COALspot.com - PT. Bukit Asam, a 32 years old Indonesian state owned coal miner has signed a coal sales and purchase agreement with PT PLN, (a state ...
Wednesday, 27 March 13
SHIPPING CONFIDENCE REACHES HIGHEST LEVEL FOR TWO YEARS - MOORE STEPHENS
Overall confidence levels in the shipping industry recovered to their highest level for two years in the three months ended February 2013, according ...
Tuesday, 26 March 13
NEWCASTLE PORT SHIPPED 2.39 MMT OF COAL W/E 25 MARCH 2013
COALspot.com - Newcastle port in Australia has loaded 2.396 million tons of thermal and coking coal for week ended 0700 hours 25 March 2013, N ...
|
|
|
Showing 4331 to 4335 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Planning Commission, India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- The University of Queensland
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Australian Coal Association
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|