We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 22 December 20
2021 DRY BULK OUTLOOK - SUPPLY GROWTH - TORVALD KLAVENESS
 In the first article in the series we mentioned that dry bulk freight was in a super cycle between 2001 and 2008. The growth in global yard capacity was unable to keep up with the seaborne demand growth triggered by China joining the World Trade Organization in 2001. This led to extensive contracting on existing yards. In addition, we saw many orders at “greenfield” shipyards in China that had to be built before the construction of vessels could even commence. In some cases, contracts were made with a delivery date 5-6 years into the future. This led to unprecedented fleet growth in the 2009 to 2012 period. The peak year in terms of annual percentage fleet growth was in 2010 at 17.1% (see third graph below). While the peak years in terms of deliveries were in 2011 and 2012. Commodity prices, freight rates, asset prices and newbuild contracts collapsed in the months after the financial crisis. However, China soon stepped in and doubled down on their raw material purchases incentivized by the low landed cost of imported commodities. This led to rebounding freight rates and a new wave of newbuild contracting.
The freight market remained strong through most of 2010 but then started another negative spiral as fleet growth remained elevated and as the Chinese demand growth moderated from the neck breaking pace seen in the period directly after the financial crisis. Deliveries slowed down considerably in 2013(see graph below). As the underlying dry bulk demand was solid, the lower fleet growth was enough to once again pull freight rates higher. At an early stage of the 2013 freight rate recovery it was argued that this time around the higher freight rates would not trigger more orders. The reasoning was that the ship owning companies was strapped for liquidity after buying expensive vessels at the peak of the market. The shipping companies had enough on the plate just servicing their debt obligations, and banks were increasingly restrictive in their lending. Thus, a big wave of ordering was deemed unlikely. However, private equity was drawn to the sector as asset valuations were low and as the freight market was in what appeared to be a cyclical bottom. This unforeseen influx of capital from the outside led to another huge wave of contracting which at its peak almost reached the levels seen in 2008 (see left graph above). This turned out be another false dawn and freight markets trended further down before bottoming out in Q1-2016. Since then the underlying trend in freight rates has been positive. We did see a new wave in contracting in 2017 and 2018, but the amount of orders did not reach the same levels as in the previous waves. It was however enough to increase the year on year fleet growth from a bottom of 2.2% in 2016 to 4.0% in 2019, and about 3.3% in 2020 (see graph below). With limited newbuild orders in the last two years the orderbook as a percentage of the fleet now stands at 6.3% (see right graph above), the lowest level in Clarksons timeseries dating back to 1996.
Fleet growth in 2021/2022
Based on the current level of the orderbook we can with a high level of certainty predict that fleet growth will be at historical low levels in 2021 and 2022. We expect demolition in 2021 and 2022 to be on more or less on par with this year as the effects from higher freight and fairly low bunker prices limits the incentives for scrapping older inefficient tonnage. We expect total fleet growth in 2021 to end at 1.6%, which will be the lowest fleet growth recorded since 1999. For 2022 we expect fleet growth to increase slightly to 1.9%. This includes a guesstimate of another 6.2Mdwt of contracts will be added to orderbook with delivery in 2022. The average lead time between orders and delivery in recent years has been more than 24 months so time is running out for orders with delivery in 2022. However, there will also be contracts that has already been signed which as of today is not included in the orderbook.
We expect the fleet growth in 2021 to be lower than in 2020 for all segments. The fleet growth in the Capesize and Handysize segment is expected to be very low at 0.9 and 0.5% respectively. Fleet growth in the Panamax and Supramax segments are expected to come in at 2.7% and 2.3% respectively. Going into 2022 we expect the fleet growth to be 1.6% in Capesize segment, 2.4% in the Panamax and Supramax segment and 1.3% in the Handysize segment.
We are confident that the dry bulk fleet growth will be at historical lows in 2021 and 2022. What happens in 2023 and beyond is more open for debate. As we walked down the memory lane earlier in the article, we saw that any uptick in freight rates in the past 20 years has triggered big waves of newbuild orders. We believe it is very likely that freight rates will increase in 2021 and 2022 as low fleet growth combines with a seaborne dry bulk trade that recovers from the black swan events of Brumadinho and covid-19. Is there any reason not to expect a big wave of newbuilding orders this time around if the freight market improves? We certainly believe that higher freight markets will trigger more newbuild orders in the coming years. However, we also believe that fleet growth in the next 5 years is likely to be at low levels due to uncertainties around the choice of fuel and propulsion systems. Klaveness will monitor the decarbonization of shipping closely going forward and have established a team named ZeroLab by Klaveness. In the following paragraphs, Head of ZeroLab Martin Prokosch provides a brief introduction to this large topic.
The initial IMO Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Strategy, adopted in 2018, sets ambitious targets to reduce carbon intensity of international shipping by 40% in 2030 compared to 2008 and reduce the absolute GHG emissions from ships with 50% by 2050, compared to 2008. These targets are illustrated in the figure below, showing both the development in seaborne trade and GHG emissions from shipping, both indexed to 100 in 2008 (Source: IMO: Fourth GHG Study, 2020). In the years after 2008, the emissions were decoupled from further growth in seaborne trade. This was largely due to slow steaming of vessels and partly due to increased energy efficiency in new vessels (ECO-ships). In the recent years the absolute emissions have again been on the rise. To reach the 40% intensity reduction target in 2030, the absolute emissions will need to stay constant while seaborne trade recovers from COVID-19 and again continues to increase as expected.
While the 2030 targets are achievable with current technologies and available alternative fuel types (e.g., LNG), the 2050 targets are much harder to reach. To achieve a reduction of 50% in absolute emissions, the average vessel needs to emit 70-80% less in 2050 vs. 2008 to compensate for the expected growth in seaborne trade. Further, for the shipping sector to be fully aligned with the +1.5-degree target in the Paris agreement, the absolute emissions from this sector will need to reach net zero by 2050.
The usual tools will not bring us there; in order to reach the 2050 emissions targets (either IMO or full alignment with the Paris agreement), new energy sources and fuels need to be introduced for shipping. Slow-steaming and energy efficiency measures reduced the typical emissions of a Dry Bulk Panamax vessel by ~30% from 2008 to 2020 (equivalent to a reduction of ~10 tCO2e per year), but there is limited remaining potential in these measures. To bring the emissions from such a vessel down to 0-30% of the 2008 baseline, the GHG emissions related to the energy sources and fuel(s) need to be close to zero.
There is large uncertainty around which fuel(s) one should design a ship for when ordering vessels during the next decade. LNG is by many seen as a good bridging fuel, coming both at a cost advantage to HFO and offering 5-25% lower GHG emissions depending on engine technology.But unless both the hydrogen and carbon in the methane (CH4) eventually can be sourced from renewable sources (or directly from the air), even LNG will not bring us even close to the target in 2050. Biofuels can also be a bridging solution to reduce emissions in the short- and medium-term, but the future availability and general sustainability is hotly debated. Ammonia produced from renewable energy is by many regarded as the best candidate for the alternative fuel of the future for deep sea shipping. However, ammonia is challenging to handle and currently not available in “green form” (close to 100% is currently produced from fossil fuel). In the longer run, even nuclear energy could be back on the table, especially for very large ships. In the short- and medium-term owners will need to settle with looking at flexibility and optionality when designing and ordering vessels; an LNG-powered vessel designed with retrofit to use of green ammonia in mind, seems like a good place to start.
Conclusion
We are confident that the supply growth in 2021 and 2022 will be at historical low levels. In the absence of new black swan events of a similar magnitude as the Brumadinho disaster and the covid19 epidemic we firmly believe that 2021 and 2022 will deliver demand growth that exceeds the fleet growth. This will increase freight rates. While we do believe that higher freight will trigger more newbuild orders we expect supply growth to trail demand growth in the coming 5 years due to the uncertainty around the choice of fuel and propulsion systems.
So, there you have it. This concludes our 2021 dry bulk outlook series. Hopefully, it has given you as a reader some food for thought.
Source: Peter Lindström, Head of Research, Torvald Klaveness
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 14 April 21
CHINA TAIYUAN COAL TRANSACTION PRICE INDEX DOWN 1.10 PCT - XINHUA
China Taiyuan coal transaction price index stood at 138.05 points Monday, down 1.10 percent week on week.
The index, released by Chi ...
Wednesday, 14 April 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
After a series of months where the dry bulk sector was attracting most of the buying interest, tankers SnP activity spiked in the previous weeks. O ...
Tuesday, 13 April 21
INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE IN APRIL UP AGAIN ON FIRM DEMAND
COALspot.com: The Indonesia coal price reference for April 2021 settles at US$ 86.68 per ton FOB vessel.
The Indonesia coal pr ...
Monday, 12 April 21
CHINA'S ECONOMIC RECOVERY PUSHES COAL MINES TO INCREASE YIELD - GLOBAL TIMES
China’s fast economic rebound from coronavirus has driven up electricity demand, leading to higher consumption of coal which is seeing rising ...
Monday, 12 April 21
GLOBAL COAL PRODUCTION EXPECTED TO RISE BY 3.5% IN 2021, SAYS GLOBALDATA
Global coal output is estimated to have declined by 2% in 2020 due to COVID-19-related lockdowns and restrictions, with significant reductions obse ...
|
|
|
Showing 601 to 605 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
