keeps you connected across the coal world

Submit Your Articles
We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining, shipping, etc.

To Submit your article please click here.

International Energy Events

WTI Crude Oil

BRENT Crude Oil

Search News
Latest CoalNews Headlines
Tuesday, 09 June 20

Regardless of whether a buyer purchases fuel directly from physical suppliers or via brokers or traders and whether sale is under a global framework agreement or ad hoc on a port by port basis, a common feature is that the seller’s terms generally prevail.
On 1 January 2020, the lower sulphur limit imposed pursuant to IMO 2020 regulations came into effect. The new regulations have been written about extensively by Gard and others in the shipping and insurance industries.  However, the terms upon which bunkers are purchased is perhaps not given the consideration it deserves
Sellers' terms often incorporate fixed (often low) limits on sellers’ liability, exclusions for certain types of loss (e.g. loss of time, profit, indirect or consequential loss), short time bars for buyers’ claims, and evidential and law and jurisdiction clauses in sellers' favour. There have been moves to try and work towards standard bunker purchase contracts with BIMCO introducing BIMCO Bunker Purchase Terms in 2015 which were updated in 2018. These contracts are more balanced than typical sellers' standard terms, and representatives from owners, charterers and bunker companies were all involved in the drafting process.
From a commercial bargaining perspective, it may be easier to negotiate more balanced terms if they are agreed in advance as part of a worldwide framework agreement to buy bunkers from a single or small number of sellers.
Taking the BIMCO Terms as a starting point buyers may try to negotiate on some of the following checklist key items:
Bunker supply contracts – key issues checklist
Due diligence with respect to the seller: considermarket reputation and financial standing of sellers, in terms of financial standing and insurance position (see below) and involvement in previous supply issues. 
Are they also a physical supplier or only an intermediary? 
How do they verify the quality of the fuel supplied? 
What are their supply chain quality management procedures?
Due diligence with respect to the fuel: consider what information you need about the fuel and its origin.  Are there any special parameters regarding storage, handling, treatment and use of the fuel on board? Do you require specific information in the Certificate of Quality?
Helpful Joint Industry Guidance is available on the supply and use of 0.50%-sulphur fuel:
Fuel specification: the contract should identify the correct specification of the fuel - for example by expressly stating the relevant ISO specification. For residual fuels, the most widely used specification is ISO 8217 Table 2.  The Table 2 specification for sulphur content is stated as per “statutory requirements” and, since 1 January 2020, the global MARPOL sulphur limit is 0.50% with lower limits set for SECAs. ISO 8217 is periodically revised and the industry guidance recommends the most recent version, ISO 8217 2017. Check whether the fuel specified in your bunker supply terms complies with IMO 2020 and that this also accords with charterparty requirements so it is back-to-back. A further point to consider adding is an express term that the fuel is free of contaminants, is fit for purpose and complies with MARPOL. 
Sampling and quality testing: the contract should specify the agreed sampling and quality testing regime, including for sulphur content. Ideally, a sample from each of the bunker supplier and the vessel should be analysed as opposed to only the supplier's sample.  Again, insofar as possible, sampling and testing requirements need to match the charterparty so the buyer is not exposed to different test standards. Ideally, the sampling process should be set out in detail in the contract together with the agreed analysis regime that is to be used. Consideration should also be given as to whether preferred accredited labs for testing should be identified in the contract. In the event there is a dispute about the quality or characteristic of the particular stem, inability to agree to a lab for testing may complicate and delay resolution. 
Quality claims time bar: the contract should ideally include a quality claim time bar that allows sufficient time for quality testing to be performed, taking into consideration that testing might need to take place at an accredited lab located at a place other than the place of supply. In our experience, bunker contract time bars are normally far too short, especially given that bunkers may not be immediately used (for example bunker test results may be required under the charter before the bunkers are in fact used) and even when used promptly problems may not manifest themselves immediately. We have seen cases where the bunker recourse claim against the supplier is time barred before the bunkers have been used. It is recommended to link any time bar to 14 days after use of the bunkers or alternatively to have a much longer time bar period, for example 45 days.
Limitation of liability: standard bunker supply contracts usually include a low mutual limitation of liability figure (usually one or at most two times the invoiced value of the fuel). Consider negotiating increased limitation of liability sums to reflect the fact that losses arising from loading or consumption of off-specification fuel can be very high in value. It is suggested that at least twice the value of the fuel or more should be targeted where possible. An alternative option is to include reference to both a specific amount and at least twice the value of the fuel provision, with the highest of the two applying. Lastly, make sure that any limitation agreed applies mutually to both parties (rather than just the sellers).
The "OW Bunkers" issue: if buying direct from a physical supplier there is less risk, but if purchasing via a broker or trader there is a risk they may not have paid their counterpart for the bunkers which could, in the event of their insolvency, lead to competing payment demands and the risk for the buyer of having to pay twice.  It is sensible to include provisions under which the sellers warrant they have paid for the bunkers and the buyer has a right to request evidence from the sellers that they have paid any third parties for the bunkers before the buyer is required to pay the sellers' invoice, such that if no evidence is provided the buyer may withhold payment/hold sellers in breach.
It is further prudent to include a term that in the event of bankruptcy of the sellers, the buyer will be entitled to withhold payment for the fuel until the relevant court/tribunal determines whether sellers or the physical suppliers or any third parties have a claim directly against the buyer/vessel. If there is such a determination, the contract can also provide that payment to a party other than sellers for the fuel, as determined by the relevant court/tribunal, shall be deemed to subordinate the claim to the rightful party in order to safeguard the buyer from having to pay more than one party (and more than once!) for the fuel.
Consider also making the contract subject to the Sale of Goods Act 1979, so as to make the contract a contract of sale (thus bringing in the Act's protection so far as fitness for purpose and quality are concerned, and the requirement that the Sellers also have good title to the fuel at the time of sale to the buyer).  
Insurance: sellers should ideally have insurance in place and should be required to produce evidence of this. Such insurance may for example include credit, professional indemnity and product liability insurance.
Local rules and regulations: most standard term contracts incorporate local rules and regulations into the bunker supply contracts. Local rules and regulations can bring about surprises that the parties to the contract might not be aware of at the time of contracting. Consideration is accordingly recommended to be given to the exclusion of local rules and regulations either in their entirety or to limit their applicability to fuel sampling only.
Uniform bunker supply terms: ideally the same supply terms should be used across the board with all suppliers so as to have certainty over the risk allocation and to avoid the use of ad hoc supplier friendly terms. In effect, have a framework agreement/standard terms agreed with major suppliers.
Lien: try and avoid provisions that give the sellers a lien over the vessel or any rights of action against third parties (e.g. the owner if the charterer is the buyer) as this can cause serious issues under the charterparty. A further point to consider, is to add an express provision that the sellers must hold the buyer harmless and indemnify the buyer in the event that a third party asserts a lien or encumbrance on the vessel in relation to the fuel purchased from the sellers. Similarly, a clause can also be included by which the sellers warrant that no third party has any right to claim against the buyer in relation to the fuel, or exercise any right of lien, charge, encumbrance or arrest over the vessel or any sister vessels in respect of the fuel. Lastly, consider including a provision that if such a claim nevertheless arises, the sellers shall co-operate to allow interpleader proceedings. See also our comments on the OW Bunkers issue above.
Exclusions: consider whether you wish to exclude indirect or consequential loss (as this could extend to loss of time). Be careful of broad term exclusions that are usually found in bespoke sellers' contracts. Make sure that any exclusions apply mutually to both contractual parties if they are agreed.
Law and Jurisdiction: avoid the application of US law (due to maritime lien rights) and agree on a neutral law/jurisdiction that is not necessarily the sellers' choice.
These suggestions come from our experience in disputes and litigation involving bunker quality. It is important for buyers to understand the consequences of accepting sellers' terms and well worth the effort to attempt to negotiate a more balanced contract. Even when the terms are not negotiable, risks can be mitigated by exercising due diligence before selecting the seller.
We thank HFW solicitors, Rory Butler and Louise Lazarou for their contribution to Gard Insight. Gard publishes articles, alerts and circulars concerning the MARPOL 2020 low sulphur requirements that are available on the Gard website including topics such as residual fuel specifications and testing for sulphur content, stability and compatibility of very low sulphur fuel oils,  preparing crew for port state inspections and limitations on P&I cover for non-compliance.    

by Rory Butler, Partner, and Louise Lazarou, Senior Associate
Holman Fenwick Willan 
Source: GARD

If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.

Recent News

Monday, 20 July 20
KOREA MIDLAND POWER INVITED BIDS FOR TOTAL 2.520 MILLION MT OF BITUMINOUS COAL FOR THREE YEARS Korea Midland Power Co., Ltd (KOMIPO), has issued an international tender for total 840,000 of  Bituminous Coal to be used at Bo ...

Monday, 20 July 20
China’s coal output dropped 1.2% in June on the year to 330 million tonnes, official data showed, as major coal mining areas cracked down on ...

Monday, 20 July 20
Coal India (CIL) on Friday launched a special category of e-auction for importers of coal. This is in line with the government’s declaration ...

Monday, 20 July 20
The Russian Ministry of Energy considers the current oil price of $40-43 per barrel more or less balanced and does not expect price changes after t ...

Monday, 20 July 20
Capesize The capesize market showed some resistance this week to recent losses as all routes saw a small uptick in value to end the week. With ...

   62 63 64 65 66   
Showing 316 to 320 news of total 6321
News by Category
Popular News
Total Members : 27,459
User ID
Remember Me
By logging on you accept our TERMS OF USE.
Forgot Password
Our Members Are From ...

  • Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
  • Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
  • Ministry of Transport, Egypt
  • Xstrata Coal
  • Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
  • Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
  • Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
  • Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
  • Ministry of Mines - Canada
  • PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
  • Bhatia International Limited - India
  • Singapore Mercantile Exchange
  • Cement Manufacturers Association - India
  • Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
  • Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
  • EIA - United States
  • Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
  • WorleyParsons
  • TNPL - India
  • Inco-Indonesia
  • PTC India Limited - India
  • JPMorgan - India
  • Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
  • Aditya Birla Group - India
  • Indika Energy - Indonesia
  • GHCL Limited - India
  • KOWEPO - South Korea
  • Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
  • Shenhua Group - China
  • Asia Cement - Taiwan
  • Core Mineral Indonesia
  • Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
  • Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
  • SASOL - South Africa
  • Kobe Steel Ltd - Japan
  • Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
  • TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
  • Minerals Council of Australia
  • Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
  • Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
  • Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
  • Thomson Reuters GRC
  • Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
  • Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
  • Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
  • Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
  • Gresik Semen - Indonesia
  • Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
  • Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
  • Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
  • Lafarge - France
  • Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
  • Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
  • Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
  • GNFC Limited - India
  • Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Freeport Indonesia
  • Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
  • Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
  • Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
  • Mercator Lines Limited - India
  • Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
  • GB Group - China
  • Indorama - Singapore
  • Berau Coal - Indonesia
  • Arch Coal - USA
  • Ince & co LLP
  • Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
  • PetroVietnam
  • Georgia Ports Authority, United States
  • Vedanta Resources Plc - India
  • European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
  • J M Baxi & Co - India
  • Thiess Contractors Indonesia
  • U S Energy Resources
  • Indonesian Coal Mining Association
  • Australian Coal Association
  • Maybank - Singapore
  • SGS (Thailand) Limited
  • KEPCO - South Korea
  • Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
  • Posco Energy - South Korea
  • Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
  • Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
  • Maersk Broker
  • Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
  • Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
  • London Commodity Brokers - England
  • Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
  • The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
  • Goldman Sachs - Singapore
  • Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
  • NALCO India
  • NTPC Limited - India
  • Cargill India Pvt Ltd
  • Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
  • Chamber of Mines of South Africa
  • Malabar Cements Ltd - India
  • Sucofindo - Indonesia
  • Planning Commission, India
  • Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
  • Cemex - Philippines
  • Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
  • Indian School of Mines
  • Eastern Coal Council - USA
  • Bangladesh Power Developement Board
  • Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
  • The Treasury - Australian Government
  • Petrosea - Indonesia
  • bp singapore
  • AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
  • Tanito Harum - Indonesia
  • Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
  • Bhushan Steel Limited - India
  • Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
  • ETA - Dubai
  • Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
  • Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
  • International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
  • GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
  • Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
  • Dalmia Cement Bharat India
  • Maruti Cements - India
  • Petron Corporation, Philippines
  • Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
  • Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
  • Commonwealth Bank - Australia
  • Mitsui
  • Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
  • Mechel - Russia
  • Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • Japan Coal Energy Center
  • PLN - Indonesia
  • Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
  • Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • Trasteel International SA, Italy
  • McConnell Dowell - Australia
  • Geoservices-GeoAssay Lab
  • Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
  • Malco - India
  • Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
  • Edison Trading Spa - Italy
  • CCIC - Indonesia
  • ING Bank NV - Singapore
  • Agrawal Coal Company - India
  • Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
  • Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
  • DBS Bank - Singapore
  • Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
  • World Bank
  • Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
  • Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
  • Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
  • Coal India Limited
  • Parliament of New Zealand
  • Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
  • Enel Italy
  • Surastha Cement
  • Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
  • Inspectorate - India
  • ACC Limited - India
  • Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
  • Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
  • Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
  • Eastern Energy - Thailand
  • Wilmar Investment Holdings
  • Central Electricity Authority - India
  • Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
  • Credit Suisse - India
  • Qatrana Cement - Jordan
  • Infraline Energy - India
  • Barclays Capital - USA
  • Thriveni
  • Cebu Energy, Philippines
  • San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
  • Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
  • Moodys - Singapore
  • Coal Orbis AG
  • Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
  • Videocon Industries ltd - India
  • Pinang Coal Indonesia
  • Baramulti Group, Indonesia
  • Parry Sugars Refinery, India
  • Thai Mozambique Logistica
  • IOL Indonesia
  • Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
  • Star Paper Mills Limited - India
  • CoalTek, United States
  • Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
  • MS Steel International - UAE
  • Permata Bank - Indonesia
  • Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
  • Indonesia Power. PT
  • Idemitsu - Japan
  • Peabody Energy - USA
  • UBS Singapore
  • Argus Media - Singapore
  • Ernst & Young Pvt. Ltd.
  • IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
  • Noble Europe Ltd - UK
  • Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
  • Central Java Power - Indonesia
  • Electricity Authority, New Zealand
  • Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
  • Platts
  • Platou - Singapore
  • Tata Power - India
  • Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
  • OCBC - Singapore
  • Sical Logistics Limited - India
  • SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
  • PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
  • South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
  • IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
  • Economic Council, Georgia
  • EMO - The Netherlands
  • JPower - Japan
  • Bank of America
  • Vitol - Bahrain
  • Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
  • Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
  • Mitsubishi Corporation
  • Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
  • GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
  • Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
  • SUEK AG - Indonesia
  • CNBM International Corporation - China
  • RBS Sempra - UK
  • globalCOAL - UK
  • The University of Queensland
  • Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
  • McKinsey & Co - India
  • Deutsche Bank - India
  • Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
  • Energy Development Corp, Philippines
  • Cosco
  • Sojitz Corporation - Japan
  • Bangkok Bank PCL
  • Latin American Coal - Colombia
  • Shree Cement - India
  • White Energy Company Limited
  • Xindia Steels Limited - India
  • Renaissance Capital - South Africa
  • Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
  • Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
  • Tamil Nadu electricity Board
  • ICICI Bank Limited - India
  • IMC Shipping - Singapore
  • Humpuss - Indonesia
  • Fearnleys - India
  • ANZ Bank - Australia
  • Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
  • TRAFIGURA, South Korea
  • Arutmin Indonesia
  • Indogreen Group - Indonesia
  • Merrill Lynch Bank
  • Adaro Indonesia
  • Bank of China, Malaysia
  • Mitra SK Pvt Ltd - India
  • Siam City Cement - Thailand
  • Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
  • Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
  • Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
  • Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
  • Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
  • Clarksons - UK
  • Jatenergy - Australia
  • Interocean Group of Companies - India
  • Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
  • Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
  • SRK Consulting
  • Asian Development Bank
  • World Coal - UK
  • Romanian Commodities Exchange
  • The India Cements Ltd
  • ASAPP Information Group - India
  • Reliance Power - India
  • Glencore India Pvt. Ltd
  • Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
  • Vale Mozambique
  • KPMG - USA
  • Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
  • Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
  • Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
  • GMR Energy Limited - India
  • Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
  • Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
  • MEC Coal - Indonesia
  • PowerSource Philippines DevCo
  • Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
  • HSBC - Hong Kong
  • New Zealand Coal & Carbon
  • Adani Power Ltd - India
  • TANGEDCO India
  • Heidelberg Cement - Germany
  • Thermax Limited - India
  • SMC Global Power, Philippines
  • APGENCO India
  • Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
  • Coaltrans Conferences
  • Coal and Oil Company - UAE
  • India Bulls Power Limited - India
  • Samsung - South Korea
  • Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
  • Marubeni Corporation - India
  • Cardiff University - UK
  • LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
  • Coeclerici Indonesia
  • Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
  • OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
  • Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
  • Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
  • Runge Indonesia
  • Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
  • Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
  • Mjunction Services Limited - India
  • Medco Energi Mining Internasional
  • VISA Power Limited - India
  • Thailand Anthracite
  • Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Anglo American - United Kingdom
  • Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
  • Independent Power Producers Association of India
  • Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
  • Indian Oil Corporation Limited
  • Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
  • BRS Brokers - Singapore
  • Russian Coal LLC
  • Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
  • Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
  • GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
  • CESC Limited - India
  • Britmindo - Indonesia
  • Panama Canal Authority
  • IBC Asia (S) Pte Ltd
  • Gupta Coal India Ltd
  • Deloitte Consulting - India
  • Total Coal South Africa
  • Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
  • Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
  • BNP Paribas - Singapore
  • Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
  • SMG Consultants - Indonesia
  • Rudhra Energy - India
  • PLN Batubara - Indonesia
  • Carbofer General Trading SA - India
  • Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
  • Indian Energy Exchange, India
  • KPCL - India
  • TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
  • UOB Asia (HK) Ltd
  • Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
  • Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
  • CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia