keeps you connected across the coal world

Submit Your Articles
We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining, shipping, etc.

To Submit your article please click here.

International Energy Events

WTI Crude Oil

BRENT Crude Oil

Search News
Latest CoalNews Headlines
Tuesday, 09 June 20

Regardless of whether a buyer purchases fuel directly from physical suppliers or via brokers or traders and whether sale is under a global framework agreement or ad hoc on a port by port basis, a common feature is that the seller’s terms generally prevail.
On 1 January 2020, the lower sulphur limit imposed pursuant to IMO 2020 regulations came into effect. The new regulations have been written about extensively by Gard and others in the shipping and insurance industries.  However, the terms upon which bunkers are purchased is perhaps not given the consideration it deserves
Sellers' terms often incorporate fixed (often low) limits on sellers’ liability, exclusions for certain types of loss (e.g. loss of time, profit, indirect or consequential loss), short time bars for buyers’ claims, and evidential and law and jurisdiction clauses in sellers' favour. There have been moves to try and work towards standard bunker purchase contracts with BIMCO introducing BIMCO Bunker Purchase Terms in 2015 which were updated in 2018. These contracts are more balanced than typical sellers' standard terms, and representatives from owners, charterers and bunker companies were all involved in the drafting process.
From a commercial bargaining perspective, it may be easier to negotiate more balanced terms if they are agreed in advance as part of a worldwide framework agreement to buy bunkers from a single or small number of sellers.
Taking the BIMCO Terms as a starting point buyers may try to negotiate on some of the following checklist key items:
Bunker supply contracts – key issues checklist
Due diligence with respect to the seller: considermarket reputation and financial standing of sellers, in terms of financial standing and insurance position (see below) and involvement in previous supply issues. 
Are they also a physical supplier or only an intermediary? 
How do they verify the quality of the fuel supplied? 
What are their supply chain quality management procedures?
Due diligence with respect to the fuel: consider what information you need about the fuel and its origin.  Are there any special parameters regarding storage, handling, treatment and use of the fuel on board? Do you require specific information in the Certificate of Quality?
Helpful Joint Industry Guidance is available on the supply and use of 0.50%-sulphur fuel:
Fuel specification: the contract should identify the correct specification of the fuel - for example by expressly stating the relevant ISO specification. For residual fuels, the most widely used specification is ISO 8217 Table 2.  The Table 2 specification for sulphur content is stated as per “statutory requirements” and, since 1 January 2020, the global MARPOL sulphur limit is 0.50% with lower limits set for SECAs. ISO 8217 is periodically revised and the industry guidance recommends the most recent version, ISO 8217 2017. Check whether the fuel specified in your bunker supply terms complies with IMO 2020 and that this also accords with charterparty requirements so it is back-to-back. A further point to consider adding is an express term that the fuel is free of contaminants, is fit for purpose and complies with MARPOL. 
Sampling and quality testing: the contract should specify the agreed sampling and quality testing regime, including for sulphur content. Ideally, a sample from each of the bunker supplier and the vessel should be analysed as opposed to only the supplier's sample.  Again, insofar as possible, sampling and testing requirements need to match the charterparty so the buyer is not exposed to different test standards. Ideally, the sampling process should be set out in detail in the contract together with the agreed analysis regime that is to be used. Consideration should also be given as to whether preferred accredited labs for testing should be identified in the contract. In the event there is a dispute about the quality or characteristic of the particular stem, inability to agree to a lab for testing may complicate and delay resolution. 
Quality claims time bar: the contract should ideally include a quality claim time bar that allows sufficient time for quality testing to be performed, taking into consideration that testing might need to take place at an accredited lab located at a place other than the place of supply. In our experience, bunker contract time bars are normally far too short, especially given that bunkers may not be immediately used (for example bunker test results may be required under the charter before the bunkers are in fact used) and even when used promptly problems may not manifest themselves immediately. We have seen cases where the bunker recourse claim against the supplier is time barred before the bunkers have been used. It is recommended to link any time bar to 14 days after use of the bunkers or alternatively to have a much longer time bar period, for example 45 days.
Limitation of liability: standard bunker supply contracts usually include a low mutual limitation of liability figure (usually one or at most two times the invoiced value of the fuel). Consider negotiating increased limitation of liability sums to reflect the fact that losses arising from loading or consumption of off-specification fuel can be very high in value. It is suggested that at least twice the value of the fuel or more should be targeted where possible. An alternative option is to include reference to both a specific amount and at least twice the value of the fuel provision, with the highest of the two applying. Lastly, make sure that any limitation agreed applies mutually to both parties (rather than just the sellers).
The "OW Bunkers" issue: if buying direct from a physical supplier there is less risk, but if purchasing via a broker or trader there is a risk they may not have paid their counterpart for the bunkers which could, in the event of their insolvency, lead to competing payment demands and the risk for the buyer of having to pay twice.  It is sensible to include provisions under which the sellers warrant they have paid for the bunkers and the buyer has a right to request evidence from the sellers that they have paid any third parties for the bunkers before the buyer is required to pay the sellers' invoice, such that if no evidence is provided the buyer may withhold payment/hold sellers in breach.
It is further prudent to include a term that in the event of bankruptcy of the sellers, the buyer will be entitled to withhold payment for the fuel until the relevant court/tribunal determines whether sellers or the physical suppliers or any third parties have a claim directly against the buyer/vessel. If there is such a determination, the contract can also provide that payment to a party other than sellers for the fuel, as determined by the relevant court/tribunal, shall be deemed to subordinate the claim to the rightful party in order to safeguard the buyer from having to pay more than one party (and more than once!) for the fuel.
Consider also making the contract subject to the Sale of Goods Act 1979, so as to make the contract a contract of sale (thus bringing in the Act's protection so far as fitness for purpose and quality are concerned, and the requirement that the Sellers also have good title to the fuel at the time of sale to the buyer).  
Insurance: sellers should ideally have insurance in place and should be required to produce evidence of this. Such insurance may for example include credit, professional indemnity and product liability insurance.
Local rules and regulations: most standard term contracts incorporate local rules and regulations into the bunker supply contracts. Local rules and regulations can bring about surprises that the parties to the contract might not be aware of at the time of contracting. Consideration is accordingly recommended to be given to the exclusion of local rules and regulations either in their entirety or to limit their applicability to fuel sampling only.
Uniform bunker supply terms: ideally the same supply terms should be used across the board with all suppliers so as to have certainty over the risk allocation and to avoid the use of ad hoc supplier friendly terms. In effect, have a framework agreement/standard terms agreed with major suppliers.
Lien: try and avoid provisions that give the sellers a lien over the vessel or any rights of action against third parties (e.g. the owner if the charterer is the buyer) as this can cause serious issues under the charterparty. A further point to consider, is to add an express provision that the sellers must hold the buyer harmless and indemnify the buyer in the event that a third party asserts a lien or encumbrance on the vessel in relation to the fuel purchased from the sellers. Similarly, a clause can also be included by which the sellers warrant that no third party has any right to claim against the buyer in relation to the fuel, or exercise any right of lien, charge, encumbrance or arrest over the vessel or any sister vessels in respect of the fuel. Lastly, consider including a provision that if such a claim nevertheless arises, the sellers shall co-operate to allow interpleader proceedings. See also our comments on the OW Bunkers issue above.
Exclusions: consider whether you wish to exclude indirect or consequential loss (as this could extend to loss of time). Be careful of broad term exclusions that are usually found in bespoke sellers' contracts. Make sure that any exclusions apply mutually to both contractual parties if they are agreed.
Law and Jurisdiction: avoid the application of US law (due to maritime lien rights) and agree on a neutral law/jurisdiction that is not necessarily the sellers' choice.
These suggestions come from our experience in disputes and litigation involving bunker quality. It is important for buyers to understand the consequences of accepting sellers' terms and well worth the effort to attempt to negotiate a more balanced contract. Even when the terms are not negotiable, risks can be mitigated by exercising due diligence before selecting the seller.
We thank HFW solicitors, Rory Butler and Louise Lazarou for their contribution to Gard Insight. Gard publishes articles, alerts and circulars concerning the MARPOL 2020 low sulphur requirements that are available on the Gard website including topics such as residual fuel specifications and testing for sulphur content, stability and compatibility of very low sulphur fuel oils,  preparing crew for port state inspections and limitations on P&I cover for non-compliance.    

by Rory Butler, Partner, and Louise Lazarou, Senior Associate
Holman Fenwick Willan 
Source: GARD

If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.

Recent News

Saturday, 01 August 20
Oil demand in Asia Pacific might be expected to plunge 1.8m barrels per day (bpd) this year, but there are still strong prospects for growth over t ...

Friday, 31 July 20
Due to the India-China dispute, the threat of deteriorating trade relations between the two countries has become real. Meanwhile, we expect freight ...

Friday, 31 July 20
Capesize After weeks of dropping rates, there are finally some resistance for the Capes. Pacific rounds improving to upper15,000s by the middle ...

Friday, 31 July 20
Could South Africa’s coal export industry, one of the largest in the world, be about to take a severe hit from the coronavirus?   ...

Friday, 31 July 20
An African economic leader like Botswana should embrace solar to reduce subsidies and tariff hikes   As Sub-Saharan solar ambition has ...

   3 4 5 6 7   
Showing 21 to 25 news of total 6038
News by Category
Popular News
Total Members : 27,028
User ID
Remember Me
By logging on you accept our TERMS OF USE.
Forgot Password
Our Members Are From ...

  • OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
  • Bank of China, Malaysia
  • EMO - The Netherlands
  • BNP Paribas - Singapore
  • LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
  • Gupta Coal India Ltd
  • Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
  • Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
  • WorleyParsons
  • Agrawal Coal Company - India
  • Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
  • Freeport Indonesia
  • KPCL - India
  • Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
  • Siam City Cement - Thailand
  • Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
  • KEPCO - South Korea
  • Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
  • Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
  • Merrill Lynch Bank
  • Permata Bank - Indonesia
  • PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
  • Eastern Coal Council - USA
  • PowerSource Philippines DevCo
  • Sical Logistics Limited - India
  • Videocon Industries ltd - India
  • Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
  • McConnell Dowell - Australia
  • Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
  • Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
  • Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
  • IBC Asia (S) Pte Ltd
  • Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
  • Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
  • Indika Energy - Indonesia
  • Indonesia Power. PT
  • Singapore Mercantile Exchange
  • Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
  • Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
  • Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
  • Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
  • Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
  • GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
  • JPower - Japan
  • Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
  • Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
  • Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
  • Xstrata Coal
  • NALCO India
  • Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
  • South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
  • Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
  • Peabody Energy - USA
  • Shenhua Group - China
  • Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
  • Vedanta Resources Plc - India
  • TRAFIGURA, South Korea
  • CCIC - Indonesia
  • Argus Media - Singapore
  • Central Electricity Authority - India
  • Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
  • TANGEDCO India
  • Arch Coal - USA
  • Indian Oil Corporation Limited
  • SMC Global Power, Philippines
  • The Treasury - Australian Government
  • Maruti Cements - India
  • TNPL - India
  • TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
  • Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
  • Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
  • Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
  • Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
  • Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
  • Indorama - Singapore
  • Indian School of Mines
  • Trasteel International SA, Italy
  • Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
  • TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
  • Latin American Coal - Colombia
  • Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
  • Deutsche Bank - India
  • Georgia Ports Authority, United States
  • Maybank - Singapore
  • Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
  • Malabar Cements Ltd - India
  • Parry Sugars Refinery, India
  • Independent Power Producers Association of India
  • Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
  • Parliament of New Zealand
  • White Energy Company Limited
  • Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
  • Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
  • Japan Coal Energy Center
  • Berau Coal - Indonesia
  • Romanian Commodities Exchange
  • Ince & co LLP
  • Economic Council, Georgia
  • Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
  • Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
  • Platts
  • Lafarge - France
  • Anglo American - United Kingdom
  • Coal Orbis AG
  • Cardiff University - UK
  • ING Bank NV - Singapore
  • bp singapore
  • JPMorgan - India
  • Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
  • CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
  • Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
  • Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
  • Total Coal South Africa
  • Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
  • Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
  • Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
  • Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
  • Glencore India Pvt. Ltd
  • Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
  • Thiess Contractors Indonesia
  • Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
  • Planning Commission, India
  • ASAPP Information Group - India
  • PLN - Indonesia
  • Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
  • IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
  • Jatenergy - Australia
  • Vitol - Bahrain
  • Tata Power - India
  • Platou - Singapore
  • Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
  • UBS Singapore
  • Mitra SK Pvt Ltd - India
  • Marubeni Corporation - India
  • Surastha Cement
  • Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
  • Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
  • PTC India Limited - India
  • Baramulti Group, Indonesia
  • Deloitte Consulting - India
  • International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
  • Petron Corporation, Philippines
  • Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
  • Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • CoalTek, United States
  • J M Baxi & Co - India
  • Shree Cement - India
  • Kobe Steel Ltd - Japan
  • Ministry of Transport, Egypt
  • Panama Canal Authority
  • Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
  • U S Energy Resources
  • Mechel - Russia
  • Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
  • KOWEPO - South Korea
  • Energy Development Corp, Philippines
  • Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
  • Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
  • Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
  • Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
  • SASOL - South Africa
  • World Bank
  • Bhatia International Limited - India
  • PLN Batubara - Indonesia
  • Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
  • Tanito Harum - Indonesia
  • Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
  • Indogreen Group - Indonesia
  • Bank of America
  • India Bulls Power Limited - India
  • RBS Sempra - UK
  • World Coal - UK
  • Clarksons - UK
  • globalCOAL - UK
  • Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
  • Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
  • Thai Mozambique Logistica
  • Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
  • APGENCO India
  • Cebu Energy, Philippines
  • AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
  • Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
  • Malco - India
  • Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
  • Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
  • Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
  • HSBC - Hong Kong
  • Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
  • Coaltrans Conferences
  • Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
  • CESC Limited - India
  • Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
  • Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
  • IOL Indonesia
  • Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
  • Coal India Limited
  • Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
  • Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
  • Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
  • Sojitz Corporation - Japan
  • Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
  • London Commodity Brokers - England
  • Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
  • Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
  • Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
  • Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
  • GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
  • Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
  • Mitsubishi Corporation
  • Ernst & Young Pvt. Ltd.
  • ETA - Dubai
  • Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
  • Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
  • Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
  • Eastern Energy - Thailand
  • Renaissance Capital - South Africa
  • Asia Cement - Taiwan
  • Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
  • ICICI Bank Limited - India
  • Dalmia Cement Bharat India
  • ANZ Bank - Australia
  • Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
  • Inco-Indonesia
  • Carbofer General Trading SA - India
  • Bangkok Bank PCL
  • Thomson Reuters GRC
  • Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
  • Geoservices-GeoAssay Lab
  • Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
  • McKinsey & Co - India
  • SUEK AG - Indonesia
  • New Zealand Coal & Carbon
  • CNBM International Corporation - China
  • Thailand Anthracite
  • Bhushan Steel Limited - India
  • Credit Suisse - India
  • Britmindo - Indonesia
  • Arutmin Indonesia
  • Samsung - South Korea
  • Cemex - Philippines
  • Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
  • Mercator Lines Limited - India
  • Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
  • Commonwealth Bank - Australia
  • Central Java Power - Indonesia
  • GNFC Limited - India
  • Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
  • Mitsui
  • GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
  • Interocean Group of Companies - India
  • PetroVietnam
  • Thermax Limited - India
  • Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
  • Core Mineral Indonesia
  • BRS Brokers - Singapore
  • NTPC Limited - India
  • Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
  • San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
  • Star Paper Mills Limited - India
  • Bangladesh Power Developement Board
  • Mjunction Services Limited - India
  • Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
  • Ministry of Mines - Canada
  • MEC Coal - Indonesia
  • Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
  • GB Group - China
  • Qatrana Cement - Jordan
  • IMC Shipping - Singapore
  • Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
  • Xindia Steels Limited - India
  • MS Steel International - UAE
  • Medco Energi Mining Internasional
  • Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
  • Fearnleys - India
  • Moodys - Singapore
  • UOB Asia (HK) Ltd
  • Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
  • PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
  • SMG Consultants - Indonesia
  • Idemitsu - Japan
  • Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
  • European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
  • Cement Manufacturers Association - India
  • Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
  • DBS Bank - Singapore
  • Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
  • Adani Power Ltd - India
  • Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
  • Australian Coal Association
  • Tamil Nadu electricity Board
  • Aditya Birla Group - India
  • Russian Coal LLC
  • SRK Consulting
  • Petrosea - Indonesia
  • Maersk Broker
  • Posco Energy - South Korea
  • Edison Trading Spa - Italy
  • Adaro Indonesia
  • Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
  • VISA Power Limited - India
  • Chamber of Mines of South Africa
  • The India Cements Ltd
  • Infraline Energy - India
  • ACC Limited - India
  • Goldman Sachs - Singapore
  • GHCL Limited - India
  • Inspectorate - India
  • GMR Energy Limited - India
  • Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
  • Coal and Oil Company - UAE
  • Cargill India Pvt Ltd
  • Rudhra Energy - India
  • Cosco
  • Heidelberg Cement - Germany
  • Gresik Semen - Indonesia
  • Reliance Power - India
  • Vale Mozambique
  • Humpuss - Indonesia
  • Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
  • KPMG - USA
  • SGS (Thailand) Limited
  • Coeclerici Indonesia
  • Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
  • Thriveni
  • Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
  • Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
  • Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
  • Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
  • IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
  • Enel Italy
  • Indonesian Coal Mining Association
  • Minerals Council of Australia
  • Noble Europe Ltd - UK
  • Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
  • Barclays Capital - USA
  • Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
  • The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
  • SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
  • Pinang Coal Indonesia
  • Sucofindo - Indonesia
  • Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
  • Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
  • The University of Queensland
  • Runge Indonesia
  • OCBC - Singapore
  • Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
  • Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Asian Development Bank
  • Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
  • Wilmar Investment Holdings
  • EIA - United States