keeps you connected across the coal world

Submit Your Articles
We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining, shipping, etc.

To Submit your article please click here.

International Energy Events

WTI Crude Oil

BRENT Crude Oil

Search News
Latest CoalNews Headlines
Tuesday, 09 June 20

Regardless of whether a buyer purchases fuel directly from physical suppliers or via brokers or traders and whether sale is under a global framework agreement or ad hoc on a port by port basis, a common feature is that the seller’s terms generally prevail.
On 1 January 2020, the lower sulphur limit imposed pursuant to IMO 2020 regulations came into effect. The new regulations have been written about extensively by Gard and others in the shipping and insurance industries.  However, the terms upon which bunkers are purchased is perhaps not given the consideration it deserves
Sellers' terms often incorporate fixed (often low) limits on sellers’ liability, exclusions for certain types of loss (e.g. loss of time, profit, indirect or consequential loss), short time bars for buyers’ claims, and evidential and law and jurisdiction clauses in sellers' favour. There have been moves to try and work towards standard bunker purchase contracts with BIMCO introducing BIMCO Bunker Purchase Terms in 2015 which were updated in 2018. These contracts are more balanced than typical sellers' standard terms, and representatives from owners, charterers and bunker companies were all involved in the drafting process.
From a commercial bargaining perspective, it may be easier to negotiate more balanced terms if they are agreed in advance as part of a worldwide framework agreement to buy bunkers from a single or small number of sellers.
Taking the BIMCO Terms as a starting point buyers may try to negotiate on some of the following checklist key items:
Bunker supply contracts – key issues checklist
Due diligence with respect to the seller: considermarket reputation and financial standing of sellers, in terms of financial standing and insurance position (see below) and involvement in previous supply issues. 
Are they also a physical supplier or only an intermediary? 
How do they verify the quality of the fuel supplied? 
What are their supply chain quality management procedures?
Due diligence with respect to the fuel: consider what information you need about the fuel and its origin.  Are there any special parameters regarding storage, handling, treatment and use of the fuel on board? Do you require specific information in the Certificate of Quality?
Helpful Joint Industry Guidance is available on the supply and use of 0.50%-sulphur fuel:
Fuel specification: the contract should identify the correct specification of the fuel - for example by expressly stating the relevant ISO specification. For residual fuels, the most widely used specification is ISO 8217 Table 2.  The Table 2 specification for sulphur content is stated as per “statutory requirements” and, since 1 January 2020, the global MARPOL sulphur limit is 0.50% with lower limits set for SECAs. ISO 8217 is periodically revised and the industry guidance recommends the most recent version, ISO 8217 2017. Check whether the fuel specified in your bunker supply terms complies with IMO 2020 and that this also accords with charterparty requirements so it is back-to-back. A further point to consider adding is an express term that the fuel is free of contaminants, is fit for purpose and complies with MARPOL. 
Sampling and quality testing: the contract should specify the agreed sampling and quality testing regime, including for sulphur content. Ideally, a sample from each of the bunker supplier and the vessel should be analysed as opposed to only the supplier's sample.  Again, insofar as possible, sampling and testing requirements need to match the charterparty so the buyer is not exposed to different test standards. Ideally, the sampling process should be set out in detail in the contract together with the agreed analysis regime that is to be used. Consideration should also be given as to whether preferred accredited labs for testing should be identified in the contract. In the event there is a dispute about the quality or characteristic of the particular stem, inability to agree to a lab for testing may complicate and delay resolution. 
Quality claims time bar: the contract should ideally include a quality claim time bar that allows sufficient time for quality testing to be performed, taking into consideration that testing might need to take place at an accredited lab located at a place other than the place of supply. In our experience, bunker contract time bars are normally far too short, especially given that bunkers may not be immediately used (for example bunker test results may be required under the charter before the bunkers are in fact used) and even when used promptly problems may not manifest themselves immediately. We have seen cases where the bunker recourse claim against the supplier is time barred before the bunkers have been used. It is recommended to link any time bar to 14 days after use of the bunkers or alternatively to have a much longer time bar period, for example 45 days.
Limitation of liability: standard bunker supply contracts usually include a low mutual limitation of liability figure (usually one or at most two times the invoiced value of the fuel). Consider negotiating increased limitation of liability sums to reflect the fact that losses arising from loading or consumption of off-specification fuel can be very high in value. It is suggested that at least twice the value of the fuel or more should be targeted where possible. An alternative option is to include reference to both a specific amount and at least twice the value of the fuel provision, with the highest of the two applying. Lastly, make sure that any limitation agreed applies mutually to both parties (rather than just the sellers).
The "OW Bunkers" issue: if buying direct from a physical supplier there is less risk, but if purchasing via a broker or trader there is a risk they may not have paid their counterpart for the bunkers which could, in the event of their insolvency, lead to competing payment demands and the risk for the buyer of having to pay twice.  It is sensible to include provisions under which the sellers warrant they have paid for the bunkers and the buyer has a right to request evidence from the sellers that they have paid any third parties for the bunkers before the buyer is required to pay the sellers' invoice, such that if no evidence is provided the buyer may withhold payment/hold sellers in breach.
It is further prudent to include a term that in the event of bankruptcy of the sellers, the buyer will be entitled to withhold payment for the fuel until the relevant court/tribunal determines whether sellers or the physical suppliers or any third parties have a claim directly against the buyer/vessel. If there is such a determination, the contract can also provide that payment to a party other than sellers for the fuel, as determined by the relevant court/tribunal, shall be deemed to subordinate the claim to the rightful party in order to safeguard the buyer from having to pay more than one party (and more than once!) for the fuel.
Consider also making the contract subject to the Sale of Goods Act 1979, so as to make the contract a contract of sale (thus bringing in the Act's protection so far as fitness for purpose and quality are concerned, and the requirement that the Sellers also have good title to the fuel at the time of sale to the buyer).  
Insurance: sellers should ideally have insurance in place and should be required to produce evidence of this. Such insurance may for example include credit, professional indemnity and product liability insurance.
Local rules and regulations: most standard term contracts incorporate local rules and regulations into the bunker supply contracts. Local rules and regulations can bring about surprises that the parties to the contract might not be aware of at the time of contracting. Consideration is accordingly recommended to be given to the exclusion of local rules and regulations either in their entirety or to limit their applicability to fuel sampling only.
Uniform bunker supply terms: ideally the same supply terms should be used across the board with all suppliers so as to have certainty over the risk allocation and to avoid the use of ad hoc supplier friendly terms. In effect, have a framework agreement/standard terms agreed with major suppliers.
Lien: try and avoid provisions that give the sellers a lien over the vessel or any rights of action against third parties (e.g. the owner if the charterer is the buyer) as this can cause serious issues under the charterparty. A further point to consider, is to add an express provision that the sellers must hold the buyer harmless and indemnify the buyer in the event that a third party asserts a lien or encumbrance on the vessel in relation to the fuel purchased from the sellers. Similarly, a clause can also be included by which the sellers warrant that no third party has any right to claim against the buyer in relation to the fuel, or exercise any right of lien, charge, encumbrance or arrest over the vessel or any sister vessels in respect of the fuel. Lastly, consider including a provision that if such a claim nevertheless arises, the sellers shall co-operate to allow interpleader proceedings. See also our comments on the OW Bunkers issue above.
Exclusions: consider whether you wish to exclude indirect or consequential loss (as this could extend to loss of time). Be careful of broad term exclusions that are usually found in bespoke sellers' contracts. Make sure that any exclusions apply mutually to both contractual parties if they are agreed.
Law and Jurisdiction: avoid the application of US law (due to maritime lien rights) and agree on a neutral law/jurisdiction that is not necessarily the sellers' choice.
These suggestions come from our experience in disputes and litigation involving bunker quality. It is important for buyers to understand the consequences of accepting sellers' terms and well worth the effort to attempt to negotiate a more balanced contract. Even when the terms are not negotiable, risks can be mitigated by exercising due diligence before selecting the seller.
We thank HFW solicitors, Rory Butler and Louise Lazarou for their contribution to Gard Insight. Gard publishes articles, alerts and circulars concerning the MARPOL 2020 low sulphur requirements that are available on the Gard website including topics such as residual fuel specifications and testing for sulphur content, stability and compatibility of very low sulphur fuel oils,  preparing crew for port state inspections and limitations on P&I cover for non-compliance.    

by Rory Butler, Partner, and Louise Lazarou, Senior Associate
Holman Fenwick Willan 
Source: GARD

If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.

Recent News

Tuesday, 04 August 20
KOEN INVITED BIDS FOR TOTAL 900K MT OF MIN 5600 NCV COAL FOR 3 YEARS South Korea’s KOREA SOUTH-EAST POWER CO., LTD. (KOEN) has issued an international tender for 260,000 to 300,000 Tons (MT) min. ...

Tuesday, 04 August 20
This is according to the latest Global Coal Plant Tracker (GCPT) results by Global Energy Monitor (GEM), which we completed last month and report f ...

Monday, 03 August 20
According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s (EIA) most recent Monthly Energy Review, the United States consumed 6.5 quadrillion ...

Monday, 03 August 20
The collapse in oil prices and the coronavirus shock is worsening the fiscal and external balances of sub-Saharan African oil producers, Fitch Rati ...

Saturday, 01 August 20
Thursday afternoon saw a report that US GDP in Q2 shrank by 32.9%. Now this may have beaten expectations, but it’s a bit like saying that you ...

   2 3 4 5 6   
Showing 16 to 20 news of total 6038
News by Category
Popular News
Total Members : 27,028
User ID
Remember Me
By logging on you accept our TERMS OF USE.
Forgot Password
Our Members Are From ...

  • RBS Sempra - UK
  • Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
  • IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
  • Thai Mozambique Logistica
  • Anglo American - United Kingdom
  • Carbofer General Trading SA - India
  • Vedanta Resources Plc - India
  • Core Mineral Indonesia
  • Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
  • J M Baxi & Co - India
  • CoalTek, United States
  • Dalmia Cement Bharat India
  • KEPCO - South Korea
  • Cosco
  • Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
  • Cement Manufacturers Association - India
  • Surastha Cement
  • Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
  • Mitra SK Pvt Ltd - India
  • Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
  • Peabody Energy - USA
  • Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
  • KPCL - India
  • Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
  • Shenhua Group - China
  • KOWEPO - South Korea
  • EIA - United States
  • VISA Power Limited - India
  • Ince & co LLP
  • CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
  • Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
  • Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
  • Indika Energy - Indonesia
  • Asian Development Bank
  • IBC Asia (S) Pte Ltd
  • Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
  • KPMG - USA
  • GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
  • Chamber of Mines of South Africa
  • GHCL Limited - India
  • Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Renaissance Capital - South Africa
  • Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
  • Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
  • Permata Bank - Indonesia
  • Eastern Coal Council - USA
  • Coal India Limited
  • Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
  • Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
  • PetroVietnam
  • Asia Cement - Taiwan
  • Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
  • Bhatia International Limited - India
  • Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
  • Gresik Semen - Indonesia
  • Malco - India
  • DBS Bank - Singapore
  • The India Cements Ltd
  • Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
  • Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
  • Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
  • U S Energy Resources
  • Qatrana Cement - Jordan
  • NTPC Limited - India
  • Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
  • PLN - Indonesia
  • Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
  • Idemitsu - Japan
  • Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
  • Interocean Group of Companies - India
  • Maruti Cements - India
  • Eastern Energy - Thailand
  • Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
  • Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
  • ING Bank NV - Singapore
  • TNPL - India
  • Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
  • Agrawal Coal Company - India
  • Samsung - South Korea
  • MEC Coal - Indonesia
  • Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
  • IOL Indonesia
  • Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • Fearnleys - India
  • CCIC - Indonesia
  • Total Coal South Africa
  • Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
  • ANZ Bank - Australia
  • LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
  • Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
  • Tamil Nadu electricity Board
  • Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
  • Sojitz Corporation - Japan
  • APGENCO India
  • Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
  • Cargill India Pvt Ltd
  • Coal and Oil Company - UAE
  • NALCO India
  • Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
  • Cemex - Philippines
  • Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
  • McKinsey & Co - India
  • Ernst & Young Pvt. Ltd.
  • Glencore India Pvt. Ltd
  • ICICI Bank Limited - India
  • Ministry of Mines - Canada
  • Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
  • SRK Consulting
  • Central Electricity Authority - India
  • PLN Batubara - Indonesia
  • Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
  • Star Paper Mills Limited - India
  • TANGEDCO India
  • Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
  • Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
  • Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
  • The University of Queensland
  • Vitol - Bahrain
  • OCBC - Singapore
  • UOB Asia (HK) Ltd
  • CESC Limited - India
  • Commonwealth Bank - Australia
  • Malabar Cements Ltd - India
  • GMR Energy Limited - India
  • Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
  • WorleyParsons
  • Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
  • Credit Suisse - India
  • Georgia Ports Authority, United States
  • India Bulls Power Limited - India
  • South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
  • Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
  • Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
  • Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
  • Japan Coal Energy Center
  • Indonesia Power. PT
  • Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
  • Humpuss - Indonesia
  • Indian Oil Corporation Limited
  • Inspectorate - India
  • Runge Indonesia
  • SUEK AG - Indonesia
  • Indorama - Singapore
  • Singapore Mercantile Exchange
  • Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
  • Lafarge - France
  • Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
  • Britmindo - Indonesia
  • Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
  • SASOL - South Africa
  • Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
  • Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
  • Shree Cement - India
  • New Zealand Coal & Carbon
  • Indian School of Mines
  • Independent Power Producers Association of India
  • Moodys - Singapore
  • Mechel - Russia
  • Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
  • Energy Development Corp, Philippines
  • Platou - Singapore
  • Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
  • Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
  • Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
  • Bangladesh Power Developement Board
  • Bangkok Bank PCL
  • London Commodity Brokers - England
  • The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
  • IMC Shipping - Singapore
  • SMG Consultants - Indonesia
  • Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
  • Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
  • Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
  • GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
  • Mjunction Services Limited - India
  • Noble Europe Ltd - UK
  • Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
  • Reliance Power - India
  • Russian Coal LLC
  • Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
  • Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
  • Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
  • JPower - Japan
  • Posco Energy - South Korea
  • Thomson Reuters GRC
  • The Treasury - Australian Government
  • Pinang Coal Indonesia
  • Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
  • Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
  • Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
  • PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
  • World Coal - UK
  • Edison Trading Spa - Italy
  • TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
  • PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
  • Bhushan Steel Limited - India
  • MS Steel International - UAE
  • TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
  • Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
  • Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
  • Sical Logistics Limited - India
  • Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
  • Xindia Steels Limited - India
  • Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
  • Indonesian Coal Mining Association
  • Videocon Industries ltd - India
  • Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
  • Wilmar Investment Holdings
  • Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
  • globalCOAL - UK
  • Xstrata Coal
  • AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
  • Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
  • Romanian Commodities Exchange
  • Ministry of Transport, Egypt
  • Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
  • Central Java Power - Indonesia
  • Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
  • Mercator Lines Limited - India
  • SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
  • Coal Orbis AG
  • Parry Sugars Refinery, India
  • IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
  • ETA - Dubai
  • Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
  • Arutmin Indonesia
  • Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
  • Deloitte Consulting - India
  • Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
  • Kobe Steel Ltd - Japan
  • Trasteel International SA, Italy
  • International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
  • Rudhra Energy - India
  • Minerals Council of Australia
  • Thiess Contractors Indonesia
  • ASAPP Information Group - India
  • Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
  • Latin American Coal - Colombia
  • Enel Italy
  • Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
  • Maersk Broker
  • Berau Coal - Indonesia
  • TRAFIGURA, South Korea
  • Coaltrans Conferences
  • Heidelberg Cement - Germany
  • Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
  • BNP Paribas - Singapore
  • Jatenergy - Australia
  • Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
  • Cebu Energy, Philippines
  • Maybank - Singapore
  • Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
  • Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
  • GB Group - China
  • ACC Limited - India
  • Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
  • CNBM International Corporation - China
  • Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
  • Cardiff University - UK
  • BRS Brokers - Singapore
  • SMC Global Power, Philippines
  • SGS (Thailand) Limited
  • Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
  • McConnell Dowell - Australia
  • Platts
  • Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
  • Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
  • Sucofindo - Indonesia
  • Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
  • Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
  • JPMorgan - India
  • Adaro Indonesia
  • Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
  • Australian Coal Association
  • Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
  • Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
  • Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
  • Clarksons - UK
  • Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
  • Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
  • Inco-Indonesia
  • Arch Coal - USA
  • Tata Power - India
  • Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
  • Tanito Harum - Indonesia
  • Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
  • Bank of China, Malaysia
  • Deutsche Bank - India
  • Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
  • PTC India Limited - India
  • Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
  • Indogreen Group - Indonesia
  • Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
  • San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
  • Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
  • OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
  • Planning Commission, India
  • Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
  • Baramulti Group, Indonesia
  • Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
  • Economic Council, Georgia
  • Marubeni Corporation - India
  • GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
  • Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
  • Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
  • Infraline Energy - India
  • Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
  • Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
  • Medco Energi Mining Internasional
  • Petron Corporation, Philippines
  • Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
  • Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
  • Parliament of New Zealand
  • Panama Canal Authority
  • Bank of America
  • Vale Mozambique
  • Geoservices-GeoAssay Lab
  • Merrill Lynch Bank
  • Coeclerici Indonesia
  • Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
  • European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
  • PowerSource Philippines DevCo
  • Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
  • Thailand Anthracite
  • Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
  • Mitsubishi Corporation
  • Goldman Sachs - Singapore
  • Argus Media - Singapore
  • World Bank
  • bp singapore
  • Barclays Capital - USA
  • Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • Freeport Indonesia
  • Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
  • Thriveni
  • Adani Power Ltd - India
  • Mitsui
  • Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
  • White Energy Company Limited
  • Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
  • UBS Singapore
  • HSBC - Hong Kong
  • Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
  • Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
  • Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
  • Thermax Limited - India
  • Aditya Birla Group - India
  • Siam City Cement - Thailand
  • GNFC Limited - India
  • Gupta Coal India Ltd
  • Petrosea - Indonesia
  • EMO - The Netherlands