keeps you connected across the coal world
  • JULY 2021 HBA FOR EXPORTS INCREASED BY $15.02 MOM, $39.51 YTM AND $63.19 YOY

Submit Your Articles
We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining, shipping, etc.

To Submit your article please click here.

International Energy Events

WTI Crude Oil

BRENT Crude Oil

Search News
Latest CoalNews Headlines
Tuesday, 09 June 20

Regardless of whether a buyer purchases fuel directly from physical suppliers or via brokers or traders and whether sale is under a global framework agreement or ad hoc on a port by port basis, a common feature is that the seller’s terms generally prevail.
On 1 January 2020, the lower sulphur limit imposed pursuant to IMO 2020 regulations came into effect. The new regulations have been written about extensively by Gard and others in the shipping and insurance industries.  However, the terms upon which bunkers are purchased is perhaps not given the consideration it deserves
Sellers' terms often incorporate fixed (often low) limits on sellers’ liability, exclusions for certain types of loss (e.g. loss of time, profit, indirect or consequential loss), short time bars for buyers’ claims, and evidential and law and jurisdiction clauses in sellers' favour. There have been moves to try and work towards standard bunker purchase contracts with BIMCO introducing BIMCO Bunker Purchase Terms in 2015 which were updated in 2018. These contracts are more balanced than typical sellers' standard terms, and representatives from owners, charterers and bunker companies were all involved in the drafting process.
From a commercial bargaining perspective, it may be easier to negotiate more balanced terms if they are agreed in advance as part of a worldwide framework agreement to buy bunkers from a single or small number of sellers.
Taking the BIMCO Terms as a starting point buyers may try to negotiate on some of the following checklist key items:
Bunker supply contracts – key issues checklist
Due diligence with respect to the seller: considermarket reputation and financial standing of sellers, in terms of financial standing and insurance position (see below) and involvement in previous supply issues. 
Are they also a physical supplier or only an intermediary? 
How do they verify the quality of the fuel supplied? 
What are their supply chain quality management procedures?
Due diligence with respect to the fuel: consider what information you need about the fuel and its origin.  Are there any special parameters regarding storage, handling, treatment and use of the fuel on board? Do you require specific information in the Certificate of Quality?
Helpful Joint Industry Guidance is available on the supply and use of 0.50%-sulphur fuel:
Fuel specification: the contract should identify the correct specification of the fuel - for example by expressly stating the relevant ISO specification. For residual fuels, the most widely used specification is ISO 8217 Table 2.  The Table 2 specification for sulphur content is stated as per “statutory requirements” and, since 1 January 2020, the global MARPOL sulphur limit is 0.50% with lower limits set for SECAs. ISO 8217 is periodically revised and the industry guidance recommends the most recent version, ISO 8217 2017. Check whether the fuel specified in your bunker supply terms complies with IMO 2020 and that this also accords with charterparty requirements so it is back-to-back. A further point to consider adding is an express term that the fuel is free of contaminants, is fit for purpose and complies with MARPOL. 
Sampling and quality testing: the contract should specify the agreed sampling and quality testing regime, including for sulphur content. Ideally, a sample from each of the bunker supplier and the vessel should be analysed as opposed to only the supplier's sample.  Again, insofar as possible, sampling and testing requirements need to match the charterparty so the buyer is not exposed to different test standards. Ideally, the sampling process should be set out in detail in the contract together with the agreed analysis regime that is to be used. Consideration should also be given as to whether preferred accredited labs for testing should be identified in the contract. In the event there is a dispute about the quality or characteristic of the particular stem, inability to agree to a lab for testing may complicate and delay resolution. 
Quality claims time bar: the contract should ideally include a quality claim time bar that allows sufficient time for quality testing to be performed, taking into consideration that testing might need to take place at an accredited lab located at a place other than the place of supply. In our experience, bunker contract time bars are normally far too short, especially given that bunkers may not be immediately used (for example bunker test results may be required under the charter before the bunkers are in fact used) and even when used promptly problems may not manifest themselves immediately. We have seen cases where the bunker recourse claim against the supplier is time barred before the bunkers have been used. It is recommended to link any time bar to 14 days after use of the bunkers or alternatively to have a much longer time bar period, for example 45 days.
Limitation of liability: standard bunker supply contracts usually include a low mutual limitation of liability figure (usually one or at most two times the invoiced value of the fuel). Consider negotiating increased limitation of liability sums to reflect the fact that losses arising from loading or consumption of off-specification fuel can be very high in value. It is suggested that at least twice the value of the fuel or more should be targeted where possible. An alternative option is to include reference to both a specific amount and at least twice the value of the fuel provision, with the highest of the two applying. Lastly, make sure that any limitation agreed applies mutually to both parties (rather than just the sellers).
The "OW Bunkers" issue: if buying direct from a physical supplier there is less risk, but if purchasing via a broker or trader there is a risk they may not have paid their counterpart for the bunkers which could, in the event of their insolvency, lead to competing payment demands and the risk for the buyer of having to pay twice.  It is sensible to include provisions under which the sellers warrant they have paid for the bunkers and the buyer has a right to request evidence from the sellers that they have paid any third parties for the bunkers before the buyer is required to pay the sellers' invoice, such that if no evidence is provided the buyer may withhold payment/hold sellers in breach.
It is further prudent to include a term that in the event of bankruptcy of the sellers, the buyer will be entitled to withhold payment for the fuel until the relevant court/tribunal determines whether sellers or the physical suppliers or any third parties have a claim directly against the buyer/vessel. If there is such a determination, the contract can also provide that payment to a party other than sellers for the fuel, as determined by the relevant court/tribunal, shall be deemed to subordinate the claim to the rightful party in order to safeguard the buyer from having to pay more than one party (and more than once!) for the fuel.
Consider also making the contract subject to the Sale of Goods Act 1979, so as to make the contract a contract of sale (thus bringing in the Act's protection so far as fitness for purpose and quality are concerned, and the requirement that the Sellers also have good title to the fuel at the time of sale to the buyer).  
Insurance: sellers should ideally have insurance in place and should be required to produce evidence of this. Such insurance may for example include credit, professional indemnity and product liability insurance.
Local rules and regulations: most standard term contracts incorporate local rules and regulations into the bunker supply contracts. Local rules and regulations can bring about surprises that the parties to the contract might not be aware of at the time of contracting. Consideration is accordingly recommended to be given to the exclusion of local rules and regulations either in their entirety or to limit their applicability to fuel sampling only.
Uniform bunker supply terms: ideally the same supply terms should be used across the board with all suppliers so as to have certainty over the risk allocation and to avoid the use of ad hoc supplier friendly terms. In effect, have a framework agreement/standard terms agreed with major suppliers.
Lien: try and avoid provisions that give the sellers a lien over the vessel or any rights of action against third parties (e.g. the owner if the charterer is the buyer) as this can cause serious issues under the charterparty. A further point to consider, is to add an express provision that the sellers must hold the buyer harmless and indemnify the buyer in the event that a third party asserts a lien or encumbrance on the vessel in relation to the fuel purchased from the sellers. Similarly, a clause can also be included by which the sellers warrant that no third party has any right to claim against the buyer in relation to the fuel, or exercise any right of lien, charge, encumbrance or arrest over the vessel or any sister vessels in respect of the fuel. Lastly, consider including a provision that if such a claim nevertheless arises, the sellers shall co-operate to allow interpleader proceedings. See also our comments on the OW Bunkers issue above.
Exclusions: consider whether you wish to exclude indirect or consequential loss (as this could extend to loss of time). Be careful of broad term exclusions that are usually found in bespoke sellers' contracts. Make sure that any exclusions apply mutually to both contractual parties if they are agreed.
Law and Jurisdiction: avoid the application of US law (due to maritime lien rights) and agree on a neutral law/jurisdiction that is not necessarily the sellers' choice.
These suggestions come from our experience in disputes and litigation involving bunker quality. It is important for buyers to understand the consequences of accepting sellers' terms and well worth the effort to attempt to negotiate a more balanced contract. Even when the terms are not negotiable, risks can be mitigated by exercising due diligence before selecting the seller.
We thank HFW solicitors, Rory Butler and Louise Lazarou for their contribution to Gard Insight. Gard publishes articles, alerts and circulars concerning the MARPOL 2020 low sulphur requirements that are available on the Gard website including topics such as residual fuel specifications and testing for sulphur content, stability and compatibility of very low sulphur fuel oils,  preparing crew for port state inspections and limitations on P&I cover for non-compliance.    

by Rory Butler, Partner, and Louise Lazarou, Senior Associate
Holman Fenwick Willan 
Source: GARD

If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.

Recent News

Tuesday, 06 July 21
Chinese coal imports declined by 25% yoy in 5M21as a result of both restrictions on Australian coal and the high base in 2020. Import volume in Jan ...

Tuesday, 06 July 21
Price Surge Since March APAC thermal coal has resumed its price surge since March this year. The  benchmark Newcastle 6,000kcal/kg grade c ...

Thursday, 01 July 21
What’s behind the recent increase?   Solar tariffs are deflationary. Prices have fallen by 75% in seven years in India, and in 2 ...

Thursday, 01 July 21
Press Release: The deadline to phase out coal from Great Britain's energy system has been brought forward by a whole year, highlighting the UK& ...

Thursday, 01 July 21
Governments in Asia are planning 600 new coal plants that could lose investors $150 billion and derail efforts to limit temperature rise in line wi ...

   2 3 4 5 6   
Showing 16 to 20 news of total 6351
News by Category
Popular News
Total Members : 27,491
User ID
Remember Me
By logging on you accept our TERMS OF USE.
Forgot Password
Our Members Are From ...

  • Permata Bank - Indonesia
  • Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
  • Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
  • Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
  • Sical Logistics Limited - India
  • Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
  • SUEK AG - Indonesia
  • Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
  • Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Commonwealth Bank - Australia
  • Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
  • Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
  • SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
  • Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
  • Infraline Energy - India
  • Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Fearnleys - India
  • PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
  • Georgia Ports Authority, United States
  • Merrill Lynch Bank
  • McKinsey & Co - India
  • Maersk Broker
  • EMO - The Netherlands
  • Tamil Nadu electricity Board
  • Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
  • Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
  • Cement Manufacturers Association - India
  • Adani Power Ltd - India
  • Deutsche Bank - India
  • Independent Power Producers Association of India
  • India Bulls Power Limited - India
  • Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
  • BNP Paribas - Singapore
  • Indian Energy Exchange, India
  • Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
  • Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
  • GMR Energy Limited - India
  • Britmindo - Indonesia
  • DBS Bank - Singapore
  • Rudhra Energy - India
  • Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
  • Indonesia Power. PT
  • Cosco
  • Enel Italy
  • Moodys - Singapore
  • PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
  • Ernst & Young Pvt. Ltd.
  • The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
  • Indian Oil Corporation Limited
  • Surastha Cement
  • Thiess Contractors Indonesia
  • Indonesian Coal Mining Association
  • Asia Cement - Taiwan
  • Coal and Oil Company - UAE
  • CNBM International Corporation - China
  • Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
  • Berau Coal - Indonesia
  • Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
  • White Energy Company Limited
  • Central Electricity Authority - India
  • Cargill India Pvt Ltd
  • Glencore India Pvt. Ltd
  • Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • Freeport Indonesia
  • Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
  • Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
  • Mercator Lines Limited - India
  • World Coal - UK
  • Clarksons - UK
  • Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
  • Malco - India
  • ETA - Dubai
  • Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
  • Inco-Indonesia
  • Asian Development Bank
  • Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
  • Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
  • McConnell Dowell - Australia
  • IBC Asia (S) Pte Ltd
  • Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
  • Singapore Mercantile Exchange
  • Vale Mozambique
  • Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
  • Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
  • Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
  • MEC Coal - Indonesia
  • Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
  • Platou - Singapore
  • Coal India Limited
  • Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
  • Electricity Authority, New Zealand
  • CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
  • Mjunction Services Limited - India
  • Maruti Cements - India
  • Petrosea - Indonesia
  • Marubeni Corporation - India
  • Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
  • Runge Indonesia
  • PLN Batubara - Indonesia
  • Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
  • Bank of China, Malaysia
  • Tanito Harum - Indonesia
  • Mitra SK Pvt Ltd - India
  • GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
  • Coaltrans Conferences
  • MS Steel International - UAE
  • Siam City Cement - Thailand
  • J M Baxi & Co - India
  • Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
  • Chamber of Mines of South Africa
  • Ministry of Transport, Egypt
  • PetroVietnam
  • Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
  • Samsung - South Korea
  • Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
  • Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
  • Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
  • Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
  • Latin American Coal - Colombia
  • Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
  • IMC Shipping - Singapore
  • Indogreen Group - Indonesia
  • ING Bank NV - Singapore
  • Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
  • Tata Power - India
  • Adaro Indonesia
  • World Bank
  • Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
  • globalCOAL - UK
  • Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
  • Interocean Group of Companies - India
  • Mitsubishi Corporation
  • Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
  • Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
  • PowerSource Philippines DevCo
  • Bhatia International Limited - India
  • Argus Media - Singapore
  • SMC Global Power, Philippines
  • GNFC Limited - India
  • Panama Canal Authority
  • Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
  • Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
  • Mechel - Russia
  • Economic Council, Georgia
  • Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
  • IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
  • SASOL - South Africa
  • CoalTek, United States
  • Arutmin Indonesia
  • Anglo American - United Kingdom
  • Japan Coal Energy Center
  • Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
  • BRS Brokers - Singapore
  • Shenhua Group - China
  • Lafarge - France
  • San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
  • Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
  • Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
  • Arch Coal - USA
  • Xstrata Coal
  • Aditya Birla Group - India
  • IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
  • Humpuss - Indonesia
  • Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
  • The India Cements Ltd
  • Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
  • Renaissance Capital - South Africa
  • Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
  • Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
  • UBS Singapore
  • The Treasury - Australian Government
  • Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
  • KPCL - India
  • Vitol - Bahrain
  • Inspectorate - India
  • Australian Coal Association
  • Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
  • Thriveni
  • ASAPP Information Group - India
  • GHCL Limited - India
  • Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
  • Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
  • European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
  • Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
  • Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
  • Xindia Steels Limited - India
  • Thomson Reuters GRC
  • Peabody Energy - USA
  • Core Mineral Indonesia
  • JPMorgan - India
  • Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
  • Dalmia Cement Bharat India
  • Coeclerici Indonesia
  • UOB Asia (HK) Ltd
  • PLN - Indonesia
  • RBS Sempra - UK
  • KOWEPO - South Korea
  • Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
  • Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
  • Bangladesh Power Developement Board
  • Bangkok Bank PCL
  • Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
  • Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
  • Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
  • VISA Power Limited - India
  • Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
  • Total Coal South Africa
  • Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
  • Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
  • Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
  • Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
  • Medco Energi Mining Internasional
  • Petron Corporation, Philippines
  • Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
  • Romanian Commodities Exchange
  • Russian Coal LLC
  • KEPCO - South Korea
  • Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
  • EIA - United States
  • SGS (Thailand) Limited
  • Noble Europe Ltd - UK
  • South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
  • Sucofindo - Indonesia
  • Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
  • Coal Orbis AG
  • Eastern Energy - Thailand
  • Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
  • Central Java Power - Indonesia
  • Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
  • Goldman Sachs - Singapore
  • Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
  • Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
  • WorleyParsons
  • TNPL - India
  • Thermax Limited - India
  • Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
  • Planning Commission, India
  • CCIC - Indonesia
  • Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
  • Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
  • Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
  • Mitsui
  • SRK Consulting
  • HSBC - Hong Kong
  • ANZ Bank - Australia
  • Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
  • Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
  • IOL Indonesia
  • Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
  • Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
  • New Zealand Coal & Carbon
  • Indorama - Singapore
  • KPMG - USA
  • Ince & co LLP
  • CESC Limited - India
  • Gupta Coal India Ltd
  • ICICI Bank Limited - India
  • Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
  • Agrawal Coal Company - India
  • Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
  • NALCO India
  • PTC India Limited - India
  • Reliance Power - India
  • Vedanta Resources Plc - India
  • Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
  • Barclays Capital - USA
  • GB Group - China
  • Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
  • ACC Limited - India
  • Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
  • Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
  • Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
  • Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
  • Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
  • Jatenergy - Australia
  • Bhushan Steel Limited - India
  • U S Energy Resources
  • Ministry of Mines - Canada
  • Eastern Coal Council - USA
  • AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
  • Thai Mozambique Logistica
  • Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
  • Edison Trading Spa - Italy
  • Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
  • Cardiff University - UK
  • Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
  • Credit Suisse - India
  • OCBC - Singapore
  • Star Paper Mills Limited - India
  • Geoservices-GeoAssay Lab
  • Posco Energy - South Korea
  • Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
  • Cemex - Philippines
  • Shree Cement - India
  • Trasteel International SA, Italy
  • TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
  • Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
  • Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
  • LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
  • Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
  • GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
  • Malabar Cements Ltd - India
  • Parry Sugars Refinery, India
  • bp singapore
  • Platts
  • Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
  • Sojitz Corporation - Japan
  • Deloitte Consulting - India
  • Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
  • TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
  • Bank of America
  • SMG Consultants - Indonesia
  • GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
  • Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
  • Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
  • Cebu Energy, Philippines
  • Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
  • Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
  • Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
  • Indika Energy - Indonesia
  • Idemitsu - Japan
  • Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
  • Baramulti Group, Indonesia
  • Wilmar Investment Holdings
  • Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
  • NTPC Limited - India
  • TRAFIGURA, South Korea
  • Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
  • Pinang Coal Indonesia
  • Gresik Semen - Indonesia
  • Kobe Steel Ltd - Japan
  • OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
  • Minerals Council of Australia
  • Energy Development Corp, Philippines
  • Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
  • Indian School of Mines
  • Qatrana Cement - Jordan
  • Videocon Industries ltd - India
  • Parliament of New Zealand
  • International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
  • Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
  • Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
  • Thailand Anthracite
  • Maybank - Singapore
  • APGENCO India
  • TANGEDCO India
  • Carbofer General Trading SA - India
  • Heidelberg Cement - Germany
  • The University of Queensland
  • London Commodity Brokers - England
  • JPower - Japan
  • Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India