COALspot.com keeps you connected across the coal world
  • OCTOBER 2020 INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE FOR EXPORTS AND DOMESTIC BUYERS INCLUDING POWER PRODUCERS FIXED AT US$ 51.00 A TON

Submit Your Articles
We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining, shipping, etc.

To Submit your article please click here.

International Energy Events


WTI Crude Oil

BRENT Crude Oil

Search News
Latest CoalNews Headlines
Tuesday, 09 June 20
BUNKER SUPPLY CONTRACTS - KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE BUYER - GARD
GARDKNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE

Regardless of whether a buyer purchases fuel directly from physical suppliers or via brokers or traders and whether sale is under a global framework agreement or ad hoc on a port by port basis, a common feature is that the seller’s terms generally prevail.
 
On 1 January 2020, the lower sulphur limit imposed pursuant to IMO 2020 regulations came into effect. The new regulations have been written about extensively by Gard and others in the shipping and insurance industries.  However, the terms upon which bunkers are purchased is perhaps not given the consideration it deserves
 
Sellers' terms often incorporate fixed (often low) limits on sellers’ liability, exclusions for certain types of loss (e.g. loss of time, profit, indirect or consequential loss), short time bars for buyers’ claims, and evidential and law and jurisdiction clauses in sellers' favour. There have been moves to try and work towards standard bunker purchase contracts with BIMCO introducing BIMCO Bunker Purchase Terms in 2015 which were updated in 2018. These contracts are more balanced than typical sellers' standard terms, and representatives from owners, charterers and bunker companies were all involved in the drafting process.
 
From a commercial bargaining perspective, it may be easier to negotiate more balanced terms if they are agreed in advance as part of a worldwide framework agreement to buy bunkers from a single or small number of sellers.
 
Taking the BIMCO Terms as a starting point buyers may try to negotiate on some of the following checklist key items:
 
Bunker supply contracts – key issues checklist
Due diligence with respect to the seller: considermarket reputation and financial standing of sellers, in terms of financial standing and insurance position (see below) and involvement in previous supply issues. 
Are they also a physical supplier or only an intermediary? 
How do they verify the quality of the fuel supplied? 
What are their supply chain quality management procedures?
 
Due diligence with respect to the fuel: consider what information you need about the fuel and its origin.  Are there any special parameters regarding storage, handling, treatment and use of the fuel on board? Do you require specific information in the Certificate of Quality?
 
Helpful Joint Industry Guidance is available on the supply and use of 0.50%-sulphur fuel:
 
Fuel specification: the contract should identify the correct specification of the fuel - for example by expressly stating the relevant ISO specification. For residual fuels, the most widely used specification is ISO 8217 Table 2.  The Table 2 specification for sulphur content is stated as per “statutory requirements” and, since 1 January 2020, the global MARPOL sulphur limit is 0.50% with lower limits set for SECAs. ISO 8217 is periodically revised and the industry guidance recommends the most recent version, ISO 8217 2017. Check whether the fuel specified in your bunker supply terms complies with IMO 2020 and that this also accords with charterparty requirements so it is back-to-back. A further point to consider adding is an express term that the fuel is free of contaminants, is fit for purpose and complies with MARPOL. 
 
Sampling and quality testing: the contract should specify the agreed sampling and quality testing regime, including for sulphur content. Ideally, a sample from each of the bunker supplier and the vessel should be analysed as opposed to only the supplier's sample.  Again, insofar as possible, sampling and testing requirements need to match the charterparty so the buyer is not exposed to different test standards. Ideally, the sampling process should be set out in detail in the contract together with the agreed analysis regime that is to be used. Consideration should also be given as to whether preferred accredited labs for testing should be identified in the contract. In the event there is a dispute about the quality or characteristic of the particular stem, inability to agree to a lab for testing may complicate and delay resolution. 
 
Quality claims time bar: the contract should ideally include a quality claim time bar that allows sufficient time for quality testing to be performed, taking into consideration that testing might need to take place at an accredited lab located at a place other than the place of supply. In our experience, bunker contract time bars are normally far too short, especially given that bunkers may not be immediately used (for example bunker test results may be required under the charter before the bunkers are in fact used) and even when used promptly problems may not manifest themselves immediately. We have seen cases where the bunker recourse claim against the supplier is time barred before the bunkers have been used. It is recommended to link any time bar to 14 days after use of the bunkers or alternatively to have a much longer time bar period, for example 45 days.
 
Limitation of liability: standard bunker supply contracts usually include a low mutual limitation of liability figure (usually one or at most two times the invoiced value of the fuel). Consider negotiating increased limitation of liability sums to reflect the fact that losses arising from loading or consumption of off-specification fuel can be very high in value. It is suggested that at least twice the value of the fuel or more should be targeted where possible. An alternative option is to include reference to both a specific amount and at least twice the value of the fuel provision, with the highest of the two applying. Lastly, make sure that any limitation agreed applies mutually to both parties (rather than just the sellers).
 
The "OW Bunkers" issue: if buying direct from a physical supplier there is less risk, but if purchasing via a broker or trader there is a risk they may not have paid their counterpart for the bunkers which could, in the event of their insolvency, lead to competing payment demands and the risk for the buyer of having to pay twice.  It is sensible to include provisions under which the sellers warrant they have paid for the bunkers and the buyer has a right to request evidence from the sellers that they have paid any third parties for the bunkers before the buyer is required to pay the sellers' invoice, such that if no evidence is provided the buyer may withhold payment/hold sellers in breach.
 
It is further prudent to include a term that in the event of bankruptcy of the sellers, the buyer will be entitled to withhold payment for the fuel until the relevant court/tribunal determines whether sellers or the physical suppliers or any third parties have a claim directly against the buyer/vessel. If there is such a determination, the contract can also provide that payment to a party other than sellers for the fuel, as determined by the relevant court/tribunal, shall be deemed to subordinate the claim to the rightful party in order to safeguard the buyer from having to pay more than one party (and more than once!) for the fuel.
 
Consider also making the contract subject to the Sale of Goods Act 1979, so as to make the contract a contract of sale (thus bringing in the Act's protection so far as fitness for purpose and quality are concerned, and the requirement that the Sellers also have good title to the fuel at the time of sale to the buyer).  
 
Insurance: sellers should ideally have insurance in place and should be required to produce evidence of this. Such insurance may for example include credit, professional indemnity and product liability insurance.
 
Local rules and regulations: most standard term contracts incorporate local rules and regulations into the bunker supply contracts. Local rules and regulations can bring about surprises that the parties to the contract might not be aware of at the time of contracting. Consideration is accordingly recommended to be given to the exclusion of local rules and regulations either in their entirety or to limit their applicability to fuel sampling only.
 
Uniform bunker supply terms: ideally the same supply terms should be used across the board with all suppliers so as to have certainty over the risk allocation and to avoid the use of ad hoc supplier friendly terms. In effect, have a framework agreement/standard terms agreed with major suppliers.
 
Lien: try and avoid provisions that give the sellers a lien over the vessel or any rights of action against third parties (e.g. the owner if the charterer is the buyer) as this can cause serious issues under the charterparty. A further point to consider, is to add an express provision that the sellers must hold the buyer harmless and indemnify the buyer in the event that a third party asserts a lien or encumbrance on the vessel in relation to the fuel purchased from the sellers. Similarly, a clause can also be included by which the sellers warrant that no third party has any right to claim against the buyer in relation to the fuel, or exercise any right of lien, charge, encumbrance or arrest over the vessel or any sister vessels in respect of the fuel. Lastly, consider including a provision that if such a claim nevertheless arises, the sellers shall co-operate to allow interpleader proceedings. See also our comments on the OW Bunkers issue above.
 
Exclusions: consider whether you wish to exclude indirect or consequential loss (as this could extend to loss of time). Be careful of broad term exclusions that are usually found in bespoke sellers' contracts. Make sure that any exclusions apply mutually to both contractual parties if they are agreed.
 
Law and Jurisdiction: avoid the application of US law (due to maritime lien rights) and agree on a neutral law/jurisdiction that is not necessarily the sellers' choice.
 
These suggestions come from our experience in disputes and litigation involving bunker quality. It is important for buyers to understand the consequences of accepting sellers' terms and well worth the effort to attempt to negotiate a more balanced contract. Even when the terms are not negotiable, risks can be mitigated by exercising due diligence before selecting the seller.
 
We thank HFW solicitors, Rory Butler and Louise Lazarou for their contribution to Gard Insight. Gard publishes articles, alerts and circulars concerning the MARPOL 2020 low sulphur requirements that are available on the Gard website including topics such as residual fuel specifications and testing for sulphur content, stability and compatibility of very low sulphur fuel oils,  preparing crew for port state inspections and limitations on P&I cover for non-compliance.    

by Rory Butler, Partner, and Louise Lazarou, Senior Associate
Holman Fenwick Willan 
Source: GARD


If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.

Recent News

Thursday, 19 November 20
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
As we are moving towards the end of the year, the overall deal landscape of the dry bulk sector corresponding to the second half of 2020 (up to dat ...


Tuesday, 17 November 20
COAL SQUEEZE INTENSIFIES - BALTIC EXCHANGE
The message from the top is clear: cut out coal. While the regulatory pressure has been evident for some time, the race to banish the black stuff s ...


Tuesday, 17 November 20
CHINA TAIYUAN COAL TRANSACTION PRICE INDEX UP 0.35 PCT - XINHUA
China Taiyuan coal transaction price index stood at 128.72 points Monday, up 0.35 percent week on week.   The index, released by China ...


Tuesday, 17 November 20
AUSTRALIAN COAL EXPORTS TO CHINA SLUMP, BUT PRICES ARE MIXED - REUTERS
China’s unofficial ban on coal imports from Australia is starting to take its toll on volumes, with departing cargoes down sharply so far in ...


Friday, 13 November 20
SHIPPING OUTLOOK TURNS STABLE ON EBITDA GROWTH, IMPROVING SUPPLY-DEMAND BALANCE - MOODY’S
Outlook revised to stable from negative.   The global shipping industry is on course to perform better overall than we had previously ex ...


   1 2 3 4 5   
Showing 11 to 15 news of total 6147
News by Category
Popular News
 
Total Members : 27,167
Member
Panelist
User ID
Password
Remember Me
By logging on you accept our TERMS OF USE.
Free
Register
Forgot Password
 
Our Members Are From ...

  • Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
  • Asian Development Bank
  • The University of Queensland
  • ANZ Bank - Australia
  • Glencore India Pvt. Ltd
  • Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
  • Cardiff University - UK
  • Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
  • SMC Global Power, Philippines
  • Petron Corporation, Philippines
  • Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
  • Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
  • Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
  • Aditya Birla Group - India
  • TNPL - India
  • Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
  • Permata Bank - Indonesia
  • Coal India Limited
  • Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
  • SGS (Thailand) Limited
  • GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
  • Central Electricity Authority - India
  • Agrawal Coal Company - India
  • UBS Singapore
  • Lafarge - France
  • CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
  • PetroVietnam
  • Sical Logistics Limited - India
  • Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
  • Cosco
  • IMC Shipping - Singapore
  • Rudhra Energy - India
  • WorleyParsons
  • Bhushan Steel Limited - India
  • Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
  • Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
  • Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
  • KEPCO - South Korea
  • Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
  • Panama Canal Authority
  • MEC Coal - Indonesia
  • Bangladesh Power Developement Board
  • Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
  • Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
  • Argus Media - Singapore
  • Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
  • SASOL - South Africa
  • Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
  • CNBM International Corporation - China
  • Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
  • CCIC - Indonesia
  • MS Steel International - UAE
  • Mechel - Russia
  • The Treasury - Australian Government
  • EIA - United States
  • Marubeni Corporation - India
  • Mitsui
  • Commonwealth Bank - Australia
  • India Bulls Power Limited - India
  • GB Group - China
  • Adani Power Ltd - India
  • Edison Trading Spa - Italy
  • Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
  • Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
  • Heidelberg Cement - Germany
  • TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
  • Japan Coal Energy Center
  • Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
  • IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
  • Enel Italy
  • Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
  • Bhatia International Limited - India
  • IBC Asia (S) Pte Ltd
  • Cemex - Philippines
  • Carbofer General Trading SA - India
  • Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Kobe Steel Ltd - Japan
  • SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
  • Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
  • Peabody Energy - USA
  • Romanian Commodities Exchange
  • CESC Limited - India
  • Geoservices-GeoAssay Lab
  • Surastha Cement
  • KPMG - USA
  • Indogreen Group - Indonesia
  • Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
  • Posco Energy - South Korea
  • Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
  • Australian Coal Association
  • GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
  • Economic Council, Georgia
  • RBS Sempra - UK
  • SMG Consultants - Indonesia
  • Baramulti Group, Indonesia
  • Barclays Capital - USA
  • Trasteel International SA, Italy
  • Inco-Indonesia
  • Wilmar Investment Holdings
  • The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
  • White Energy Company Limited
  • Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
  • Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
  • Coaltrans Conferences
  • LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
  • Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
  • Planning Commission, India
  • Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
  • Noble Europe Ltd - UK
  • TANGEDCO India
  • Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
  • Maybank - Singapore
  • Renaissance Capital - South Africa
  • Arch Coal - USA
  • Infraline Energy - India
  • Mercator Lines Limited - India
  • Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
  • U S Energy Resources
  • Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
  • Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
  • Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
  • GMR Energy Limited - India
  • Deutsche Bank - India
  • Siam City Cement - Thailand
  • AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
  • Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
  • J M Baxi & Co - India
  • Malabar Cements Ltd - India
  • Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
  • Sucofindo - Indonesia
  • Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
  • Tamil Nadu electricity Board
  • Cargill India Pvt Ltd
  • Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
  • Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
  • ETA - Dubai
  • SRK Consulting
  • VISA Power Limited - India
  • Thailand Anthracite
  • Idemitsu - Japan
  • Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
  • Mitra SK Pvt Ltd - India
  • Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
  • Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
  • Coal Orbis AG
  • Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
  • Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
  • Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
  • ICICI Bank Limited - India
  • EMO - The Netherlands
  • bp singapore
  • Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
  • Samsung - South Korea
  • Bank of America
  • Parry Sugars Refinery, India
  • JPower - Japan
  • NALCO India
  • Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
  • Ince & co LLP
  • globalCOAL - UK
  • Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
  • CoalTek, United States
  • Cement Manufacturers Association - India
  • Gupta Coal India Ltd
  • Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
  • Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
  • Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
  • Ernst & Young Pvt. Ltd.
  • Singapore Mercantile Exchange
  • Indian School of Mines
  • Ministry of Transport, Egypt
  • Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
  • Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
  • Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
  • Independent Power Producers Association of India
  • Sojitz Corporation - Japan
  • Total Coal South Africa
  • Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
  • Vale Mozambique
  • Vedanta Resources Plc - India
  • Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
  • Britmindo - Indonesia
  • Adaro Indonesia
  • Russian Coal LLC
  • Arutmin Indonesia
  • Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
  • KOWEPO - South Korea
  • Runge Indonesia
  • Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
  • OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
  • Tanito Harum - Indonesia
  • APGENCO India
  • Gresik Semen - Indonesia
  • Minerals Council of Australia
  • Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
  • Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
  • Pinang Coal Indonesia
  • Humpuss - Indonesia
  • Maersk Broker
  • Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
  • Indian Oil Corporation Limited
  • London Commodity Brokers - England
  • Tata Power - India
  • BRS Brokers - Singapore
  • Videocon Industries ltd - India
  • Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
  • Parliament of New Zealand
  • GNFC Limited - India
  • Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
  • Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
  • Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
  • Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
  • Mitsubishi Corporation
  • McConnell Dowell - Australia
  • Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
  • BNP Paribas - Singapore
  • European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
  • Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
  • Platou - Singapore
  • Xstrata Coal
  • JPMorgan - India
  • Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
  • PLN Batubara - Indonesia
  • Bank of China, Malaysia
  • Petrosea - Indonesia
  • Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
  • Merrill Lynch Bank
  • Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
  • Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
  • Latin American Coal - Colombia
  • Dalmia Cement Bharat India
  • Indonesia Power. PT
  • PowerSource Philippines DevCo
  • Clarksons - UK
  • Thermax Limited - India
  • Indika Energy - Indonesia
  • Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
  • Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • World Bank
  • Georgia Ports Authority, United States
  • PLN - Indonesia
  • Coeclerici Indonesia
  • Asia Cement - Taiwan
  • Qatrana Cement - Jordan
  • Coal and Oil Company - UAE
  • Cebu Energy, Philippines
  • Reliance Power - India
  • ASAPP Information Group - India
  • Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
  • Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
  • Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
  • International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
  • Thai Mozambique Logistica
  • Vitol - Bahrain
  • Bangkok Bank PCL
  • PTC India Limited - India
  • Star Paper Mills Limited - India
  • IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
  • SUEK AG - Indonesia
  • Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
  • Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
  • Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
  • Medco Energi Mining Internasional
  • Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
  • NTPC Limited - India
  • TRAFIGURA, South Korea
  • Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
  • ING Bank NV - Singapore
  • Xindia Steels Limited - India
  • KPCL - India
  • The India Cements Ltd
  • Berau Coal - Indonesia
  • Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
  • DBS Bank - Singapore
  • Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
  • PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
  • Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
  • Anglo American - United Kingdom
  • Indonesian Coal Mining Association
  • Fearnleys - India
  • Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
  • Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
  • Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
  • Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
  • OCBC - Singapore
  • Interocean Group of Companies - India
  • San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
  • Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
  • Eastern Energy - Thailand
  • Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
  • Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
  • Core Mineral Indonesia
  • Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
  • Indorama - Singapore
  • Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
  • Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
  • World Coal - UK
  • Thriveni
  • HSBC - Hong Kong
  • IOL Indonesia
  • Platts
  • Goldman Sachs - Singapore
  • Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
  • Thiess Contractors Indonesia
  • Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
  • Inspectorate - India
  • TGV SRAAC LIMITED, India
  • Ministry of Mines - Canada
  • Freeport Indonesia
  • Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
  • Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
  • Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
  • Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
  • Shree Cement - India
  • Moodys - Singapore
  • Shenhua Group - China
  • TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
  • Chamber of Mines of South Africa
  • McKinsey & Co - India
  • South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
  • PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
  • Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
  • Thomson Reuters GRC
  • Mjunction Services Limited - India
  • Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
  • Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
  • Jatenergy - Australia
  • Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
  • Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
  • Deloitte Consulting - India
  • Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
  • Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
  • Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
  • New Zealand Coal & Carbon
  • Energy Development Corp, Philippines
  • ACC Limited - India
  • Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
  • GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
  • GHCL Limited - India
  • Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
  • Malco - India
  • Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
  • Credit Suisse - India
  • Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
  • Eastern Coal Council - USA
  • Central Java Power - Indonesia
  • Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
  • Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
  • Maruti Cements - India
  • UOB Asia (HK) Ltd