COALspot.com keeps you connected across the coal world
  • JANAURY 2021 INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE FOR EXPORTS FIXED AT US$ 75.84 A TON

Submit Your Articles
We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining, shipping, etc.

To Submit your article please click here.

International Energy Events


WTI Crude Oil

BRENT Crude Oil

Search News
Latest CoalNews Headlines
Tuesday, 09 June 20
BUNKER SUPPLY CONTRACTS - KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE BUYER - GARD
GARDKNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE

Regardless of whether a buyer purchases fuel directly from physical suppliers or via brokers or traders and whether sale is under a global framework agreement or ad hoc on a port by port basis, a common feature is that the seller’s terms generally prevail.
 
On 1 January 2020, the lower sulphur limit imposed pursuant to IMO 2020 regulations came into effect. The new regulations have been written about extensively by Gard and others in the shipping and insurance industries.  However, the terms upon which bunkers are purchased is perhaps not given the consideration it deserves
 
Sellers' terms often incorporate fixed (often low) limits on sellers’ liability, exclusions for certain types of loss (e.g. loss of time, profit, indirect or consequential loss), short time bars for buyers’ claims, and evidential and law and jurisdiction clauses in sellers' favour. There have been moves to try and work towards standard bunker purchase contracts with BIMCO introducing BIMCO Bunker Purchase Terms in 2015 which were updated in 2018. These contracts are more balanced than typical sellers' standard terms, and representatives from owners, charterers and bunker companies were all involved in the drafting process.
 
From a commercial bargaining perspective, it may be easier to negotiate more balanced terms if they are agreed in advance as part of a worldwide framework agreement to buy bunkers from a single or small number of sellers.
 
Taking the BIMCO Terms as a starting point buyers may try to negotiate on some of the following checklist key items:
 
Bunker supply contracts – key issues checklist
Due diligence with respect to the seller: considermarket reputation and financial standing of sellers, in terms of financial standing and insurance position (see below) and involvement in previous supply issues. 
Are they also a physical supplier or only an intermediary? 
How do they verify the quality of the fuel supplied? 
What are their supply chain quality management procedures?
 
Due diligence with respect to the fuel: consider what information you need about the fuel and its origin.  Are there any special parameters regarding storage, handling, treatment and use of the fuel on board? Do you require specific information in the Certificate of Quality?
 
Helpful Joint Industry Guidance is available on the supply and use of 0.50%-sulphur fuel:
 
Fuel specification: the contract should identify the correct specification of the fuel - for example by expressly stating the relevant ISO specification. For residual fuels, the most widely used specification is ISO 8217 Table 2.  The Table 2 specification for sulphur content is stated as per “statutory requirements” and, since 1 January 2020, the global MARPOL sulphur limit is 0.50% with lower limits set for SECAs. ISO 8217 is periodically revised and the industry guidance recommends the most recent version, ISO 8217 2017. Check whether the fuel specified in your bunker supply terms complies with IMO 2020 and that this also accords with charterparty requirements so it is back-to-back. A further point to consider adding is an express term that the fuel is free of contaminants, is fit for purpose and complies with MARPOL. 
 
Sampling and quality testing: the contract should specify the agreed sampling and quality testing regime, including for sulphur content. Ideally, a sample from each of the bunker supplier and the vessel should be analysed as opposed to only the supplier's sample.  Again, insofar as possible, sampling and testing requirements need to match the charterparty so the buyer is not exposed to different test standards. Ideally, the sampling process should be set out in detail in the contract together with the agreed analysis regime that is to be used. Consideration should also be given as to whether preferred accredited labs for testing should be identified in the contract. In the event there is a dispute about the quality or characteristic of the particular stem, inability to agree to a lab for testing may complicate and delay resolution. 
 
Quality claims time bar: the contract should ideally include a quality claim time bar that allows sufficient time for quality testing to be performed, taking into consideration that testing might need to take place at an accredited lab located at a place other than the place of supply. In our experience, bunker contract time bars are normally far too short, especially given that bunkers may not be immediately used (for example bunker test results may be required under the charter before the bunkers are in fact used) and even when used promptly problems may not manifest themselves immediately. We have seen cases where the bunker recourse claim against the supplier is time barred before the bunkers have been used. It is recommended to link any time bar to 14 days after use of the bunkers or alternatively to have a much longer time bar period, for example 45 days.
 
Limitation of liability: standard bunker supply contracts usually include a low mutual limitation of liability figure (usually one or at most two times the invoiced value of the fuel). Consider negotiating increased limitation of liability sums to reflect the fact that losses arising from loading or consumption of off-specification fuel can be very high in value. It is suggested that at least twice the value of the fuel or more should be targeted where possible. An alternative option is to include reference to both a specific amount and at least twice the value of the fuel provision, with the highest of the two applying. Lastly, make sure that any limitation agreed applies mutually to both parties (rather than just the sellers).
 
The "OW Bunkers" issue: if buying direct from a physical supplier there is less risk, but if purchasing via a broker or trader there is a risk they may not have paid their counterpart for the bunkers which could, in the event of their insolvency, lead to competing payment demands and the risk for the buyer of having to pay twice.  It is sensible to include provisions under which the sellers warrant they have paid for the bunkers and the buyer has a right to request evidence from the sellers that they have paid any third parties for the bunkers before the buyer is required to pay the sellers' invoice, such that if no evidence is provided the buyer may withhold payment/hold sellers in breach.
 
It is further prudent to include a term that in the event of bankruptcy of the sellers, the buyer will be entitled to withhold payment for the fuel until the relevant court/tribunal determines whether sellers or the physical suppliers or any third parties have a claim directly against the buyer/vessel. If there is such a determination, the contract can also provide that payment to a party other than sellers for the fuel, as determined by the relevant court/tribunal, shall be deemed to subordinate the claim to the rightful party in order to safeguard the buyer from having to pay more than one party (and more than once!) for the fuel.
 
Consider also making the contract subject to the Sale of Goods Act 1979, so as to make the contract a contract of sale (thus bringing in the Act's protection so far as fitness for purpose and quality are concerned, and the requirement that the Sellers also have good title to the fuel at the time of sale to the buyer).  
 
Insurance: sellers should ideally have insurance in place and should be required to produce evidence of this. Such insurance may for example include credit, professional indemnity and product liability insurance.
 
Local rules and regulations: most standard term contracts incorporate local rules and regulations into the bunker supply contracts. Local rules and regulations can bring about surprises that the parties to the contract might not be aware of at the time of contracting. Consideration is accordingly recommended to be given to the exclusion of local rules and regulations either in their entirety or to limit their applicability to fuel sampling only.
 
Uniform bunker supply terms: ideally the same supply terms should be used across the board with all suppliers so as to have certainty over the risk allocation and to avoid the use of ad hoc supplier friendly terms. In effect, have a framework agreement/standard terms agreed with major suppliers.
 
Lien: try and avoid provisions that give the sellers a lien over the vessel or any rights of action against third parties (e.g. the owner if the charterer is the buyer) as this can cause serious issues under the charterparty. A further point to consider, is to add an express provision that the sellers must hold the buyer harmless and indemnify the buyer in the event that a third party asserts a lien or encumbrance on the vessel in relation to the fuel purchased from the sellers. Similarly, a clause can also be included by which the sellers warrant that no third party has any right to claim against the buyer in relation to the fuel, or exercise any right of lien, charge, encumbrance or arrest over the vessel or any sister vessels in respect of the fuel. Lastly, consider including a provision that if such a claim nevertheless arises, the sellers shall co-operate to allow interpleader proceedings. See also our comments on the OW Bunkers issue above.
 
Exclusions: consider whether you wish to exclude indirect or consequential loss (as this could extend to loss of time). Be careful of broad term exclusions that are usually found in bespoke sellers' contracts. Make sure that any exclusions apply mutually to both contractual parties if they are agreed.
 
Law and Jurisdiction: avoid the application of US law (due to maritime lien rights) and agree on a neutral law/jurisdiction that is not necessarily the sellers' choice.
 
These suggestions come from our experience in disputes and litigation involving bunker quality. It is important for buyers to understand the consequences of accepting sellers' terms and well worth the effort to attempt to negotiate a more balanced contract. Even when the terms are not negotiable, risks can be mitigated by exercising due diligence before selecting the seller.
 
We thank HFW solicitors, Rory Butler and Louise Lazarou for their contribution to Gard Insight. Gard publishes articles, alerts and circulars concerning the MARPOL 2020 low sulphur requirements that are available on the Gard website including topics such as residual fuel specifications and testing for sulphur content, stability and compatibility of very low sulphur fuel oils,  preparing crew for port state inspections and limitations on P&I cover for non-compliance.    

by Rory Butler, Partner, and Louise Lazarou, Senior Associate
Holman Fenwick Willan 
Source: GARD


If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.

Recent News

Wednesday, 13 January 21
CHINA THERMAL GENCO PROFITS FACE PRESSURE AMID POWER SHORTAGES - FITHCH WIRE
High coal and gas prices will put near-term pressure on margins for thermal power generators in China, says Fitch Ratings. However, the power short ...


Wednesday, 13 January 21
COAL TO BE BIGGEST CONTRIBUTOR TO INDIA'S $5 TRILLION ECONOMY: AMIT SHAH - BUSINESS STANDARD
The Centre on Monday awarded the letter of allocation to successful bidders of coal mines under the commercial auction held during October-November ...


Monday, 11 January 21
MUTED COAL RECOVERY IN 2021 - BALTIC EXCHANGE
Coal demand is expected to rebound in 2021   Medium-term outlook is less favourable although demand declines are expected to be subtle ...


Sunday, 10 January 21
KOREAN GENCOS INVITED BIDS FOR TOTAL 880,000 TONS OF COAL FOR MARCH 2021 LOADING
COALspot.com: Korea South-East Power Co., Ltd. (KOEN),  on behalf of EWP, KOSPO, KOSEP and KOWEPO issued an international tender for total 880 ...


Friday, 08 January 21
INDIA COULD COMPETE AGAINST CHINA IN SOLAR MODULE PRODUCTION WITH THE RIGHT GOVERNMENT SUPPORT - IEEFA
The focus should be on helping manufacturers become globally competitive Although one of the top 10 solar module producers in the world, India ...


   1 2 3 4 5   
Showing 6 to 10 news of total 6204
News by Category
Popular News
 
Total Members : 27,251
Member
Panelist
User ID
Password
Remember Me
By logging on you accept our TERMS OF USE.
Free
Register
Forgot Password
 
Our Members Are From ...

  • ACC Limited - India
  • Ernst & Young Pvt. Ltd.
  • Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
  • Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
  • Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
  • Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
  • Bhatia International Limited - India
  • globalCOAL - UK
  • Indogreen Group - Indonesia
  • Posco Energy - South Korea
  • Minerals Council of Australia
  • AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
  • Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
  • Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
  • Indika Energy - Indonesia
  • Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
  • EIA - United States
  • Maybank - Singapore
  • Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
  • IMC Shipping - Singapore
  • Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
  • Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
  • Lafarge - France
  • Pinang Coal Indonesia
  • Videocon Industries ltd - India
  • Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
  • Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
  • Sical Logistics Limited - India
  • Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
  • Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
  • ANZ Bank - Australia
  • Dalmia Cement Bharat India
  • NTPC Limited - India
  • Maersk Broker
  • Heidelberg Cement - Germany
  • PTC India Limited - India
  • Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
  • CESC Limited - India
  • McConnell Dowell - Australia
  • Freeport Indonesia
  • Coal Orbis AG
  • World Coal - UK
  • Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
  • Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
  • Clarksons - UK
  • Siam City Cement - Thailand
  • Coal and Oil Company - UAE
  • Malco - India
  • Mechel - Russia
  • Japan Coal Energy Center
  • BRS Brokers - Singapore
  • Samsung - South Korea
  • Trasteel International SA, Italy
  • Cardiff University - UK
  • Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
  • Eastern Energy - Thailand
  • IOL Indonesia
  • Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
  • Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
  • Indian Oil Corporation Limited
  • Bhushan Steel Limited - India
  • MS Steel International - UAE
  • Asia Cement - Taiwan
  • Cosco
  • SASOL - South Africa
  • Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
  • Mjunction Services Limited - India
  • CoalTek, United States
  • Argus Media - Singapore
  • Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
  • Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
  • Bangladesh Power Developement Board
  • Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
  • Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
  • Coal India Limited
  • Indonesian Coal Mining Association
  • Noble Europe Ltd - UK
  • Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
  • SGS (Thailand) Limited
  • UBS Singapore
  • Commonwealth Bank - Australia
  • PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
  • Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
  • Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
  • European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
  • Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
  • Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
  • GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
  • Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
  • Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
  • Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
  • GHCL Limited - India
  • Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
  • Rudhra Energy - India
  • International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
  • Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
  • TGV SRAAC LIMITED, India
  • Coeclerici Indonesia
  • Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
  • Deutsche Bank - India
  • Platts
  • Parliament of New Zealand
  • LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
  • Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
  • SMG Consultants - Indonesia
  • Xindia Steels Limited - India
  • Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
  • Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
  • PLN - Indonesia
  • Panama Canal Authority
  • Cement Manufacturers Association - India
  • Sucofindo - Indonesia
  • Berau Coal - Indonesia
  • IBC Asia (S) Pte Ltd
  • KPCL - India
  • Russian Coal LLC
  • Tata Power - India
  • Economic Council, Georgia
  • Petrosea - Indonesia
  • Petron Corporation, Philippines
  • Moodys - Singapore
  • Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
  • ASAPP Information Group - India
  • WorleyParsons
  • Core Mineral Indonesia
  • KPMG - USA
  • Ministry of Transport, Egypt
  • Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
  • New Zealand Coal & Carbon
  • Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
  • Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
  • Ince & co LLP
  • GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
  • RBS Sempra - UK
  • Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • Geoservices-GeoAssay Lab
  • Tanito Harum - Indonesia
  • DBS Bank - Singapore
  • Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
  • Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
  • Aditya Birla Group - India
  • Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
  • Renaissance Capital - South Africa
  • Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
  • Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
  • The University of Queensland
  • Credit Suisse - India
  • Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
  • Eastern Coal Council - USA
  • London Commodity Brokers - England
  • Australian Coal Association
  • Chamber of Mines of South Africa
  • CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
  • Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
  • Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
  • Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
  • Thai Mozambique Logistica
  • Kobe Steel Ltd - Japan
  • Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
  • Xstrata Coal
  • KOWEPO - South Korea
  • Thiess Contractors Indonesia
  • PowerSource Philippines DevCo
  • Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
  • Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
  • Cebu Energy, Philippines
  • Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
  • EMO - The Netherlands
  • Medco Energi Mining Internasional
  • The Treasury - Australian Government
  • Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
  • Malabar Cements Ltd - India
  • Energy Development Corp, Philippines
  • Romanian Commodities Exchange
  • Inspectorate - India
  • Glencore India Pvt. Ltd
  • San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
  • BNP Paribas - Singapore
  • Thomson Reuters GRC
  • Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
  • Bangkok Bank PCL
  • Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
  • bp singapore
  • Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
  • TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
  • Tamil Nadu electricity Board
  • Arutmin Indonesia
  • CNBM International Corporation - China
  • GB Group - China
  • Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
  • Adaro Indonesia
  • Latin American Coal - Colombia
  • Interocean Group of Companies - India
  • Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
  • Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
  • Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
  • Reliance Power - India
  • Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
  • Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
  • J M Baxi & Co - India
  • Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
  • Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
  • VISA Power Limited - India
  • Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
  • MEC Coal - Indonesia
  • Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
  • Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
  • Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
  • Enel Italy
  • Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
  • TNPL - India
  • Shree Cement - India
  • Mercator Lines Limited - India
  • UOB Asia (HK) Ltd
  • Goldman Sachs - Singapore
  • Gresik Semen - Indonesia
  • Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
  • Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
  • TRAFIGURA, South Korea
  • Carbofer General Trading SA - India
  • Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
  • Total Coal South Africa
  • The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
  • Marubeni Corporation - India
  • Central Java Power - Indonesia
  • Arch Coal - USA
  • Idemitsu - Japan
  • Infraline Energy - India
  • Inco-Indonesia
  • Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
  • Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
  • Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
  • Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
  • Britmindo - Indonesia
  • Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
  • Thailand Anthracite
  • Bank of China, Malaysia
  • Ministry of Mines - Canada
  • Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
  • Thermax Limited - India
  • Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
  • Cemex - Philippines
  • Humpuss - Indonesia
  • World Bank
  • Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
  • Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
  • Indian School of Mines
  • Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
  • Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
  • Mitsubishi Corporation
  • Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
  • Georgia Ports Authority, United States
  • SMC Global Power, Philippines
  • Maruti Cements - India
  • Vitol - Bahrain
  • Parry Sugars Refinery, India
  • Merrill Lynch Bank
  • Indonesia Power. PT
  • Gupta Coal India Ltd
  • Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
  • Deloitte Consulting - India
  • GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
  • Runge Indonesia
  • ETA - Dubai
  • Jatenergy - Australia
  • Thriveni
  • Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Edison Trading Spa - Italy
  • Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
  • PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
  • ICICI Bank Limited - India
  • Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
  • Surastha Cement
  • Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
  • Barclays Capital - USA
  • Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
  • Adani Power Ltd - India
  • JPower - Japan
  • PLN Batubara - Indonesia
  • TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
  • GMR Energy Limited - India
  • Platou - Singapore
  • Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
  • IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
  • GNFC Limited - India
  • Independent Power Producers Association of India
  • OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
  • Shenhua Group - China
  • OCBC - Singapore
  • SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
  • Coaltrans Conferences
  • Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
  • JPMorgan - India
  • Peabody Energy - USA
  • Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
  • Central Electricity Authority - India
  • Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
  • Asian Development Bank
  • South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
  • PetroVietnam
  • McKinsey & Co - India
  • Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
  • Planning Commission, India
  • Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
  • Sojitz Corporation - Japan
  • TANGEDCO India
  • Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
  • Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
  • Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
  • Bank of America
  • Fearnleys - India
  • White Energy Company Limited
  • Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
  • SRK Consulting
  • SUEK AG - Indonesia
  • Indorama - Singapore
  • Vale Mozambique
  • Cargill India Pvt Ltd
  • Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
  • Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
  • CCIC - Indonesia
  • Star Paper Mills Limited - India
  • Mitra SK Pvt Ltd - India
  • Baramulti Group, Indonesia
  • Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
  • The India Cements Ltd
  • Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
  • Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
  • NALCO India
  • ING Bank NV - Singapore
  • Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
  • Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
  • Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
  • Singapore Mercantile Exchange
  • Anglo American - United Kingdom
  • APGENCO India
  • IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
  • Permata Bank - Indonesia
  • Agrawal Coal Company - India
  • U S Energy Resources
  • Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
  • Vedanta Resources Plc - India
  • Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
  • Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
  • Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
  • Mitsui
  • HSBC - Hong Kong
  • India Bulls Power Limited - India
  • Wilmar Investment Holdings
  • Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
  • KEPCO - South Korea
  • Qatrana Cement - Jordan