We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 05 June 20
U.S. SANCTIONS COMPLIANCE GUIDANCE RELEASED FOR THE GLOBAL MARITIME, ENERGY AND METALS SECTORS - AKIN GUMP
 Key Points
-
On May 14, 2020, OFAC, the Department of State and the U.S. Coast Guard jointly released guidance for persons involved in the maritime industry regarding common deceptive shipping practices used to subvert U.S. and United Nations sanctions programs targeting Iran, North Korea and Syria.
-
The guidance highlights certain deceptive practices employed in maritime activity that could signal sanctions evasion.
-
The guidance also contains specific measures that the maritime industry and energy and metals sectors can take to tailor their sanctions compliance programs to avoid sanctions violations or otherwise supporting illicit shipping activities.
-
This Guidance is part of a sustained focus on the international shipping industry, including the U.S. Government’s latest enforcement actions in the shipping sector on June 2, 2020.
The Guidance
On May 14, 2020, the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), the Department of State and the U.S. Coast Guard jointly released guidance (the “Guidance”) regarding common deceptive shipping practices in order to aid persons involved in the maritime industry, and energy and metals sectors, in tailoring their due diligence and sanctions compliance policies and procedures. The Guidance is particularly targeted towards ship owners, managers, operators, brokers, ship chandlers, flag registries, port operators, shipping companies, freight forwarders, classification service providers, commodity traders, insurance companies and financial institutions. The shipping industry continues to present particularly challenging issues associated with U.S. sanctions compliance, including the involvement of numerous parties in particular voyages all with different, yet overlapping risks.
The Guidance continues a further and concerted effort by OFAC to focus in particular on the shipping industry and builds on prior advisories that it has issued directed at the shipping industry, including one issued on September 4, 2019, entitled “Sanctions Risks Related to Shipping Petroleum and Petroleum Products from Iran” that also identified specific deceptive shipping practices and risk mitigation measures for the industry. As the U.S. Government’s latest enforcement actions on June 2, 2020 demonstrate, OFAC sanctions enforcement attention is squarely focused on the international shipping industry.
The Guidance also provides important insights for companies operating in the maritime sector regarding the criteria that OFAC applies when evaluating an effective sanctions compliance program for such companies.
Below we summarize key points from the Guidance that are relevant for the shipping sector, including a summary of deceptive practices highlighted in the Guidance, a summary of general practices for effective identification of potential sanctions evasion and summaries of guidance for certain actors in the maritime industry and country-specific guidance.
Deceptive Shipping Practices
The Guidance provides a summary of common tactics utilized to facilitate sanctionable or illicit maritime trade linked to Iran, North Korea and Syria, including:
-
Disabling or manipulating the Automatic Identification System (AIS) on vessels to conceal a vessel’s port of call or other information regarding its voyage.
-
Physically altering vessel identification to obscure the identities of sanctioned vessels or vessels engaging in sanctionable activities.
-
Falsifying cargo and vessel documents, particularly with respect to shipments involving petrochemicals, petroleum, petroleum products, metals (steel, iron) or sand to disguise their origin.
-
Ship-to-Ship (STS) Transfers used to conceal origin/destination of products.
-
Voyage irregularities to disguise the ultimate destination or origin of cargo, including indirect routing, unscheduled detours or transit or transshipment of cargo through third countries.
-
False flags and flag hopping (i.e., repeatedly registering vessels with new flag states).
-
Use of complex ownership or management to disguise the ultimate beneficial owner of cargo or commodities in order to avoid sanctions or other enforcement actions.
General Practices for Effective Identification of Sanctions Evasion
The Guidance also highlights, and provides details regarding, the following practices for effective identification of potential sanctions evasion:
-
Institutionalizing a sanctions compliance program, including through the implementation of written standardized operational compliance policies, procedures, standards of conduct and safeguards.
-
Establishing AIS best practices and contractual requirements that make disabling/manipulating AIS for illegitimate reasons grounds for termination of contracts or investigations.
-
Monitoring ships throughout the entire transaction lifecycle, including through supplementing AIS with Long Range Identification and Tracking (LRIT) and receiving periodic LRIT signals on a frequency informed by the entity’s risk assessment.
-
Conducting “Know Your Customer” due diligence on customers and counterparties, which could include “maintaining the names, passport ID numbers, address(es), phone number(s), email address(es), and copies of photo identification of each customer’s beneficial owner(s).”
-
Exercising supply chain due diligence, including, as appropriate, conducting due diligence to ensure that recipients and counterparties to a transaction are not sending or receiving commodities that may trigger sanctions, such as Iranian petroleum or North Korea-origin coal, and implementing controls that allow for verification-of-origin and recipient checks for ships that conduct STS transfers.
-
Incorporating the above “best practices” into contracts.
-
Sharing information about sanctions evasion techniques and threats amongst industry groups.
Annex A: Actor-specific Guidance
In Annex A, the Guidance provides bulleted lists of guidance and information for particular actors within the maritime industry, including: maritime insurance companies, flag registry managers, port state control authorities, shipping industry associations, regional and global commodity trading, supplier, and brokering companies, financial institutions, ship owners, operators, and charterers, classification societies, vessel captains and crewing companies.
Below we summarize the guidance with respect to ship owners, operators and charterers, vessel captains and crewing companies.
Ship Owners, Operators, and Charterers:
-
Identify vessels that, in the past two years, have a pattern of AIS manipulation not consistent with the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea and terminating business relationships with clients that continue to use those vessels.
-
Keep and analyze records, including, where possible, photographs, of delivery and recipient vessels and/or recipients located at ports when possible, to enhance end-use verification.
-
Protect employees who reveal illegal or sanctionable behavior from retaliation.
-
Incorporate data into due diligence practices from organizations that provide commercial shipping data.
-
Communicate to counterparts as necessary and appropriate (e.g., ship owners, managers, charterers, operators) an expectation that they have adequate and appropriate compliance policies.
Vessel Captains:
-
Ensure deck officers are aware of the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) AIS regulations, including the requirement to consistently broadcast AIS transmissions.
-
Communicate to ship owners and charterers that vessels are monitored for AIS disablement and that any occurrences of AIS disablement will be investigated.
-
Understand vessels’ AIS history to determine whether they may have been involved in illicit activities.
-
Before engaging in ship-to-ship transfers, verify the other vessel’s name, IMO number and flag, and ensure there is a legitimate business purpose for the transfer.
Crewing Companies:
-
Ensure crewmembers are aware of IMO guidance in relation to illicit shipping and the reasons why certain practices are unsafe.
-
Communicate to clients that crews are monitored for AIS disablement and that any occurrences of AIS disablement will be investigated.
-
Understand vessels’ AIS history to determine whether it may have been involved in illicit activities.
-
Ensure that crewmembers who reveal illegal or sanctionable activity are protected from retaliation and providing a confidential mechanism for reporting sanctionable conduct.
Annex B: Country Guidance
In Annex B, the Guidance summarizes relevant provisions of U.S. and U.N. sanctions programs concerning North Korea, Iran and Syria and actions prohibited under said programs relevant to the maritime industry. It also highlights a few points with respect to recent deceptive practices to facilitate illicit shipping to North Korea, Syria, and Iran which are summarized below.
North Korea:
North Korea reportedly exported 3.7 million metric tons of coal between January and August 2019, in violation of U.N. sanctions. Further, while under United Nations Security Council Resolution 2397, North Korea is limited to importing a maximum of 500,000 barrels of petroleum per year, from January to October 2019. North Korea ports received 221 tanker deliveries, which, if fully laden, would result in approximately 3.89 million barrels of imports. According to the Guidance, these illicit exports and imports are primarily effectuated via ship-to-ship transfers in Chinese territorial seas. Image 1 below depicts the most common areas in which such ship-to-ship transfers take place.
|
|
Common Locations of Ship-to-Ship Transfers subverting North Korean Sanctions1 |
North Korea is also reportedly acquiring vessels destined for scrapping and non-ocean-going barges that do not transmit AIS signals to engage in illicit import/export operations.
Syria:
The Guidance notes that “the supply chain and petroleum-related shipments [to Syria] create significant sanctions risk for those in the maritime industry.” As an example, it highlights the September 2019 OFAC action against Maritime Assistance LLC for facilitating the sale and delivery of jet fuel to Russian military forces operating in Syria. It also highlights the OFAC action in the November 2018 scheme in which Iranian and Russian entities engaged in a payment offsetting arrangement in which the sale and shipment of Iranian oil to Syria provided funding to Iran and proxy groups such as Hizballah, the Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS) and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Quds Force (IRGC-QF).
Iran:
The Guidance did not provide specific guidance with respect to deceptive shipping practices used to subvert Iran-related sanctions—rather, it noted that the IRGC-QF continues to try to evade U.S. sanctions “by obfuscating the origin, destination, and recipient of oil shipments,” stating that “the use of such deceptive tactics is unique neither to Iran nor to Iran’s petroleum industry.”
Companies in the shipping industry or whose businesses intersect the shipping sector should assess their sanctions risk in light of this latest U.S. government guidance and make necessary modifications or enhancements to their compliance programs to mitigate this risk.
Source: Akin Gump, Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 02 June 20
THE HISTORIC DECLINE OF US COAL - WOOD MACKENZIE
The first commercial power plant in the US was Thomas Edison’s coal-fired Pearl Street station in lower Manhattan, which started operating in ...
Tuesday, 02 June 20
COAL INDIA'S MAY SALES DRIVEN SHARPLY LOWER BY SLUMP IN POWER DEMAND - REUTER
Coal India’s sales fell 23.3% in May as utilities refrained from purchases amid record stockpiles and tepid demand because of a nationwide lo ...
Tuesday, 02 June 20
TUAH TURANGGA AGUNG RECORDED 4.54 MILLION TONS OF COAL SALES IN THE FIRST FOUR MONTHS OF 2020
PT United Tractors Tbk through its subsidiary, PT Tuah Turangga Agung recorded 4.54 million tons of coal sales in the first four months of 2020, up ...
Tuesday, 02 June 20
SOURING SINO-AUSTRALIA TRADE RELATIONS - BALTIC EXCHANGE
Cooling relations between the commodity powerhouses of China and Australia may point to trade troubles ahead when the world emerges from the Covid- ...
Tuesday, 02 June 20
CHINA TAIYUAN COAL TRANSACTION PRICE INDEX DOWN 0.86 PCT - XINHUA
China Taiyuan coal transaction price index stood at 123.95 points Monday, down 0.86 percent week on week.
The index, released by Chi ...
|
|
|
Showing 936 to 940 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Australian Coal Association
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
|
| |
| |
|
