We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 05 June 20
U.S. SANCTIONS COMPLIANCE GUIDANCE RELEASED FOR THE GLOBAL MARITIME, ENERGY AND METALS SECTORS - AKIN GUMP
 Key Points
-
On May 14, 2020, OFAC, the Department of State and the U.S. Coast Guard jointly released guidance for persons involved in the maritime industry regarding common deceptive shipping practices used to subvert U.S. and United Nations sanctions programs targeting Iran, North Korea and Syria.
-
The guidance highlights certain deceptive practices employed in maritime activity that could signal sanctions evasion.
-
The guidance also contains specific measures that the maritime industry and energy and metals sectors can take to tailor their sanctions compliance programs to avoid sanctions violations or otherwise supporting illicit shipping activities.
-
This Guidance is part of a sustained focus on the international shipping industry, including the U.S. Government’s latest enforcement actions in the shipping sector on June 2, 2020.
The Guidance
On May 14, 2020, the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), the Department of State and the U.S. Coast Guard jointly released guidance (the “Guidance”) regarding common deceptive shipping practices in order to aid persons involved in the maritime industry, and energy and metals sectors, in tailoring their due diligence and sanctions compliance policies and procedures. The Guidance is particularly targeted towards ship owners, managers, operators, brokers, ship chandlers, flag registries, port operators, shipping companies, freight forwarders, classification service providers, commodity traders, insurance companies and financial institutions. The shipping industry continues to present particularly challenging issues associated with U.S. sanctions compliance, including the involvement of numerous parties in particular voyages all with different, yet overlapping risks.
The Guidance continues a further and concerted effort by OFAC to focus in particular on the shipping industry and builds on prior advisories that it has issued directed at the shipping industry, including one issued on September 4, 2019, entitled “Sanctions Risks Related to Shipping Petroleum and Petroleum Products from Iran” that also identified specific deceptive shipping practices and risk mitigation measures for the industry. As the U.S. Government’s latest enforcement actions on June 2, 2020 demonstrate, OFAC sanctions enforcement attention is squarely focused on the international shipping industry.
The Guidance also provides important insights for companies operating in the maritime sector regarding the criteria that OFAC applies when evaluating an effective sanctions compliance program for such companies.
Below we summarize key points from the Guidance that are relevant for the shipping sector, including a summary of deceptive practices highlighted in the Guidance, a summary of general practices for effective identification of potential sanctions evasion and summaries of guidance for certain actors in the maritime industry and country-specific guidance.
Deceptive Shipping Practices
The Guidance provides a summary of common tactics utilized to facilitate sanctionable or illicit maritime trade linked to Iran, North Korea and Syria, including:
-
Disabling or manipulating the Automatic Identification System (AIS) on vessels to conceal a vessel’s port of call or other information regarding its voyage.
-
Physically altering vessel identification to obscure the identities of sanctioned vessels or vessels engaging in sanctionable activities.
-
Falsifying cargo and vessel documents, particularly with respect to shipments involving petrochemicals, petroleum, petroleum products, metals (steel, iron) or sand to disguise their origin.
-
Ship-to-Ship (STS) Transfers used to conceal origin/destination of products.
-
Voyage irregularities to disguise the ultimate destination or origin of cargo, including indirect routing, unscheduled detours or transit or transshipment of cargo through third countries.
-
False flags and flag hopping (i.e., repeatedly registering vessels with new flag states).
-
Use of complex ownership or management to disguise the ultimate beneficial owner of cargo or commodities in order to avoid sanctions or other enforcement actions.
General Practices for Effective Identification of Sanctions Evasion
The Guidance also highlights, and provides details regarding, the following practices for effective identification of potential sanctions evasion:
-
Institutionalizing a sanctions compliance program, including through the implementation of written standardized operational compliance policies, procedures, standards of conduct and safeguards.
-
Establishing AIS best practices and contractual requirements that make disabling/manipulating AIS for illegitimate reasons grounds for termination of contracts or investigations.
-
Monitoring ships throughout the entire transaction lifecycle, including through supplementing AIS with Long Range Identification and Tracking (LRIT) and receiving periodic LRIT signals on a frequency informed by the entity’s risk assessment.
-
Conducting “Know Your Customer” due diligence on customers and counterparties, which could include “maintaining the names, passport ID numbers, address(es), phone number(s), email address(es), and copies of photo identification of each customer’s beneficial owner(s).”
-
Exercising supply chain due diligence, including, as appropriate, conducting due diligence to ensure that recipients and counterparties to a transaction are not sending or receiving commodities that may trigger sanctions, such as Iranian petroleum or North Korea-origin coal, and implementing controls that allow for verification-of-origin and recipient checks for ships that conduct STS transfers.
-
Incorporating the above “best practices” into contracts.
-
Sharing information about sanctions evasion techniques and threats amongst industry groups.
Annex A: Actor-specific Guidance
In Annex A, the Guidance provides bulleted lists of guidance and information for particular actors within the maritime industry, including: maritime insurance companies, flag registry managers, port state control authorities, shipping industry associations, regional and global commodity trading, supplier, and brokering companies, financial institutions, ship owners, operators, and charterers, classification societies, vessel captains and crewing companies.
Below we summarize the guidance with respect to ship owners, operators and charterers, vessel captains and crewing companies.
Ship Owners, Operators, and Charterers:
-
Identify vessels that, in the past two years, have a pattern of AIS manipulation not consistent with the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea and terminating business relationships with clients that continue to use those vessels.
-
Keep and analyze records, including, where possible, photographs, of delivery and recipient vessels and/or recipients located at ports when possible, to enhance end-use verification.
-
Protect employees who reveal illegal or sanctionable behavior from retaliation.
-
Incorporate data into due diligence practices from organizations that provide commercial shipping data.
-
Communicate to counterparts as necessary and appropriate (e.g., ship owners, managers, charterers, operators) an expectation that they have adequate and appropriate compliance policies.
Vessel Captains:
-
Ensure deck officers are aware of the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) AIS regulations, including the requirement to consistently broadcast AIS transmissions.
-
Communicate to ship owners and charterers that vessels are monitored for AIS disablement and that any occurrences of AIS disablement will be investigated.
-
Understand vessels’ AIS history to determine whether they may have been involved in illicit activities.
-
Before engaging in ship-to-ship transfers, verify the other vessel’s name, IMO number and flag, and ensure there is a legitimate business purpose for the transfer.
Crewing Companies:
-
Ensure crewmembers are aware of IMO guidance in relation to illicit shipping and the reasons why certain practices are unsafe.
-
Communicate to clients that crews are monitored for AIS disablement and that any occurrences of AIS disablement will be investigated.
-
Understand vessels’ AIS history to determine whether it may have been involved in illicit activities.
-
Ensure that crewmembers who reveal illegal or sanctionable activity are protected from retaliation and providing a confidential mechanism for reporting sanctionable conduct.
Annex B: Country Guidance
In Annex B, the Guidance summarizes relevant provisions of U.S. and U.N. sanctions programs concerning North Korea, Iran and Syria and actions prohibited under said programs relevant to the maritime industry. It also highlights a few points with respect to recent deceptive practices to facilitate illicit shipping to North Korea, Syria, and Iran which are summarized below.
North Korea:
North Korea reportedly exported 3.7 million metric tons of coal between January and August 2019, in violation of U.N. sanctions. Further, while under United Nations Security Council Resolution 2397, North Korea is limited to importing a maximum of 500,000 barrels of petroleum per year, from January to October 2019. North Korea ports received 221 tanker deliveries, which, if fully laden, would result in approximately 3.89 million barrels of imports. According to the Guidance, these illicit exports and imports are primarily effectuated via ship-to-ship transfers in Chinese territorial seas. Image 1 below depicts the most common areas in which such ship-to-ship transfers take place.
|
|
Common Locations of Ship-to-Ship Transfers subverting North Korean Sanctions1 |
North Korea is also reportedly acquiring vessels destined for scrapping and non-ocean-going barges that do not transmit AIS signals to engage in illicit import/export operations.
Syria:
The Guidance notes that “the supply chain and petroleum-related shipments [to Syria] create significant sanctions risk for those in the maritime industry.” As an example, it highlights the September 2019 OFAC action against Maritime Assistance LLC for facilitating the sale and delivery of jet fuel to Russian military forces operating in Syria. It also highlights the OFAC action in the November 2018 scheme in which Iranian and Russian entities engaged in a payment offsetting arrangement in which the sale and shipment of Iranian oil to Syria provided funding to Iran and proxy groups such as Hizballah, the Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS) and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Quds Force (IRGC-QF).
Iran:
The Guidance did not provide specific guidance with respect to deceptive shipping practices used to subvert Iran-related sanctions—rather, it noted that the IRGC-QF continues to try to evade U.S. sanctions “by obfuscating the origin, destination, and recipient of oil shipments,” stating that “the use of such deceptive tactics is unique neither to Iran nor to Iran’s petroleum industry.”
Companies in the shipping industry or whose businesses intersect the shipping sector should assess their sanctions risk in light of this latest U.S. government guidance and make necessary modifications or enhancements to their compliance programs to mitigate this risk.
Source: Akin Gump, Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 10 September 23
CHINA AUGUST COAL IMPORTS OF 44.3 MLN T HIT RECORD - REUTERS
China, the world’s top coal consumer, imported 44.3 million metric tons of the fuel last month, customs data showed, the highest amount in an ...
Tuesday, 22 August 23
CHINA'S COAL PRODUCTION LOGS STEADY GROWTH IN JANUARY-JULY: XINHUA
China’s output of raw coal went up 3.6 percent year on year in the first seven months of this year, official data showed.
The ...
Sunday, 13 August 23
THE COMMODITIES FEED: LNG SUPPLY RISKS LINGER - ING
Energy – OPEC sees deficit over remainder of 2023
Oil prices came under some pressure yesterday with ICE Brent settling a litt ...
Wednesday, 09 August 23
COAL TRADE TO RETURN TO 2019 LEVELS - BALTIC EXCHANGE
The International Energy Agency’s mid-year Coal Market Update for 2023 brings both positive and concerning news for the global coal industry. ...
Sunday, 23 July 23
ANALYSIS-INDIA'S COAL MINING BET STUMBLES AS WARY BANKS WEIGH RISING RISKS - REUTERS
India’s drive to ramp up coal output to meet growing energy demand is faltering due to banks’ reluctance to finance newly auctioned min ...
|
|
|
Showing 86 to 90 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- The University of Queensland
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
