keeps you connected across the coal world

Submit Your Articles
We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining, shipping, etc.

To Submit your article please click here.

International Energy Events

WTI Crude Oil

BRENT Crude Oil

Search News
Latest CoalNews Headlines
Tuesday, 21 April 20

Whilst the plight of cruise ships, stranded off shore with sick passengers and crew, may be dominating media headlines, the current COVID-19 pandemic is having a significant effect on the shipping industry as a whole. This article first explores owners’ rights to refuse to call at a port which is affected by the virus, before examining the rights, obligations and liabilities of owners under charterparties in the context of delays at loading and discharging ports.
Can owners refuse to comply with charterers’ orders?
Owners may be concerned that proceeding to a particular port could expose the crew to COVID-19, thereby endangering their health. The crew themselves may express concerns and indeed there have been recent reports in the industry press of a crew refusing to berth and allow stevedores on board the ship due to their fears of coming into contact with the virus.
However, owners are only likely to be able to refuse to proceed if there is a specific clause in the charterparty entitling them to do so, or if they can show that any safe port warranty has been breached.
Under English law, a port is considered unsafe (and the safe port warranty breached) if it a ship is unable to reach it, use it and return from it without, in the absence of some abnormal occurrence, being exposed to danger which cannot be avoided by good navigation and seamanship. An owner may wish to argue that a port is unsafe because of the danger to the health of the crew, or because of the risk of the vessel being quarantined or delayed after visiting that port.
Any dispute about the safety of the port is likely to be highly fact specific, including factors such as the spread of the virus in the port/country in question and the measures which the port have (or the crew can) put in place to limit contact between the crew and shore personnel. In most cases (at least based on the situations we have seen to date), it will be difficult to establish that a port is unsafe within the legal definition. Crews are generally able to take sufficient steps to limit their interaction with shore personnel and any delays which are incurred due to complying with quarantine restrictions are unlikely to be sufficiently lengthy to be considered a danger to the ship’s free movement. Accordingly, refusing to proceed to a particular port is likely to be risky and could expose owners to substantial claims from charterers for delays and losses.
We consider below the extent to which, if owners agree to comply with charterers’ orders, any adverse consequences of so doing – including, in particular, delays and additional port costs and expenses – are likely to be recoverable from charterers. In most cases, owners should be reluctant to refuse to comply with charterer’s voyage orders in the absence of a very real concern for the health and well-being of the crew.
BIMCO Infectious or Contagious Disease Clause
The position may be different if there is an express term in the charterparty which gives additional rights to owners. The most common clause in charterparties is BIMCO’s Infectious or Contagious Disease clause, with different versions applicable for time and voyage charterparties.
The essence of the clause is that it gives owners a right to leave, or refuse to proceed to, a port where there is a risk of exposure by the vessel to a “highly infectious or contagious disease that is seriously harmful to humans” or to a risk of quarantine or other restrictions being imposed in connection with the disease (an “affected area”). Charterers are required to provide alternative voyage orders and indemnify owners for additional costs or expenses incurred as a result of complying with or awaiting such orders. The vessel expressly remains on hire throughout. If the owners agree to proceed to an “affected area” within the meaning of the clause, the vessel will remain on hire at all times and charterers will be liable for delays or additional costs or liabilities arising.
The clause for use in voyage charterparties has a similar effect. However, owners are only entitled to refuse to proceed to a port which has become an affected area after the date of the charterparty: owners are expected to exercise their own due diligence in respect of the state of the contractually agreed ports when agreeing the fixture. If alternative voyage orders are issued, owners are entitled to recover additional expenses and freight. If owners agree to proceed to the affected area, charterers are responsible for additional costs arising and time lost counts as laytime or time on demurrage.
It is important to note that the BIMCO clauses have not yet been tested by any court or tribunal in the context of coronavirus. This means that, although BIMCO have clarified that they believe the clause could be triggered in respect of a port affected by COVID-19, there remains a risk that the scope of the clauses could be limited. For example a court could ultimately determine that there was no real risk of exposure to the crew due to measures put in place by a port to ensure minimal interaction between the crew and shore personnel. BIMCO suggest that, unless a public health authority has declared a port as a risk to visiting ships, it is unlikely to fall within the scope of the clause. Accordingly, even if a charterparty includes such a clause, shipowners should continue to exercise due diligence by informing themselves about the situation at individual ports and assessing the specific risks on a case by case basis.
Delays at port and force majeure
A number of ports have declared “force majeure” since their ability to operate has been affected by the spread of COVID-19. In particular, operations have been slowed due to restrictions affecting the free movement of the workforce and disruptions to the supply chain have affected the routine flow of cargo through the port. Such declarations may limit shipowners’ ability to take any action against the port authorities, but would not tend to affect liabilities between owners and charterers under their charterparties, which are private contractual arrangements and very often subject to English law.
Unlike certain civil law jurisdictions, English law does not recognise “force majeure” as a general legal concept. This means that a party to a contract subject to English law cannot simply declare that they are affected by circumstances of force majeure and are therefore relieved from their obligations. They can only do so if the contract or charterparty in question contains an express force majeure clause or other exclusion / exceptions clause which grants them such rights.
The force majeure clause will set out the specific circumstances in which it can be triggered and will identify the rights and obligations of both parties when force majeure circumstances are triggered. This may include rights of termination, or be limited to an exclusion of liability for delays and non-performance. In circumstances where charterers are claiming the protection of a force majeure clause, owners will likely want to ensure their charterparty includes a right to terminate after a certain period, so that they do not end up waiting indefinitely for charterers to perform, without being able to recover hire or demurrage for that period.
If the charterparty becomes impossible to perform or performance has become radically different than the parties had anticipated due to circumstances unforeseen at the time of entering into the charterparty, it may be terminated automatically on the basis that it has been frustrated. Since any reduction or suspension of operations at a port can be expected to be temporary, it cannot be said that performance of a charterparty has become impossible – only that performance will be delayed.
In order for the charterparty to be frustrated, the delay would have to be such as would render performance radically different from that anticipated by the parties. At present, it seems unlikely that delays at a port would cause a time charter to be frustrated. Even in cases of a voyage charter or a time charter trip, the argument is likely to be difficult to make, but will depend on the particular circumstances in question, including the length of any delays, the term of the charterparty, and the information available to the parties when the charterparty was entered into.
Who is liable for delays?
If it has been established that the charterer has no right to terminate the charterparty on the grounds of force majeure and it has not been frustrated, then the parties will want to know who bears the liability for delays encountered and additional costs incurred. This will ultimately depend on (i) the factual circumstances / cause of the delays and (ii) the charterparty wording.
In the absence of express wording, it is likely that delays at ports due to shortage of workers, unavailability of cargo or similar shore-side delays will be for charterers’ account. In a time charter context, such events would not tend to fall within the off hire provision, provided the vessel remains fully working and ready to carry out normal operations. In a voyage charter, provided the vessel had been able to tender NOR, such events are unlikely to fall within the exceptions to laytime, so that laytime will continue to run and demurrage to accrue, subject to any other interruptions or exceptions which may take effect (e.g. weather-related interruptions).
The position may be different if the delays affect the vessel and/or crew, for example, where there is an outbreak or occurrence of COVID-19 on board a ship. If the crew members are affected in sufficient numbers, the vessel could be off hire due to deficiency of men. Deviations or delays may be caused by the need to disembark crew for medical treatment, and such delays would tend to be for the owners’ account in the first instance. A suspected or established case is likely to cause the vessel to be quarantined upon arrival at the next port. Indeed, some ports have imposed quarantine requirements on vessels arriving from specific named ports, where there has been a high prevalence of COVID-19 infections, even where there is no indication that the crew is affected. These situations are more complex and will certainly depend on the specific wording of the charterparty and the off hire clause in particular. Under a voyage charter, it will be necessary to examine the charterparty terms as to when the vessel may tender NOR and exceptions / interruptions to laytime, which will determine whether laytime runs and demurrage accrues. If the charterparty includes the relevant BIMCO clause, or similar wording, the allocation of liability for delays and additional costs which may arise should be more easily determined.
In the absence of the BIMCO clause, owners of a time-chartered vessel may be able to argue that any delays or additional costs arising due to quarantine restrictions or crew infection following a call at a port affected by COVID-19 are for charterers’ account on the basis of ‘the implied indemnity.’ The general principle of the implied indemnity is that losses suffered by owners due to their compliance with charterers’ employment orders ought to be indemnified by charterers. However, this argument has yet to be tested in the context of this pandemic and would depend upon a court / tribunal’s view of how the parties intended to allocate risk and liability, taking into account both the express wording of the charterparty and the factual information available to the parties at the time of entering into the fixture. Owners would therefore be better protected by incorporating express wording into their charterparties, such as the BIMCO clauses discussed above.
Source: Skuld

If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.

Recent News

Saturday, 01 August 20
Oil demand in Asia Pacific might be expected to plunge 1.8m barrels per day (bpd) this year, but there are still strong prospects for growth over t ...

Friday, 31 July 20
Due to the India-China dispute, the threat of deteriorating trade relations between the two countries has become real. Meanwhile, we expect freight ...

Friday, 31 July 20
Capesize After weeks of dropping rates, there are finally some resistance for the Capes. Pacific rounds improving to upper15,000s by the middle ...

Friday, 31 July 20
Could South Africa’s coal export industry, one of the largest in the world, be about to take a severe hit from the coronavirus?   ...

Friday, 31 July 20
An African economic leader like Botswana should embrace solar to reduce subsidies and tariff hikes   As Sub-Saharan solar ambition has ...

   3 4 5 6 7   
Showing 21 to 25 news of total 6038
News by Category
Popular News
Total Members : 27,028
User ID
Remember Me
By logging on you accept our TERMS OF USE.
Forgot Password
Our Members Are From ...

  • Mitra SK Pvt Ltd - India
  • PetroVietnam
  • Eastern Energy - Thailand
  • Chamber of Mines of South Africa
  • Cardiff University - UK
  • Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
  • Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
  • Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
  • Coaltrans Conferences
  • ING Bank NV - Singapore
  • Maybank - Singapore
  • PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
  • Cement Manufacturers Association - India
  • PLN Batubara - Indonesia
  • Vitol - Bahrain
  • Malco - India
  • Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
  • Reliance Power - India
  • GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
  • Malabar Cements Ltd - India
  • NALCO India
  • Thailand Anthracite
  • Argus Media - Singapore
  • Britmindo - Indonesia
  • CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
  • Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
  • Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
  • Anglo American - United Kingdom
  • Minerals Council of Australia
  • Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
  • Adani Power Ltd - India
  • Cemex - Philippines
  • Parry Sugars Refinery, India
  • Moodys - Singapore
  • South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
  • IMC Shipping - Singapore
  • SASOL - South Africa
  • PLN - Indonesia
  • Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
  • GMR Energy Limited - India
  • Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
  • Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
  • Asian Development Bank
  • Platts
  • Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
  • The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
  • Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
  • LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
  • Baramulti Group, Indonesia
  • Petrosea - Indonesia
  • Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
  • Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
  • EMO - The Netherlands
  • Coal and Oil Company - UAE
  • Interocean Group of Companies - India
  • Permata Bank - Indonesia
  • Bhushan Steel Limited - India
  • Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • Sojitz Corporation - Japan
  • PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
  • Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
  • Jatenergy - Australia
  • Aditya Birla Group - India
  • OCBC - Singapore
  • Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
  • Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
  • Tata Power - India
  • Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
  • SRK Consulting
  • Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
  • Thermax Limited - India
  • Maruti Cements - India
  • JPMorgan - India
  • Gupta Coal India Ltd
  • Clarksons - UK
  • Sical Logistics Limited - India
  • Sucofindo - Indonesia
  • GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
  • Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
  • BRS Brokers - Singapore
  • Romanian Commodities Exchange
  • MS Steel International - UAE
  • Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
  • Bangkok Bank PCL
  • globalCOAL - UK
  • Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
  • World Coal - UK
  • Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
  • Kobe Steel Ltd - Japan
  • Indorama - Singapore
  • Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
  • SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
  • Renaissance Capital - South Africa
  • Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
  • Adaro Indonesia
  • GB Group - China
  • Freeport Indonesia
  • Barclays Capital - USA
  • Dalmia Cement Bharat India
  • Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
  • Bank of China, Malaysia
  • ETA - Dubai
  • Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
  • PowerSource Philippines DevCo
  • Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
  • Central Electricity Authority - India
  • IOL Indonesia
  • Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
  • PTC India Limited - India
  • APGENCO India
  • Noble Europe Ltd - UK
  • TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
  • Parliament of New Zealand
  • Xstrata Coal
  • Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
  • Ince & co LLP
  • Bangladesh Power Developement Board
  • GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
  • Inspectorate - India
  • Thomson Reuters GRC
  • Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
  • Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
  • Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
  • Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
  • Asia Cement - Taiwan
  • Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
  • Economic Council, Georgia
  • Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
  • Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
  • Indian Oil Corporation Limited
  • Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
  • KPMG - USA
  • Tamil Nadu electricity Board
  • Qatrana Cement - Jordan
  • New Zealand Coal & Carbon
  • Trasteel International SA, Italy
  • Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
  • ASAPP Information Group - India
  • Indian School of Mines
  • U S Energy Resources
  • TRAFIGURA, South Korea
  • Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
  • OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
  • NTPC Limited - India
  • Vedanta Resources Plc - India
  • Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
  • Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
  • Thriveni
  • Wilmar Investment Holdings
  • Arch Coal - USA
  • Coeclerici Indonesia
  • KEPCO - South Korea
  • Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
  • Commonwealth Bank - Australia
  • Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
  • Cebu Energy, Philippines
  • Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
  • Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
  • Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
  • Ministry of Transport, Egypt
  • Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
  • Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
  • Posco Energy - South Korea
  • Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
  • Geoservices-GeoAssay Lab
  • Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
  • Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Pinang Coal Indonesia
  • Cargill India Pvt Ltd
  • Shenhua Group - China
  • Planning Commission, India
  • Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
  • Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
  • J M Baxi & Co - India
  • Bank of America
  • Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
  • Enel Italy
  • Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
  • Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
  • Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
  • Berau Coal - Indonesia
  • London Commodity Brokers - England
  • Runge Indonesia
  • India Bulls Power Limited - India
  • Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
  • IBC Asia (S) Pte Ltd
  • Platou - Singapore
  • Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Tanito Harum - Indonesia
  • Indika Energy - Indonesia
  • Georgia Ports Authority, United States
  • WorleyParsons
  • IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
  • Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
  • Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
  • Fearnleys - India
  • Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
  • Thiess Contractors Indonesia
  • Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
  • Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
  • CoalTek, United States
  • Arutmin Indonesia
  • Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
  • Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
  • Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
  • Lafarge - France
  • Rudhra Energy - India
  • Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
  • Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
  • Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
  • Japan Coal Energy Center
  • Coal Orbis AG
  • Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
  • Deloitte Consulting - India
  • Agrawal Coal Company - India
  • Mitsui
  • GHCL Limited - India
  • Vale Mozambique
  • Mjunction Services Limited - India
  • Latin American Coal - Colombia
  • White Energy Company Limited
  • Independent Power Producers Association of India
  • The Treasury - Australian Government
  • Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
  • Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
  • Xindia Steels Limited - India
  • The University of Queensland
  • Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
  • Credit Suisse - India
  • CESC Limited - India
  • Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
  • Indonesia Power. PT
  • SGS (Thailand) Limited
  • Singapore Mercantile Exchange
  • BNP Paribas - Singapore
  • Gresik Semen - Indonesia
  • Idemitsu - Japan
  • Peabody Energy - USA
  • Petron Corporation, Philippines
  • Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
  • KPCL - India
  • Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
  • Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
  • Cosco
  • ACC Limited - India
  • Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
  • Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
  • DBS Bank - Singapore
  • AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
  • Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
  • Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
  • Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
  • Russian Coal LLC
  • MEC Coal - Indonesia
  • Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
  • Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
  • HSBC - Hong Kong
  • Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
  • Mercator Lines Limited - India
  • Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
  • Total Coal South Africa
  • bp singapore
  • Eastern Coal Council - USA
  • VISA Power Limited - India
  • IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
  • Heidelberg Cement - Germany
  • Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
  • World Bank
  • Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
  • Glencore India Pvt. Ltd
  • Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
  • Goldman Sachs - Singapore
  • Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
  • Star Paper Mills Limited - India
  • Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
  • Coal India Limited
  • Samsung - South Korea
  • Energy Development Corp, Philippines
  • Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
  • Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
  • Carbofer General Trading SA - India
  • The India Cements Ltd
  • Edison Trading Spa - Italy
  • Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
  • Videocon Industries ltd - India
  • Indogreen Group - Indonesia
  • UBS Singapore
  • GNFC Limited - India
  • Siam City Cement - Thailand
  • Indonesian Coal Mining Association
  • Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
  • Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
  • Merrill Lynch Bank
  • Ministry of Mines - Canada
  • EIA - United States
  • Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
  • International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
  • Australian Coal Association
  • ANZ Bank - Australia
  • Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
  • Surastha Cement
  • SUEK AG - Indonesia
  • Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
  • McKinsey & Co - India
  • ICICI Bank Limited - India
  • SMG Consultants - Indonesia
  • European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
  • UOB Asia (HK) Ltd
  • Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
  • McConnell Dowell - Australia
  • Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
  • Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
  • TNPL - India
  • TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
  • Maersk Broker
  • RBS Sempra - UK
  • Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
  • Deutsche Bank - India
  • Mechel - Russia
  • Infraline Energy - India
  • Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
  • Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
  • Core Mineral Indonesia
  • Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
  • JPower - Japan
  • Thai Mozambique Logistica
  • Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
  • Humpuss - Indonesia
  • Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
  • Shree Cement - India
  • SMC Global Power, Philippines
  • Marubeni Corporation - India
  • Mitsubishi Corporation
  • CNBM International Corporation - China
  • Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
  • TANGEDCO India
  • Inco-Indonesia
  • Panama Canal Authority
  • Medco Energi Mining Internasional
  • San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
  • Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
  • Central Java Power - Indonesia
  • Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
  • CCIC - Indonesia
  • Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
  • Bhatia International Limited - India
  • Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
  • KOWEPO - South Korea
  • Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
  • Ernst & Young Pvt. Ltd.