keeps you connected across the coal world

Submit Your Articles
We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining, shipping, etc.

To Submit your article please click here.

International Energy Events

WTI Crude Oil

BRENT Crude Oil

Search News
Latest CoalNews Headlines
Tuesday, 21 April 20

Whilst the plight of cruise ships, stranded off shore with sick passengers and crew, may be dominating media headlines, the current COVID-19 pandemic is having a significant effect on the shipping industry as a whole. This article first explores owners’ rights to refuse to call at a port which is affected by the virus, before examining the rights, obligations and liabilities of owners under charterparties in the context of delays at loading and discharging ports.
Can owners refuse to comply with charterers’ orders?
Owners may be concerned that proceeding to a particular port could expose the crew to COVID-19, thereby endangering their health. The crew themselves may express concerns and indeed there have been recent reports in the industry press of a crew refusing to berth and allow stevedores on board the ship due to their fears of coming into contact with the virus.
However, owners are only likely to be able to refuse to proceed if there is a specific clause in the charterparty entitling them to do so, or if they can show that any safe port warranty has been breached.
Under English law, a port is considered unsafe (and the safe port warranty breached) if it a ship is unable to reach it, use it and return from it without, in the absence of some abnormal occurrence, being exposed to danger which cannot be avoided by good navigation and seamanship. An owner may wish to argue that a port is unsafe because of the danger to the health of the crew, or because of the risk of the vessel being quarantined or delayed after visiting that port.
Any dispute about the safety of the port is likely to be highly fact specific, including factors such as the spread of the virus in the port/country in question and the measures which the port have (or the crew can) put in place to limit contact between the crew and shore personnel. In most cases (at least based on the situations we have seen to date), it will be difficult to establish that a port is unsafe within the legal definition. Crews are generally able to take sufficient steps to limit their interaction with shore personnel and any delays which are incurred due to complying with quarantine restrictions are unlikely to be sufficiently lengthy to be considered a danger to the ship’s free movement. Accordingly, refusing to proceed to a particular port is likely to be risky and could expose owners to substantial claims from charterers for delays and losses.
We consider below the extent to which, if owners agree to comply with charterers’ orders, any adverse consequences of so doing – including, in particular, delays and additional port costs and expenses – are likely to be recoverable from charterers. In most cases, owners should be reluctant to refuse to comply with charterer’s voyage orders in the absence of a very real concern for the health and well-being of the crew.
BIMCO Infectious or Contagious Disease Clause
The position may be different if there is an express term in the charterparty which gives additional rights to owners. The most common clause in charterparties is BIMCO’s Infectious or Contagious Disease clause, with different versions applicable for time and voyage charterparties.
The essence of the clause is that it gives owners a right to leave, or refuse to proceed to, a port where there is a risk of exposure by the vessel to a “highly infectious or contagious disease that is seriously harmful to humans” or to a risk of quarantine or other restrictions being imposed in connection with the disease (an “affected area”). Charterers are required to provide alternative voyage orders and indemnify owners for additional costs or expenses incurred as a result of complying with or awaiting such orders. The vessel expressly remains on hire throughout. If the owners agree to proceed to an “affected area” within the meaning of the clause, the vessel will remain on hire at all times and charterers will be liable for delays or additional costs or liabilities arising.
The clause for use in voyage charterparties has a similar effect. However, owners are only entitled to refuse to proceed to a port which has become an affected area after the date of the charterparty: owners are expected to exercise their own due diligence in respect of the state of the contractually agreed ports when agreeing the fixture. If alternative voyage orders are issued, owners are entitled to recover additional expenses and freight. If owners agree to proceed to the affected area, charterers are responsible for additional costs arising and time lost counts as laytime or time on demurrage.
It is important to note that the BIMCO clauses have not yet been tested by any court or tribunal in the context of coronavirus. This means that, although BIMCO have clarified that they believe the clause could be triggered in respect of a port affected by COVID-19, there remains a risk that the scope of the clauses could be limited. For example a court could ultimately determine that there was no real risk of exposure to the crew due to measures put in place by a port to ensure minimal interaction between the crew and shore personnel. BIMCO suggest that, unless a public health authority has declared a port as a risk to visiting ships, it is unlikely to fall within the scope of the clause. Accordingly, even if a charterparty includes such a clause, shipowners should continue to exercise due diligence by informing themselves about the situation at individual ports and assessing the specific risks on a case by case basis.
Delays at port and force majeure
A number of ports have declared “force majeure” since their ability to operate has been affected by the spread of COVID-19. In particular, operations have been slowed due to restrictions affecting the free movement of the workforce and disruptions to the supply chain have affected the routine flow of cargo through the port. Such declarations may limit shipowners’ ability to take any action against the port authorities, but would not tend to affect liabilities between owners and charterers under their charterparties, which are private contractual arrangements and very often subject to English law.
Unlike certain civil law jurisdictions, English law does not recognise “force majeure” as a general legal concept. This means that a party to a contract subject to English law cannot simply declare that they are affected by circumstances of force majeure and are therefore relieved from their obligations. They can only do so if the contract or charterparty in question contains an express force majeure clause or other exclusion / exceptions clause which grants them such rights.
The force majeure clause will set out the specific circumstances in which it can be triggered and will identify the rights and obligations of both parties when force majeure circumstances are triggered. This may include rights of termination, or be limited to an exclusion of liability for delays and non-performance. In circumstances where charterers are claiming the protection of a force majeure clause, owners will likely want to ensure their charterparty includes a right to terminate after a certain period, so that they do not end up waiting indefinitely for charterers to perform, without being able to recover hire or demurrage for that period.
If the charterparty becomes impossible to perform or performance has become radically different than the parties had anticipated due to circumstances unforeseen at the time of entering into the charterparty, it may be terminated automatically on the basis that it has been frustrated. Since any reduction or suspension of operations at a port can be expected to be temporary, it cannot be said that performance of a charterparty has become impossible – only that performance will be delayed.
In order for the charterparty to be frustrated, the delay would have to be such as would render performance radically different from that anticipated by the parties. At present, it seems unlikely that delays at a port would cause a time charter to be frustrated. Even in cases of a voyage charter or a time charter trip, the argument is likely to be difficult to make, but will depend on the particular circumstances in question, including the length of any delays, the term of the charterparty, and the information available to the parties when the charterparty was entered into.
Who is liable for delays?
If it has been established that the charterer has no right to terminate the charterparty on the grounds of force majeure and it has not been frustrated, then the parties will want to know who bears the liability for delays encountered and additional costs incurred. This will ultimately depend on (i) the factual circumstances / cause of the delays and (ii) the charterparty wording.
In the absence of express wording, it is likely that delays at ports due to shortage of workers, unavailability of cargo or similar shore-side delays will be for charterers’ account. In a time charter context, such events would not tend to fall within the off hire provision, provided the vessel remains fully working and ready to carry out normal operations. In a voyage charter, provided the vessel had been able to tender NOR, such events are unlikely to fall within the exceptions to laytime, so that laytime will continue to run and demurrage to accrue, subject to any other interruptions or exceptions which may take effect (e.g. weather-related interruptions).
The position may be different if the delays affect the vessel and/or crew, for example, where there is an outbreak or occurrence of COVID-19 on board a ship. If the crew members are affected in sufficient numbers, the vessel could be off hire due to deficiency of men. Deviations or delays may be caused by the need to disembark crew for medical treatment, and such delays would tend to be for the owners’ account in the first instance. A suspected or established case is likely to cause the vessel to be quarantined upon arrival at the next port. Indeed, some ports have imposed quarantine requirements on vessels arriving from specific named ports, where there has been a high prevalence of COVID-19 infections, even where there is no indication that the crew is affected. These situations are more complex and will certainly depend on the specific wording of the charterparty and the off hire clause in particular. Under a voyage charter, it will be necessary to examine the charterparty terms as to when the vessel may tender NOR and exceptions / interruptions to laytime, which will determine whether laytime runs and demurrage accrues. If the charterparty includes the relevant BIMCO clause, or similar wording, the allocation of liability for delays and additional costs which may arise should be more easily determined.
In the absence of the BIMCO clause, owners of a time-chartered vessel may be able to argue that any delays or additional costs arising due to quarantine restrictions or crew infection following a call at a port affected by COVID-19 are for charterers’ account on the basis of ‘the implied indemnity.’ The general principle of the implied indemnity is that losses suffered by owners due to their compliance with charterers’ employment orders ought to be indemnified by charterers. However, this argument has yet to be tested in the context of this pandemic and would depend upon a court / tribunal’s view of how the parties intended to allocate risk and liability, taking into account both the express wording of the charterparty and the factual information available to the parties at the time of entering into the fixture. Owners would therefore be better protected by incorporating express wording into their charterparties, such as the BIMCO clauses discussed above.
Source: Skuld

If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.

Recent News

Tuesday, 04 August 20
KOEN INVITED BIDS FOR TOTAL 900K MT OF MIN 5600 NCV COAL FOR 3 YEARS South Korea’s KOREA SOUTH-EAST POWER CO., LTD. (KOEN) has issued an international tender for 260,000 to 300,000 Tons (MT) min. ...

Tuesday, 04 August 20
This is according to the latest Global Coal Plant Tracker (GCPT) results by Global Energy Monitor (GEM), which we completed last month and report f ...

Monday, 03 August 20
According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s (EIA) most recent Monthly Energy Review, the United States consumed 6.5 quadrillion ...

Monday, 03 August 20
The collapse in oil prices and the coronavirus shock is worsening the fiscal and external balances of sub-Saharan African oil producers, Fitch Rati ...

Saturday, 01 August 20
Thursday afternoon saw a report that US GDP in Q2 shrank by 32.9%. Now this may have beaten expectations, but it’s a bit like saying that you ...

   2 3 4 5 6   
Showing 16 to 20 news of total 6038
News by Category
Popular News
Total Members : 27,028
User ID
Remember Me
By logging on you accept our TERMS OF USE.
Forgot Password
Our Members Are From ...

  • ETA - Dubai
  • Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
  • NALCO India
  • Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
  • Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
  • ACC Limited - India
  • Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
  • Total Coal South Africa
  • McConnell Dowell - Australia
  • Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
  • Coaltrans Conferences
  • Anglo American - United Kingdom
  • U S Energy Resources
  • Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
  • Ministry of Transport, Egypt
  • Kobe Steel Ltd - Japan
  • Thiess Contractors Indonesia
  • Merrill Lynch Bank
  • GB Group - China
  • Jatenergy - Australia
  • White Energy Company Limited
  • VISA Power Limited - India
  • Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
  • Trasteel International SA, Italy
  • Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
  • Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
  • Platou - Singapore
  • Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
  • Shree Cement - India
  • CoalTek, United States
  • Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
  • Vale Mozambique
  • Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
  • Permata Bank - Indonesia
  • WorleyParsons
  • MS Steel International - UAE
  • CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
  • Glencore India Pvt. Ltd
  • Japan Coal Energy Center
  • Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
  • ASAPP Information Group - India
  • KPCL - India
  • Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
  • Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
  • Thermax Limited - India
  • Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
  • Runge Indonesia
  • Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
  • Malabar Cements Ltd - India
  • European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
  • PTC India Limited - India
  • Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
  • Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
  • Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
  • The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
  • Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • EMO - The Netherlands
  • Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
  • Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
  • Mechel - Russia
  • Mercator Lines Limited - India
  • Asia Cement - Taiwan
  • Videocon Industries ltd - India
  • Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
  • Bhushan Steel Limited - India
  • Bangladesh Power Developement Board
  • PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
  • Rudhra Energy - India
  • Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
  • Heidelberg Cement - Germany
  • Inco-Indonesia
  • Tanito Harum - Indonesia
  • Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
  • Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
  • LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
  • Deloitte Consulting - India
  • BRS Brokers - Singapore
  • Georgia Ports Authority, United States
  • Qatrana Cement - Jordan
  • GNFC Limited - India
  • The University of Queensland
  • Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
  • Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
  • Cebu Energy, Philippines
  • Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
  • San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
  • Singapore Mercantile Exchange
  • TRAFIGURA, South Korea
  • Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
  • Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
  • Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
  • Carbofer General Trading SA - India
  • Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
  • KOWEPO - South Korea
  • TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
  • Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
  • DBS Bank - Singapore
  • Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
  • Inspectorate - India
  • Maybank - Singapore
  • Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
  • Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
  • Platts
  • TANGEDCO India
  • Economic Council, Georgia
  • Vitol - Bahrain
  • Adani Power Ltd - India
  • Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
  • Sical Logistics Limited - India
  • Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
  • Deutsche Bank - India
  • Indian School of Mines
  • EIA - United States
  • Barclays Capital - USA
  • Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
  • Parry Sugars Refinery, India
  • Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
  • Interocean Group of Companies - India
  • Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
  • Mitsui
  • ICICI Bank Limited - India
  • SRK Consulting
  • Dalmia Cement Bharat India
  • Baramulti Group, Indonesia
  • Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
  • Argus Media - Singapore
  • Tata Power - India
  • Australian Coal Association
  • Minerals Council of Australia
  • Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
  • GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
  • Indika Energy - Indonesia
  • Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
  • Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
  • Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
  • Credit Suisse - India
  • Gresik Semen - Indonesia
  • Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
  • Eastern Energy - Thailand
  • Sucofindo - Indonesia
  • Cosco
  • Indonesia Power. PT
  • BNP Paribas - Singapore
  • PetroVietnam
  • Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
  • Humpuss - Indonesia
  • Mitsubishi Corporation
  • PLN Batubara - Indonesia
  • Edison Trading Spa - Italy
  • Coeclerici Indonesia
  • AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
  • Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
  • Marubeni Corporation - India
  • J M Baxi & Co - India
  • Berau Coal - Indonesia
  • Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
  • Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
  • OCBC - Singapore
  • Indorama - Singapore
  • RBS Sempra - UK
  • Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
  • Enel Italy
  • OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
  • Maruti Cements - India
  • Coal India Limited
  • The Treasury - Australian Government
  • McKinsey & Co - India
  • Asian Development Bank
  • International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
  • Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
  • World Coal - UK
  • UBS Singapore
  • Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
  • Cemex - Philippines
  • Indonesian Coal Mining Association
  • Central Java Power - Indonesia
  • Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
  • Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
  • Arutmin Indonesia
  • Britmindo - Indonesia
  • Thriveni
  • Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
  • Star Paper Mills Limited - India
  • Siam City Cement - Thailand
  • Indogreen Group - Indonesia
  • Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
  • Parliament of New Zealand
  • Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
  • JPower - Japan
  • CCIC - Indonesia
  • bp singapore
  • Gupta Coal India Ltd
  • Lafarge - France
  • Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
  • TNPL - India
  • Russian Coal LLC
  • Latin American Coal - Colombia
  • Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
  • TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
  • CNBM International Corporation - China
  • Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
  • Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
  • Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
  • Pinang Coal Indonesia
  • Posco Energy - South Korea
  • Malco - India
  • Ministry of Mines - Canada
  • Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
  • Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
  • Planning Commission, India
  • Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
  • Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
  • Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
  • Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
  • World Bank
  • Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Reliance Power - India
  • Thailand Anthracite
  • Cement Manufacturers Association - India
  • Ince & co LLP
  • Energy Development Corp, Philippines
  • Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
  • globalCOAL - UK
  • Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
  • Freeport Indonesia
  • Independent Power Producers Association of India
  • Thai Mozambique Logistica
  • Commonwealth Bank - Australia
  • Mjunction Services Limited - India
  • Renaissance Capital - South Africa
  • JPMorgan - India
  • Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
  • The India Cements Ltd
  • Vedanta Resources Plc - India
  • Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • NTPC Limited - India
  • PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
  • New Zealand Coal & Carbon
  • Cargill India Pvt Ltd
  • Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
  • Cardiff University - UK
  • Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
  • Mitra SK Pvt Ltd - India
  • Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
  • GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
  • Shenhua Group - China
  • PowerSource Philippines DevCo
  • Surastha Cement
  • ANZ Bank - Australia
  • Medco Energi Mining Internasional
  • IMC Shipping - Singapore
  • Sojitz Corporation - Japan
  • PLN - Indonesia
  • Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
  • Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
  • IOL Indonesia
  • Petron Corporation, Philippines
  • Goldman Sachs - Singapore
  • Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
  • Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
  • Central Electricity Authority - India
  • Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
  • Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
  • Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
  • Agrawal Coal Company - India
  • HSBC - Hong Kong
  • Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
  • Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
  • Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
  • Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
  • Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
  • India Bulls Power Limited - India
  • MEC Coal - Indonesia
  • Adaro Indonesia
  • Peabody Energy - USA
  • Xstrata Coal
  • South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
  • Fearnleys - India
  • Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
  • Chamber of Mines of South Africa
  • Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
  • ING Bank NV - Singapore
  • Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
  • Panama Canal Authority
  • Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
  • SMC Global Power, Philippines
  • Bhatia International Limited - India
  • Arch Coal - USA
  • GMR Energy Limited - India
  • Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
  • Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
  • APGENCO India
  • IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
  • Coal and Oil Company - UAE
  • Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
  • Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
  • Bangkok Bank PCL
  • KPMG - USA
  • Moodys - Singapore
  • Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
  • Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
  • Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
  • Core Mineral Indonesia
  • KEPCO - South Korea
  • Petrosea - Indonesia
  • Xindia Steels Limited - India
  • Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
  • Eastern Coal Council - USA
  • Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
  • GHCL Limited - India
  • Maersk Broker
  • Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
  • UOB Asia (HK) Ltd
  • SUEK AG - Indonesia
  • Coal Orbis AG
  • Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
  • Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
  • IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
  • Thomson Reuters GRC
  • GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
  • Bank of America
  • Aditya Birla Group - India
  • Noble Europe Ltd - UK
  • SMG Consultants - Indonesia
  • Indian Oil Corporation Limited
  • IBC Asia (S) Pte Ltd
  • SASOL - South Africa
  • Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
  • Ernst & Young Pvt. Ltd.
  • Romanian Commodities Exchange
  • Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
  • Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
  • Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
  • Samsung - South Korea
  • Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
  • Infraline Energy - India
  • Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
  • Geoservices-GeoAssay Lab
  • London Commodity Brokers - England
  • Clarksons - UK
  • Tamil Nadu electricity Board
  • SGS (Thailand) Limited
  • Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
  • Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
  • Wilmar Investment Holdings
  • SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
  • Idemitsu - Japan
  • Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
  • CESC Limited - India
  • Bank of China, Malaysia