keeps you connected across the coal world

Submit Your Articles
We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining, shipping, etc.

To Submit your article please click here.

International Energy Events

WTI Crude Oil

BRENT Crude Oil

Search News
Latest CoalNews Headlines
Tuesday, 21 April 20

Whilst the plight of cruise ships, stranded off shore with sick passengers and crew, may be dominating media headlines, the current COVID-19 pandemic is having a significant effect on the shipping industry as a whole. This article first explores owners’ rights to refuse to call at a port which is affected by the virus, before examining the rights, obligations and liabilities of owners under charterparties in the context of delays at loading and discharging ports.
Can owners refuse to comply with charterers’ orders?
Owners may be concerned that proceeding to a particular port could expose the crew to COVID-19, thereby endangering their health. The crew themselves may express concerns and indeed there have been recent reports in the industry press of a crew refusing to berth and allow stevedores on board the ship due to their fears of coming into contact with the virus.
However, owners are only likely to be able to refuse to proceed if there is a specific clause in the charterparty entitling them to do so, or if they can show that any safe port warranty has been breached.
Under English law, a port is considered unsafe (and the safe port warranty breached) if it a ship is unable to reach it, use it and return from it without, in the absence of some abnormal occurrence, being exposed to danger which cannot be avoided by good navigation and seamanship. An owner may wish to argue that a port is unsafe because of the danger to the health of the crew, or because of the risk of the vessel being quarantined or delayed after visiting that port.
Any dispute about the safety of the port is likely to be highly fact specific, including factors such as the spread of the virus in the port/country in question and the measures which the port have (or the crew can) put in place to limit contact between the crew and shore personnel. In most cases (at least based on the situations we have seen to date), it will be difficult to establish that a port is unsafe within the legal definition. Crews are generally able to take sufficient steps to limit their interaction with shore personnel and any delays which are incurred due to complying with quarantine restrictions are unlikely to be sufficiently lengthy to be considered a danger to the ship’s free movement. Accordingly, refusing to proceed to a particular port is likely to be risky and could expose owners to substantial claims from charterers for delays and losses.
We consider below the extent to which, if owners agree to comply with charterers’ orders, any adverse consequences of so doing – including, in particular, delays and additional port costs and expenses – are likely to be recoverable from charterers. In most cases, owners should be reluctant to refuse to comply with charterer’s voyage orders in the absence of a very real concern for the health and well-being of the crew.
BIMCO Infectious or Contagious Disease Clause
The position may be different if there is an express term in the charterparty which gives additional rights to owners. The most common clause in charterparties is BIMCO’s Infectious or Contagious Disease clause, with different versions applicable for time and voyage charterparties.
The essence of the clause is that it gives owners a right to leave, or refuse to proceed to, a port where there is a risk of exposure by the vessel to a “highly infectious or contagious disease that is seriously harmful to humans” or to a risk of quarantine or other restrictions being imposed in connection with the disease (an “affected area”). Charterers are required to provide alternative voyage orders and indemnify owners for additional costs or expenses incurred as a result of complying with or awaiting such orders. The vessel expressly remains on hire throughout. If the owners agree to proceed to an “affected area” within the meaning of the clause, the vessel will remain on hire at all times and charterers will be liable for delays or additional costs or liabilities arising.
The clause for use in voyage charterparties has a similar effect. However, owners are only entitled to refuse to proceed to a port which has become an affected area after the date of the charterparty: owners are expected to exercise their own due diligence in respect of the state of the contractually agreed ports when agreeing the fixture. If alternative voyage orders are issued, owners are entitled to recover additional expenses and freight. If owners agree to proceed to the affected area, charterers are responsible for additional costs arising and time lost counts as laytime or time on demurrage.
It is important to note that the BIMCO clauses have not yet been tested by any court or tribunal in the context of coronavirus. This means that, although BIMCO have clarified that they believe the clause could be triggered in respect of a port affected by COVID-19, there remains a risk that the scope of the clauses could be limited. For example a court could ultimately determine that there was no real risk of exposure to the crew due to measures put in place by a port to ensure minimal interaction between the crew and shore personnel. BIMCO suggest that, unless a public health authority has declared a port as a risk to visiting ships, it is unlikely to fall within the scope of the clause. Accordingly, even if a charterparty includes such a clause, shipowners should continue to exercise due diligence by informing themselves about the situation at individual ports and assessing the specific risks on a case by case basis.
Delays at port and force majeure
A number of ports have declared “force majeure” since their ability to operate has been affected by the spread of COVID-19. In particular, operations have been slowed due to restrictions affecting the free movement of the workforce and disruptions to the supply chain have affected the routine flow of cargo through the port. Such declarations may limit shipowners’ ability to take any action against the port authorities, but would not tend to affect liabilities between owners and charterers under their charterparties, which are private contractual arrangements and very often subject to English law.
Unlike certain civil law jurisdictions, English law does not recognise “force majeure” as a general legal concept. This means that a party to a contract subject to English law cannot simply declare that they are affected by circumstances of force majeure and are therefore relieved from their obligations. They can only do so if the contract or charterparty in question contains an express force majeure clause or other exclusion / exceptions clause which grants them such rights.
The force majeure clause will set out the specific circumstances in which it can be triggered and will identify the rights and obligations of both parties when force majeure circumstances are triggered. This may include rights of termination, or be limited to an exclusion of liability for delays and non-performance. In circumstances where charterers are claiming the protection of a force majeure clause, owners will likely want to ensure their charterparty includes a right to terminate after a certain period, so that they do not end up waiting indefinitely for charterers to perform, without being able to recover hire or demurrage for that period.
If the charterparty becomes impossible to perform or performance has become radically different than the parties had anticipated due to circumstances unforeseen at the time of entering into the charterparty, it may be terminated automatically on the basis that it has been frustrated. Since any reduction or suspension of operations at a port can be expected to be temporary, it cannot be said that performance of a charterparty has become impossible – only that performance will be delayed.
In order for the charterparty to be frustrated, the delay would have to be such as would render performance radically different from that anticipated by the parties. At present, it seems unlikely that delays at a port would cause a time charter to be frustrated. Even in cases of a voyage charter or a time charter trip, the argument is likely to be difficult to make, but will depend on the particular circumstances in question, including the length of any delays, the term of the charterparty, and the information available to the parties when the charterparty was entered into.
Who is liable for delays?
If it has been established that the charterer has no right to terminate the charterparty on the grounds of force majeure and it has not been frustrated, then the parties will want to know who bears the liability for delays encountered and additional costs incurred. This will ultimately depend on (i) the factual circumstances / cause of the delays and (ii) the charterparty wording.
In the absence of express wording, it is likely that delays at ports due to shortage of workers, unavailability of cargo or similar shore-side delays will be for charterers’ account. In a time charter context, such events would not tend to fall within the off hire provision, provided the vessel remains fully working and ready to carry out normal operations. In a voyage charter, provided the vessel had been able to tender NOR, such events are unlikely to fall within the exceptions to laytime, so that laytime will continue to run and demurrage to accrue, subject to any other interruptions or exceptions which may take effect (e.g. weather-related interruptions).
The position may be different if the delays affect the vessel and/or crew, for example, where there is an outbreak or occurrence of COVID-19 on board a ship. If the crew members are affected in sufficient numbers, the vessel could be off hire due to deficiency of men. Deviations or delays may be caused by the need to disembark crew for medical treatment, and such delays would tend to be for the owners’ account in the first instance. A suspected or established case is likely to cause the vessel to be quarantined upon arrival at the next port. Indeed, some ports have imposed quarantine requirements on vessels arriving from specific named ports, where there has been a high prevalence of COVID-19 infections, even where there is no indication that the crew is affected. These situations are more complex and will certainly depend on the specific wording of the charterparty and the off hire clause in particular. Under a voyage charter, it will be necessary to examine the charterparty terms as to when the vessel may tender NOR and exceptions / interruptions to laytime, which will determine whether laytime runs and demurrage accrues. If the charterparty includes the relevant BIMCO clause, or similar wording, the allocation of liability for delays and additional costs which may arise should be more easily determined.
In the absence of the BIMCO clause, owners of a time-chartered vessel may be able to argue that any delays or additional costs arising due to quarantine restrictions or crew infection following a call at a port affected by COVID-19 are for charterers’ account on the basis of ‘the implied indemnity.’ The general principle of the implied indemnity is that losses suffered by owners due to their compliance with charterers’ employment orders ought to be indemnified by charterers. However, this argument has yet to be tested in the context of this pandemic and would depend upon a court / tribunal’s view of how the parties intended to allocate risk and liability, taking into account both the express wording of the charterparty and the factual information available to the parties at the time of entering into the fixture. Owners would therefore be better protected by incorporating express wording into their charterparties, such as the BIMCO clauses discussed above.
Source: Skuld

If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.

Recent News

Tuesday, 06 October 20
KOSPO TO IMPORT 80,000 MT OF 3,800 NCV COAL FOR 2H NOV Korea Southern Power Co., Ltd. (KOSPO) has issued an International tender for 80,000 MT Min.3800 kcal/kg NCV coal 2H November, 2020 l ...

Friday, 02 October 20
THE INDONESIA COAL PRICE REFERENCE RISE AFTER HISTORIC CRASH TO US$ 49.42 The Indonesia Coal Price Reference for the month of October Rise to US$ 51.00 after historic crash to US$ 49.42 in September 2020. ...

Friday, 02 October 20
Overcommitment to fossil-fuelled power generation is leading to excess capacity and rising capacity payments, subsidies, and tariffs around the con ...

Wednesday, 30 September 20
Spot rates for Capesize bulk carriers received a significant boost last week, however, there are certain reservations in the market regarding the p ...

Tuesday, 29 September 20
China Taiyuan coal transaction price index stood at 125.91 points Monday, up 0.73 percent week on week.   The index, released by China ...

   2 3 4 5 6   
Showing 16 to 20 news of total 6117
News by Category
Popular News
Total Members : 27,133
User ID
Remember Me
By logging on you accept our TERMS OF USE.
Forgot Password
Our Members Are From ...

  • Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
  • Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
  • The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
  • World Bank
  • Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
  • Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
  • Anglo American - United Kingdom
  • Cargill India Pvt Ltd
  • Eastern Energy - Thailand
  • Thai Mozambique Logistica
  • Russian Coal LLC
  • Total Coal South Africa
  • Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
  • PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
  • Coeclerici Indonesia
  • AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
  • Aditya Birla Group - India
  • Independent Power Producers Association of India
  • CCIC - Indonesia
  • EIA - United States
  • Bhushan Steel Limited - India
  • Maersk Broker
  • Adani Power Ltd - India
  • GNFC Limited - India
  • Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
  • Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
  • Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
  • Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
  • Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
  • Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
  • Geoservices-GeoAssay Lab
  • JPower - Japan
  • Japan Coal Energy Center
  • Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
  • Energy Development Corp, Philippines
  • CESC Limited - India
  • Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
  • ACC Limited - India
  • SMG Consultants - Indonesia
  • Platou - Singapore
  • HSBC - Hong Kong
  • ICICI Bank Limited - India
  • Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
  • Platts
  • IBC Asia (S) Pte Ltd
  • Baramulti Group, Indonesia
  • Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
  • Indika Energy - Indonesia
  • Barclays Capital - USA
  • Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
  • WorleyParsons
  • Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
  • Ministry of Mines - Canada
  • Coal India Limited
  • Pinang Coal Indonesia
  • Inspectorate - India
  • Argus Media - Singapore
  • Singapore Mercantile Exchange
  • Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
  • Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
  • Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
  • PLN - Indonesia
  • OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
  • Idemitsu - Japan
  • NTPC Limited - India
  • Gresik Semen - Indonesia
  • IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
  • Minerals Council of Australia
  • MS Steel International - UAE
  • Indian School of Mines
  • Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
  • Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
  • Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
  • Shree Cement - India
  • Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
  • Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
  • Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
  • Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
  • Credit Suisse - India
  • Peabody Energy - USA
  • Deloitte Consulting - India
  • Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
  • KOWEPO - South Korea
  • Australian Coal Association
  • JPMorgan - India
  • Medco Energi Mining Internasional
  • Siam City Cement - Thailand
  • Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
  • Coal Orbis AG
  • Arch Coal - USA
  • Berau Coal - Indonesia
  • The Treasury - Australian Government
  • Cosco
  • Agrawal Coal Company - India
  • Maybank - Singapore
  • PowerSource Philippines DevCo
  • Maruti Cements - India
  • IMC Shipping - Singapore
  • Mitra SK Pvt Ltd - India
  • Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
  • GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
  • Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
  • Marubeni Corporation - India
  • Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
  • Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
  • Thailand Anthracite
  • Thermax Limited - India
  • Georgia Ports Authority, United States
  • Jatenergy - Australia
  • Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
  • London Commodity Brokers - England
  • bp singapore
  • Cardiff University - UK
  • Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
  • Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
  • Arutmin Indonesia
  • Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
  • Heidelberg Cement - Germany
  • Moodys - Singapore
  • Asian Development Bank
  • Mitsui
  • White Energy Company Limited
  • Inco-Indonesia
  • Xstrata Coal
  • Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
  • Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
  • Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
  • Economic Council, Georgia
  • TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
  • Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
  • Gupta Coal India Ltd
  • Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
  • Qatrana Cement - Jordan
  • Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
  • Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
  • Wilmar Investment Holdings
  • Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • ANZ Bank - Australia
  • Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
  • Star Paper Mills Limited - India
  • Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
  • Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
  • Glencore India Pvt. Ltd
  • Parry Sugars Refinery, India
  • Deutsche Bank - India
  • TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
  • Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
  • Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
  • PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
  • Petron Corporation, Philippines
  • Videocon Industries ltd - India
  • Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
  • Lafarge - France
  • Noble Europe Ltd - UK
  • Infraline Energy - India
  • Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
  • San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
  • Freeport Indonesia
  • Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
  • Indogreen Group - Indonesia
  • TANGEDCO India
  • Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
  • Eastern Coal Council - USA
  • TNPL - India
  • Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
  • U S Energy Resources
  • Rudhra Energy - India
  • Indian Oil Corporation Limited
  • Malabar Cements Ltd - India
  • Malco - India
  • IOL Indonesia
  • Renaissance Capital - South Africa
  • Ince & co LLP
  • Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
  • VISA Power Limited - India
  • Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
  • CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
  • GMR Energy Limited - India
  • Indonesian Coal Mining Association
  • Humpuss - Indonesia
  • Mechel - Russia
  • Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • Carbofer General Trading SA - India
  • Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
  • Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
  • J M Baxi & Co - India
  • Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
  • Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
  • Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
  • McConnell Dowell - Australia
  • Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
  • Tanito Harum - Indonesia
  • Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
  • IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
  • Sical Logistics Limited - India
  • Ernst & Young Pvt. Ltd.
  • Core Mineral Indonesia
  • Indorama - Singapore
  • Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
  • EMO - The Netherlands
  • APGENCO India
  • OCBC - Singapore
  • Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
  • DBS Bank - Singapore
  • Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
  • Vale Mozambique
  • Britmindo - Indonesia
  • GB Group - China
  • Indonesia Power. PT
  • Vedanta Resources Plc - India
  • Bank of America
  • Enel Italy
  • Interocean Group of Companies - India
  • SRK Consulting
  • Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
  • SGS (Thailand) Limited
  • Tata Power - India
  • SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
  • Cebu Energy, Philippines
  • Thriveni
  • Coal and Oil Company - UAE
  • Sucofindo - Indonesia
  • Parliament of New Zealand
  • NALCO India
  • Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
  • CNBM International Corporation - China
  • Cemex - Philippines
  • Xindia Steels Limited - India
  • Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
  • Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
  • Mjunction Services Limited - India
  • Shenhua Group - China
  • Adaro Indonesia
  • Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
  • Bangkok Bank PCL
  • Romanian Commodities Exchange
  • Thomson Reuters GRC
  • SUEK AG - Indonesia
  • Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
  • Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
  • Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
  • Chamber of Mines of South Africa
  • Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
  • Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
  • Sojitz Corporation - Japan
  • Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
  • PLN Batubara - Indonesia
  • Fearnleys - India
  • Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
  • Merrill Lynch Bank
  • Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
  • Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
  • ASAPP Information Group - India
  • Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
  • SMC Global Power, Philippines
  • KPCL - India
  • European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
  • Edison Trading Spa - Italy
  • Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
  • Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
  • Coaltrans Conferences
  • MEC Coal - Indonesia
  • GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
  • CoalTek, United States
  • Trasteel International SA, Italy
  • Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
  • Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
  • Surastha Cement
  • GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
  • Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
  • Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
  • Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
  • KEPCO - South Korea
  • RBS Sempra - UK
  • Bank of China, Malaysia
  • Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
  • Posco Energy - South Korea
  • Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
  • Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
  • Bhatia International Limited - India
  • globalCOAL - UK
  • Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
  • Panama Canal Authority
  • The University of Queensland
  • BNP Paribas - Singapore
  • Clarksons - UK
  • Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
  • Dalmia Cement Bharat India
  • Cement Manufacturers Association - India
  • The India Cements Ltd
  • Mercator Lines Limited - India
  • Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
  • Latin American Coal - Colombia
  • Petrosea - Indonesia
  • Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
  • Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
  • Goldman Sachs - Singapore
  • BRS Brokers - Singapore
  • Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Samsung - South Korea
  • Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
  • GHCL Limited - India
  • Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
  • Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
  • Reliance Power - India
  • Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
  • Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
  • Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
  • TRAFIGURA, South Korea
  • LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
  • Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
  • Planning Commission, India
  • India Bulls Power Limited - India
  • Central Electricity Authority - India
  • Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
  • ETA - Dubai
  • SASOL - South Africa
  • Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
  • Kobe Steel Ltd - Japan
  • Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
  • Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
  • World Coal - UK
  • KPMG - USA
  • Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
  • Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
  • Commonwealth Bank - Australia
  • Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
  • Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
  • Vitol - Bahrain
  • McKinsey & Co - India
  • Bangladesh Power Developement Board
  • Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
  • Runge Indonesia
  • ING Bank NV - Singapore
  • Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
  • Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
  • South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
  • Asia Cement - Taiwan
  • UBS Singapore
  • PTC India Limited - India
  • International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
  • Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Thiess Contractors Indonesia
  • Central Java Power - Indonesia
  • Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
  • UOB Asia (HK) Ltd
  • Ministry of Transport, Egypt
  • New Zealand Coal & Carbon
  • Permata Bank - Indonesia
  • Mitsubishi Corporation
  • PetroVietnam
  • Tamil Nadu electricity Board