keeps you connected across the coal world

Submit Your Articles
We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining, shipping, etc.

To Submit your article please click here.

International Energy Events

WTI Crude Oil

BRENT Crude Oil

Search News
Latest CoalNews Headlines
Tuesday, 21 April 20

Whilst the plight of cruise ships, stranded off shore with sick passengers and crew, may be dominating media headlines, the current COVID-19 pandemic is having a significant effect on the shipping industry as a whole. This article first explores owners’ rights to refuse to call at a port which is affected by the virus, before examining the rights, obligations and liabilities of owners under charterparties in the context of delays at loading and discharging ports.
Can owners refuse to comply with charterers’ orders?
Owners may be concerned that proceeding to a particular port could expose the crew to COVID-19, thereby endangering their health. The crew themselves may express concerns and indeed there have been recent reports in the industry press of a crew refusing to berth and allow stevedores on board the ship due to their fears of coming into contact with the virus.
However, owners are only likely to be able to refuse to proceed if there is a specific clause in the charterparty entitling them to do so, or if they can show that any safe port warranty has been breached.
Under English law, a port is considered unsafe (and the safe port warranty breached) if it a ship is unable to reach it, use it and return from it without, in the absence of some abnormal occurrence, being exposed to danger which cannot be avoided by good navigation and seamanship. An owner may wish to argue that a port is unsafe because of the danger to the health of the crew, or because of the risk of the vessel being quarantined or delayed after visiting that port.
Any dispute about the safety of the port is likely to be highly fact specific, including factors such as the spread of the virus in the port/country in question and the measures which the port have (or the crew can) put in place to limit contact between the crew and shore personnel. In most cases (at least based on the situations we have seen to date), it will be difficult to establish that a port is unsafe within the legal definition. Crews are generally able to take sufficient steps to limit their interaction with shore personnel and any delays which are incurred due to complying with quarantine restrictions are unlikely to be sufficiently lengthy to be considered a danger to the ship’s free movement. Accordingly, refusing to proceed to a particular port is likely to be risky and could expose owners to substantial claims from charterers for delays and losses.
We consider below the extent to which, if owners agree to comply with charterers’ orders, any adverse consequences of so doing – including, in particular, delays and additional port costs and expenses – are likely to be recoverable from charterers. In most cases, owners should be reluctant to refuse to comply with charterer’s voyage orders in the absence of a very real concern for the health and well-being of the crew.
BIMCO Infectious or Contagious Disease Clause
The position may be different if there is an express term in the charterparty which gives additional rights to owners. The most common clause in charterparties is BIMCO’s Infectious or Contagious Disease clause, with different versions applicable for time and voyage charterparties.
The essence of the clause is that it gives owners a right to leave, or refuse to proceed to, a port where there is a risk of exposure by the vessel to a “highly infectious or contagious disease that is seriously harmful to humans” or to a risk of quarantine or other restrictions being imposed in connection with the disease (an “affected area”). Charterers are required to provide alternative voyage orders and indemnify owners for additional costs or expenses incurred as a result of complying with or awaiting such orders. The vessel expressly remains on hire throughout. If the owners agree to proceed to an “affected area” within the meaning of the clause, the vessel will remain on hire at all times and charterers will be liable for delays or additional costs or liabilities arising.
The clause for use in voyage charterparties has a similar effect. However, owners are only entitled to refuse to proceed to a port which has become an affected area after the date of the charterparty: owners are expected to exercise their own due diligence in respect of the state of the contractually agreed ports when agreeing the fixture. If alternative voyage orders are issued, owners are entitled to recover additional expenses and freight. If owners agree to proceed to the affected area, charterers are responsible for additional costs arising and time lost counts as laytime or time on demurrage.
It is important to note that the BIMCO clauses have not yet been tested by any court or tribunal in the context of coronavirus. This means that, although BIMCO have clarified that they believe the clause could be triggered in respect of a port affected by COVID-19, there remains a risk that the scope of the clauses could be limited. For example a court could ultimately determine that there was no real risk of exposure to the crew due to measures put in place by a port to ensure minimal interaction between the crew and shore personnel. BIMCO suggest that, unless a public health authority has declared a port as a risk to visiting ships, it is unlikely to fall within the scope of the clause. Accordingly, even if a charterparty includes such a clause, shipowners should continue to exercise due diligence by informing themselves about the situation at individual ports and assessing the specific risks on a case by case basis.
Delays at port and force majeure
A number of ports have declared “force majeure” since their ability to operate has been affected by the spread of COVID-19. In particular, operations have been slowed due to restrictions affecting the free movement of the workforce and disruptions to the supply chain have affected the routine flow of cargo through the port. Such declarations may limit shipowners’ ability to take any action against the port authorities, but would not tend to affect liabilities between owners and charterers under their charterparties, which are private contractual arrangements and very often subject to English law.
Unlike certain civil law jurisdictions, English law does not recognise “force majeure” as a general legal concept. This means that a party to a contract subject to English law cannot simply declare that they are affected by circumstances of force majeure and are therefore relieved from their obligations. They can only do so if the contract or charterparty in question contains an express force majeure clause or other exclusion / exceptions clause which grants them such rights.
The force majeure clause will set out the specific circumstances in which it can be triggered and will identify the rights and obligations of both parties when force majeure circumstances are triggered. This may include rights of termination, or be limited to an exclusion of liability for delays and non-performance. In circumstances where charterers are claiming the protection of a force majeure clause, owners will likely want to ensure their charterparty includes a right to terminate after a certain period, so that they do not end up waiting indefinitely for charterers to perform, without being able to recover hire or demurrage for that period.
If the charterparty becomes impossible to perform or performance has become radically different than the parties had anticipated due to circumstances unforeseen at the time of entering into the charterparty, it may be terminated automatically on the basis that it has been frustrated. Since any reduction or suspension of operations at a port can be expected to be temporary, it cannot be said that performance of a charterparty has become impossible – only that performance will be delayed.
In order for the charterparty to be frustrated, the delay would have to be such as would render performance radically different from that anticipated by the parties. At present, it seems unlikely that delays at a port would cause a time charter to be frustrated. Even in cases of a voyage charter or a time charter trip, the argument is likely to be difficult to make, but will depend on the particular circumstances in question, including the length of any delays, the term of the charterparty, and the information available to the parties when the charterparty was entered into.
Who is liable for delays?
If it has been established that the charterer has no right to terminate the charterparty on the grounds of force majeure and it has not been frustrated, then the parties will want to know who bears the liability for delays encountered and additional costs incurred. This will ultimately depend on (i) the factual circumstances / cause of the delays and (ii) the charterparty wording.
In the absence of express wording, it is likely that delays at ports due to shortage of workers, unavailability of cargo or similar shore-side delays will be for charterers’ account. In a time charter context, such events would not tend to fall within the off hire provision, provided the vessel remains fully working and ready to carry out normal operations. In a voyage charter, provided the vessel had been able to tender NOR, such events are unlikely to fall within the exceptions to laytime, so that laytime will continue to run and demurrage to accrue, subject to any other interruptions or exceptions which may take effect (e.g. weather-related interruptions).
The position may be different if the delays affect the vessel and/or crew, for example, where there is an outbreak or occurrence of COVID-19 on board a ship. If the crew members are affected in sufficient numbers, the vessel could be off hire due to deficiency of men. Deviations or delays may be caused by the need to disembark crew for medical treatment, and such delays would tend to be for the owners’ account in the first instance. A suspected or established case is likely to cause the vessel to be quarantined upon arrival at the next port. Indeed, some ports have imposed quarantine requirements on vessels arriving from specific named ports, where there has been a high prevalence of COVID-19 infections, even where there is no indication that the crew is affected. These situations are more complex and will certainly depend on the specific wording of the charterparty and the off hire clause in particular. Under a voyage charter, it will be necessary to examine the charterparty terms as to when the vessel may tender NOR and exceptions / interruptions to laytime, which will determine whether laytime runs and demurrage accrues. If the charterparty includes the relevant BIMCO clause, or similar wording, the allocation of liability for delays and additional costs which may arise should be more easily determined.
In the absence of the BIMCO clause, owners of a time-chartered vessel may be able to argue that any delays or additional costs arising due to quarantine restrictions or crew infection following a call at a port affected by COVID-19 are for charterers’ account on the basis of ‘the implied indemnity.’ The general principle of the implied indemnity is that losses suffered by owners due to their compliance with charterers’ employment orders ought to be indemnified by charterers. However, this argument has yet to be tested in the context of this pandemic and would depend upon a court / tribunal’s view of how the parties intended to allocate risk and liability, taking into account both the express wording of the charterparty and the factual information available to the parties at the time of entering into the fixture. Owners would therefore be better protected by incorporating express wording into their charterparties, such as the BIMCO clauses discussed above.
Source: Skuld

If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.

Recent News

Friday, 09 October 20
India’s coal imports, depressed by the impact of coronavirus this year, regained ground in September, but in an uneven uptick – shipmen ...

Thursday, 08 October 20
China's coal imports boomed in 2019,  surprising many who had expected the government would clamp down strictly on shipments.   ...

Thursday, 08 October 20
Is coal on the rebound? Demand appears stronger and supply reductions have underpinned a tightening market. Certainly, the Newcastle thermal coal p ...

Wednesday, 07 October 20
EIA expects total U.S. coal production in 2020 to be 525 million short tons (MMst), compared with 705 MMst in 2019, a 26% decrease. COVID-19 a ...

Wednesday, 07 October 20
The challenges brought forward in 2020 proved to be very different from what we could have ever imagined. Together with placing a significant strai ...

   1 2 3 4 5   
Showing 11 to 15 news of total 6117
News by Category
Popular News
Total Members : 27,133
User ID
Remember Me
By logging on you accept our TERMS OF USE.
Forgot Password
Our Members Are From ...

  • OCBC - Singapore
  • Bank of America
  • Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
  • GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
  • Heidelberg Cement - Germany
  • Star Paper Mills Limited - India
  • Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
  • Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
  • Mitra SK Pvt Ltd - India
  • Singapore Mercantile Exchange
  • Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
  • Deloitte Consulting - India
  • BNP Paribas - Singapore
  • Lafarge - France
  • EMO - The Netherlands
  • TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
  • Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
  • Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
  • MEC Coal - Indonesia
  • CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
  • London Commodity Brokers - England
  • GMR Energy Limited - India
  • Enel Italy
  • Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
  • Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
  • Thai Mozambique Logistica
  • Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
  • Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
  • Indika Energy - Indonesia
  • Noble Europe Ltd - UK
  • White Energy Company Limited
  • Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
  • BRS Brokers - Singapore
  • Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
  • SMC Global Power, Philippines
  • PTC India Limited - India
  • Moodys - Singapore
  • Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
  • JPMorgan - India
  • Marubeni Corporation - India
  • Shree Cement - India
  • Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
  • Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • Ince & co LLP
  • Minerals Council of Australia
  • SGS (Thailand) Limited
  • Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
  • Tanito Harum - Indonesia
  • Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
  • Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
  • Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
  • Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
  • Planning Commission, India
  • Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
  • Goldman Sachs - Singapore
  • Jatenergy - Australia
  • Wilmar Investment Holdings
  • Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
  • Interocean Group of Companies - India
  • Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
  • APGENCO India
  • Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
  • GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
  • Agrawal Coal Company - India
  • Indonesia Power. PT
  • Bhushan Steel Limited - India
  • Siam City Cement - Thailand
  • New Zealand Coal & Carbon
  • Kobe Steel Ltd - Japan
  • Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
  • GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
  • Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
  • Credit Suisse - India
  • RBS Sempra - UK
  • VISA Power Limited - India
  • EIA - United States
  • Mitsubishi Corporation
  • Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
  • CCIC - Indonesia
  • Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
  • Videocon Industries ltd - India
  • Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
  • McKinsey & Co - India
  • Freeport Indonesia
  • Coaltrans Conferences
  • Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
  • Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
  • CESC Limited - India
  • Samsung - South Korea
  • Humpuss - Indonesia
  • Australian Coal Association
  • Russian Coal LLC
  • Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
  • Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
  • Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
  • Infraline Energy - India
  • Core Mineral Indonesia
  • Qatrana Cement - Jordan
  • OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
  • World Coal - UK
  • Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
  • Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
  • Idemitsu - Japan
  • Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
  • Economic Council, Georgia
  • Indogreen Group - Indonesia
  • Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
  • Commonwealth Bank - Australia
  • CNBM International Corporation - China
  • Gupta Coal India Ltd
  • SRK Consulting
  • Aditya Birla Group - India
  • IBC Asia (S) Pte Ltd
  • Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
  • Panama Canal Authority
  • Parliament of New Zealand
  • Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
  • Adani Power Ltd - India
  • Permata Bank - Indonesia
  • bp singapore
  • GB Group - China
  • Petron Corporation, Philippines
  • Reliance Power - India
  • Japan Coal Energy Center
  • Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Xindia Steels Limited - India
  • AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
  • Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
  • Surastha Cement
  • Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
  • Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
  • JPower - Japan
  • European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
  • Trasteel International SA, Italy
  • Barclays Capital - USA
  • Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
  • Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
  • Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
  • Carbofer General Trading SA - India
  • Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
  • Sojitz Corporation - Japan
  • Romanian Commodities Exchange
  • Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
  • PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
  • Ernst & Young Pvt. Ltd.
  • Coeclerici Indonesia
  • PetroVietnam
  • Mechel - Russia
  • Cargill India Pvt Ltd
  • ANZ Bank - Australia
  • PowerSource Philippines DevCo
  • Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
  • The India Cements Ltd
  • Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
  • Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
  • Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
  • Coal India Limited
  • Indian Oil Corporation Limited
  • Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
  • Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
  • Dalmia Cement Bharat India
  • Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
  • Thomson Reuters GRC
  • UBS Singapore
  • Thriveni
  • Asian Development Bank
  • ETA - Dubai
  • Indonesian Coal Mining Association
  • Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
  • Inspectorate - India
  • IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
  • DBS Bank - Singapore
  • SASOL - South Africa
  • Renaissance Capital - South Africa
  • Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
  • Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
  • International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
  • Peabody Energy - USA
  • Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
  • Cement Manufacturers Association - India
  • Bank of China, Malaysia
  • Xstrata Coal
  • Mjunction Services Limited - India
  • Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
  • Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
  • Argus Media - Singapore
  • Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
  • Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
  • McConnell Dowell - Australia
  • PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
  • globalCOAL - UK
  • Mitsui
  • Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
  • Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
  • Maersk Broker
  • Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
  • The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
  • SUEK AG - Indonesia
  • KEPCO - South Korea
  • Sucofindo - Indonesia
  • Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
  • Eastern Coal Council - USA
  • Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
  • KPMG - USA
  • Medco Energi Mining Internasional
  • Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
  • Sical Logistics Limited - India
  • Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
  • Thermax Limited - India
  • Central Java Power - Indonesia
  • Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
  • Pinang Coal Indonesia
  • Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
  • Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
  • Merrill Lynch Bank
  • Parry Sugars Refinery, India
  • Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
  • Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
  • Fearnleys - India
  • Cebu Energy, Philippines
  • Malco - India
  • Thailand Anthracite
  • Platou - Singapore
  • Latin American Coal - Colombia
  • KPCL - India
  • Chamber of Mines of South Africa
  • Britmindo - Indonesia
  • Gresik Semen - Indonesia
  • Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
  • Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
  • Vale Mozambique
  • Arutmin Indonesia
  • Geoservices-GeoAssay Lab
  • Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
  • Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
  • Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
  • Ministry of Mines - Canada
  • Glencore India Pvt. Ltd
  • Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
  • Rudhra Energy - India
  • PLN - Indonesia
  • Maybank - Singapore
  • Platts
  • Berau Coal - Indonesia
  • Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
  • U S Energy Resources
  • Eastern Energy - Thailand
  • Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
  • Deutsche Bank - India
  • Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
  • TNPL - India
  • Tamil Nadu electricity Board
  • Thiess Contractors Indonesia
  • Georgia Ports Authority, United States
  • World Bank
  • Anglo American - United Kingdom
  • Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
  • Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
  • UOB Asia (HK) Ltd
  • GHCL Limited - India
  • San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
  • TANGEDCO India
  • Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
  • Coal Orbis AG
  • Total Coal South Africa
  • Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
  • Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
  • Inco-Indonesia
  • India Bulls Power Limited - India
  • SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
  • SMG Consultants - Indonesia
  • ING Bank NV - Singapore
  • ASAPP Information Group - India
  • Malabar Cements Ltd - India
  • Central Electricity Authority - India
  • Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
  • Baramulti Group, Indonesia
  • Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
  • Runge Indonesia
  • Shenhua Group - China
  • Cosco
  • Posco Energy - South Korea
  • Indorama - Singapore
  • TRAFIGURA, South Korea
  • Petrosea - Indonesia
  • CoalTek, United States
  • IOL Indonesia
  • Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
  • NTPC Limited - India
  • Indian School of Mines
  • ICICI Bank Limited - India
  • Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
  • Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
  • GNFC Limited - India
  • Adaro Indonesia
  • Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
  • Arch Coal - USA
  • Coal and Oil Company - UAE
  • Ministry of Transport, Egypt
  • Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
  • Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
  • Bhatia International Limited - India
  • Tata Power - India
  • The University of Queensland
  • Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
  • Asia Cement - Taiwan
  • WorleyParsons
  • Energy Development Corp, Philippines
  • NALCO India
  • Independent Power Producers Association of India
  • Vitol - Bahrain
  • Clarksons - UK
  • South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
  • Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
  • Maruti Cements - India
  • Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
  • Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
  • Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
  • Mercator Lines Limited - India
  • IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
  • Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
  • Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
  • Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
  • Edison Trading Spa - Italy
  • LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
  • IMC Shipping - Singapore
  • Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
  • Bangkok Bank PCL
  • Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
  • Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
  • Cardiff University - UK
  • KOWEPO - South Korea
  • Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
  • PLN Batubara - Indonesia
  • Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
  • Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
  • MS Steel International - UAE
  • ACC Limited - India
  • Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
  • Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
  • J M Baxi & Co - India
  • Bangladesh Power Developement Board
  • TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
  • The Treasury - Australian Government
  • Vedanta Resources Plc - India
  • Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
  • Cemex - Philippines
  • Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
  • Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
  • HSBC - Hong Kong