keeps you connected across the coal world

Submit Your Articles
We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining, shipping, etc.

To Submit your article please click here.

International Energy Events

WTI Crude Oil

BRENT Crude Oil

Search News
Latest CoalNews Headlines
Tuesday, 21 April 20

Whilst the plight of cruise ships, stranded off shore with sick passengers and crew, may be dominating media headlines, the current COVID-19 pandemic is having a significant effect on the shipping industry as a whole. This article first explores owners’ rights to refuse to call at a port which is affected by the virus, before examining the rights, obligations and liabilities of owners under charterparties in the context of delays at loading and discharging ports.
Can owners refuse to comply with charterers’ orders?
Owners may be concerned that proceeding to a particular port could expose the crew to COVID-19, thereby endangering their health. The crew themselves may express concerns and indeed there have been recent reports in the industry press of a crew refusing to berth and allow stevedores on board the ship due to their fears of coming into contact with the virus.
However, owners are only likely to be able to refuse to proceed if there is a specific clause in the charterparty entitling them to do so, or if they can show that any safe port warranty has been breached.
Under English law, a port is considered unsafe (and the safe port warranty breached) if it a ship is unable to reach it, use it and return from it without, in the absence of some abnormal occurrence, being exposed to danger which cannot be avoided by good navigation and seamanship. An owner may wish to argue that a port is unsafe because of the danger to the health of the crew, or because of the risk of the vessel being quarantined or delayed after visiting that port.
Any dispute about the safety of the port is likely to be highly fact specific, including factors such as the spread of the virus in the port/country in question and the measures which the port have (or the crew can) put in place to limit contact between the crew and shore personnel. In most cases (at least based on the situations we have seen to date), it will be difficult to establish that a port is unsafe within the legal definition. Crews are generally able to take sufficient steps to limit their interaction with shore personnel and any delays which are incurred due to complying with quarantine restrictions are unlikely to be sufficiently lengthy to be considered a danger to the ship’s free movement. Accordingly, refusing to proceed to a particular port is likely to be risky and could expose owners to substantial claims from charterers for delays and losses.
We consider below the extent to which, if owners agree to comply with charterers’ orders, any adverse consequences of so doing – including, in particular, delays and additional port costs and expenses – are likely to be recoverable from charterers. In most cases, owners should be reluctant to refuse to comply with charterer’s voyage orders in the absence of a very real concern for the health and well-being of the crew.
BIMCO Infectious or Contagious Disease Clause
The position may be different if there is an express term in the charterparty which gives additional rights to owners. The most common clause in charterparties is BIMCO’s Infectious or Contagious Disease clause, with different versions applicable for time and voyage charterparties.
The essence of the clause is that it gives owners a right to leave, or refuse to proceed to, a port where there is a risk of exposure by the vessel to a “highly infectious or contagious disease that is seriously harmful to humans” or to a risk of quarantine or other restrictions being imposed in connection with the disease (an “affected area”). Charterers are required to provide alternative voyage orders and indemnify owners for additional costs or expenses incurred as a result of complying with or awaiting such orders. The vessel expressly remains on hire throughout. If the owners agree to proceed to an “affected area” within the meaning of the clause, the vessel will remain on hire at all times and charterers will be liable for delays or additional costs or liabilities arising.
The clause for use in voyage charterparties has a similar effect. However, owners are only entitled to refuse to proceed to a port which has become an affected area after the date of the charterparty: owners are expected to exercise their own due diligence in respect of the state of the contractually agreed ports when agreeing the fixture. If alternative voyage orders are issued, owners are entitled to recover additional expenses and freight. If owners agree to proceed to the affected area, charterers are responsible for additional costs arising and time lost counts as laytime or time on demurrage.
It is important to note that the BIMCO clauses have not yet been tested by any court or tribunal in the context of coronavirus. This means that, although BIMCO have clarified that they believe the clause could be triggered in respect of a port affected by COVID-19, there remains a risk that the scope of the clauses could be limited. For example a court could ultimately determine that there was no real risk of exposure to the crew due to measures put in place by a port to ensure minimal interaction between the crew and shore personnel. BIMCO suggest that, unless a public health authority has declared a port as a risk to visiting ships, it is unlikely to fall within the scope of the clause. Accordingly, even if a charterparty includes such a clause, shipowners should continue to exercise due diligence by informing themselves about the situation at individual ports and assessing the specific risks on a case by case basis.
Delays at port and force majeure
A number of ports have declared “force majeure” since their ability to operate has been affected by the spread of COVID-19. In particular, operations have been slowed due to restrictions affecting the free movement of the workforce and disruptions to the supply chain have affected the routine flow of cargo through the port. Such declarations may limit shipowners’ ability to take any action against the port authorities, but would not tend to affect liabilities between owners and charterers under their charterparties, which are private contractual arrangements and very often subject to English law.
Unlike certain civil law jurisdictions, English law does not recognise “force majeure” as a general legal concept. This means that a party to a contract subject to English law cannot simply declare that they are affected by circumstances of force majeure and are therefore relieved from their obligations. They can only do so if the contract or charterparty in question contains an express force majeure clause or other exclusion / exceptions clause which grants them such rights.
The force majeure clause will set out the specific circumstances in which it can be triggered and will identify the rights and obligations of both parties when force majeure circumstances are triggered. This may include rights of termination, or be limited to an exclusion of liability for delays and non-performance. In circumstances where charterers are claiming the protection of a force majeure clause, owners will likely want to ensure their charterparty includes a right to terminate after a certain period, so that they do not end up waiting indefinitely for charterers to perform, without being able to recover hire or demurrage for that period.
If the charterparty becomes impossible to perform or performance has become radically different than the parties had anticipated due to circumstances unforeseen at the time of entering into the charterparty, it may be terminated automatically on the basis that it has been frustrated. Since any reduction or suspension of operations at a port can be expected to be temporary, it cannot be said that performance of a charterparty has become impossible – only that performance will be delayed.
In order for the charterparty to be frustrated, the delay would have to be such as would render performance radically different from that anticipated by the parties. At present, it seems unlikely that delays at a port would cause a time charter to be frustrated. Even in cases of a voyage charter or a time charter trip, the argument is likely to be difficult to make, but will depend on the particular circumstances in question, including the length of any delays, the term of the charterparty, and the information available to the parties when the charterparty was entered into.
Who is liable for delays?
If it has been established that the charterer has no right to terminate the charterparty on the grounds of force majeure and it has not been frustrated, then the parties will want to know who bears the liability for delays encountered and additional costs incurred. This will ultimately depend on (i) the factual circumstances / cause of the delays and (ii) the charterparty wording.
In the absence of express wording, it is likely that delays at ports due to shortage of workers, unavailability of cargo or similar shore-side delays will be for charterers’ account. In a time charter context, such events would not tend to fall within the off hire provision, provided the vessel remains fully working and ready to carry out normal operations. In a voyage charter, provided the vessel had been able to tender NOR, such events are unlikely to fall within the exceptions to laytime, so that laytime will continue to run and demurrage to accrue, subject to any other interruptions or exceptions which may take effect (e.g. weather-related interruptions).
The position may be different if the delays affect the vessel and/or crew, for example, where there is an outbreak or occurrence of COVID-19 on board a ship. If the crew members are affected in sufficient numbers, the vessel could be off hire due to deficiency of men. Deviations or delays may be caused by the need to disembark crew for medical treatment, and such delays would tend to be for the owners’ account in the first instance. A suspected or established case is likely to cause the vessel to be quarantined upon arrival at the next port. Indeed, some ports have imposed quarantine requirements on vessels arriving from specific named ports, where there has been a high prevalence of COVID-19 infections, even where there is no indication that the crew is affected. These situations are more complex and will certainly depend on the specific wording of the charterparty and the off hire clause in particular. Under a voyage charter, it will be necessary to examine the charterparty terms as to when the vessel may tender NOR and exceptions / interruptions to laytime, which will determine whether laytime runs and demurrage accrues. If the charterparty includes the relevant BIMCO clause, or similar wording, the allocation of liability for delays and additional costs which may arise should be more easily determined.
In the absence of the BIMCO clause, owners of a time-chartered vessel may be able to argue that any delays or additional costs arising due to quarantine restrictions or crew infection following a call at a port affected by COVID-19 are for charterers’ account on the basis of ‘the implied indemnity.’ The general principle of the implied indemnity is that losses suffered by owners due to their compliance with charterers’ employment orders ought to be indemnified by charterers. However, this argument has yet to be tested in the context of this pandemic and would depend upon a court / tribunal’s view of how the parties intended to allocate risk and liability, taking into account both the express wording of the charterparty and the factual information available to the parties at the time of entering into the fixture. Owners would therefore be better protected by incorporating express wording into their charterparties, such as the BIMCO clauses discussed above.
Source: Skuld

If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.

Recent News

Wednesday, 09 June 21
“Counter cyclical investments.” usually take place by investing in a “bad” market at the point that ensures that the acquir ...

Saturday, 05 June 21
KOMIPO INVITED 5600 NAR COAL OFFERS FOR THREE YEARS SUPPLY; 520,000 MT PER YEAR Korea Midland Power Co., Ltd (KOMIPO) has issued an international tender for total 1,560,000 MT of  Bituminous Coal to be used a ...

Saturday, 05 June 21
Fossil gas and nuclear investments risk locking in costly, outdated infrastructure for the long-term   The United States has spent the ...

Friday, 04 June 21
Coal capacity additions face major stranded asset risk Much of India’s 33 gigawatts (GW) of coal-fired power capacity currently under co ...

Thursday, 03 June 21
JUNE HBA IS HITTING ABOVE $100 AND SETTLED AT ITS HIGHEST SINCE OCTOBER 2020 The Indonesia coal price reference for June 2021 settles at US$ 100.33 per ton FOB vessel.    The Indonesia coal pr ...

   1 2 3 4 5   
Showing 11 to 15 news of total 6321
News by Category
Popular News
Total Members : 27,459
User ID
Remember Me
By logging on you accept our TERMS OF USE.
Forgot Password
Our Members Are From ...

  • WorleyParsons
  • PetroVietnam
  • The Treasury - Australian Government
  • Eastern Energy - Thailand
  • San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
  • International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
  • London Commodity Brokers - England
  • Vedanta Resources Plc - India
  • Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
  • India Bulls Power Limited - India
  • SASOL - South Africa
  • Malabar Cements Ltd - India
  • Humpuss - Indonesia
  • Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
  • TANGEDCO India
  • SMG Consultants - Indonesia
  • Russian Coal LLC
  • Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
  • Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
  • Indogreen Group - Indonesia
  • Indonesia Power. PT
  • Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
  • Peabody Energy - USA
  • Enel Italy
  • Qatrana Cement - Jordan
  • NTPC Limited - India
  • Sical Logistics Limited - India
  • Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
  • Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
  • Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
  • Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
  • Coal India Limited
  • Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
  • Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
  • Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
  • Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
  • SUEK AG - Indonesia
  • Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
  • Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
  • Tata Power - India
  • KOWEPO - South Korea
  • Singapore Mercantile Exchange
  • GMR Energy Limited - India
  • Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
  • Deloitte Consulting - India
  • TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
  • Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
  • Asia Cement - Taiwan
  • Ince & co LLP
  • UBS Singapore
  • Independent Power Producers Association of India
  • Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
  • Planning Commission, India
  • PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
  • CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
  • Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
  • Agrawal Coal Company - India
  • Arutmin Indonesia
  • Minerals Council of Australia
  • Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
  • Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
  • Interocean Group of Companies - India
  • Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
  • OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
  • Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
  • McConnell Dowell - Australia
  • Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
  • MEC Coal - Indonesia
  • Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
  • World Bank
  • Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
  • Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
  • Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
  • Petrosea - Indonesia
  • Commonwealth Bank - Australia
  • Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
  • Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
  • globalCOAL - UK
  • Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
  • Infraline Energy - India
  • Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
  • KPCL - India
  • Surastha Cement
  • Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
  • Noble Europe Ltd - UK
  • Indian School of Mines
  • Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
  • KEPCO - South Korea
  • Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
  • Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
  • Sojitz Corporation - Japan
  • Glencore India Pvt. Ltd
  • Permata Bank - Indonesia
  • Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
  • Adani Power Ltd - India
  • Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • JPMorgan - India
  • Argus Media - Singapore
  • Total Coal South Africa
  • Goldman Sachs - Singapore
  • The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
  • Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
  • IOL Indonesia
  • Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
  • Coal and Oil Company - UAE
  • GB Group - China
  • Videocon Industries ltd - India
  • GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
  • Runge Indonesia
  • Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
  • AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
  • Indorama - Singapore
  • Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
  • Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
  • Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
  • PLN - Indonesia
  • TNPL - India
  • Moodys - Singapore
  • Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
  • PowerSource Philippines DevCo
  • Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
  • J M Baxi & Co - India
  • Romanian Commodities Exchange
  • IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
  • The India Cements Ltd
  • Panama Canal Authority
  • Cement Manufacturers Association - India
  • Rudhra Energy - India
  • Heidelberg Cement - Germany
  • ETA - Dubai
  • Eastern Coal Council - USA
  • Cargill India Pvt Ltd
  • SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
  • Thriveni
  • Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
  • Star Paper Mills Limited - India
  • Wilmar Investment Holdings
  • Idemitsu - Japan
  • IMC Shipping - Singapore
  • Clarksons - UK
  • Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
  • Malco - India
  • Electricity Authority, New Zealand
  • Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
  • Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
  • Baramulti Group, Indonesia
  • Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
  • Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
  • Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • Bhatia International Limited - India
  • GHCL Limited - India
  • Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
  • APGENCO India
  • Tamil Nadu electricity Board
  • Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
  • Maybank - Singapore
  • GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
  • Medco Energi Mining Internasional
  • Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
  • bp singapore
  • Core Mineral Indonesia
  • Indian Energy Exchange, India
  • Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
  • Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
  • CESC Limited - India
  • Marubeni Corporation - India
  • Economic Council, Georgia
  • NALCO India
  • Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
  • Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
  • Posco Energy - South Korea
  • Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
  • Platou - Singapore
  • SRK Consulting
  • Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
  • Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
  • CNBM International Corporation - China
  • World Coal - UK
  • BNP Paribas - Singapore
  • JPower - Japan
  • The University of Queensland
  • Geoservices-GeoAssay Lab
  • TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
  • GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
  • Inspectorate - India
  • ING Bank NV - Singapore
  • Pinang Coal Indonesia
  • Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
  • Xstrata Coal
  • Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
  • Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
  • OCBC - Singapore
  • Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
  • Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
  • Siam City Cement - Thailand
  • EMO - The Netherlands
  • VISA Power Limited - India
  • Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
  • Ernst & Young Pvt. Ltd.
  • Xindia Steels Limited - India
  • Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
  • DBS Bank - Singapore
  • Vitol - Bahrain
  • Cardiff University - UK
  • Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
  • Mercator Lines Limited - India
  • Dalmia Cement Bharat India
  • Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
  • Cemex - Philippines
  • Thailand Anthracite
  • PTC India Limited - India
  • Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
  • LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
  • UOB Asia (HK) Ltd
  • Ministry of Transport, Egypt
  • Parry Sugars Refinery, India
  • Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
  • Vale Mozambique
  • Maruti Cements - India
  • Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
  • Mitra SK Pvt Ltd - India
  • Freeport Indonesia
  • IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
  • Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
  • TRAFIGURA, South Korea
  • Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
  • Thai Mozambique Logistica
  • Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
  • Bangladesh Power Developement Board
  • Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
  • Mitsui
  • Tanito Harum - Indonesia
  • Ministry of Mines - Canada
  • Lafarge - France
  • Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
  • Energy Development Corp, Philippines
  • Cosco
  • Berau Coal - Indonesia
  • Parliament of New Zealand
  • Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
  • White Energy Company Limited
  • HSBC - Hong Kong
  • Georgia Ports Authority, United States
  • U S Energy Resources
  • Bank of China, Malaysia
  • CCIC - Indonesia
  • Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
  • Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
  • Trasteel International SA, Italy
  • Samsung - South Korea
  • New Zealand Coal & Carbon
  • EIA - United States
  • Australian Coal Association
  • GNFC Limited - India
  • Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
  • ASAPP Information Group - India
  • Adaro Indonesia
  • ACC Limited - India
  • Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
  • PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
  • Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
  • Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
  • Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
  • Coaltrans Conferences
  • SMC Global Power, Philippines
  • Thermax Limited - India
  • Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
  • Carbofer General Trading SA - India
  • South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
  • Indian Oil Corporation Limited
  • Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
  • Mjunction Services Limited - India
  • Maersk Broker
  • Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
  • Bank of America
  • Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
  • Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
  • Thomson Reuters GRC
  • Credit Suisse - India
  • MS Steel International - UAE
  • Chamber of Mines of South Africa
  • Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
  • PLN Batubara - Indonesia
  • Kobe Steel Ltd - Japan
  • CoalTek, United States
  • BRS Brokers - Singapore
  • Petron Corporation, Philippines
  • Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
  • Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
  • Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
  • ANZ Bank - Australia
  • Bhushan Steel Limited - India
  • Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
  • Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
  • Shenhua Group - China
  • Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
  • Gresik Semen - Indonesia
  • Central Java Power - Indonesia
  • Japan Coal Energy Center
  • Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
  • Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
  • Cebu Energy, Philippines
  • Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Anglo American - United Kingdom
  • Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
  • Barclays Capital - USA
  • ICICI Bank Limited - India
  • Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
  • Aditya Birla Group - India
  • Mitsubishi Corporation
  • KPMG - USA
  • RBS Sempra - UK
  • Bangkok Bank PCL
  • Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
  • Indika Energy - Indonesia
  • Latin American Coal - Colombia
  • Mechel - Russia
  • Fearnleys - India
  • Indonesian Coal Mining Association
  • Central Electricity Authority - India
  • Shree Cement - India
  • Coeclerici Indonesia
  • Jatenergy - Australia
  • Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
  • Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
  • European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
  • Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
  • Edison Trading Spa - Italy
  • Arch Coal - USA
  • Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
  • Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
  • Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
  • Inco-Indonesia
  • Gupta Coal India Ltd
  • Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
  • Thiess Contractors Indonesia
  • McKinsey & Co - India
  • Reliance Power - India
  • Sucofindo - Indonesia
  • Renaissance Capital - South Africa
  • Deutsche Bank - India
  • Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
  • Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
  • Asian Development Bank
  • Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
  • Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
  • Coal Orbis AG
  • Merrill Lynch Bank
  • Britmindo - Indonesia
  • Platts
  • IBC Asia (S) Pte Ltd
  • SGS (Thailand) Limited