COALspot.com keeps you connected across the coal world
  • BUMA MINED 4.1 MMT OF COAL AND REMOVED 23.8 M BCM OF OVERBURDEN IN MARCH 2021. YEAR TO DATE, BUMA MINED 12.7 MMT OF COAL, WHICH INCREASED 5% YOY.
  • COAL FINANCING COSTS SURGE AS INVESTORS OPT FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY - THE GUARDIAN
  • INDIA MAY BUILD NEW COAL PLANTS DUE TO LOW COST DESPITE CLIMATE CHANGE - REUTERS
  • APRIL 2021 INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE FOR EXPORTS FIXED AT US$ 86.68 A TON

Submit Your Articles
We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining, shipping, etc.

To Submit your article please click here.

International Energy Events


WTI Crude Oil

BRENT Crude Oil

Search News
Latest CoalNews Headlines
Tuesday, 21 April 20
COVID-19: CHARTERPARTY MATTERS FOR SHIPOWNERS - SKULD
SkuldKNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE

Whilst the plight of cruise ships, stranded off shore with sick passengers and crew, may be dominating media headlines, the current COVID-19 pandemic is having a significant effect on the shipping industry as a whole. This article first explores owners’ rights to refuse to call at a port which is affected by the virus, before examining the rights, obligations and liabilities of owners under charterparties in the context of delays at loading and discharging ports.
 
Can owners refuse to comply with charterers’ orders?
Owners may be concerned that proceeding to a particular port could expose the crew to COVID-19, thereby endangering their health. The crew themselves may express concerns and indeed there have been recent reports in the industry press of a crew refusing to berth and allow stevedores on board the ship due to their fears of coming into contact with the virus.
 
However, owners are only likely to be able to refuse to proceed if there is a specific clause in the charterparty entitling them to do so, or if they can show that any safe port warranty has been breached.
 
Under English law, a port is considered unsafe (and the safe port warranty breached) if it a ship is unable to reach it, use it and return from it without, in the absence of some abnormal occurrence, being exposed to danger which cannot be avoided by good navigation and seamanship. An owner may wish to argue that a port is unsafe because of the danger to the health of the crew, or because of the risk of the vessel being quarantined or delayed after visiting that port.
 
Any dispute about the safety of the port is likely to be highly fact specific, including factors such as the spread of the virus in the port/country in question and the measures which the port have (or the crew can) put in place to limit contact between the crew and shore personnel. In most cases (at least based on the situations we have seen to date), it will be difficult to establish that a port is unsafe within the legal definition. Crews are generally able to take sufficient steps to limit their interaction with shore personnel and any delays which are incurred due to complying with quarantine restrictions are unlikely to be sufficiently lengthy to be considered a danger to the ship’s free movement. Accordingly, refusing to proceed to a particular port is likely to be risky and could expose owners to substantial claims from charterers for delays and losses.
 
We consider below the extent to which, if owners agree to comply with charterers’ orders, any adverse consequences of so doing – including, in particular, delays and additional port costs and expenses – are likely to be recoverable from charterers. In most cases, owners should be reluctant to refuse to comply with charterer’s voyage orders in the absence of a very real concern for the health and well-being of the crew.
 
BIMCO Infectious or Contagious Disease Clause
The position may be different if there is an express term in the charterparty which gives additional rights to owners. The most common clause in charterparties is BIMCO’s Infectious or Contagious Disease clause, with different versions applicable for time and voyage charterparties.
 
The essence of the clause is that it gives owners a right to leave, or refuse to proceed to, a port where there is a risk of exposure by the vessel to a “highly infectious or contagious disease that is seriously harmful to humans” or to a risk of quarantine or other restrictions being imposed in connection with the disease (an “affected area”). Charterers are required to provide alternative voyage orders and indemnify owners for additional costs or expenses incurred as a result of complying with or awaiting such orders. The vessel expressly remains on hire throughout. If the owners agree to proceed to an “affected area” within the meaning of the clause, the vessel will remain on hire at all times and charterers will be liable for delays or additional costs or liabilities arising.
 
The clause for use in voyage charterparties has a similar effect. However, owners are only entitled to refuse to proceed to a port which has become an affected area after the date of the charterparty: owners are expected to exercise their own due diligence in respect of the state of the contractually agreed ports when agreeing the fixture. If alternative voyage orders are issued, owners are entitled to recover additional expenses and freight. If owners agree to proceed to the affected area, charterers are responsible for additional costs arising and time lost counts as laytime or time on demurrage.
 
It is important to note that the BIMCO clauses have not yet been tested by any court or tribunal in the context of coronavirus. This means that, although BIMCO have clarified that they believe the clause could be triggered in respect of a port affected by COVID-19, there remains a risk that the scope of the clauses could be limited. For example a court could ultimately determine that there was no real risk of exposure to the crew due to measures put in place by a port to ensure minimal interaction between the crew and shore personnel. BIMCO suggest that, unless a public health authority has declared a port as a risk to visiting ships, it is unlikely to fall within the scope of the clause. Accordingly, even if a charterparty includes such a clause, shipowners should continue to exercise due diligence by informing themselves about the situation at individual ports and assessing the specific risks on a case by case basis.
 
Delays at port and force majeure
A number of ports have declared “force majeure” since their ability to operate has been affected by the spread of COVID-19. In particular, operations have been slowed due to restrictions affecting the free movement of the workforce and disruptions to the supply chain have affected the routine flow of cargo through the port. Such declarations may limit shipowners’ ability to take any action against the port authorities, but would not tend to affect liabilities between owners and charterers under their charterparties, which are private contractual arrangements and very often subject to English law.
 
Unlike certain civil law jurisdictions, English law does not recognise “force majeure” as a general legal concept. This means that a party to a contract subject to English law cannot simply declare that they are affected by circumstances of force majeure and are therefore relieved from their obligations. They can only do so if the contract or charterparty in question contains an express force majeure clause or other exclusion / exceptions clause which grants them such rights.
 
The force majeure clause will set out the specific circumstances in which it can be triggered and will identify the rights and obligations of both parties when force majeure circumstances are triggered. This may include rights of termination, or be limited to an exclusion of liability for delays and non-performance. In circumstances where charterers are claiming the protection of a force majeure clause, owners will likely want to ensure their charterparty includes a right to terminate after a certain period, so that they do not end up waiting indefinitely for charterers to perform, without being able to recover hire or demurrage for that period.
 
Frustration
If the charterparty becomes impossible to perform or performance has become radically different than the parties had anticipated due to circumstances unforeseen at the time of entering into the charterparty, it may be terminated automatically on the basis that it has been frustrated. Since any reduction or suspension of operations at a port can be expected to be temporary, it cannot be said that performance of a charterparty has become impossible – only that performance will be delayed.
 
In order for the charterparty to be frustrated, the delay would have to be such as would render performance radically different from that anticipated by the parties. At present, it seems unlikely that delays at a port would cause a time charter to be frustrated. Even in cases of a voyage charter or a time charter trip, the argument is likely to be difficult to make, but will depend on the particular circumstances in question, including the length of any delays, the term of the charterparty, and the information available to the parties when the charterparty was entered into.
 
Who is liable for delays?
If it has been established that the charterer has no right to terminate the charterparty on the grounds of force majeure and it has not been frustrated, then the parties will want to know who bears the liability for delays encountered and additional costs incurred. This will ultimately depend on (i) the factual circumstances / cause of the delays and (ii) the charterparty wording.
 
In the absence of express wording, it is likely that delays at ports due to shortage of workers, unavailability of cargo or similar shore-side delays will be for charterers’ account. In a time charter context, such events would not tend to fall within the off hire provision, provided the vessel remains fully working and ready to carry out normal operations. In a voyage charter, provided the vessel had been able to tender NOR, such events are unlikely to fall within the exceptions to laytime, so that laytime will continue to run and demurrage to accrue, subject to any other interruptions or exceptions which may take effect (e.g. weather-related interruptions).
 
The position may be different if the delays affect the vessel and/or crew, for example, where there is an outbreak or occurrence of COVID-19 on board a ship. If the crew members are affected in sufficient numbers, the vessel could be off hire due to deficiency of men. Deviations or delays may be caused by the need to disembark crew for medical treatment, and such delays would tend to be for the owners’ account in the first instance. A suspected or established case is likely to cause the vessel to be quarantined upon arrival at the next port. Indeed, some ports have imposed quarantine requirements on vessels arriving from specific named ports, where there has been a high prevalence of COVID-19 infections, even where there is no indication that the crew is affected. These situations are more complex and will certainly depend on the specific wording of the charterparty and the off hire clause in particular. Under a voyage charter, it will be necessary to examine the charterparty terms as to when the vessel may tender NOR and exceptions / interruptions to laytime, which will determine whether laytime runs and demurrage accrues. If the charterparty includes the relevant BIMCO clause, or similar wording, the allocation of liability for delays and additional costs which may arise should be more easily determined.
 
In the absence of the BIMCO clause, owners of a time-chartered vessel may be able to argue that any delays or additional costs arising due to quarantine restrictions or crew infection following a call at a port affected by COVID-19 are for charterers’ account on the basis of ‘the implied indemnity.’ The general principle of the implied indemnity is that losses suffered by owners due to their compliance with charterers’ employment orders ought to be indemnified by charterers. However, this argument has yet to be tested in the context of this pandemic and would depend upon a court / tribunal’s view of how the parties intended to allocate risk and liability, taking into account both the express wording of the charterparty and the factual information available to the parties at the time of entering into the fixture. Owners would therefore be better protected by incorporating express wording into their charterparties, such as the BIMCO clauses discussed above.
Source: Skuld


If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.

Recent News

Wednesday, 14 April 21
INDIA HAS A RECORD LEVEL OF STOCKPILED COAL DAMPENING NEED FOR NEW DOMESTIC MINES - IEEFA
Proposed coal mining expansions at odds with excess supply   India has stockpiled a record 132 million tonnes of coal – enough t ...


Wednesday, 14 April 21
BANGLADESH NEEDS A RENEWABLES FOCUS, NOT A SWITCH FROM 'COAL TO GAS' - IEEFA
Renewables are cheaper and more sustainable than gas imports, and can provide better energy security in developing nations   The emerg ...


Wednesday, 14 April 21
CHINA TAIYUAN COAL TRANSACTION PRICE INDEX DOWN 1.10 PCT - XINHUA
China Taiyuan coal transaction price index stood at 138.05 points Monday, down 1.10 percent week on week.   The index, released by Chi ...


Wednesday, 14 April 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
After a series of months where the dry bulk sector was attracting most of the buying interest, tankers SnP activity spiked in the previous weeks. O ...


Tuesday, 13 April 21
INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE IN APRIL UP AGAIN ON FIRM DEMAND
COALspot.com: The Indonesia coal price reference for April 2021 settles at US$ 86.68 per ton FOB vessel.    The Indonesia coal pr ...


   1 2 3 4 5   
Showing 6 to 10 news of total 6276
News by Category
Popular News
 
Total Members : 27,393
Member
Panelist
User ID
Password
Remember Me
By logging on you accept our TERMS OF USE.
Free
Register
Forgot Password
 
Our Members Are From ...

  • Jatenergy - Australia
  • Arch Coal - USA
  • Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
  • SRK Consulting
  • PLN Batubara - Indonesia
  • Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
  • Chamber of Mines of South Africa
  • Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
  • PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
  • White Energy Company Limited
  • Central Electricity Authority - India
  • McKinsey & Co - India
  • Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
  • Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
  • Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
  • Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
  • Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
  • Asia Cement - Taiwan
  • Economic Council, Georgia
  • Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
  • ETA - Dubai
  • ACC Limited - India
  • Panama Canal Authority
  • Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
  • Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
  • Mercator Lines Limited - India
  • CESC Limited - India
  • EMO - The Netherlands
  • Romanian Commodities Exchange
  • Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
  • Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
  • International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
  • IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
  • Singapore Mercantile Exchange
  • Tata Power - India
  • Bank of America
  • Tanito Harum - Indonesia
  • Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
  • Russian Coal LLC
  • World Bank
  • Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
  • PowerSource Philippines DevCo
  • UBS Singapore
  • Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
  • Total Coal South Africa
  • Mechel - Russia
  • CCIC - Indonesia
  • Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • Indika Energy - Indonesia
  • Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
  • Latin American Coal - Colombia
  • Bhushan Steel Limited - India
  • TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
  • KEPCO - South Korea
  • Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
  • Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
  • Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
  • Permata Bank - Indonesia
  • Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
  • Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
  • Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
  • Mitsui
  • Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
  • Minerals Council of Australia
  • Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
  • Geoservices-GeoAssay Lab
  • Wilmar Investment Holdings
  • Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
  • Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
  • KPCL - India
  • Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
  • Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
  • Argus Media - Singapore
  • Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
  • Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
  • Thermax Limited - India
  • Posco Energy - South Korea
  • Indian School of Mines
  • Qatrana Cement - Jordan
  • Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
  • Mjunction Services Limited - India
  • Sojitz Corporation - Japan
  • Cebu Energy, Philippines
  • Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
  • GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
  • Indonesia Power. PT
  • Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
  • GNFC Limited - India
  • Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
  • Platou - Singapore
  • New Zealand Coal & Carbon
  • Vedanta Resources Plc - India
  • Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
  • Energy Development Corp, Philippines
  • Cardiff University - UK
  • PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
  • Carbofer General Trading SA - India
  • Lafarge - France
  • Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
  • Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
  • GHCL Limited - India
  • Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
  • SMG Consultants - Indonesia
  • Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
  • SGS (Thailand) Limited
  • Merrill Lynch Bank
  • Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
  • Cement Manufacturers Association - India
  • Arutmin Indonesia
  • Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
  • VISA Power Limited - India
  • Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
  • J M Baxi & Co - India
  • Vale Mozambique
  • KPMG - USA
  • JPMorgan - India
  • Barclays Capital - USA
  • TRAFIGURA, South Korea
  • IBC Asia (S) Pte Ltd
  • Adani Power Ltd - India
  • EIA - United States
  • Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
  • Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
  • Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
  • Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
  • GB Group - China
  • JPower - Japan
  • Maruti Cements - India
  • Planning Commission, India
  • Fearnleys - India
  • Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
  • Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
  • Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
  • Ministry of Transport, Egypt
  • Bangladesh Power Developement Board
  • CoalTek, United States
  • Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
  • Runge Indonesia
  • Tamil Nadu electricity Board
  • GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
  • Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
  • SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
  • Mitsubishi Corporation
  • Platts
  • SMC Global Power, Philippines
  • Heidelberg Cement - Germany
  • Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
  • Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
  • Moodys - Singapore
  • Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
  • TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
  • Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
  • Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
  • London Commodity Brokers - England
  • Indian Energy Exchange, India
  • Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
  • Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
  • Dalmia Cement Bharat India
  • Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
  • PTC India Limited - India
  • Eastern Coal Council - USA
  • Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
  • Malco - India
  • Bangkok Bank PCL
  • ANZ Bank - Australia
  • The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
  • Noble Europe Ltd - UK
  • MEC Coal - Indonesia
  • Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
  • Deutsche Bank - India
  • Cemex - Philippines
  • PLN - Indonesia
  • Aditya Birla Group - India
  • Central Java Power - Indonesia
  • Britmindo - Indonesia
  • Maybank - Singapore
  • Baramulti Group, Indonesia
  • Japan Coal Energy Center
  • Thai Mozambique Logistica
  • The University of Queensland
  • Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
  • KOWEPO - South Korea
  • UOB Asia (HK) Ltd
  • U S Energy Resources
  • Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
  • Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
  • Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
  • Star Paper Mills Limited - India
  • Parry Sugars Refinery, India
  • Coal India Limited
  • LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
  • Interocean Group of Companies - India
  • SASOL - South Africa
  • MS Steel International - UAE
  • Sucofindo - Indonesia
  • Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
  • TANGEDCO India
  • Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
  • Ernst & Young Pvt. Ltd.
  • Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
  • DBS Bank - Singapore
  • Inspectorate - India
  • Kobe Steel Ltd - Japan
  • Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
  • Bank of China, Malaysia
  • OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
  • Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
  • Berau Coal - Indonesia
  • BNP Paribas - Singapore
  • APGENCO India
  • Agrawal Coal Company - India
  • Indian Oil Corporation Limited
  • Glencore India Pvt. Ltd
  • Indorama - Singapore
  • Idemitsu - Japan
  • Coal Orbis AG
  • Cargill India Pvt Ltd
  • Thomson Reuters GRC
  • Marubeni Corporation - India
  • Georgia Ports Authority, United States
  • Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
  • Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
  • Deloitte Consulting - India
  • India Bulls Power Limited - India
  • Maersk Broker
  • NALCO India
  • Indonesian Coal Mining Association
  • Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
  • Surastha Cement
  • TNPL - India
  • Sical Logistics Limited - India
  • Inco-Indonesia
  • Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
  • Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
  • IOL Indonesia
  • Coaltrans Conferences
  • NTPC Limited - India
  • Parliament of New Zealand
  • Vitol - Bahrain
  • PetroVietnam
  • Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
  • Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
  • Adaro Indonesia
  • Coeclerici Indonesia
  • Renaissance Capital - South Africa
  • Medco Energi Mining Internasional
  • The India Cements Ltd
  • GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
  • Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
  • Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
  • BRS Brokers - Singapore
  • World Coal - UK
  • Freeport Indonesia
  • ICICI Bank Limited - India
  • Shree Cement - India
  • Indogreen Group - Indonesia
  • Cosco
  • Shenhua Group - China
  • Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
  • TGV SRAAC LIMITED, India
  • Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
  • Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
  • ASAPP Information Group - India
  • Petron Corporation, Philippines
  • Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
  • Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
  • AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
  • SUEK AG - Indonesia
  • Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
  • Siam City Cement - Thailand
  • GMR Energy Limited - India
  • Xindia Steels Limited - India
  • Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
  • South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
  • Mitra SK Pvt Ltd - India
  • Rudhra Energy - India
  • Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
  • Samsung - South Korea
  • The Treasury - Australian Government
  • Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
  • Malabar Cements Ltd - India
  • Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
  • Videocon Industries ltd - India
  • Reliance Power - India
  • bp singapore
  • Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
  • Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
  • Edison Trading Spa - Italy
  • Electricity Authority, New Zealand
  • Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
  • Anglo American - United Kingdom
  • Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
  • Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
  • IMC Shipping - Singapore
  • Peabody Energy - USA
  • Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
  • Trasteel International SA, Italy
  • HSBC - Hong Kong
  • Eastern Energy - Thailand
  • Pinang Coal Indonesia
  • Xstrata Coal
  • Gresik Semen - Indonesia
  • Goldman Sachs - Singapore
  • European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
  • Thriveni
  • Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
  • Gupta Coal India Ltd
  • globalCOAL - UK
  • Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
  • Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
  • ING Bank NV - Singapore
  • Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
  • Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
  • Core Mineral Indonesia
  • Coal and Oil Company - UAE
  • Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
  • Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
  • RBS Sempra - UK
  • Enel Italy
  • Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
  • Ministry of Mines - Canada
  • McConnell Dowell - Australia
  • Australian Coal Association
  • Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
  • Ince & co LLP
  • Asian Development Bank
  • IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
  • Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
  • Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
  • Infraline Energy - India
  • Independent Power Producers Association of India
  • San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
  • WorleyParsons
  • Thailand Anthracite
  • Petrosea - Indonesia
  • Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
  • Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
  • Humpuss - Indonesia
  • Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
  • Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
  • CNBM International Corporation - China
  • Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
  • Thiess Contractors Indonesia
  • Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
  • Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
  • Bhatia International Limited - India
  • Clarksons - UK
  • Credit Suisse - India
  • CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
  • Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
  • OCBC - Singapore
  • Commonwealth Bank - Australia