We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This is in part because English courts or arbitration tribunals will interpret these clauses strictly and narrowly against the party seeking to rely on them.
Recent decisions, including Triple Point Technology v PTT (2017) and Seadrill Ghana v Tullow Ghana (2018), are evidence of this approach. However, Sucden Middle-East, represented by Nick Fisher of HFW, has recently relied successfully on such a clause in the Commercial Court, on appeal from arbitration.
The case, Sucden Middle-East v Yagci Denizcilik Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, “The Mv Muammer Yagci”, involved a shipment of sugar to Algeria on the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form. The facts found by the arbitral tribunal were that when the cargo arrived in Algeria, the cargo-receivers submitted false import documents to local customs authorities. The local customs responded by seizing the cargo, using powers under customs laws and regulations.
A delay to discharging the cargo of four and a half months ensued. Sucden, as charterers, claimed this delay fell within the exceptions to laytime running under clause 28. Owners disagreed. At first instance, the arbitral tribunal agreed with owners.
Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court. Permission to bring the appeal was given on the basis that the question of law was one of general public importance, as it related to a standard form contract in wide commercial usage.
The judgement
The question before the Commercial Court was: “Where a cargo is seized by the local customs authorities at the discharge port causing a delay to discharge, is the time so lost caused by ‘government interferences’ within the meaning of clause 28 of the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form?” Clause 28 reads:
“Strikes and Force Majeure
In the event that whilst at or off the loading place or discharging place the loading and/or discharging of the vessel is prevented or delayed by any of the following occurrences: strikes, riots, civil commotions, lockouts of men, accidents and/or breakdowns on railways, stoppages on railway and/or river and/or canal by ice or frost, mechanical breakdowns at mechanical loading plants, government interferences, vessel being inoperative or rendered inoperative due to terms and conditions of employment of the Officers and Crew, time so lost shall not count as laytime on demurrage or detention…”
In deciding whether a force majeure event had occurred, the Court focused on the construction of “government interferences”. It was fairly straightforward to establish that a government entity acting in a sovereign capacity was involved, but owners argued that the government being involved was not enough and that there had to be “interferences”. In reaching its decision that there had been no interference, the tribunal had considered it a key point that seizure was an “ordinary” action. The Court rejected this conclusion. It held that the seizure of the cargo was not routine and did fall within the meaning of “interferences”. Seizure is a significant exercise of executive power and therefore could not be regarded as “ordinary”. Suspected or predictable consequences are not the same as ordinary actions (such as the inspection of the cargo by a government surveyor): “In the usual course of things, cargo is not seized and property rights are not invaded in that way.” The very fact that false documents were involved showed that the circumstances were not routine.
The Court emphasised that it was of “real importance” that its conclusion on the language was not difficult to apply, nor did it in any way offend commercial common sense.
The owners’ causation argument was also dismissed, as it was held that the seizure caused the delay, even if the submission of false documents caused the seizure.
Further detail
In allowing the appeal, the Court still maintained the strict and narrow approach to force majeure, stressing that “the answer given to the question is only a narrow ‘yes’. It is ‘yes’ where the circumstances are as in the present case. The answer does not address all of the circumstances that may come within or fall outside clause 28. The answer is concerned only with the seizure of a cargo and with that seizure by a customs authority that is a State revenue authority acting in a sovereign capacity”.
This judgment gives some welcome publicly-available guidance on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a standard form widely used in sugar trading. While the charterers were successfully able to rely on the force majeure clause in this case, it does not signal a change in the strict and narrow approach typically adopted by the English courts.
Source: Baltic Exchange
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 08 January 19
GLOBAL TRADE GROWTH EXPECTED TO REMAIN AT HEALTHY IN 2019 - ALLIED
2019 is here and we find ourselves with new challenges for the shipping industry and the global economy as whole, with market prospects being neith ...
Monday, 07 January 19
THE NEWCASTLE BENCHMARK SPOT PRICE IS FORECAST TO DECLINE FROM AN ESTIMATED AVERAGE OF US$105 A TONNE IN 2018 TO US$74 A TONNE IN 2020 - DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRY, AUSTRALIA
• The Newcastle benchmark spot price is forecast to decline from an estimated average of US$105 a tonne in 2018 to US$74 a tonne in 2020, prim ...
Monday, 07 January 19
INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT DECLARED COAL BENCHMARK PRICE FALLS FOR FIFTH STRAIGHT MONTH IN JANUARY 2019; LOWEST SINCE JUNE 2018
COALspot.com: The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources of the Republic of Indonesia has revised down again the benchmark price of Indonesian th ...
Monday, 07 January 19
RUSSIA'S COAL PRODUCTION UP 5.9% TO 433.4 MLN TONNES IN 2018 - TASS
Coal production in Russia in 2018 increased by 5.9% year-on-year to 433.4 mln tonnes, according to the Central Dispatching Department of Fuel Energ ...
Friday, 04 January 19
FOCUS IS ON BOOSTING COAL PRODUCTION: INDIAN COAL MINISTER
The current focus of the government is on boosting production from operational coal mines, according to Minister for Coal, Piyush Goyal.
...
|
|
|
Showing 1501 to 1505 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Australian Coal Association
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Planning Commission, India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
|
| |
| |
|
