We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This is in part because English courts or arbitration tribunals will interpret these clauses strictly and narrowly against the party seeking to rely on them.
Recent decisions, including Triple Point Technology v PTT (2017) and Seadrill Ghana v Tullow Ghana (2018), are evidence of this approach. However, Sucden Middle-East, represented by Nick Fisher of HFW, has recently relied successfully on such a clause in the Commercial Court, on appeal from arbitration.
The case, Sucden Middle-East v Yagci Denizcilik Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, “The Mv Muammer Yagci”, involved a shipment of sugar to Algeria on the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form. The facts found by the arbitral tribunal were that when the cargo arrived in Algeria, the cargo-receivers submitted false import documents to local customs authorities. The local customs responded by seizing the cargo, using powers under customs laws and regulations.
A delay to discharging the cargo of four and a half months ensued. Sucden, as charterers, claimed this delay fell within the exceptions to laytime running under clause 28. Owners disagreed. At first instance, the arbitral tribunal agreed with owners.
Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court. Permission to bring the appeal was given on the basis that the question of law was one of general public importance, as it related to a standard form contract in wide commercial usage.
The judgement
The question before the Commercial Court was: “Where a cargo is seized by the local customs authorities at the discharge port causing a delay to discharge, is the time so lost caused by ‘government interferences’ within the meaning of clause 28 of the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form?” Clause 28 reads:
“Strikes and Force Majeure
In the event that whilst at or off the loading place or discharging place the loading and/or discharging of the vessel is prevented or delayed by any of the following occurrences: strikes, riots, civil commotions, lockouts of men, accidents and/or breakdowns on railways, stoppages on railway and/or river and/or canal by ice or frost, mechanical breakdowns at mechanical loading plants, government interferences, vessel being inoperative or rendered inoperative due to terms and conditions of employment of the Officers and Crew, time so lost shall not count as laytime on demurrage or detention…”
In deciding whether a force majeure event had occurred, the Court focused on the construction of “government interferences”. It was fairly straightforward to establish that a government entity acting in a sovereign capacity was involved, but owners argued that the government being involved was not enough and that there had to be “interferences”. In reaching its decision that there had been no interference, the tribunal had considered it a key point that seizure was an “ordinary” action. The Court rejected this conclusion. It held that the seizure of the cargo was not routine and did fall within the meaning of “interferences”. Seizure is a significant exercise of executive power and therefore could not be regarded as “ordinary”. Suspected or predictable consequences are not the same as ordinary actions (such as the inspection of the cargo by a government surveyor): “In the usual course of things, cargo is not seized and property rights are not invaded in that way.” The very fact that false documents were involved showed that the circumstances were not routine.
The Court emphasised that it was of “real importance” that its conclusion on the language was not difficult to apply, nor did it in any way offend commercial common sense.
The owners’ causation argument was also dismissed, as it was held that the seizure caused the delay, even if the submission of false documents caused the seizure.
Further detail
In allowing the appeal, the Court still maintained the strict and narrow approach to force majeure, stressing that “the answer given to the question is only a narrow ‘yes’. It is ‘yes’ where the circumstances are as in the present case. The answer does not address all of the circumstances that may come within or fall outside clause 28. The answer is concerned only with the seizure of a cargo and with that seizure by a customs authority that is a State revenue authority acting in a sovereign capacity”.
This judgment gives some welcome publicly-available guidance on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a standard form widely used in sugar trading. While the charterers were successfully able to rely on the force majeure clause in this case, it does not signal a change in the strict and narrow approach typically adopted by the English courts.
Source: Baltic Exchange
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 08 January 19
GLOBAL TRADE GROWTH EXPECTED TO REMAIN AT HEALTHY IN 2019 - ALLIED
2019 is here and we find ourselves with new challenges for the shipping industry and the global economy as whole, with market prospects being neith ...
Monday, 07 January 19
THE NEWCASTLE BENCHMARK SPOT PRICE IS FORECAST TO DECLINE FROM AN ESTIMATED AVERAGE OF US$105 A TONNE IN 2018 TO US$74 A TONNE IN 2020 - DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRY, AUSTRALIA
• The Newcastle benchmark spot price is forecast to decline from an estimated average of US$105 a tonne in 2018 to US$74 a tonne in 2020, prim ...
Monday, 07 January 19
INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT DECLARED COAL BENCHMARK PRICE FALLS FOR FIFTH STRAIGHT MONTH IN JANUARY 2019; LOWEST SINCE JUNE 2018
COALspot.com: The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources of the Republic of Indonesia has revised down again the benchmark price of Indonesian th ...
Monday, 07 January 19
RUSSIA'S COAL PRODUCTION UP 5.9% TO 433.4 MLN TONNES IN 2018 - TASS
Coal production in Russia in 2018 increased by 5.9% year-on-year to 433.4 mln tonnes, according to the Central Dispatching Department of Fuel Energ ...
Friday, 04 January 19
FOCUS IS ON BOOSTING COAL PRODUCTION: INDIAN COAL MINISTER
The current focus of the government is on boosting production from operational coal mines, according to Minister for Coal, Piyush Goyal.
...
|
|
|
Showing 1501 to 1505 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- White Energy Company Limited
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- PTC India Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- VISA Power Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
