We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 March 17
THE ROLE OF COAL IN THE ENERGY SUPPLY OF THE EU-28: HANS-WILHELM SCHIFFER
The European Union (EU-28) is one of the largest economies in the world, with a gross domestic product (GDP) of €14,635 billion in 2015. It has 508 million inhabitants, or 7% of the world´s population. Coal has played, and still plays, an important role in covering the energy needs of the EU-28. This article reflects on the role of coal within Europe in the past, at present, and in the future.
STRUCTURE OF THE EU ENERGY SUPPLY
In 2015 the total primary energy consumption of the EU-28 was 2332 million tonnes of coal equivalent (Mtce). That ranks the EU as the third largest energy market worldwide—after China and the U.S. Table 1 gives the total primary energy consumption of the EU by energy sources in comparison with the global average energy mix.
A significant difference is the lower share of coal in primary energy consumption. In contrast, there is a higher contribution of nuclear energy in comparison to the global average. The share of non-hydro renewables, particularly wind and solar, in total primary consumption exceeds the global average by a factor of three.
The energy production within the EU-28 by energy sources in 2015 was:
Oil: 103 Mtce
Natural gas: 155 Mtce
Coal: 208 Mtce
Nuclear energy: 278 Mtce
Hydro power: 109 Mtce
Other renewables: 194 Mtce
The share of production (including nuclear energy) in the total primary energy consumption was 45%. The energy import dependence of the EU was 55% accordingly.
Globally, the EU-28 has become the largest energy importer. The EU´s energy import was one-fourth the total worldwide trade in oil, gas, and coal. In contrast, the EU´s share in global primary energy consumption was only 12.4% in 2015. The import dependence in the case of oil and gas is particularly high, 88% and 70%, respectively. The share of imports in total coal consumption was 45%.
The import dependence of the EU´s energy supply has increased over the last decade. The main reasons for this were the halving of EU oil and gas production and a decline in the production of coal by 17%. The trend of increasing import dependence would have been even stronger were it not for a doubling in the consumption of renewables.
The lack of diversification in the supply sources for oil and gas are concerning from an energy security point of view. Russia is the largest supplier of oil and gas imports. Four EU member-states procure their entire supply of natural gas exclusively from Russia: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Finland. The countries of Central and Eastern Europe, such as Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Hungary, cover between 50 and nearly 100% of their annual gas consumption via imports from Russia. Because some of the region´s gas comes via Ukraine, it risks transit disruptions due to Ukraine´s situation as well as Russia-related risks. This high dependence on a single supply source makes some EU countries susceptible to supply disruptions. Ten years after Russia cut off gas supplies to Ukraine and Europe in the winters of 2006 and 2009, and in the midst of the 2014 Ukraine crisis, concerns about a potential politically motivated disruption of gas supplies from Russia, and especially those that pass through Ukraine, triggered a discussion on creating an Energy Union to counter this threat.
In fact, Russia is also the most important single supplier of coal. However, the supply options for coal are numerous, and thanks to the existing infrastructure, even the loss of the largest supplier could be offset with deliveries from other sources—unlike the situation for gas.
THE EU REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE ENERGY MIX
At the beginning of 2015, the EU Commission presented plans for a European Energy Union based on the strategic framework of the Commission and featuring five closely connected dimensions: energy supply security, solidarity, and trust; single energy market; energy efficiency; reduction of CO2 emissions from economic activities; research, innovation, and competitiveness. The Energy Union has the following specific objectives:
Energy dependency is to be reduced and investors are to be given planning security by the EU´s efforts to develop new sources, especially natural gas sources. Coal as a domestic energy source found in abundance in Europe is not mentioned specifically. The European Council wants to improve “the utilization of domestic sources”, however, and coal is one of these sources.
A strategy for the import of more liquefied natural gas (LNG) and for increasing energy efficiency is to be prepared with the aim of making the energy system “fit for a society low in carbon”.
The prosperity and security of the EU depend on a stable and adequate supply of energy. Consequently, the Commission has developed a strategy for a secure European energy supply that fosters resilience against energy supply disruptions in the short term and reduces dependency on certain fuels, energy suppliers, and supply channels in the long term.
The energy mix of EU countries differs markedly, due not only to differing resources but also to the wide variety of national energy policies adopted over the years.
Thus, power generation in France is based on nuclear energy. In contrast, Germany has decided to phase out nuclear energy by the end of 2022. As a result of political support in Germany, the share of renewables in total power generation reached 29.0% in 2015. This represents a fivefold increase since 2000. Hydropower has the highest share in power generation in Austria and in Sweden. Wind energy has a strong position in Denmark. In the Netherlands, gas is the most important energy source for power generation. Coal dominates power generation in Poland with a share of more than 80%. Of the UK´s electricity generation in 2015, coal accounted for 22.6 %—a decrease of 7.1 percentage points on 2014 due to plant closures and conversions. In 2015, the British Secretary for Energy and Climate Change proposed a consultation on the closure of all coal-fired power plants without CCS by 2025. A week later, the UK government cancelled its £1 billion funding of the flagship White Rose CCS project.
COAL SUPPLY IN 2015
The total coal supply breakdown in 2015 for Europe. The total production of hard coal in the EU-28 was 100.3 Mt in 2015. Poland was the most important producer with 72.2 Mt, followed by the United Kingdom with 8.7 Mt, Czech Republic with 8.2 Mt, Germany with 6.7 Mt, Spain with 3.0 Mt, and Romania with 1.5 Mt. The total brown coal production in the EU-28 was 398.1 Mt in 2015. Germany is the most important producer of brown coal within the EU. The production of brown coal, classified as lignite, was 178.1 Mt in 2015. Other major producers of brown coal in the EU are Poland (63.1 Mt), Greece (45.4 Mt), the Czech Republic (38.1 Mt), Bulgaria (36.8 Mt), Romania (22.4 Mt), Hungary (9.2 Mt), Slovenia (3.2 Mt), and Slovakia (1.8 Mt).
The coal supply of the EU-28 was supplemented by 191.6 Mt of hard coal imports (including anthracite) in 2015. In 2015, the most important such importers were Germany (55.5 Mt), the United Kingdom (27.1 Mt), Italy (19.5 Mt), Spain (19.0 Mt), France (14.3 Mt), the Netherlands (12.4 Mt), and Poland (8.2 Mt).
Domestic production and consumption of coal has declined in the EU over the past two decades. However, domestic production of hard coal and lignite represent a significant share in total coal supply, 55% in 2015—after conversion of the different categories of coal into energy quantities using standardized heating values.
Imported coal can also be classified as secure in supply as the import sources are well diversified. Global coal reserves remain plentiful and are found around the world. On an energy basis, proven reserves of coal, essentially an inventory of what is currently economic to produce, are much greater than those of oil and gas combined, and are sufficient to supply more than 100 years of production at 2015 levels.
ROLE OF COAL IN THE ENERGY SUPPLY MARKET
The power and heat sector dominates coal demand in the EU, accounting for more than 75% of the total coal demand. Another 10% is used in blast furnaces and coke ovens for iron and steel production. Other industries, such as cement making, accounts for 9% of coal use, the residential sector for 3%, and commercial and other services for 1%. Coal demand has been declining slowly in all sectors.
Despite being the main source of coal demand, coal’s share in power generation in the EU-28 has decreased substantially since 2000, from roughly 32% in 2000 to 25% in 2015. Although the German nuclear phase-out temporarily led to some increases in coal’s contribution after 2011, the share of coal in total electricity generation was 42% in 2015 compared to 50% in 2000.
The share of coal in total power generation varies from country to country. The highest share of coal in power generation exists in Poland with more than 80%. In Germany, the Czech Republic, Greece, and Bulgaria coal is the most important fuel for power generation with shares between 40 and 50%. Indigenous lignite plays a major role in these countries. Coal covers 10–30% of power generation in the UK, Spain, Denmark, the Netherlands, Romania, Portugal, Hungary, Ireland, and Slovenia. Coal continues to make a major contribution to energy security in approximately half of the member countries.
IMPACTS OF COAL ON KEY EU CLIMATE AND ENERGY POLICIES
In recent years, sustainability—notably, mitigating climate change—has been the key driver for EU energy policies. However, concerns about energy security and industrial competitiveness have become more pressing in recent years.
Coal is one of the main pillars for power generation. “But the European Union does not have a specific coal policy, even though its policy affects coal use, including the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU-ETS), air pollution directives and renewable energy targets. There is still substantial competitive indigenous coal production in the European Union and well diversified secure international coal supply at low (hard) coal prices; this fuel has clear security benefits. A continued contribution from coal in a low-carbon economy is however compromised by its high CO2 intensity. Considerable improvements in power plant efficiency and the use of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies will therefore be required.”
Over the last decade, the EU has embarked on three major actions in energy and climate policy: (1) the progressive liberalization of the internal energy market package, the so-called “Third Package”; (2) ambitious climate and energy targets and policy measures as part of the so-called “2020 Climate and Energy Package”; and (3) a new “2030 Climate and Energy Policy Framework” that prepared the EU position for international climate negotiations in 2015.
At their October 2014 European Council meeting, leaders from EU member-states reached an agreement on their ambitions for the 2030 Climate and Energy Policy Framework together with key conclusions on EU energy security:
A binding EU target of a domestic reduction in greenhouse gas emissions of at least 40% by 2030 compared with 1990—with reductions in the emissions-trading sector amounting to 43% and in non-ETS sectors to 30% by 2030 compared with 2005.
An EU-wide target of at least 27% for the share of renewable energy consumed in the EU in 2030.
An indicative target at EU level of at least 27% for improving energy efficiency in 2030 compared with projections of future energy consumption based on current criteria.
Energy security is also part of the 2030 Climate and Energy Policy Framework. In this context, the European Council recognized that the EU´s energy security can be increased by exploiting indigenous resources, as well as using safe and sustainable low-carbon technologies.
The EU-ETS remains the central instrument for reaching cost-effective emission reductions. In 2015, the EU-ETS was strengthened with the introduction of a market stability reserve and a steeper annual reduction in the number of ETS emission allowances issued: The 1.7% linear annual reduction will be raised to 2.2% from 2021.
PERSPECTIVES FOR COAL IN THE EU
The World Energy Council (WEC) has prepared a study, World Energy Scenarios 2060. Presented at the World Energy Congress in October 2016, the paper comprises three scenarios. These scenarios, which are characterized in Table 2, are designed to help a range of stakeholders address the energy trilemma of achieving environmental sustainability, energy security, and energy equity.
The three developed scenario stories are exploratory, not normative; they follow a bottom-up approach. They raise the following questions: Where do we stand today, and what are plausible ways that could lead us into the future? This is in contrast to other scenarios that work with a top-down approach, or roadmaps that ask how one gets from A to a defined target B.
The quantitative results are presented at the global level and by different world regions. For the EU-31 region (EU-28 plus Switzerland, Norway, and Iceland), a strong reduction in coal consumption is expected, in particular in the Unfinished Symphony scenario (see Figure 2). The share of coal in total primary energy supply will be 5% or even less in 2060.
Coal’s share in EU´s electricity generation will diminish to approximately 2% in Modern Jazz and to 3% in Unfinished Symphony and in Hard Rock by 2060. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is seen as a technology that will be implemented after 2030, in particular in the Unfinished Symphony scenario. In this scenario, 81% of electricity generated by coal within the EU-31 will use CCS by 2050, and this share is expected to grow to 95% in 2060.
The share of fossil fuels in the EU´s total power generation will be reduced to approximately 42% in Hard Rock, to 25% in Modern Jazz, and to only 16% in Unfinished Symphony by 2060. Renewable energies will contribute approximately 43% of the total electricity generation in 2060 in the Hard Rock scenario, 63% in Modern Jazz, and 67% in Unfinished Symphony. The remaining share will be covered by nuclear energy.
CONCLUSIONS
The use of coal in the EU has clear energy security benefits, given the low international coal prices and well-diversified supplies as well as EU indigenous production potential in lignite. The deployment of clean coal technologies, equipped with CCS, should be a priority to reduce CO2 emissions alongside the expansion of renewable energies and increasing energy efficiency. Furthermore, the total discounted mitigation costs for the long-term achievement of the 450 ppm CO2 eq. target would be 138% higher globally if CCS was not used. Thus, policy backing and a corresponding legal framework for the implementation of CCS in power generation (on the basis of coal, gas, and biomass) and in industry are necessary in order to secure investments that lead to a cost-efficient reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Taking such a sensible framework into account, a stronger role for coal than anticipated in the WEC scenarios would be compatible also with the ambitious climate targets of the European Union.
By Hans-Wilhelm Schiffer,
Executive Chair,
World Energy Resources,
World Energy Council
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 21 March 17
JAPAN'S RENEWED COMMITMENT TO COAL - BENJAMIN SPORTON
Japan is one of the largest economies in the world, and has long been a major consumer and importer of energy and a leader in energy technology dev ...
Monday, 20 March 17
IS THE DRY BULK INDUSTRY STILL ON TRACK FOR PROFITABILITY IN 2019? - PETER SAND
The industry remains well on target for profitable freight rates in 2019! This relies however, on the projected fleet supply growth rate of 0% in 2 ...
Friday, 17 March 17
U.S WEEKLY COAL OUTPUT VOLUME SLIDES 6.5 PERCENT WEEK OVER WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 14.7 million short ton ...
Thursday, 16 March 17
CHINA IMPOSING TOUGHER CONTROLS ON LOW-QUALITY COAL IMPORTS
China is ramping up controls on imports of low-quality coal due to concerns about smog and overcapacity in the world’s top coal consumer, a g ...
Thursday, 16 March 17
CAPESIZE: SHOWING STRENGTH; PANAMAX: VERY QUIET - FEARNLEYS
Supramax
The Atlantic market faced less activity from the USG whereas at the Cont tonnage seemed to tighten up with more cargoes emerging. Despit ...
|
|
|
Showing 2096 to 2100 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
|
| |
| |
|
