We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 23 September 16
"COLLATERAL LIES" DO NOT NECESSARILY UNDERMINE AN INSURANCE CLAIM
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
An insured was not precluded from recovering under an insurance policy even though it had made a false statement during the claims process with a view to strengthening its claim. The Supreme Court in Versloot Dredging BV & anr v HDI Gerling Industrie Versicherung AG [2016] UKSC 45 considered the extent of the fraudulent claims rule which applies to insurance contracts and prevents an insured recovering under an insurance policy where the claim is fabricated or exaggerated. The Supreme Court held (Lord Mance dissenting) that this rule does not apply to false statements that are immaterial to an insured’s right to recovery under the policy. Insurers have expressed their concern at the decision.
The claimant ship owners suffered irreparable damage of a vessel’s engine after the engine room was flooded, causing a loss of EUR 3,241 million, which they sought to recover from the defendant insurers. The ship owners had falsely stated, in response to inquiries made by the insurers, that an alarm had sounded but that no action had been taken by the crew as the alarm was attributed to the ship rolling in heavy seas. In actual fact no alarm had sounded. The ship owners had been frustrated by the insurers’ delay in recognising the claim and this statement was intended to reassure the insurers that the ship was seaworthy with fully operational alarm systems. They believed that this statement would fortify the claim and accelerate payment.
The alarm statement was later discovered to be false, but was irrelevant to the validity of the claim. Although the alarm had not sounded, it was tested shortly after the incident and found to be working. Even if it had not been working, Popplewell J at first instance held that this would not assist the insurers as the alarm’s failure to sound would not have been the proximate cause of the loss. Popplewell J concluded that the loss was caused by a peril of the seas covered by the insurance policy. Nevertheless, Popplewell J held that the insurers were entitled to repudiate the entire claim under the ship owners’ insurance policy as a result of this false statement. The ship owners appealed, with the Court of Appeal upholding the decision.
Fraudulent and exaggerated claims
At common law it is well established that if an insured makes a fraudulent or exaggerated claim on its insurer, the insured loses the right to recover the entirety of that claim, including any genuine losses it would have obtained. The law refuses to sever the honest part of the claim from the invented part.1 This is commonly referred to as the “fraudulent claims rule”.
Section 12 of the Insurance Act 2015 (which came into force on 12 August 2016) has preserved this rule. It does not, however, define what constitutes a fraudulent claim and does not refer to a situation where a valid claim is supported by a false statement.
Collateral lies and fraudulent devices
The extension of the common law rule to justified claims supported by false statements is more recent and controversial. Lord Sumption referred to Agapitos v Agnew (The Aegeon) [2003] QB 556, where Lord Mance had considered, obiter, whether the fraudulent claims rule could apply to a lie made in the presentation of a claim which does not affect the merits of, or the amount of, the claim. This has been generally termed a “fraudulent device” (or, adopting Lord Sumption’s expression, a “collateral lie”). Lord Mance considered that such collateral lies were also subject to the fraudulent claims rule.
The majority of the Supreme Court, with Lord Sumption giving the lead judgment, disagreed with this approach. Lord Sumption distinguished between a fraudulent exaggerated claim, which is designed to enable the insured to gain something which it is not entitled to, and a justified claim supported by a collateral lie. Where the lie is irrelevant to the existence or the amount the insured is entitled to, the insured gains nothing from the lie which he was not already entitled to by law and the insurer loses nothing from meeting a liability it already had (having crystallised at the moment of loss). The lie is therefore dishonest but the claim is not.
Lord Sumption concluded that it was disproportionately harsh to the insured and would go further than any legitimate commercial interest for the fraudulent claim rule to extend to collateral lies. The policy of deterrence did not justify such an extension of the rule.
COMMENT
The historic justification for the fraudulent claim rule was as a clear deterrent to fraudulent claims, recognising that insurers can be dependant on the insured for information, both at the formation of the contract and in the processing of claims. Honest policyholders would otherwise bear the financial burden of costs incurred by the insurers due to fraudulent or exaggerated claims, through increased premiums. As the judges recognised, fraudulent insurance claims are a serious issue, with insurance fraud widely perceived as victimless (a perception the judges emphasised was quite false).
However, this judgment prevents any extension of this rule and limits an insurer’s right to reject a claim. Although the decision has raised concerns within the insurance industry, it is far from being an invitation for an insured to embellish an insurance claim without fear of any consequences. Any attempt to enhance a claim which would result in increasing the amount recoverable will lead to forfeiture of the entirety of the claim if discovered. Even where a false statement is wholly collateral to a justified claim, an insured may be penalised for that statement if exposed. In the context of a contested claim, any settlement agreement induced by the false statement could be set aside. Moreover, there could be cost orders in any proceedings, increased premiums and difficulty in obtaining future insurance policies after the requirement to disclose the insured’s claims history in any insurance proposal is met. Insureds will also want to avoid litigation concerning whether a false statement is collateral or not to a justified claim.
Finally, insurers can consider including clauses in insurance contracts precluding the recovery of any claims supported by collateral lies. It is likely that going forward insurers will seek legal advice as to the merits of doing so.
Source: Allen & Overy
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 19 September 16
AFTER YEARS OF COMA, COAL BECOMES THE MOST ATTRACTIVE COMMODITY RIGHT NOW
COALspot.com: China boosted coal imports in recent months. The Chinese government’s drive to cut over capacity pushed up the demand for therm ...
Monday, 19 September 16
THE CAPE INDEX WAS UP 7.28% WEEK OVER WEEK
COALspot.com: The Baltic Exchange, tracking rates for ships carrying dry bulk commodities declined and ending in a slightly negative note this past ...
Friday, 16 September 16
GLOBAL SHIPBUILDING: THE CHALLENGE TO REMAIN 'ACTIVE' - CHRISTOPHER PEARCE, CLARKSONS
The number of ‘active’ shipyards globally has more than halved since the start of 2009, falling to around 400 shipyards at the start of ...
Friday, 16 September 16
U.S. WEEKLY COAL OUTPUT DECLINED 6.2% TO 15.1 MMST, SAYS EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 15.1 million short ton ...
Thursday, 15 September 16
INDONESIA MAY FACE A COAL CRISIS BY 2035!
COALspot.com: Indonesia is the world’s fourth-largest coal producer and the world’s largest thermal coal exporter may face a coal crisi ...
|
|
|
Showing 2281 to 2285 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- MS Steel International - UAE
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- The University of Queensland
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- VISA Power Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
|
| |
| |
|
