We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 29 February 16
LOSS OF EARNINGS IN THE WAKE OF A COLLISION - GARD
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A shipowner’s loss of earnings can form a significant part of a collision claim. Awareness of the ways of calculating loss of earnings claims can be useful in both presenting and challenging this type of claim. This Gard Insight looks at some general principles and methods applied by the courts.
A recent Gard example
A product tanker was hit by a bulker while at berth. Although the extent of the physical repairs – and therefore the repair costs – were relatively limited, the damaged tanks required stainless steel plates which had to be specially ordered. Long lead times led to a significant loss of earnings. As owners were able to document this loss with care and precision, leaving little room for doubt, the case against the owners of the bulker was settled quickly and amicably.
Basic principles
A claimant not only has the burden of proving that it has lost earnings as a result of the collision but also that it has suffered an actual loss. The fact that a ship has been unable to trade due to repairs being carried out is generally not enough, though it raises an obvious presumption that the shipowner has indeed suffered some sort of loss.
In the majority of jurisdictions, the principle of restitutio in integrum governs the measure of damages. This means that a shipowner who suffers a loss of earnings due to the negligence of another party will be put back into the position it would have been but for the negligence. Therefore, the shipowner must prove what the ship would have earned had the collision not occurred. This means that if the repairs are performed during a pre-arranged dry-docking period for example – there will be no loss.
The methods used to prove the loss depend on the facts of each case and one approach is not necessarily better than another. The optimal way is largely dependent on the trade patterns of the ship at the relevant time.
Ships on time charter
If a ship is damaged in a collision it will usually go off-hire until it has been repaired and able to function again under the terms of the charterparty. The shipowner can rely on specific off-hire statements and invoices from charterers. The loss will consist of:
- a fixed amount per day for the total time the ship is off-hire
- the bunkers consumed during the off-hire period, and
- any additional charges the time charterer may have incurred.
If the time charter has been justifiably cancelled as a result of the unavailability of the ship, the loss of earnings from that point onwards will be the difference between what the ship would have earned under the cancelled charter and what was actually earned during the same period.
Ships trading on the spot market
For a ship trading on the spot market, the approach is more flexible to calculate its loss of earnings. The starting point will be the total number of days the ship is unable to trade due to repairs, including removal time to the shipyard. However, losses may extend beyond the actual repair period, especially when the market has fallen in the meantime. If a shipowner can prove that it lost an actual fixture on the spot market due to a collision and necessary repairs, the potential net income from that fixture will be compared with the ship’s actual net income until the date the lost fixture would have ended. This is known in some jurisdictions as the time equalisation method, most recently approved in the English case of THE ASTIPALAIA [2014] EWHC 120.
For situations where a ship trading on the spot market is not fixed for her next voyage, the way to calculate the loss will depend on whether the ship was operating in an established or specialist trade.
For established trades such as the VLCC trade, fixture data is readily available throughout the year. It is a relatively simple exercise for a broker to work out what a VLCC would have earned at the relevant World Scale rates for a given period. Provided the ship would have obtained employment with a reasonable degree of certainty, the estimated charter earnings will be compared with the ship’s actual earnings for the period using the time equalisation method.
For specialised trades and trading patterns with little continuity, market data will be less readily available and reliable, so the loss of earnings calculation in each case will be more fact specific. In these cases, the best approach may be to present the average time charter equivalent earnings of the ship for a limited period around the time of collision, e.g. the casualty voyage and the voyages preceding and following the casualty. For some trades, it may be relevant to present income statements for even longer periods, however, the more remote the evidence, the more difficult it will be to prove that the figures are a true representation of the loss.
In the Norwegian collision case of Rana Frakt v ROBAS (LG-2013-173128) one party based its loss of earnings on two annual audited income statements, however the Court of Appeal made a discretionary reduction of about 33 per cent due to the lack of evidence relating to tangible fixtures the ship would have been engaged in during the period of repairs. That said, the mere fact that the loss of earnings cannot be quantified exactly will not be fatal to a claim.
FFO claims
Loss of earnings claims can arise in other contexts, e.g. where a ship damages a quay or shore based crane and renders part of a terminal unusable. The underlying assumptions and calculations involved can be complex and the appointment of a forensic accountant with knowledge of the local accountancy rules and tax law may very well be necessary in order to properly defend a shipowner’s position.
Checklist
Whether claiming or challenging loss of earnings claims, the following should be submitted:
Evidence of the total period claimed for, such as:
– Master’s statement of facts
– copies of the deck log
– the off-hire statements from charterers.
A summary of the daily net loss of earnings for the total period and the underlying documentation relied upon, such as:
– the charterparty and recap
– the off-hire invoice
– a statement from a broker of potential earnings or income statements where a time charter equivalent rate per day is arrived at.
Evidence of any mitigation, e.g. that the claimant:
– has chosen the quickest and most reasonable repair option, or
– has used other ships in its fleet to perform the contractual obligations of the damaged ship.
Evidence of the average utilisation of the ship. For ships actively trading only 80 per cent of the time, it is clearly unreasonable to claim a loss equating to 100 per cent utilisation during the period of repairs.
Final note
It is well worth spending time and effort in presenting loss of earnings claims in a clear and unambiguous manner, so that both parties understand the figures presented and the assumptions behind them. This can help achieve a quick settlement in a collision dispute.
Source: GARD
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 04 April 16
INDONESIA CS57 COAL INDEX SLIDES SLIGHTLY WEEK OVER WEEK
COALspot.com: Average 5000 GAR coal index of Indonesian origin fell 0.07 percent week over week to averaging $38.88 per ton on this past Friday, ac ...
Monday, 04 April 16
CAPE INDEX JUMPED 70% WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com: The Baltic Exchange, tracking rates for ships carrying dry bulk commodities continued to rose this week.
The freight market was ...
Friday, 01 April 16
ASSESSING THE DRY BULK MARKET AT ROCK BOTTOM - CLARKSONS
While the opening months of the year are typically a weak period for the dry bulk market, the downturn so far this year has been severe. Earnings h ...
Friday, 01 April 16
NINE AM - TIME TO GET AN INDONESIAN LANGUAGE VERSION OF YOUR CHARTERPARTIES - CLYDE & CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
For several years, Indonesian law (Article 31, Law Number 24 of 2009) has required that memoranda of understanding (" ...
Friday, 01 April 16
U.S. COAL PRODUCTION UP SLIGHTLY WEEK OVER WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 11.6 million shor ...
|
|
|
Showing 2496 to 2500 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- White Energy Company Limited
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Australian Coal Association
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
|
| |
| |
|
