We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 17 August 15
INDONESIAN THERMAL COAL REFERENCE PRICE HITS RECORD LOW AGAIN!
COALspot.com - The Director General of Mineral and Coal of Indonesia revised down Indonesian coal benchmark price once again to US$ 59.14 per MT fo ...
Monday, 17 August 15
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAPS CONTINUE TO HEAD SOUTH
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for 4Q’ 2015 delivery declined just US cents 40 (1.05%) per MT month over month.
A commodi ...
Sunday, 16 August 15
INDONESIA TO INDIA FREIGHT RATES ARE EXPECTED TO STEADY NEXT WEEK
COALspot.com: The BDI softened 12.08 per cent to 1055 points this week due to weakening of cape index which was fell 25 per cent week over week to ...
Friday, 14 August 15
FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP SHOWING NO MOVEMENT THIS PAST WEEK
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery 4Q 2015 declined month on month and week over week, this past week.
The 4Q swap was declined $ ...
Friday, 14 August 15
U.S. COAL PRODUCTION UP 2.9 PER CENT THIS WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 18.2 million shor ...
|
|
|
Showing 2866 to 2870 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- White Energy Company Limited
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
|
| |
| |
|
