COALspot.com keeps you connected across the coal world

Submit Your Articles
We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining, shipping, etc.

To Submit your article please click here.

International Energy Events


Search News
Latest CoalNews Headlines
Tuesday, 21 July 15
CHINA'S ENERGY COMMODITY IMPORTS DIVERGING - RICHARD SCOTT | HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Energy commodity imports into China have grown enormously over the past decade, boosting global demand for shipping capacity. But a dramatic change in the mixture is emerging. Key elements are sharply diverging. During most of the past ten years the upwards trend of China’s energy imports was supported by strong advances in all the main elements, oil, gas and coal. In the past eighteen months, this pattern has showed signs of a fundamental shift, with coal imports falling steeply and much greater uncertainty about future volumes arising.

Slowing growth in economic activity, a changing pattern among the chief components, and moderating demand from major energy consuming industries are contributing to the changing picture of energy commodity imports in China. Another factor is political: strenuous efforts by the leadership to drastically reduce pollution emanating from ‘dirty’ fuels, coal in particular. This aim involves moving towards cleaner energy sources, especially gas, nuclear power and renewable sources.

The changes under way, and likely to continue, have huge implications for several sectors of the global shipping industry. The tanker and gas carrier markets arguably can look forward to increasing support fromChina’s import trends in the commodities carried by these ships. By contrast, while coal is set to remain the country’s predominant energy commodity used, its relative position is diminishing and previously envisaged import growth prospects have faded. More cautious coal import assumptions imply receding advantages for the bulk carrier market.

Oil, gas and coal imports ups and downs
How have energy commodity imports into China evolved, and what is happening currently? Last year the total was slightly (by 2%) down from the previous year, which had seen the highest volume so far attained. Another sizeable reduction, perhaps as much as 5%, could occur in 2015 if present signs prove reliable.

During the past decade as a whole, from 2004 to 2014, China’s overall seaborne energy commodity imports – comprised of coal (including lignite), oil (crude and products) and gas (liquefied natural gas, LNG and liquefied petroleum gas, LPG) – grew more than three-fold, despite last year’s slight weakening. The total rose from 176m tonnes to 604mt, a 243 percent expansion, according to calculations derived from Clarkson Research trade data. This vigorous performance was more rapid than seen in other countries as a group, resulting in China’s share of world seaborne energy trade rising from 5 percent to 14 percent.

Coal imports were the most strongly growing element. Until the mid 2000s China still had a surplus of coal from its massive domestic production and was a major supplier to the world market. Foreign purchases arriving by sea were relatively minor and, in 2004 these totalled just under 17mt. Over the next four years this volume more than doubled, followed by very fast expansion up to 302mt in 2013, after which there was a downturn to 268mt in 2014. Meanwhile, during the decade, coal exports fell to small quantities. In the past couple of years coking coal (mainly for steel industry use) comprised about one-fifth of imports, with the remaining four-fifths consisting of steam coal (chiefly power station fuel, but also used by other industries including cement).

Oil started the decade as by far the largest element of energy commodity imports into China and, although overtaken by coal in 2013, regained the top slot last year. The graph below illustrates these trends. Seaborne oil imports more than doubled from 153mt in 2004 to 309mt in 2014. The majority was crude oil, 85-90 percent of the total in the past few years. Oil products (refined oil) volumes were relatively flat, mostly within a 35-40mt range, falling to 29mt last year after extra refining capacity was introduced.

Gas imports by sea, the smallest energy commodities component, have shown rapid expansion, more than quadrupling from over 6mt in 2004, to over 27mt in 2014. At the beginning of this period China’s liquefied gas purchases were entirely LPG. These fluctuated over the decade, mostly within a 3-6mt annual range, but strengthened at the end to over 7mt last year. LNG imports began in 2006, when the first regasification plant was installed, growing swiftly from under 1mt to almost 19mt in 2014.

Prospects for 2015 suggest that the mixed pattern of changes emerging in the preceding twelve months will persist. Higher oil imports could be accompanied by increased gas

imports, but the new weakening coal imports trend looks set to continue, possibly with another large reduction.

Gigantic demand for energy
Among national and regional energy markets, China’s market serving a population of more than 1.3 billion people is characterised by its gigantic proportions, augmented by great expansion since the early 2000s. For much of this period, until 2012, the Chinese economy was still growing very vigorously, boosting demand for energy. Since then, a slowing economic growth trend has become well established, with noticeable moderating effects on energy consumption. Economic expansion has been underpinned by coal, the largest proportion of which is derived from indigenous mines.

Over many years coal has dominated energy sources. In 2012 coal supplied almost two-thirds (66 percent) of total energy consumption, followed by oil at 20 percent. Other large contributors were hydro power (8 percent) and natural gas (5 percent). Renewables, mainly wind power, at over 1 percent and nuclear power, at nearly 1 percent added relatively small amounts. These figures illustrate the most recent period for which a breakdown (US Energy Information Administration data) is available. In the past two years a diversification policy, prompted by energy security and pollution concerns, has resulted in coal’s estimated share decreasing to 64 percent in 2014.

The largest usage of energy in China is in power stations generating electricity, which are predominantly coal-fired. Power generation absorbs about half of coal consumed. Other fuels used in this sector are gas and uranium, while hydro-power is another feature. Renewable energy sources, especially wind power, are also a significant contributor. Most of the remaining coal usage, about forty percent of the total, occurs in the steel and cement industries, with the remaining ten percent or so taken by residential and other consumers. In the steel industry, mills based on the blast furnace production method produce pig iron, using coking coal (converted into coke) together with iron ore, for transformation into steel.

Consumption of oil is mainly related to transport fuel usage, in road vehicles, aircraft and ships. Oil-fired power generation is small. Natural gas currently also has a minor role in electricity production, accompanied by substantial usage in industrial processes and some consumption in the transportation sector.

Domestic supplies v imports
A very large part of China’s energy market is supplied by domestic producers – coal mines, oilfields and gas fields. Domestic output of all three fuels increased over the past decade, at varying rates. This growth was insufficient to match rapidly expanding demand from consumers, however, resulting in greater reliance on foreign suppliers and rising import trends.

Coal dominates the energy commodity production scene in China and is mined on a huge scale. Since 2000 output has almost tripled and, in the past ten years’ period it has risen by 82 percent, reaching a colossal 3,874mt in 2014, although that figure was more than 2 percent below the peak volume attained in the previous twelve months. Whether or not this slightly reduced output, at the period’s end, marks the start of a downwards trend is not yet clear. Declining future volumes could be a consequence of changes in the energy market reflecting government regulations and incentives to bolster use of cleaner fuels and renewable energy.

Domestic crude oil production has also strengthened, reaching over 211mt last year, about 21 percent above the volume seen a decade earlier. A majority of China’s output is derived from mature oilfields, where it is difficult to improve well yields, explaining why growth has been quite slow. In other locations, both onshore and offshore in coastal waters, production is evolving positively. In the natural gas sector, production has more than tripled in the past ten years, to 134 billion cubic metres in 2014, aided by official policy promoting gas usage. Gas output from shale deposits is small but growing.

Another factor affecting energy commodity imports, besides consumption volumes and domestic output volumes, is the geographical location of domestic output in relation to where it is used. In the coal market, the positive effect of this influence on imports has been particularly noticeable. Rail transport for domestic coal over long distances from mines in northern China to consumers in the south, or to the coast for onwards transhipment, is expensive and there are capacity limitations. When international coal prices or ocean freight rates or both are relatively low, the delivered cost of imported supplies may be very competitive with domestic coal.

Other influences affect seaborne imports. In the coal market, quality is an issue: any shortage of domestic high-grade coking coal used in the steel industry has favourable implications for import demand. Conversely, when land movements of coal from adjacent Mongolia rise, there are adverse implications for seaborne imports. Pipeline flows of oil and gas into China, from adjacent countries, compete with volumes arriving by sea routes.

Future energy market trends
Some of the broad outlines of China’s future seaborne energy commodity imports are discernible, although attempts to forecast precisely are hazardous. An example of the effect of incorrect assumptions (best guesses?) adopted is the expectation, until last year, of a continued upwards trend in coal imports over a long period ahead. The reasoning seemed soundly based, but now appears to be proving wrong. Consequently all predictions, especially for several years ahead, must be viewed as speculative.

What can be realistically foreseen, based on current indications of how China’s energy market is likely to evolve? Assumptions about the rate and pattern of overall economic growth are clearly a crucial aspect. Many independent forecasters predict an extended slowing trend in economic activity, an expectation reinforced by signs that this change is an official policy aim. Already annual GDP growth has cumulatively slowed by over two percentage points in the past three years, to 7.4 percent in 2014, and seems set to decelerate further to below 7 percent this year, and perhaps to nearer 6 percent in 2016. Manoeuvering the economy to a more sustainable expansion rate, together with rebalancing the pattern of growth, is an outcome intended by the Chinese government.

This background provides some general clues to foreseeable energy demand trends. Energy intensity (energy consumption per unit of economic output) probably will decrease, amid a gradual shift from industry towards services, part of the rebalancing. Together with slackening overall economic growth rates, decelerating energy demand is implied. However, because China’s economy is a vast size, incremental energy usage each year can be expected to remain large. Since additional energy commodity supplies from domestic sources are unlikely to be sufficient to satisfy requirements, further import expansion is likely and a high proportion almost certainly will be seaborne trade.

Differing prospects for imports
A positive outlook for seaborne oil imports, especially crude oil, is evident. Consumption of oil in China is growing moderately, boosted by increasing usage in the transportation sector where surging road vehicle numbers are resulting in robustly rising demand for gasoline. Diesel demand, by contrast, seems to be faltering. Contributing to restraints on oil products demand growth are greater vehicle propulsion efficiency and increased use of natural gas fuel.

Potential for further seaborne crude oil imports growth into China is enhanced by more refining capacity being added at coastal locations. Recently there has been a large surplus of refining capacity compared with domestic demand for oil products, resulting in rising exports and falling imports of products. Another influence which is strengthening crude oil imports is the plans being implemented, by the Chinese government, to greatly expand both state-owned strategic and commercial crude oil reserves. New strategic tankage is opening this year, although a proportion may be filled by domestic oil. Seaborne imports look set to grow, despite large pipeline imports through land routes from Russia and Kazakhstan.

The outlook for seaborne imports of natural gas seems bright. Consumption of natural gas in China could grow vigorously, benefiting from the government’s support for this fuel with its environmental advantages. Supplies from domestic sources are growing, while large pipeline import volumes from neighbouring countries are rising rapidly, including through the new huge-capacity pipeline linking China with Myanmar which opened in 2013. Seaborne gas deliveries are also expanding, facilitated by twelve LNG regasification terminals already operating at ports, which are not yet fully utilised, accompanied by several more under construction.

Shale gas overshadows a positive view of LNG imports. China has enormous gas reserves in shale deposits. If output can be ramped up very rapidly to a massive scale, gas import demand almost certainly will weaken. But this possibility seems remote in the near- or even medium-term. Exploitation of shale gas is highly problematical in China. The geology of shale deposits is complex and the terrain difficult, requiring multiple well drilling and impeding equipment movements. A service industry with expertise and equipment on the scale necessary for very fast progress is not yet available. In some areas there are shortages of water, needed in large amounts for hydraulic fracturing (fracking). Moreover, essential pipeline connections are still under development. All these features point to restrained expansion of domestic shale gas output.

Prospects for coal imports contrast with prospects for other fuel imports. Coal probably will remain China’s dominant energy source over many years, but its relative position is likely to be eroded. Slackening economic expansion and reducing dependence on heavy industry with high energy usage are general economic influences. Greater emphasis on the environmental aspects of fuel burning, and a continuing shift towards less polluting energy sources (gas, nuclear and renewables) is an accompanying political influence. These factors imply limited growth in coal demand. Although the relationship between domestic coal supplies and imports is difficult to estimate, great uncertainty about future coal import volumes in now evident, and a negative trend has become more likely.

Specific directives and measures having adverse or potentially adverse effects on coal imports have been introduced by the Chinese government. Towards the end of last year new regulations restricting consumption of steam coal with high ash and sulphur content, and introducing a tariff on coal imports to support the domestic mining industry, were announced. Standards for other polluting trace elements (such as phosphorous) also were introduced. Power utilities were required to reduce reliance on imported coal.

As a consequence of these changes, it is clear that previous expectations of vigorous expansion in all the principal seaborne energy commodity imports into China, albeit at varying growth rates, are no longer valid. The vista of future patterns has become more diverse, with coal imports in particular facing much greater headwinds. This conclusion is especially significant for the global bulk carrier freight market, where a chronic shipping capacity surplus has been an enduring feature.
Source: Article by Richard Scott, Visiting Lecturer, China Maritime Centre and MD, Bulk Shipping Analysis, as arranged with Hellenic Shipping News


If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.

Recent News

Friday, 28 August 15
DRY BULK SHIP OWNER OPTIMISTIC ABOUT FUTURE PROSPECTS OF THE MARKET: NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Dry bulk ship owner Golden Ocean appeared optimistic on the long term prospects of the dry bulk market, mainly thanks to an expected resolution of ...


Friday, 28 August 15
COAL PRODUCTION IN THE U.S. FOR THE WEEK ENDING AUGUST 22 ROSE FOR THE THIRD STRAIGHT WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 18.5 million shor ...


Friday, 28 August 15
BANPU STRENGTHENS GROWTH PLAN
Coal Business: Asia-Pacific Synergies Increase Competitiveness for Premium Export Market. Banpu Public Company Limited (BANPU) strengthens its ...


Thursday, 27 August 15
RATES FOR CAPES REMAINED ON A FREE FALL LAST WEEK - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: Keeping everyone on their toes with the volatility seen in August, the Dry Bulk market undoubtedly remains a steady provider of chall ...


Wednesday, 26 August 15
MARKET INSIGHT - STRATOS TINIAKOS
It’s always interesting to comment on the market when big economies around the world are facing troubling times. Following the collapse of th ...


   568 569 570 571 572   
Showing 2846 to 2850 news of total 6871
News by Category
Popular News
 
Total Members : 28,691
Member
Panelist
User ID
Password
Remember Me
By logging on you accept our TERMS OF USE.
Free
Register
Forgot Password
 
Our Members Are From ...

  • SASOL - South Africa
  • Siam City Cement - Thailand
  • OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
  • Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
  • Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
  • KEPCO - South Korea
  • Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
  • DBS Bank - Singapore
  • Indonesia Power. PT
  • Latin American Coal - Colombia
  • Gresik Semen - Indonesia
  • Maybank - Singapore
  • Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
  • PowerSource Philippines DevCo
  • Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
  • Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
  • Ince & co LLP
  • PetroVietnam
  • Coal Orbis AG
  • KOWEPO - South Korea
  • Freeport Indonesia
  • Thai Mozambique Logistica
  • Cebu Energy, Philippines
  • Peabody Energy - USA
  • Russian Coal LLC
  • SUEK AG - Indonesia
  • Star Paper Mills Limited - India
  • New Zealand Coal & Carbon
  • IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
  • SMG Consultants - Indonesia
  • Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
  • Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
  • Dalmia Cement Bharat India
  • Interocean Group of Companies - India
  • GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
  • Australian Coal Association
  • Gupta Coal India Ltd
  • Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
  • Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
  • Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
  • Platts
  • Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
  • Romanian Commodities Exchange
  • Thomson Reuters GRC
  • Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
  • Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
  • Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
  • Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
  • Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
  • Core Mineral Indonesia
  • Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
  • Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
  • Inco-Indonesia
  • Wilmar Investment Holdings
  • McConnell Dowell - Australia
  • Coal India Limited
  • Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
  • Bhushan Steel Limited - India
  • Shree Cement - India
  • Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
  • Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
  • Indorama - Singapore
  • Posco Energy - South Korea
  • UOB Asia (HK) Ltd
  • Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
  • Mechel - Russia
  • BRS Brokers - Singapore
  • GHCL Limited - India
  • PLN - Indonesia
  • Infraline Energy - India
  • Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
  • GMR Energy Limited - India
  • World Coal - UK
  • Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
  • The India Cements Ltd
  • Baramulti Group, Indonesia
  • Ministry of Mines - Canada
  • RBS Sempra - UK
  • Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
  • Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
  • Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
  • South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
  • Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
  • Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
  • GB Group - China
  • Panama Canal Authority
  • Argus Media - Singapore
  • Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
  • ANZ Bank - Australia
  • JPower - Japan
  • Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
  • LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
  • Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
  • Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
  • Adaro Indonesia
  • KPMG - USA
  • Jatenergy - Australia
  • Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
  • Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
  • Cement Manufacturers Association - India
  • Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
  • Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
  • TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
  • Fearnleys - India
  • Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
  • Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
  • Thriveni
  • Mitra SK Pvt Ltd - India
  • TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
  • JPMorgan - India
  • Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
  • Maruti Cements - India
  • Indian School of Mines
  • SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
  • Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
  • UBS Singapore
  • Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
  • Indogreen Group - Indonesia
  • Cemex - Philippines
  • Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
  • PTC India Limited - India
  • ASAPP Information Group - India
  • Thailand Anthracite
  • Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
  • Electricity Authority, New Zealand
  • Ernst & Young Pvt. Ltd.
  • BNP Paribas - Singapore
  • Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
  • Renaissance Capital - South Africa
  • Petron Corporation, Philippines
  • IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
  • Anglo American - United Kingdom
  • Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
  • Heidelberg Cement - Germany
  • Economic Council, Georgia
  • Merrill Lynch Bank
  • Cargill India Pvt Ltd
  • CESC Limited - India
  • Parliament of New Zealand
  • Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
  • Edison Trading Spa - Italy
  • Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
  • ICICI Bank Limited - India
  • Independent Power Producers Association of India
  • Moodys - Singapore
  • Credit Suisse - India
  • Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
  • Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
  • Enel Italy
  • Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
  • Britmindo - Indonesia
  • Total Coal South Africa
  • Sucofindo - Indonesia
  • Sical Logistics Limited - India
  • Goldman Sachs - Singapore
  • Bhatia International Limited - India
  • ACC Limited - India
  • Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
  • Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
  • TNPL - India
  • International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
  • Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
  • GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
  • Central Java Power - Indonesia
  • Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
  • Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
  • Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
  • Vale Mozambique
  • ETA - Dubai
  • Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
  • Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
  • Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
  • Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
  • White Energy Company Limited
  • Mitsui
  • San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
  • Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
  • Humpuss - Indonesia
  • Thermax Limited - India
  • Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
  • Videocon Industries ltd - India
  • Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
  • Aditya Birla Group - India
  • Shenhua Group - China
  • Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
  • Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
  • Carbofer General Trading SA - India
  • Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
  • Sojitz Corporation - Japan
  • Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
  • Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
  • Eastern Energy - Thailand
  • Planning Commission, India
  • The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
  • Energy Development Corp, Philippines
  • AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
  • CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
  • Bank of America
  • Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
  • Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
  • Ministry of Transport, Egypt
  • The Treasury - Australian Government
  • Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
  • Bangladesh Power Developement Board
  • Runge Indonesia
  • Platou - Singapore
  • MS Steel International - UAE
  • EMO - The Netherlands
  • Cosco
  • Vedanta Resources Plc - India
  • Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
  • European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
  • Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
  • HSBC - Hong Kong
  • SMC Global Power, Philippines
  • Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
  • Adani Power Ltd - India
  • Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
  • Coal and Oil Company - UAE
  • Arch Coal - USA
  • Kobe Steel Ltd - Japan
  • Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
  • Mjunction Services Limited - India
  • Berau Coal - Indonesia
  • IOL Indonesia
  • Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
  • Noble Europe Ltd - UK
  • Petrosea - Indonesia
  • SGS (Thailand) Limited
  • Parry Sugars Refinery, India
  • WorleyParsons
  • Tata Power - India
  • Indian Oil Corporation Limited
  • Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
  • TANGEDCO India
  • Samsung - South Korea
  • CNBM International Corporation - China
  • Mitsubishi Corporation
  • Surastha Cement
  • NALCO India
  • Japan Coal Energy Center
  • Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
  • Permata Bank - Indonesia
  • Idemitsu - Japan
  • OCBC - Singapore
  • TRAFIGURA, South Korea
  • Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
  • Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
  • Reliance Power - India
  • Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
  • Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
  • KPCL - India
  • Malco - India
  • Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
  • J M Baxi & Co - India
  • Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
  • McKinsey & Co - India
  • Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • Chamber of Mines of South Africa
  • Coaltrans Conferences
  • APGENCO India
  • Indonesian Coal Mining Association
  • IMC Shipping - Singapore
  • Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
  • Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
  • Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
  • ING Bank NV - Singapore
  • Central Electricity Authority - India
  • PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
  • Coeclerici Indonesia
  • London Commodity Brokers - England
  • Deloitte Consulting - India
  • Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
  • Asia Cement - Taiwan
  • PLN Batubara - Indonesia
  • Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
  • Mercator Lines Limited - India
  • Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
  • Inspectorate - India
  • Minerals Council of Australia
  • Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
  • PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
  • Agrawal Coal Company - India
  • IBC Asia (S) Pte Ltd
  • Singapore Mercantile Exchange
  • Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • CoalTek, United States
  • Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
  • Geoservices-GeoAssay Lab
  • Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
  • Pinang Coal Indonesia
  • Eastern Coal Council - USA
  • Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
  • Rudhra Energy - India
  • Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
  • Xindia Steels Limited - India
  • Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
  • Deutsche Bank - India
  • Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
  • Barclays Capital - USA
  • GNFC Limited - India
  • Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
  • Vitol - Bahrain
  • Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
  • Indian Energy Exchange, India
  • Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
  • TGV SRAAC LIMITED, India
  • Indika Energy - Indonesia
  • Qatrana Cement - Jordan
  • Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
  • Glencore India Pvt. Ltd
  • Clarksons - UK
  • Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
  • VISA Power Limited - India
  • MEC Coal - Indonesia
  • Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
  • Asian Development Bank
  • Medco Energi Mining Internasional
  • Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
  • The University of Queensland
  • Maersk Broker
  • Commonwealth Bank - Australia
  • World Bank
  • EIA - United States
  • GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
  • Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
  • U S Energy Resources
  • NTPC Limited - India
  • Arutmin Indonesia
  • Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Xstrata Coal
  • Georgia Ports Authority, United States
  • Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
  • India Bulls Power Limited - India
  • Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
  • Bank of China, Malaysia
  • Bangkok Bank PCL
  • CCIC - Indonesia
  • Marubeni Corporation - India
  • Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
  • Thiess Contractors Indonesia
  • Cardiff University - UK
  • Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
  • Lafarge - France
  • Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
  • Tanito Harum - Indonesia
  • bp singapore
  • Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
  • Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
  • Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
  • Tamil Nadu electricity Board
  • SRK Consulting
  • Malabar Cements Ltd - India
  • Trasteel International SA, Italy
  • globalCOAL - UK