We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 01 June 15
API 5 FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP; Q1'16 CLOSED LOWER COMPARED TO Q3'15
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q3’ 2015 delivery gained US$ 0.36 per MT (0.80%) month over month. The swap was closed at US$ ...
Monday, 01 June 15
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP: GAINED W-W, M-M; Q1'16 CLOSED HIGHER THAN Q3'15
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q3’ 2015 delivery up US$ 1.15 (2.26%) per MT month over month.
A commodity swap is a f ...
Sunday, 31 May 15
CAPE AND PANAMAX SEGMENTS SLIDE CONTINUES
COALspot.com: The BDI was up about 0.5 pct week on week and closed at 589 points while the cape index was fell 0.73 pct and closed at 810 po ...
Friday, 29 May 15
DRY BULK MARKET IS THE VICTIM OF A SHIFT IN DEMAND - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The fall in dry bulk freight rates is attributed, in large part, to the substantial decrease of China’s thermal coal imports, a major commodi ...
Friday, 29 May 15
COAL PRODUCTION IN THE U.S. ALMOST FLAT THIS PAST WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the second largest coal producer in the world has produced approximately totaled an estimated 16.1 million short ...
|
|
|
Showing 2996 to 3000 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Australian Coal Association
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- White Energy Company Limited
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Minerals Council of Australia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
|
| |
| |
|
