We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 28 August 15
DRY BULK SHIP OWNER OPTIMISTIC ABOUT FUTURE PROSPECTS OF THE MARKET: NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Dry bulk ship owner Golden Ocean appeared optimistic on the long term prospects of the dry bulk market, mainly thanks to an expected resolution of ...
Friday, 28 August 15
COAL PRODUCTION IN THE U.S. FOR THE WEEK ENDING AUGUST 22 ROSE FOR THE THIRD STRAIGHT WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 18.5 million shor ...
Friday, 28 August 15
BANPU STRENGTHENS GROWTH PLAN
Coal Business: Asia-Pacific Synergies Increase Competitiveness for Premium Export Market.
Banpu Public Company Limited (BANPU) strengthens its ...
Thursday, 27 August 15
RATES FOR CAPES REMAINED ON A FREE FALL LAST WEEK - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: Keeping everyone on their toes with the volatility seen in August, the Dry Bulk market undoubtedly remains a steady provider of chall ...
Wednesday, 26 August 15
MARKET INSIGHT - STRATOS TINIAKOS
It’s always interesting to comment on the market when big economies around the world are facing troubling times. Following the collapse of th ...
|
|
|
Showing 2846 to 2850 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- The University of Queensland
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- PTC India Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Planning Commission, India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
