We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 09 March 15
CHINA'S SUPREME COURT ISSUES NEW JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION ON SHIP ARREST AND JUDICIAL SALE OF SHIPS - GARD
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
China is not traditionally a popular jurisdiction for ship arrest. However, Members and clients with ships calling at ports in China should be aware of this development. This guidance is aimed at clarifying ship arrest and sale procedure in the Chinese maritime courts which could lead to more frequent vessel arrests in China.
This Insight is a brief commentary on a new judicial interpretation1 issued by China’s Supreme Court. It covers a number of issues relating to ship arrest and the judicial sale of ships (the Interpretation) that came into force on 1 March 2015.
Provision of counter-security for arrest
It is normal practice for a claimant to provide counter-security when arresting in China. Article 76 of the Special Maritime Procedure Law 1999 (SMPL 1999)2 provides that the amount of counter-security should be equivalent to the probable loss the arrest would cause to the party whose vessel is arrested. Over the years, the practice of the Chinese maritime courts has varied depending on the facts of the case and different approaches by individual judges. In some cases, the counter-security amount was equivalent to 30 days’ hire of the vessel, whilst in others an amount equal to the claim in respect of which the vessel was arrested.
The Interpretation sets out in Article 5 a mechanism to calculate the security amount based on the aggregate of:
- the maintenance expenses of the vessel during the period of arrest
- the loss of use resulting from the arrest
- the cost to the party whose vessel had been arrested (the respondent) to provide security to release the vessel.
This is the same formula used for assessing the losses resulting from wrongful arrest, as set out in Article 24 of the Supreme Court’s judicial interpretation of 2003 relating to application of the SMPL 1999.3
A number of factors remain unclear, however, such as:
- the level of maintenance to be carried out during the arrest period
- the applicable rate of hire while under arrest
- the scope of security costs – in practice, the maritime courts have generally only included the commission payable by the respondent to provide a bank guarantee.
Furthermore, at the time the arrest application is made – and counter-security is assessed – the respondent will not have an opportunity to substantiate or challenge the evidence submitted relating to maintenance, hire and security costs. That said, once counter security has been provided following the vessel’s arrest, the owners may apply for the amount of security to be increased in the event it can be shown that the original amount is insufficient to cover the owners’ likely losses if the arrest proves wrongful.
Although Article 5 still leaves some open questions, at least it sets out a formula to be followed.
A further clarification relating to counter-security is set out in Article 4. This provides that the maritime courts have a discretion not to request counter-security if the arrest relates to a claim for personal injury at sea or a claim arising under a crew service contract.
Multiple arrests of the same vessel
Article 2 of the Interpretation allows multiple claimants to arrest the same vessel as security for their respective claims. Further, if a claimant has made an arrest application but not applied for a judicial sale, then any subsequent claimant making an arrest application may apply for judicial sale of the vessel according to Article 28 of SMPL 1999.
The Interpretation does not, however, tackle the issue of whether each claimant having arrested the vessel must provide counter-security to the full extent of their respective claims.
Judicial sale and procedure
There are several provisions relating to the judicial sale of vessels:
- Article 11 provides that the judicial sale of a vessel is to be organized by a ship auction committee (comprising judges, auctioneers and surveyors, normally three or five persons, as per Article 34 SMPL 1999)
- Article 13 states that in the event of two failed judicial auctions, the sale price of a ship can be reduced – but not to less than 50 per cent of its assessed value
- Article 14 provides that if a ship has still not been sold after a price reduction, the court may lower the price below 50 per cent of its assessed value provided consent is given by creditors representing two thirds or more of the registered creditors’ claims. In the event a sale is still unsuccessful, the court may release the vessel from arrest
- Article 16 requires creditors to register their claims within 60 days after the court’s announcement for the first judicial auction.
Release of counter-security
The practice of the Chinese maritime courts relating to release or return of counter-security has been a concern for claimants in the past. Counter-security could be held up to two years after the claim had been settled on the basis that it represented security for a possible, subsequent wrongful arrest claim brought by the respondent.
Article 6 of the Interpretation will no doubt be welcomed by claimants. It provides that counter-security should be returned to the claimant forthwith:
- if the respondent agrees, or
- if the claimant requests its return, supported by a valid judicial instrument affirming that the respondent is liable for the claim and the awarded amount is approximately equivalent to the amount of security.
In addition, when a claim has been finally concluded, the claimant can apply to the maritime court for return of the security. The court will notify the respondent and allow them to bring any wrongful arrest claim within 30 days, failing which the security will be returned to the claimant.
Arrest and judicial sale of bareboat chartered vessels
Article 23 of SMPL 1999 allows a claimant to apply to arrest a vessel where its bareboat charterer may be liable for a maritime claim and the ship is under bareboat charter at the time of arrest. However, it has not been clear whether the claimant could apply for judicial sale of the vessel following the arrest.
This is now resolved by Article 3 of the Interpretation, which provides that the claimant is entitled to apply (under Article 29 SMPL 1999) for a judicial sale of the vessel to recover a maritime claim for which the bareboat charterer is liable.
This provision is likely to expose head owners to the possibility of their vessel being subjected to a judicial sale through no fault of their own. This might be of significant interest to a shipowner who finances a bareboat charterer to purchase a vessel.
Miscellaneous
Article 7 provides that the shipowner or bareboat charterer is to remain in charge of management of the vessel while under arrest. Should they fail to do so, the maritime court may appoint the claimant or a third party to manage the ship. In which case, the management costs are to be borne by the shipowner or bareboat charterer, or to be paid out of the proceeds of a judicial sale of the vessel.
Under Article 9, the maritime court must terminate the arrest order in the event that it is impossible to enforce the arrest for “objective reasons”. It has not been defined what amounts to “objective reasons”. One possibility could be that the vessel is no longer within the jurisdiction of the Chinese maritime courts, another that the vessel has become a total loss.
The Interpretation should result in a more common approach to arrest and judicial sale by the Chinese maritime courts. However, some issues arising under the SMPL 1999 remain to be resolved, such as whether insolvency of an owner of an arrested ship should take priority over a maritime lien. Nevertheless it is expected that this Interpretation will be generally welcomed by the maritime courts and parties involved in maritime claims.
Acknowledgement: Thanks to Wang Jing & Co for use of their in-house English translation of the Interpretation, in which further details of the changes can found.
Questions or comments concerning this Gard Insight article can be e-mailed to the Gard Editorial Team.
Source: Gard | Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 08 March 15
FREIGHT RATES FROM INDONESIA TO INDIA IS TRENDING UP
COALspot.com: The freight market continued to see gains this week and all the indices were rose except for Cape index. The BDI was increased 4.62 p ...
Friday, 06 March 15
BALTIC DRY INDEX: IS THIS POWERFUL INDICATOR SIGNALING A GLOBAL RECESSION? - STREET AUTHORITY
Although memories of the Great Recession linger, a case can be made that better days lie ahead.
That’s because central banks around the ...
Friday, 06 March 15
U.S. WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION ROSE 3.5% WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of the largest coal producers, produced approximately 17.1 million short tons (mmst) of coal ...
Thursday, 05 March 15
PANAMAX : THE ATLANTIC ROUND IS NOW PAYING AROUND US$ 5K PER DAY
COALspot.com: Handy - The activity in the handy/supra segment is back. “ We see more fresh cargo in the market for 2nd half March dates ...
Thursday, 05 March 15
INDIA WILL BE THE LARGEST DRIVER OF GLOBAL SEABORNE COKING COAL DEMAND GROWTH IN 2015 - WOOD MACKENZIE
Global demand growth will remain weak because of China’s negative demand growth.
COALspot.com: At Coaltrans India, Wood Mackenzie says I ...
|
|
|
Showing 3156 to 3160 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- The University of Queensland
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Australian Coal Association
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
|
| |
| |
|
