We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 06 February 15
SHIP DAMAGED BY FIRE CAUSED BY PIRATES FOUND TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS - TAYLOR WESSING
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The High Court was asked to determine a number of preliminary issues, including whether a vessel was a constructive total loss (“CTL”), whether the claimants had lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, and whether the claimants were entitled to an indemnity for salvage, tug hire and port expenses under a war risks policy.
Background
The first claimant was the owner of the tanker Brillante Virtuoso (the “vessel”). The vessel was insured against war risks under a policy underwritten by the defendants. The second claimant was the mortgagee of the vessel and the co-assured under the policy. The value of the vessel under the hull and machinery section of the policy was US$55 million, and a further US$22 million under the increased value section of the policy.
In July 2011, whilst en route from the Ukraine to China, the vessel (carrying a cargo of fuel oil) stopped off in Aden in order for an unarmed security team to embark ahead of their journey through the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean where there is a risk of pirate attacks. However, whilst the vessel was waiting, it was in fact boarded by armed pirates who detonated an explosive device causing a fire on board and destroying a substantial proportion of machinery and equipment. The vessel subsequently became a dead ship with no power.
The crew were rescued by the US navy and the owners engaged a salvage company the same day to extinguish the fire. The owners’ consultant surveyor inspected the ship and sought quotations from shipyards in the Middle East and China for the cleaning and repairs of the vessel. He formed the opinion that the cost of repair would exceed the insured value of US$55 million. Accordingly, the owners tendered a notice of abandonment (“NOA”) to the insurers declaring the vessel a CTL. The insurers rejected the NOA.
The owners instructed shipbrokers to sell the vessel to a suitable buyer for scrap, however, the shipbrokers struggled to find a purchaser, and only managed to secure an offer of US$700,000 for the vessel. The insurers did not object to the sale at the time (in spite of being given an opportunity to do so) and the vessel was subsequently sold.
The claimants’ case was that the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of an insured peril or perils (i.e. the acts of pirates and/or persons acting maliciously, alternatively terrorists and/or persons acting from a political motive and/or the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of piracy, vandalism, sabotage, violent theft and/or malicious mischief).
The claimants claimed an indemnity for:
(i) a CTL;
(ii) if the vessel was not a CTL for partial loss and loss of hire and
(iii) sue and labour expenses incurred.
The insurers’ defence was that the claimants were not entitled to cover under the policy because, by delaying transit through the Gulf of Aden and/or calling at a port or place within the Gulf, the owners were in breach of the Talbot Gulf of Aden warranty which prevented vessels calling at any port or place or delaying their passage when transiting and/or the owners were in breach of the warranty by failing to apply Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy. The claimants denied this allegation.
Issues examined by the Court
Was the vessel a Constructive Total Loss?
The Court analysed the law on CTL and, in particular, examined section 60(2)(ii) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 which states that a vessel is a CTL “where she is so damaged by a peril insured against that the cost of repairing the damage would exceed the value of the ship when repaired.” Clause 19 of the Institute Time Clauses-Hulls also qualifies this further by stating:
“The measure of indemnity in respect of claims for unrepaired damage shall be the reasonable depreciation in the market value of the Vessel at the time this insurance terminates arising from such unrepaired damage, but not exceeding the reasonable cost of repairs…”
The Court held that in order to succeed in establishing that the vessel was a CTL, the claimants had to prove that the cost of repairing the vessel would have exceeded the insured value of US$55 million.
The Court held that in assessing the costs of repair to the vessel, the question to be asked is what a prudent uninsured shipowner in the position of the claimants would have done in deciding whether or not to repair the vessel, and where and how the repair should be carried out.
The Court acknowledged that in this case, it was not possible to determine with complete accuracy the actual extent of damage to the vessel. In cases such as this, where matters cannot be determined with precision, the Court has to apply a “large margin” to any repair estimate. The Court recognised that a margin of error has to be applied in relation to the extent of the damage where it was not possible to investigate fully and the assessment of the cost of repair has to take account of the fact that the items which were not opened up and tested might well have required replacement, so that a prudent uninsured owner would have replaced them.
Where should the repairs have been carried out?
The Court also held that whilst cost is an important factor in determining where the prudent uninsured owner would have carried out the repairs, it is not determinative. Accordingly, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would consider all the other factors which might well make the closer (whilst more expensive) yard the proper and appropriate place for repair. Hence, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would have favoured repair in these circumstances in Dubai rather than China, even though the quotations for repairs in China were much lower than in the Middle East. Accordingly, the Court found that the vessel was a CTL.
Had the owners lost the right to claim for CTL by selling the vessel?
The Court held that the owners had not lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, as the insurers were well aware throughout that the owners were proposing to sell the vessel and did not object to it. By selling the vessel, the owners were acting in the interests of both themselves and the insurers.
Sue and labour costs
In considering whether an indemnity was payable to the claimants for expenditure in relation to the costs of salvage, tugs and agency fees, the Court disagreed with the insurers’ case that once the vessel had been redelivered by the salvors, any insured peril which had been operating (e.g. violent theft, piracy, vandalism, sabotage and malicious mischief) ceased to operate. The Court found that until the vessel was in a place of safety, the insured peril continued to operate, even after redelivery by the salvors. The Court also held that the cost of the standby tugs and the associated agency expenses were incurred not only for the benefit of the owners, but for the benefit of the insurers, so that they were recoverable as sue and labour expenses.
However, the Court agreed with the insurers that the entitlement to recover sue and labour expenses ceased once the claim form was issued. The Court applied the decision in Kuwait Airways v Kuwait Insurance2 that the issue of the claim form (or writ) crystallises the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract of insurance, so that the relations between the parties are thereafter governed by the Civil Procedure Rules, rather than the contract of insurance. Hence the duty of utmost good faith ceases once proceedings are issued and sue and labour expenses incurred in that period are not recoverable as they were incurred solely for the owner’s benefit.
Source: Taylor Wessing Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 15 February 15
BALTIC DRY INDEX CONTINUALLY DIPPED IN RED
COALspot.com: The Baltic Dry Index continues its decline and fell 5.18 pct to 530 points week on week due to falling commodity prices and declining ...
Saturday, 14 February 15
SHALE GAS AND TIGHT OIL ARE COMMERCIALLY PRODUCED IN JUST FOUR COUNTRIES - EIA
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The United States, Canada, China, and Argentina are currently the only four countries in the world that are producing com ...
Friday, 13 February 15
U.S. WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION SHOWS 10% DECLINE
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of the largest coal producers, produced approximately 18.1 million short tons (mmst) of coal ...
Friday, 13 February 15
SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED SHIP OWNERS SQUEEZED OUT OF THE MARKET ON CRASHING DRY BULK MARKET AND EUROZONE CRISIS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
Financing issues have started to tighten the noose in the throats of small and medium-size ship owners, who were already facing problems over the p ...
Thursday, 12 February 15
CAPESIZE: THE BEST DESCRIPTION FOR THE MARKET IS, FLAT - FEARNRESEARCH
Handy
The handy and supra market is also being affected by the marginal volume of activity in the commodity sales. We see a small upturn in the T ...
|
|
|
Showing 3196 to 3200 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Australian Coal Association
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
|
| |
| |
|
