We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 06 October 14
THE IRON ORE SHIPPING BUSINESS IS FACING SOME ROUGH SEAS - EAST ASIA FORUM
 The impact of Chinese demand on global iron ore prices is well known. A less acknowledged consequence of China’s emergence is the transformation of incentive structures in the global shipping market. Dramatic increases in freight rates shifted global iron ore producers’ comparative advantage further in favour of Australian exporters to the detriment of the Brazilians. During the commodities boom, between 2002 and 2008, the freight differential between Brazil–China and Australia–China rates increased to around US$60 per tonne for 150,000–160,000 deadweight tonne (dwt) ships.
Japan’s tenure as dominant market player in the second half of the twentieth century was marked by a gradual evolution of the shipping pricing regime, much of it under Japanese control. In stark contrast, China’s impact on the shipping market has been much more concentrated in time, with an absence of long-term planning and coordination between the Chinese steelmakers and ship owners or operators.
In 2008, to compete with BHP and Rio Tinto over shipping costs, the shipping company Vale commissioned, at a cost of over US$2 billion, a new line of ‘Very Large Ore Carriers’ (VLOCs), dubbed the ‘Valemax’. The Valemax carrier is the largest bulk carrier ever built: over twice as big as Cape-size carriers (400,000 dwt). Current shipping costs from Australia to China stand at around US$10/tonne, whereas it currently costs around US$22/tonne to ship iron ore from Brazil to China. Direct Valemax trips from Brazil to China would bring shipping costs down to about US$15/tonne.
Vale had 24 out of 35 of these huge carriers built in China, and the rest in South Korea. China’s Export-Import Bank and the Bank of China even financed the project to the scale of US$1.3 billion, so Vale was confident that this step was in the interest of iron ore consumers in China and that these cargoes would be welcomed.
But, on 29 January 2012, the Chinese Ministry of Transport issued a notice specifying that cargo ships with a capacity greater than 350,000 dwt could not dock in Chinese ports, citing safety concerns. Interviews confirm that Vale was taken aback, alongside many Chinese iron ore industry insiders.
The blocking of the Valemax carriers was not the result of coordinated, state-led, revisionist behaviour. It was not a directive coming from the central government or the Chinese Iron ore and Steel Association, or even the large steel SOEs, all of whom favoured the Valemax since it would reduce the overall price of Brazilian iron ore. The opposition, and lobbying, came from Chinese ship owners/operators, led by COSCO (China Ocean Shipping Company), who stood to lose shipping business, and held enough sway with the Chinese Ship-owners Association, the port authorities and the Transport Ministry to make this happen. It is testament to China’s weight in global markets that a unilateral move by one Chinese interest group could have such destabilising consequences. The blocking of the Valemax was the result of the fragmentation of China’s iron ore industry, and the high jacking of policy-making by a particular interest group, against broader national priorities.
On 6 December 2011, Shouguo Zhang, Vice Executive Chairman of China Ship owners’ Association, said that ‘Vale is an iron ore producing corporation that obviously lacks experience in ship safety management, ship pollution prevention … [It] holds the cargo to itself and now intends to control shipping tonnage. It is a matter of monopoly and unfair competition which not only harms the shipping interest of mainland China but also that of South Korea, Japan and Taiwan’. It is worth noting that the president of the Chinese Ship-owners Association at the time was Wei Jiafu, also president of COSCO.
The Wall Street Journal has spoken to shipping engineers who said that safety concerns cited by the Chinese Transport Ministry were ‘insufficient to cast serious doubt on the safety of Valemax ships. Valemax vessels have docked at ports in such places as Japan, Italy, the Netherlands and the Philippines’. Ralph Leszczynski, head of research at shipping services firm Banchero Costa, said that COSCO’s reaction is natural as ‘the moment a company like Vale decides to build their own ships they are entering the “business turf” of companies like COSCO and they take those companies’ business away’. The ban has been extremely costly for Vale, as the company has had to transfer cargo to smaller carriers in the Philippines at an extra cost of between US$2 and US$7 a tonne.
Industry analysts have ventured that the only way out for Vale, as a concession to COSCO and other Chinese ship operators, would be for it to agree to a charter or sharing solution with the Chinese shipping companies, by transferring Valemax ships for Chinese ship-owners to operate.
In December 2013, news of one such five-year ‘bareboat charter arrangement’ with Shandong Shipping Alliance was announced by Vale’s Jose Carlos Martin.
On 10 February 2014, the Chinese Ministry of Transport issued a notice reframing coastal berthing regulations. From 1 July 2014, oversized cargo ships have been allowed to dock in Chinese ports with a capacity not exceeding 250,000 dwt, as long as they match their load with the port’s capacity. Some analysts say this new regulation slowly opens the door to Valemax cargoes docking in China, while the China Ship-owners Association reiterated its opposition to 400,000 dwt cargoes ever docking at Chinese ports.
Then on 12 September 2014, in a ground-breaking announcement, Vale revealed that it had reached a ‘framework agreement for strategic cooperation in iron ore shipping’ with COSCO. This is another step towards resolving the almost 3-year-old impasse between the two giants. Following the terms of the agreement, Vale will transfer 4 VLOCs to COSCO and charter them back from the shipping giant for the next 25 years. It also agreed to similar terms regarding 10 more VLOCs to be built by COSCO to transport iron ore from Brazil.
The new agreement between COSCO and Vale will presumably lead to the Chinese Ministry of Transport fully lifting the ban on the Valemax cargoes in the near future.
The Valemax story highlights the role of non-state actors as a determinant of Chinese international procurement behaviour. It also highlights the fact that despite China’s share of global demand, Chinese stakeholders feel powerless in global commodity markets whose rules were established long before Chinese re-emergence. The sheer reach of COSCO’s behaviour demonstrates how important it is to understand Chinese domestic market dynamics, and also points to broader patterns we can expect as China tries to carve itself a position commensurate with its global purchasing power. China’s domestic dynamics have now become a determining feature of the global economy.
Source: East Asia Forum / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 02 November 14
CAPE INDEX WAS UP 46.65% WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com: The BDI and Cape index continued the strong upward trend this week. The BDI was up 19.80 pct and Cape index was up by 46.65 per ...
Friday, 31 October 14
BUKIT ASAM'S NET PROFIT ROSE 27.42% FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY - SEPTEMBER 2014
COALspot.com: Publicly listed coal miner Bukit Asam reported solid profits in the first nine months of 2014 year.
Coal miner Bukit Asam manage ...
Friday, 31 October 14
U.S PRODUCED AROUND 19.3 MMST OF COAL IN A WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of largest coal producers, produced approximately 19.3 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
Thursday, 30 October 14
COAL & GRAINS SUPPORT PANAMAX AND IRON ORE SUPPORTS CAPES
Handy
The Atlantic market has been flat this week. Rates are up about US$ 200 from last week on the TA´s, but the volumes are about the sam ...
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether a ...
|
|
|
Showing 3401 to 3405 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Minerals Council of Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- White Energy Company Limited
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- PTC India Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- VISA Power Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- The University of Queensland
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Australian Coal Association
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
