We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Thursday, 19 December 13
SHIPPING CONFIDENCE HITS THREE-YEAR HIGH - MOORE STEPHENS
Overall confidence levels in the shipping industry rose to their highest level for more than three years over the three-month period to November 2013, according to the latest Shipping Confidence Survey from international accountant and shipping adviser Moore Stephens. There was encouraging news on freight rates, and evidence of an increased willingness to invest. But concern persists on overtonnaging, operating costs, and the cost of regulation.
In November 2013, the average confidence level expressed by respondents in the markets in which they operate was 6.1 on a scale of 1 (low) to 10 (high), compared to the 5.9 recorded in the previous survey in August 2013. This is the highest figure since the 6.2 recorded in August 2010. The survey was launched in May 2008 with a confidence rating of 6.8.
Despite the overall improvement in confidence, owners were the only category of individual respondent to post an increase this time, from 5.8 to 6.2, the highest figure recorded since May 2010. Confidence on the part of managers, however, was down from 6.2 to 6.1, while for charterers there was a drop from 6.3 to 5.7. Geographically, confidence was down in Asia (from 6.1 to 5.9) but up in Europe (from 5.9 to 6.1) and in North America, from 6.0 to 6.6.
The mood of optimism apparent in a number of responses was typified by the respondent who noted: “We clearly see an upswing in the markets when talking to various people at various locations in the last couple of months. There is, for the first time in a long while, a general feeling of optimism. Furthermore, the economic indicators, both small and large, all over the world, are pointing in the direction of recovery. We cannot expect it to reach the same levels as in 2007/2008, but a sustainable level of confidence is much better than skyrocketing markets because the higher you climb the lower you might fall.”
Another respondent pointed out: “The light we see at the end of the tunnel is not, as had been feared, a train coming towards us. We are quietly optimistic, with supply and demand seeming to come into balance, despite concerns over the amount of new orders being placed.”
One respondent emphasised: “A growing global economy, including the US and the EU, is crucial for an improved shipping market, and there are some good signs of that at the moment, which makes us hopeful for the future.” Another remarked, “We envisage the market growing in Asia, and in Brazil and Russia, typified by increasing imports of products for use in energy projects. We also see an increase in the use of gas as an alternative energy source, with many countries developing infrastructure and facilities to facilitate distribution.”
Others were slightly more guarded, such as the respondents who noted: “The shipping market will stay more or less at current levels well into next year as the world economic situation continues to fluctuate,” and, “The shipping industry in general is very weak at present, although we do expect improvements in 2014.” Others still remained pessimistic, such as the respondent who complained, “Shipping companies are facing a number of challenges, including low market rates caused by overtonnaging in a number of sectors, slow growth in the global economy, and increases in global ship operating costs.” Another noted, “Supply remains higher than demand, with significant falls in freight rates, while operating costs are always increasing. All this means that the shipping business is no longer attractive.”
Elsewhere it was noted: “Things are still pretty fragile, and it wouldn’t take much to knock many operators back into the hole again,” and, “We think the industry is stuck where it is for another year as available tonnage waits for an uplift in world trade.”
The overriding concern on the part of respondents once more related to the levels of excess tonnage both in the market and about to enter it. “There is too much shipbuilding capacity which, coupled with the entry of new investors, will lead to a continuation in the current oversupply of tonnage and low rates,” said one respondent. Another noted: “We need to convince owners to stop building ships, especially tankers,” while another observed “There is a large surplus which is unlikely to be removed for two or three years.”
One respondent said: “Our principal concern is the perennial ability of owners to kill off improvements by increasing the supply of vessels in every sector,” while another feared, “The higher average rates we are likely to see in 2014 will be killed off by massive new deliveries in 2015.” Yet another observed, “Owners must be disciplined when placing new orders, even if they have the luxury of using other people’s money.”
Operating costs and the cost of regulatory compliance continued to concern respondents, one of whom noted “Regulations to control emissions are commendable, and owners will have to adhere to them, but they will need financial support to compensate for the high cost of installing technologically advanced equipment to meet the requirements.” Another pointed out, “Regulatory requirements are still not fully factored into economic assessments, be they financing or investment decisions, and this will come back to haunt the industry.”
“Operating costs and the increasing cost of regulation are major factors,” noted one respondent, “and indeed the cost of additional regulation directly affects operating costs. There is a problem also with the supply of qualified crew, especially in certain niche markets, due to the ‘greying’ of the supply pool.” Another respondent simply said: “Low freight rates, high operating costs and costly regulations are killing us.”
The likelihood of respondents making a major investment or significant development over the next 12 months was up on the previous survey, on a scale of 1 to 10, from 5.5 to 5.8 which, as with overall confidence, is the highest figure recorded since August 2010. The figure for managers was up from 5.8 to its highest ever figure of 6.1, while that for owners was also up, from 5.8 to 6.0. Although charterers recorded a fall, from 6.7 to 6.4, they remain the most optimistic category of respondent in terms of the likelihood of making a new investment.
The number of managers rating the likelihood of making a new investment over the next twelve months at 7.0 out of 10.0, or higher, was up from 45 per cent to 51 per cent, while the number of owners who thought likewise was up by one percentage point from 47 per cent to 48 per cent. The percentage of charterers of like mind, however, was down from 72 per cent to 45 per cent. Geographically, expectation levels of major investments were up in both Asia and Europe, from 5.5 to 5.7 and from 5.6 to 5.8 respectively, and in North America from 5.0 to 5.8.
One respondent said: “While earnings and income are low, there is still a great deal of activity involving planning and preparing for the future, and indeed we are investing with a very positive attitude.” Another noted: “Some major owners have the funds available to acquire tonnage. But the key is timing, and too many big shipping companies are intent on looking good on paper despite the fact that they are actually drowning.”
A number of respondents referred to the increasing involvement in the industry of non-shipping investors. One said: “The risk of overcapacity in all sectors has increased now that so many non-shipping investors have discovered the shipping market”, while another noted “Over the past five years we have seen a lot of non-shipping investors enter the market, and they have now seen that shipping is not an easy business. But we are hopeful for the future, and now is certainly not the time to leave the table.”
Demand trends, competition and finance costs once again featured as the top three factors cited by respondents overall as those likely to influence performance most significantly over the coming twelve months. The overall numbers for demand trends and finance costs were down by one percentage point to 23% and 15 % respectively, while competition was unchanged at 19%. Tonnage supply (unchanged at 13%) featured in fourth place, ahead of fuel costs (static at 10%) and operating costs, another non-mover, at 9%.
Demand trends remained the number one performance-affecting factor for owners, unchanged at 25 %. Tonnage supply, meanwhile, was up one percentage point to 17% in joint-second place with finance costs, up 2 percentage points. For managers, meanwhile, competition was in first place, up 2 percentage points to 22%, the highest figure in the life of the survey. Demand trends, unchanged at 15%, featured in second place ahead of finance costs, down four percentage points to 14%.
For charterers, demand trends, although down by 7 percentage points to 26%, featured in first place, ahead of competition (up 2 percentage points to 22%), and tonnage supply, unchanged at 16%.
Geographically, demand trends were the most significant factor for respondents in Asia (up by one percentage point to 24%), Europe (down to 22% from 24%) and North America (up by 3 percentage points to 35%, the highest figure recorded since the survey was launched). Competition and finance costs, in that order, made up the top three performance-affecting factors in both Asia and Europe, while in North America it was competition and tonnage supply.
There was a one percentage-point fall (from 41% to 40%) in the number of respondents overall who expected finance costs to increase over the next 12 months. The number of respondents expecting finance costs to come down, meanwhile, fell by two percentage points to 9%, which was nevertheless still the second-highest figure recorded in this regard since August 2011. Owners were the only main category to record an increase in the numbers of respondents expecting higher finance costs (up from 36% to 41%). The figure for brokers was down from 50% to 36%, while both managers (down from 44% to 40%) and charterers (down ten percentage points to 28%) recorded all-time survey lows in this respect.
The number of respondents in Asia anticipating an increase in the cost of finance fell by 4 percentage points to 49%, while in Europe the numbers were up from 33% to 35%. In North America, meanwhile, the numbers anticipating higher finance costs fell sharply from 57% to 33%.
One respondent said: “Financing is a big problem”, while another noted, “It is difficult to finance new projects, given unsatisfactory returns on investment and perceived risk levels on the part of banks.”
Turning to the freight markets, there was, for the second survey in succession, an increased expectation of higher rates in the tanker and dry bulk sectors. One respondent claimed, “Rates have not reached this level since October 2008.” In the container ship market, meanwhile, confidence was maintained at existing levels.
The number of respondents overall who expressed an expectation of higher rates in the tanker sector over the next twelve months was up by 5 percentage points to 43%, the highest figure since May 2011. Owners led the way, with 52% anticipating higher rates, as opposed to 37% last time. Managers’ expectations in this regard were up by one percentage point to 37%, but 40% of brokers (as opposed to 35%) thought that tanker rates were likely to go up over the coming year. Charterers, however, were of a different mind, with the number anticipating higher tanker rates falling from 43% to 36%.
Geographically, the prospects for increased tanker rates were deemed higher this time by respondents in Asia (up from 39% to 46%), in Europe (up from 36% to 40%) and in North America (up by 40 percentage points to 83%).
In the dry bulk sector, meanwhile, there was a 14 percentage-point increase, to 56%, in the overall numbers of those anticipating rate increases. This is the highest figure recorded in the life of the survey, and 100% up on the corresponding figure when the survey was launched in 2008. Managers, up by 22 percentage points to a survey high of 60%, led the way, followed by owners, up 6 percentage points to 58%, another all-time high. Even charterers, recording a 5 percentage-point increase to 47%, and brokers (up by 25 percentage points to 46%) were looking on the bright side.
Expectations of higher dry bulk rates over the next 12 months were up to all-time survey highs in both Asia and Europe, rising by 21% and 13% respectively to levels of 63% and 55%. The numbers were also up, by 8 percentage points to 64%, in North America.
One respondent said: “The dry cargo market is coming into balance and, with the new eco-ships on the way, everything looks very positive for those owners who have the right fleet profile and minimal counter-party risk.” Elsewhere, however, it was noted, “Strong dry bulk markets can only last for a very short time, making it difficult to compensate for the poor market conditions we have seen in recent years.”
In the container ship market, the numbers expecting rates to increase over the coming 12 months was unchanged at 30%. Owners’ expectations were up by 3 percentage points on last time to 30%, while optimism in this regard on the part of brokers rose from 25% to 29%. The expectations of managers rose two percentage points to 30 per cent, while those of charterers held steady, also at 30%. Geographically, expectations of improved container ship rates were up by 3 percentage points in Asia to 36%, by 9 percentage points in North America to 44%, and unchanged in Europe at 27%.
One respondent made the extravagant claim that, “All non-operator-owned container ships need to be removed from the market, so that over-supply can be corrected.”
Moore Stephens Shipping Partner, Richard Greiner, said: “The findings of this latest survey provide more good news for the shipping industry. It is now fifteen months since we recorded a decline in shipping confidence. There is an old adage which says that confidence is contagious. If that is true, shipping certainly seems to have caught the bug.
“It was noticeable on this occasion that, in contrast to previous surveys, very few of our respondents referred to the effect that the global economic and political situation is having on their business. This does not mean, of course, that those problems have gone away. But it is a clear indication that they are perceived to be improving, to the extent that the industry is now focusing on issues closer to home, and moreover on problems where they can realistically contribute towards helping to find a solution.
“Those problems represent a significant challenge for the shipping industry. Moreover, they continue to have a familiar ring to them. There are still too many ships for the cargoes available on many trades. There is not the ready access to bank finance that many would like. Operating costs are expected to rise over the next two years, following the fall for 2012 recorded by Moore Stephens’ ship operating costs benchmark study OpCost. Crew wages are only moving in one direction. The cost of keeping up with regulatory compliance is now a big-ticket item. And P&I premiums are on the increase.
“These problems will not go away. But the prospect of being able to fund them properly is brighter now than for some time. Expectations of improved rates in the dry bulk sector are now higher than at any time in the last five years, while in the tanker market the mood is at its most bullish for two and a half years. In the container trades, things are meanwhile holding up well. In short, there should be more money about next year, although no shortage of things to spend it on.
“Some of that money will have to be spent on compliance and on increased operating costs, but there could be some over for new investment, expectations of which are running at their highest survey levels for two and a half years. That is good news, particularly when viewed together with indications of the increasing interest being shown in shipping by non-industry investors. The latter, of course, can bring problems of its own, but in principle the prospect of new money coming into shipping should be a good thing.
“Whatever the level of new money coming in, the vast majority of players who have survived the downturn of the past five years are very much old money in terms of their industry experience. They have taken the worst that can be thrown at them and are still standing. That means that they have committed to operating in a cleaner and leaner shipping industry, and to meeting the costs that go with it. Provided the evidence of improved confidence that we are seeing does not turn out to be a false dawn, they can reasonably expect to reap better rewards over the coming years than they have for some time.”
Source: Moore Stephens / Hellenic Shipping News
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 18 November 13
SUB-BIT INDONESIA COAL SWAP LOST ON WEEK; MARGINALLY GAINED ON DAY
COALspot.com – Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swap (FOB ) for average Q1’ 14 delivery gained $ 1.25 pmt month on month on Friday 15 Novemb ...
Sunday, 17 November 13
Q4' 14 API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP CLOSED $ 3.43 PMT (4.34 %) HIGHER THAN Q1' 14 SWAP
COALspot.com : API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q1’ 14 delivery gained 0.05 percept d-d on Friday 15 November 2013. The CFR South ...
Saturday, 16 November 13
INDONESIA TO INDIA SUPRAMAX FREIGHT RATES FIRM DUE TO STRONG COAL ACTIVITIES
COALspot.com: The Cape and Panamax index was down this week and pulling down the BDI by about 5 pct. BDI was closed at 1507 points on Friday 1 ...
Friday, 15 November 13
DRY BULK MARKET STILL LINGERING ON, DESPITE PREDICTIONS OF NEW IMMINENT RALLY PRIOR TO THE YEAR'S END - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market hasn't yet managed to stage a new comeback after its retreat from the recent multiyear highs. Yesterday, the industry's benchm ...
Friday, 15 November 13
US COAL PRODUCTION UP 2.59% WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer, produced approximately 19.8 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
|
|
|
Showing 4006 to 4010 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- The University of Queensland
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Planning Commission, India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- VISA Power Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Parliament of New Zealand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|