keeps you connected across the coal world

Submit Your Articles
We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining, shipping, etc.

To Submit your article please click here.

International Energy Events

WTI Crude Oil

BRENT Crude Oil

Search News
Latest CoalNews Headlines
Tuesday, 16 October 18

With less than eighteen months before Regulation 14.1.3 of Annex VI of the MARPOL Convention comes into effect, there are still numerous challenges surrounding compliance and enforcement, which have cast uncertainty over the effect that the Regulation will have on the international maritime industry, and on individual shipping companies.
This three-part series aims to draw owners’ and charterers’ attentions to the practical issues that they should be aware of, ahead of the implementation of Regulation 14.1.3, and to highlight the various measures that they should now be considering, in order to safely absorb the significant costs and other commercial risks that are forecast to accompany the entry into force of the Regulation.
Part 1 provides a brief summary of the scope of Regulation 14.1.3, and an analysis of the different types of risks to which owners and charterers are likely to be exposed, if they do not take the necessary steps to comply with Regulation 14.1.3, by 1 January 2020.
Scope of the Regulation
Regulation 14.1.3 of Annex VI of the MARPOL Convention (“Regulation 14.1.3”) was adopted by the IMO in 2016, in response to environmental concerns. The Regulation now provides that “the sulphur content of any fuel oil used on board ships shall not exceed … 0.50% m/m on and after 1 January 2020.” The new limit will see a steep reduction in the permissible global sulphur limit, down from the 3.5% mass/mass (“m/m”) limit, currently in effect under Regulation 14.1.2. The limit will apply to all vessels registered with Flag States that have ratified Annex VI, and in all waters belonging to Port or Coastal States that have ratified Annex VI, at which, or through which, a vessel calls or passes.
The IMO has reconfirmed that Regulation 14.1.3 will take effect with immediacy, despite recent calls by leading Flag States and shipping associations for a period of “experience building” and “pragmatic enforcement”. The new limit will also not affect the ongoing obligation under Regulation 14.4.3 that vessels operating within Emission Control Areas (“ECAs”) use fuel with a sulphur content of only 0.1 m/m.
1. What are the risks of non-compliance?
a) Contractual liability
At a commercial level, non-compliance with Regulation 14.1.3 is likely to give rise to a variety of charterparty claims between owners and charterers. These will likely include claims for unseaworthiness; claims that the vessel has not been properly fitted for service; claims for the costs of deviation required to take on compliant fuel; off-spec bunker claims; disputes over responsibility for managing and segregating different fuels on board; contamination claims; claims for delay occasioned by engine failure, detention or arrest; and disputes over payment of financial penalties incurred. Owners and charterers are therefore advised to assess, and if necessary renegotiate their charterparty terms, focusing in particular on the costs and risk allocation clauses, to ensure that they are not unduly exposed to liability arising from non-compliance. Two considerable areas for potential dispute are addressed below:
i) Bunkering of compliant fuel
Under common time charterparty forms, including the NYPE 1946 form and the Shelltime 4 form, it is charterers’ responsibility to supply fuel for the vessel. Time charterparties will normally also include a bunker specification rider clause, and, potentially, additional standard form BIMCO or other clauses, dealing with sulphur content or bunker quality. Owners and charterers should review all clauses concerning fuel and bunkering, to ensure that those clauses are Regulation 14.1.3-compliant. In particular, this will reduce the risk of disputes in circumstances where vessels are visiting port states which have not ratified Annex VI, or smaller ports where non-compliant fuel may not be available. The inclusion of express sampling procedures, to ensure that bunkering operations are Annex VI-compliant (including that bunker delivery notes state the sulphur content of the fuel supplied) are also likely to reduce the occurrence of disputes.
Parties should further consider the adoption of a clause overriding Regulation 18.2 of Annex VI (which establishes that a vessel should not be required to deviate from the intended voyage or unduly delay the voyage, in order to obtain compliant fuel). As well as minimising the scope for disputes (assuming that the vessel is not fitted with a scrubber or other alternative means of compliance), this is relevant from a commercial point of view; increasing numbers of blue-chip companies have now adopted a zero-tolerance policy concerning doing business with shipping companies that are non-compliant with the new Regulation. Cargo owners may also demand a compliance clause before placing cargo with vessels.
BIMCO have recently announced that they will be introducing a series of standard clauses to attempt to address some of the above issues. The first, named the “BIMCO 2020 Global Marine Fuel Sulphur Content Clause for Time Charter Parties” is expected to be published at the end of October 2018. It sets out time charterers’ obligations and liabilities in providing fuel of the required content. Fuel management is to remain the responsibility of owners. A second “bridging” clause, addressing the transitional period around 1 January 2020, is expected to be published between January and February 2019. This clause will likely address the final bunkering of the ship by time charterers prior to redelivery, requirements for sufficient compliant fuel on board at redelivery, tank cleaning costs and disposal of residual fuel, during the period immediately before and after 1 January 2020. Parties should also ensure that the price of fuel on delivery and redelivery is specified, in particular when negotiating longer-term fixtures that will span the transitional period, to avoid disputes.
ii) Installation, maintenance and repair of scrubbers
In the context of vessels retrofitted with scrubbers to comply with Regulation 14.1.3, owners and charterers should ensure that any charterparty entered into, adequately allocates responsibility for installation, maintenance and repair. BIMCO have announced that a standard Scrubber clause is due to be published around March – April 2019. The clause is likely to address possible installation cost sharing between owners and charterers, with formulas potentially reflecting the life of the scrubber or the remaining duration of the charterparty. The clause might also deal with scrubber breakdown, and impose requirements for the carriage of a reserve of LSFO to avoid off-hire.
Owners and charterers should additionally review dry-docking and off-hire clauses (in the context of time charterparties), and laytime and demurrage clauses (in the context of voyage charterparties) to ensure that those clauses clearly allocate responsibility for time and costs spent on installation, maintenance and/or repair.
A further consideration for owners, in the context of vessels both able to burn LSFO and also retrofitted with a scrubber, is the extent to which charterers may use scrubbers, instead of sourcing compliant fuel under the contract, and to what extent charterers should bear the additional energy consumption costs incurred as a result.
b) Sanctions and fines
Though enforcement will vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, non-compliant vessels should expect financial penalties from Port States that have ratified Annex VI. Article 4(4) MARPOL Convention requires that these should be “adequate in severity to discourage violations … irrespective of where the violations occur.” The EU Sulphur Directive similarly requires Member States to impose penalties that are “effective, proportionate and dissuasive and may include fines … [that] at least deprive those responsible of the economic benefits derived from their infringement and that those fines gradually increase for repeated infringements.”
Further, certain Port States may pursue and arrest vessels under local rules and regulations. The United States Coast Guard, for example, are empowered to seize vessels in breach of Sulphur Regulations. Concurrently, the US Environmental Pollution Agency (“EPA”) may impose civil fines on non-MARPOL compliant vessels of USD 25,000 per day of non-compliance.
Again, owners and charterers should ensure clear allocation of risk and cost liability in their charterparties.
c) Insurance
Owners should also be aware of the potential consequences for their Hull and P&I insurance coverage. Flag States that have ratified Annex VI should in theory revoke or, at least, suspend vessels’ MARPOL certificates, if they do not comply with the Regulation. If this occurs, or if a vessel is otherwise deemed to be unseaworthy, or no longer in class, as a result of non-compliance, owners may be considered to have breached seaworthiness, class and / or other warranties under their Hull and Machinery and / or Protection and Indemnity policies. If these breaches are determined to define the risk as a whole, UK insurers, at least, will be entitled to avoid liability for losses that would otherwise be covered under a policy.
2. Concluding thoughts for Part 1
Regulation 14.1.3 is likely to have a dramatic effect on the shipping industry, the extent of which is still largely unknown. As explored above, from a contractual point of view, owners and charterers can best protect themselves by reviewing the terms of their contracts of carriage, and of their insurance policies, to ensure that their contractual positions are adequately protected, and that they are aware of the extent to which any non-compliance may affect policy coverage.
At Clyde & Co, we have experience in assisting owners, charterers and fuel suppliers with drafting well-structured, clear and balanced clauses, and in providing concise coverage advice.
In Part 2, we will explore challenges to compliance facing owners and charterers, in addition to the perceived challenges to enforcement, still facing the IMO.
Source: Beth Bradley, Benjamin Bryant, Ioanna Tsekoura, Clyde&Co

If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.

Recent News

Monday, 18 March 19
Capesize The Baltic Capesize market shrugged off its recent negative sentiment to post daily incremental improvements over the last week. Pacif ...

Saturday, 16 March 19
Australian coal exports to China are still facing delays, with protectionism and environmental checks blamed for the slowdown.   Coal ...

Thursday, 14 March 19
Capesize Average daily earning still well below operating costs, and owners keep bleeding - but nevertheless finally some bright spots for the ...

Monday, 11 March 19
Capesize A faint glimmer of hope with the suggestion the market may have finally bottomed out, with owners attempting to resist further cuts in ...

Friday, 08 March 19
South Korea state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued a tender for 520,000 MT of min. 5700 NAR coal of Australian origin to be burnt ...

   1 2 3 4 5   
Showing 1 to 5 news of total 5422
News by Category
Popular News
Total Members : 25,955
User ID
Remember Me
By logging on you accept our TERMS OF USE.
Forgot Password
Our Members Are From ...

  • Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
  • Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
  • Shenhua Group - China
  • Sical Logistics Limited - India
  • Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
  • Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
  • Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
  • Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
  • Goldman Sachs - Singapore
  • MEC Coal - Indonesia
  • Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
  • The India Cements Ltd
  • Thailand Anthracite
  • World Coal - UK
  • Maruti Cements - India
  • Fearnleys - India
  • Platts
  • Cemex - Philippines
  • Eastern Energy - Thailand
  • Bangkok Bank PCL
  • Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
  • Rudhra Energy - India
  • Moodys - Singapore
  • Gupta Coal India Ltd
  • Renaissance Capital - South Africa
  • Bank of America
  • KEPCO - South Korea
  • Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
  • Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
  • CCIC - Indonesia
  • Central Java Power - Indonesia
  • Maybank - Singapore
  • Georgia Ports Authority, United States
  • SGS (Thailand) Limited
  • Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
  • Permata Bank - Indonesia
  • White Energy Company Limited
  • Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
  • Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
  • Ministry of Transport, Egypt
  • Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
  • Maersk Broker
  • HSBC - Hong Kong
  • Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
  • Posco Energy - South Korea
  • Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
  • Argus Media - Singapore
  • Heidelberg Cement - Germany
  • Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
  • KOWEPO - South Korea
  • Kobe Steel Ltd - Japan
  • Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
  • Anglo American - United Kingdom
  • Bank of China, Malaysia
  • CoalTek, United States
  • Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
  • Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
  • Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
  • TANGEDCO India
  • Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
  • Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
  • Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
  • Deutsche Bank - India
  • Japan Coal Energy Center
  • IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
  • Sucofindo - Indonesia
  • Barclays Capital - USA
  • OCBC - Singapore
  • Parry Sugars Refinery, India
  • Reliance Power - India
  • Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
  • Inco-Indonesia
  • MS Steel International - UAE
  • Bhatia International Limited - India
  • Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
  • Dalmia Cement Bharat India
  • Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
  • Marubeni Corporation - India
  • Aditya Birla Group - India
  • Cement Manufacturers Association - India
  • McConnell Dowell - Australia
  • GNFC Limited - India
  • UOB Asia (HK) Ltd
  • Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
  • Inspectorate - India
  • Tata Power - India
  • Mercator Lines Limited - India
  • Tamil Nadu electricity Board
  • Chamber of Mines of South Africa
  • IBC Asia (S) Pte Ltd
  • Independent Power Producers Association of India
  • Thomson Reuters GRC
  • J M Baxi & Co - India
  • Mitra SK Pvt Ltd - India
  • JPMorgan - India
  • Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
  • TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
  • Central Electricity Authority - India
  • Runge Indonesia
  • Coeclerici Indonesia
  • globalCOAL - UK
  • Videocon Industries ltd - India
  • Edison Trading Spa - Italy
  • TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
  • APGENCO India
  • Infraline Energy - India
  • Thiess Contractors Indonesia
  • Malco - India
  • Indonesian Coal Mining Association
  • EMO - The Netherlands
  • Tanito Harum - Indonesia
  • Ernst & Young Pvt. Ltd.
  • PowerSource Philippines DevCo
  • Eastern Coal Council - USA
  • Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
  • Freeport Indonesia
  • India Bulls Power Limited - India
  • CESC Limited - India
  • Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
  • VISA Power Limited - India
  • Xindia Steels Limited - India
  • Mitsubishi Corporation
  • PetroVietnam
  • Indian Oil Corporation Limited
  • Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
  • Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
  • Siam City Cement - Thailand
  • Vitol - Bahrain
  • Enel Italy
  • Agrawal Coal Company - India
  • Mitsui
  • The University of Queensland
  • Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
  • Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
  • IOL Indonesia
  • Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
  • PLN - Indonesia
  • Surastha Cement
  • Jatenergy - Australia
  • Coal India Limited
  • Bhushan Steel Limited - India
  • Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
  • Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
  • Singapore Mercantile Exchange
  • Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
  • Berau Coal - Indonesia
  • Indonesia Power. PT
  • BRS Brokers - Singapore
  • Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
  • SRK Consulting
  • OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
  • Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
  • ASAPP Information Group - India
  • Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
  • JPower - Japan
  • Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
  • Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
  • Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
  • Thermax Limited - India
  • Mjunction Services Limited - India
  • Mechel - Russia
  • Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
  • Star Paper Mills Limited - India
  • Medco Energi Mining Internasional
  • Latin American Coal - Colombia
  • Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
  • Indogreen Group - Indonesia
  • U S Energy Resources
  • Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
  • Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
  • The Treasury - Australian Government
  • Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
  • Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
  • Adaro Indonesia
  • Carbofer General Trading SA - India
  • ETA - Dubai
  • Cardiff University - UK
  • European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
  • Ince & co LLP
  • Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
  • Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
  • Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
  • KPMG - USA
  • Humpuss - Indonesia
  • SASOL - South Africa
  • Arutmin Indonesia
  • Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
  • RBS Sempra - UK
  • Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
  • GB Group - China
  • Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
  • TNPL - India
  • Gresik Semen - Indonesia
  • EIA - United States
  • Peabody Energy - USA
  • Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
  • Asia Cement - Taiwan
  • Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
  • NALCO India
  • Credit Suisse - India
  • Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
  • Indika Energy - Indonesia
  • KPCL - India
  • World Bank
  • Indorama - Singapore
  • Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
  • Arch Coal - USA
  • Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
  • Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
  • Glencore India Pvt. Ltd
  • Clarksons - UK
  • The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
  • Thai Mozambique Logistica
  • IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
  • Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
  • Idemitsu - Japan
  • LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
  • Lafarge - France
  • Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
  • Geoservices-GeoAssay Lab
  • Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
  • Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
  • Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
  • Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
  • Vale Mozambique
  • ICICI Bank Limited - India
  • Minerals Council of Australia
  • Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
  • Parliament of New Zealand
  • Platou - Singapore
  • New Zealand Coal & Carbon
  • Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
  • Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
  • Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
  • Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
  • GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
  • Vedanta Resources Plc - India
  • Indian School of Mines
  • DBS Bank - Singapore
  • Coal and Oil Company - UAE
  • Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
  • Cosco
  • CNBM International Corporation - China
  • Russian Coal LLC
  • GMR Energy Limited - India
  • Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
  • Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
  • Cargill India Pvt Ltd
  • Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
  • SMG Consultants - Indonesia
  • bp singapore
  • Australian Coal Association
  • Sojitz Corporation - Japan
  • Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
  • PLN Batubara - Indonesia
  • Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
  • Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
  • Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
  • Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
  • Xstrata Coal
  • Qatrana Cement - Jordan
  • Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
  • Adani Power Ltd - India
  • PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
  • SUEK AG - Indonesia
  • Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
  • GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
  • Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
  • CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
  • Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
  • Trasteel International SA, Italy
  • GHCL Limited - India
  • Noble Europe Ltd - UK
  • Core Mineral Indonesia
  • Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
  • ACC Limited - India
  • Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
  • Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
  • UBS Singapore
  • Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
  • Asian Development Bank
  • PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
  • Malabar Cements Ltd - India
  • Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
  • Bangladesh Power Developement Board
  • Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
  • Wilmar Investment Holdings
  • Romanian Commodities Exchange
  • Deloitte Consulting - India
  • Total Coal South Africa
  • Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
  • Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
  • Merrill Lynch Bank
  • South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
  • ANZ Bank - Australia
  • McKinsey & Co - India
  • Petrosea - Indonesia
  • Panama Canal Authority
  • Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
  • WorleyParsons
  • Britmindo - Indonesia
  • Coal Orbis AG
  • NTPC Limited - India
  • Commonwealth Bank - Australia
  • Shree Cement - India
  • ING Bank NV - Singapore
  • IMC Shipping - Singapore
  • Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
  • Pinang Coal Indonesia
  • Interocean Group of Companies - India
  • Planning Commission, India
  • Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
  • Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
  • Thriveni
  • Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
  • Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
  • Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
  • Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
  • PTC India Limited - India
  • London Commodity Brokers - England
  • Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
  • BNP Paribas - Singapore
  • Ministry of Mines - Canada
  • Economic Council, Georgia
  • Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
  • Coaltrans Conferences
  • Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
  • Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
  • Samsung - South Korea