keeps you connected across the coal world

Submit Your Articles
We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining, shipping, etc.

To Submit your article please click here.

International Energy Events

WTI Crude Oil

BRENT Crude Oil

Search News
Latest CoalNews Headlines
Tuesday, 16 October 18

With less than eighteen months before Regulation 14.1.3 of Annex VI of the MARPOL Convention comes into effect, there are still numerous challenges surrounding compliance and enforcement, which have cast uncertainty over the effect that the Regulation will have on the international maritime industry, and on individual shipping companies.
This three-part series aims to draw owners’ and charterers’ attentions to the practical issues that they should be aware of, ahead of the implementation of Regulation 14.1.3, and to highlight the various measures that they should now be considering, in order to safely absorb the significant costs and other commercial risks that are forecast to accompany the entry into force of the Regulation.
Part 1 provides a brief summary of the scope of Regulation 14.1.3, and an analysis of the different types of risks to which owners and charterers are likely to be exposed, if they do not take the necessary steps to comply with Regulation 14.1.3, by 1 January 2020.
Scope of the Regulation
Regulation 14.1.3 of Annex VI of the MARPOL Convention (“Regulation 14.1.3”) was adopted by the IMO in 2016, in response to environmental concerns. The Regulation now provides that “the sulphur content of any fuel oil used on board ships shall not exceed … 0.50% m/m on and after 1 January 2020.” The new limit will see a steep reduction in the permissible global sulphur limit, down from the 3.5% mass/mass (“m/m”) limit, currently in effect under Regulation 14.1.2. The limit will apply to all vessels registered with Flag States that have ratified Annex VI, and in all waters belonging to Port or Coastal States that have ratified Annex VI, at which, or through which, a vessel calls or passes.
The IMO has reconfirmed that Regulation 14.1.3 will take effect with immediacy, despite recent calls by leading Flag States and shipping associations for a period of “experience building” and “pragmatic enforcement”. The new limit will also not affect the ongoing obligation under Regulation 14.4.3 that vessels operating within Emission Control Areas (“ECAs”) use fuel with a sulphur content of only 0.1 m/m.
1. What are the risks of non-compliance?
a) Contractual liability
At a commercial level, non-compliance with Regulation 14.1.3 is likely to give rise to a variety of charterparty claims between owners and charterers. These will likely include claims for unseaworthiness; claims that the vessel has not been properly fitted for service; claims for the costs of deviation required to take on compliant fuel; off-spec bunker claims; disputes over responsibility for managing and segregating different fuels on board; contamination claims; claims for delay occasioned by engine failure, detention or arrest; and disputes over payment of financial penalties incurred. Owners and charterers are therefore advised to assess, and if necessary renegotiate their charterparty terms, focusing in particular on the costs and risk allocation clauses, to ensure that they are not unduly exposed to liability arising from non-compliance. Two considerable areas for potential dispute are addressed below:
i) Bunkering of compliant fuel
Under common time charterparty forms, including the NYPE 1946 form and the Shelltime 4 form, it is charterers’ responsibility to supply fuel for the vessel. Time charterparties will normally also include a bunker specification rider clause, and, potentially, additional standard form BIMCO or other clauses, dealing with sulphur content or bunker quality. Owners and charterers should review all clauses concerning fuel and bunkering, to ensure that those clauses are Regulation 14.1.3-compliant. In particular, this will reduce the risk of disputes in circumstances where vessels are visiting port states which have not ratified Annex VI, or smaller ports where non-compliant fuel may not be available. The inclusion of express sampling procedures, to ensure that bunkering operations are Annex VI-compliant (including that bunker delivery notes state the sulphur content of the fuel supplied) are also likely to reduce the occurrence of disputes.
Parties should further consider the adoption of a clause overriding Regulation 18.2 of Annex VI (which establishes that a vessel should not be required to deviate from the intended voyage or unduly delay the voyage, in order to obtain compliant fuel). As well as minimising the scope for disputes (assuming that the vessel is not fitted with a scrubber or other alternative means of compliance), this is relevant from a commercial point of view; increasing numbers of blue-chip companies have now adopted a zero-tolerance policy concerning doing business with shipping companies that are non-compliant with the new Regulation. Cargo owners may also demand a compliance clause before placing cargo with vessels.
BIMCO have recently announced that they will be introducing a series of standard clauses to attempt to address some of the above issues. The first, named the “BIMCO 2020 Global Marine Fuel Sulphur Content Clause for Time Charter Parties” is expected to be published at the end of October 2018. It sets out time charterers’ obligations and liabilities in providing fuel of the required content. Fuel management is to remain the responsibility of owners. A second “bridging” clause, addressing the transitional period around 1 January 2020, is expected to be published between January and February 2019. This clause will likely address the final bunkering of the ship by time charterers prior to redelivery, requirements for sufficient compliant fuel on board at redelivery, tank cleaning costs and disposal of residual fuel, during the period immediately before and after 1 January 2020. Parties should also ensure that the price of fuel on delivery and redelivery is specified, in particular when negotiating longer-term fixtures that will span the transitional period, to avoid disputes.
ii) Installation, maintenance and repair of scrubbers
In the context of vessels retrofitted with scrubbers to comply with Regulation 14.1.3, owners and charterers should ensure that any charterparty entered into, adequately allocates responsibility for installation, maintenance and repair. BIMCO have announced that a standard Scrubber clause is due to be published around March – April 2019. The clause is likely to address possible installation cost sharing between owners and charterers, with formulas potentially reflecting the life of the scrubber or the remaining duration of the charterparty. The clause might also deal with scrubber breakdown, and impose requirements for the carriage of a reserve of LSFO to avoid off-hire.
Owners and charterers should additionally review dry-docking and off-hire clauses (in the context of time charterparties), and laytime and demurrage clauses (in the context of voyage charterparties) to ensure that those clauses clearly allocate responsibility for time and costs spent on installation, maintenance and/or repair.
A further consideration for owners, in the context of vessels both able to burn LSFO and also retrofitted with a scrubber, is the extent to which charterers may use scrubbers, instead of sourcing compliant fuel under the contract, and to what extent charterers should bear the additional energy consumption costs incurred as a result.
b) Sanctions and fines
Though enforcement will vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, non-compliant vessels should expect financial penalties from Port States that have ratified Annex VI. Article 4(4) MARPOL Convention requires that these should be “adequate in severity to discourage violations … irrespective of where the violations occur.” The EU Sulphur Directive similarly requires Member States to impose penalties that are “effective, proportionate and dissuasive and may include fines … [that] at least deprive those responsible of the economic benefits derived from their infringement and that those fines gradually increase for repeated infringements.”
Further, certain Port States may pursue and arrest vessels under local rules and regulations. The United States Coast Guard, for example, are empowered to seize vessels in breach of Sulphur Regulations. Concurrently, the US Environmental Pollution Agency (“EPA”) may impose civil fines on non-MARPOL compliant vessels of USD 25,000 per day of non-compliance.
Again, owners and charterers should ensure clear allocation of risk and cost liability in their charterparties.
c) Insurance
Owners should also be aware of the potential consequences for their Hull and P&I insurance coverage. Flag States that have ratified Annex VI should in theory revoke or, at least, suspend vessels’ MARPOL certificates, if they do not comply with the Regulation. If this occurs, or if a vessel is otherwise deemed to be unseaworthy, or no longer in class, as a result of non-compliance, owners may be considered to have breached seaworthiness, class and / or other warranties under their Hull and Machinery and / or Protection and Indemnity policies. If these breaches are determined to define the risk as a whole, UK insurers, at least, will be entitled to avoid liability for losses that would otherwise be covered under a policy.
2. Concluding thoughts for Part 1
Regulation 14.1.3 is likely to have a dramatic effect on the shipping industry, the extent of which is still largely unknown. As explored above, from a contractual point of view, owners and charterers can best protect themselves by reviewing the terms of their contracts of carriage, and of their insurance policies, to ensure that their contractual positions are adequately protected, and that they are aware of the extent to which any non-compliance may affect policy coverage.
At Clyde & Co, we have experience in assisting owners, charterers and fuel suppliers with drafting well-structured, clear and balanced clauses, and in providing concise coverage advice.
In Part 2, we will explore challenges to compliance facing owners and charterers, in addition to the perceived challenges to enforcement, still facing the IMO.
Source: Beth Bradley, Benjamin Bryant, Ioanna Tsekoura, Clyde&Co

If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.

Recent News

Tuesday, 20 August 19
NORDEN has been awarded a 3-year contract with a power company in Hong Kong for the transportation of coal from Indonesia to Hong Kong.   ...

Tuesday, 20 August 19
THE AUGUST 2019 INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE POSTS THE FIRST MONTHLY GAIN SINCE AUGUST 2018 The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources of the Republic of Indonesia has revised up the benchmark price of Indonesian thermal co ...

Monday, 19 August 19
Capesize The Capesize market was buoyant in both basins this week, posting gains across the board. After bottoming out the previous week, rates ...

Sunday, 11 August 19
Capesize With typhoon Lekima gathering pace, numerous China ports were closed by the end of the week and will likely be for two to three days. ...

Tuesday, 06 August 19
On the 12th of May four tankers were attacked near the coast of Fujairah.  The tankers hit were waiving international flags such as that of No ...

   1 2 3 4 5   
Showing 1 to 5 news of total 5523
News by Category
Popular News
Total Members : 26,420
User ID
Remember Me
By logging on you accept our TERMS OF USE.
Forgot Password
Our Members Are From ...

  • SASOL - South Africa
  • Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
  • Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
  • Britmindo - Indonesia
  • Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
  • PetroVietnam
  • Infraline Energy - India
  • Gupta Coal India Ltd
  • Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
  • Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
  • Thailand Anthracite
  • DBS Bank - Singapore
  • Malco - India
  • CESC Limited - India
  • Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
  • Platts
  • Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
  • Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
  • Petrosea - Indonesia
  • Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
  • Sical Logistics Limited - India
  • ETA - Dubai
  • Coaltrans Conferences
  • Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
  • Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
  • Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
  • Economic Council, Georgia
  • Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
  • Asian Development Bank
  • Cemex - Philippines
  • PowerSource Philippines DevCo
  • Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
  • Indian Oil Corporation Limited
  • Ernst & Young Pvt. Ltd.
  • Siam City Cement - Thailand
  • HSBC - Hong Kong
  • Videocon Industries ltd - India
  • Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
  • Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
  • Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
  • Planning Commission, India
  • SUEK AG - Indonesia
  • Indonesian Coal Mining Association
  • Romanian Commodities Exchange
  • Credit Suisse - India
  • Renaissance Capital - South Africa
  • Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
  • Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
  • Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
  • NTPC Limited - India
  • White Energy Company Limited
  • Tanito Harum - Indonesia
  • JPower - Japan
  • The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
  • Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
  • Russian Coal LLC
  • Agrawal Coal Company - India
  • TNPL - India
  • Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
  • J M Baxi & Co - India
  • Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
  • Edison Trading Spa - Italy
  • Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
  • Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
  • Thomson Reuters GRC
  • Platou - Singapore
  • UOB Asia (HK) Ltd
  • CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
  • OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
  • CNBM International Corporation - China
  • Peabody Energy - USA
  • Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
  • Lafarge - France
  • BNP Paribas - Singapore
  • Asia Cement - Taiwan
  • Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
  • Dalmia Cement Bharat India
  • Barclays Capital - USA
  • KOWEPO - South Korea
  • Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
  • Tamil Nadu electricity Board
  • Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
  • TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
  • IMC Shipping - Singapore
  • Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
  • South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
  • Eastern Energy - Thailand
  • Vitol - Bahrain
  • Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
  • Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
  • Central Java Power - Indonesia
  • Mitsubishi Corporation
  • ANZ Bank - Australia
  • Vedanta Resources Plc - India
  • KPMG - USA
  • Freeport Indonesia
  • PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
  • RBS Sempra - UK
  • U S Energy Resources
  • Coal and Oil Company - UAE
  • Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
  • Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
  • KEPCO - South Korea
  • Coal Orbis AG
  • Noble Europe Ltd - UK
  • Tata Power - India
  • Bangladesh Power Developement Board
  • Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
  • ACC Limited - India
  • Indian School of Mines
  • Ministry of Mines - Canada
  • Minerals Council of Australia
  • CCIC - Indonesia
  • BRS Brokers - Singapore
  • Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
  • Eastern Coal Council - USA
  • Mjunction Services Limited - India
  • Vale Mozambique
  • Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
  • Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
  • Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
  • Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
  • Georgia Ports Authority, United States
  • World Coal - UK
  • Commonwealth Bank - Australia
  • Goldman Sachs - Singapore
  • International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
  • Central Electricity Authority - India
  • ING Bank NV - Singapore
  • EMO - The Netherlands
  • Cargill India Pvt Ltd
  • Bhushan Steel Limited - India
  • PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
  • Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
  • WorleyParsons
  • Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
  • Maersk Broker
  • Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
  • Merrill Lynch Bank
  • Indika Energy - Indonesia
  • Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
  • EIA - United States
  • Posco Energy - South Korea
  • Thriveni
  • Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
  • Ministry of Transport, Egypt
  • GB Group - China
  • Panama Canal Authority
  • Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
  • Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
  • Total Coal South Africa
  • Humpuss - Indonesia
  • Parliament of New Zealand
  • Rudhra Energy - India
  • McConnell Dowell - Australia
  • Cosco
  • McKinsey & Co - India
  • JPMorgan - India
  • Bank of America
  • Xstrata Coal
  • Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
  • European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
  • Latin American Coal - Colombia
  • New Zealand Coal & Carbon
  • Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
  • Runge Indonesia
  • Berau Coal - Indonesia
  • Independent Power Producers Association of India
  • Reliance Power - India
  • Australian Coal Association
  • Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
  • ICICI Bank Limited - India
  • Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
  • Wilmar Investment Holdings
  • Indorama - Singapore
  • Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
  • Clarksons - UK
  • Medco Energi Mining Internasional
  • Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
  • Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
  • Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
  • Qatrana Cement - Jordan
  • globalCOAL - UK
  • Argus Media - Singapore
  • Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
  • MEC Coal - Indonesia
  • bp singapore
  • Deloitte Consulting - India
  • Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
  • LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
  • Xindia Steels Limited - India
  • Carbofer General Trading SA - India
  • Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
  • Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
  • Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
  • Singapore Mercantile Exchange
  • Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
  • Glencore India Pvt. Ltd
  • Bank of China, Malaysia
  • Shenhua Group - China
  • Core Mineral Indonesia
  • Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
  • Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
  • CoalTek, United States
  • Inspectorate - India
  • Moodys - Singapore
  • Mitsui
  • Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
  • Permata Bank - Indonesia
  • VISA Power Limited - India
  • Mechel - Russia
  • Jatenergy - Australia
  • Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
  • OCBC - Singapore
  • Idemitsu - Japan
  • Fearnleys - India
  • MS Steel International - UAE
  • PLN - Indonesia
  • Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
  • Coeclerici Indonesia
  • ASAPP Information Group - India
  • Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
  • Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
  • Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
  • Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
  • Malabar Cements Ltd - India
  • Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
  • Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
  • Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
  • Adaro Indonesia
  • GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
  • Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
  • TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
  • GNFC Limited - India
  • Anglo American - United Kingdom
  • Indonesia Power. PT
  • Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
  • Enel Italy
  • TANGEDCO India
  • Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
  • The India Cements Ltd
  • KPCL - India
  • PLN Batubara - Indonesia
  • Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
  • Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
  • Marubeni Corporation - India
  • Arutmin Indonesia
  • Shree Cement - India
  • Cement Manufacturers Association - India
  • Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
  • Sojitz Corporation - Japan
  • Sucofindo - Indonesia
  • Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
  • PTC India Limited - India
  • GMR Energy Limited - India
  • Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
  • Bangkok Bank PCL
  • Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
  • Deutsche Bank - India
  • Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
  • Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
  • Maybank - Singapore
  • APGENCO India
  • Thermax Limited - India
  • Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
  • India Bulls Power Limited - India
  • Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
  • Kobe Steel Ltd - Japan
  • Pinang Coal Indonesia
  • Chamber of Mines of South Africa
  • GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
  • Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
  • Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
  • Geoservices-GeoAssay Lab
  • Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
  • Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
  • Coal India Limited
  • Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
  • Mitra SK Pvt Ltd - India
  • IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
  • Surastha Cement
  • Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
  • SRK Consulting
  • Ince & co LLP
  • Japan Coal Energy Center
  • Interocean Group of Companies - India
  • Inco-Indonesia
  • Maruti Cements - India
  • Heidelberg Cement - Germany
  • Star Paper Mills Limited - India
  • Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
  • Gresik Semen - Indonesia
  • Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
  • NALCO India
  • Samsung - South Korea
  • Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
  • UBS Singapore
  • Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
  • Arch Coal - USA
  • London Commodity Brokers - England
  • Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
  • Aditya Birla Group - India
  • Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
  • Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
  • Bhatia International Limited - India
  • Adani Power Ltd - India
  • Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
  • Cardiff University - UK
  • Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
  • Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
  • Indogreen Group - Indonesia
  • IOL Indonesia
  • Mercator Lines Limited - India
  • Thai Mozambique Logistica
  • Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
  • SGS (Thailand) Limited
  • The University of Queensland
  • World Bank
  • Parry Sugars Refinery, India
  • GHCL Limited - India
  • Trasteel International SA, Italy
  • IBC Asia (S) Pte Ltd
  • SMG Consultants - Indonesia
  • Thiess Contractors Indonesia
  • Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
  • Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
  • Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
  • The Treasury - Australian Government
  • Mintek Dendrill Indonesia